Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Further musings on Enfield crankcase breathing *updated*

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Workshop Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:29 - 23 Jan 2016    Post subject: Further musings on Enfield crankcase breathing *updated* Reply with quote

Long, boring and probably pointless posting. More for me getting my thought processes in order.

The breather arrangement on my bike is a lash-up and ongoing headache.

It's a pre-unit bike with a dry sump and an integrated (but effectively seperate by design) oil tank.

What it should have by design is a duckbill breather coming from the crankcase to atmosphere. Negative pressure is maintained. Blowpast is vented. Planets align, zen occurrs.

What I got, due to it being a very late model was no breather at all in the crankcase itself. A hole drilled in the casting between the crankcase and the oil tank. A duckbill breather running from a hose-tail on the oil tank to a catch-can. A one-way hose running from the catch can to a stub on the timing chest supposedly to return any liquid breathed out.

What this gets you is a wheezy engine prone to mayonaise in the oil and slightly positive crankcase pressure.

Catch can contents after 600 miles.
https://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f216/stinkwheel/distributor/DSCN0705.png

First attempt at fixing this was to ditch the catch-can, vent the oiltank breather to atmosphere with a simple duckbill and block off the return stub. That got the mayonaise beat. Breathing still seemed erratic at best. Oil consumption was (and still remains) horriffic.

Having trashed a head through the shear quantity of oil being burned I attempted to re-create the original breather system. This meant drilling a hole into the crankcase, fitting a stub and attaching it to a one-way valve. Venting any positive pressure to atmosphere. I used a diesel engine one-way mechainical valve this time.

Broadly sucessful. This vents a huge amout of gas/vapour compared to the previous breather. I'd say 5 times as much. I can be fairly confident this is creating a slight vacuum. I am however still consuming an inordinate amount of oil.

Breather pipe. Vertical copper pipe is an attempt to reduce oil loss by misting (most of it should run back down the pipe)
https://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f216/stinkwheel/distributor/CIMG1318_zps7827d360.jpg

Now to the question. I was having a play with the bike today. In particular, seeing what I ought to be doing with the two stubs (leading into both the timing chest and the oil tank). I had previously blanked off the timing chest stub and left the duckbill hose on the oil tank one in case the new breather became blocked.

So using my exhaust balancer gauge I can see a very slight vacuum on the end of the timing chest stub. I'll call that a win and leave it blanked off.

The oil tank breather stub however... Thinking It kind of blows gas gently to-and-fro at tickover, consistant with the piston going up and down too slowly to activate the one-way valve in the main breather.

With revs though, there is a surprisingly powerful vacuum. enough to hold the end of an 8mm hose onto a wet fingertip. True to form, if I block off the end of the new crankcase breather, it reverts to being pressurised and venting the crankcase pressure through here.

So I'm not sure exactly what to do with it. In an ideal world, I'd go in and block up that hole between the crankcase and the oil tank that wasn't in the original design. Trouble is, that would mean taking the ENTIRE engine apart.

I'm pretty sure I don't want a vacuum in my oil tank so blanking that stub off probably isn't a great idea?? Confused I'd imagine it's not helping the feed pump among other things.

But if I leave it to vent naturally, it's going to be drawing air in through the oil tank breather stub and from there ventilating into the crankcase (hopefully not taking oil with it). Essentially creating a through-draught and reducing the level of vacuum in the crankcase.

But can you have too much crankcase vacuum? Is there even a number on it? (I could probably measure it with a manometer). Would simply avoiding positive pressure be sufficient?

TL;DR

It's an old fashioned engine that's been fucked with to pass emissions. I've fucked with it further to try to undo the damage.

I have a choice of leaving a vacuum in my oil tank or allowing it to ventilate to atmosphere. Doing the latter will radically reduce the vacuum in the crankcase. Is there a minimum qualtity of crankcase vacuum?
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.


Last edited by stinkwheel on 15:28 - 19 Apr 2019; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stevo as b4
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:49 - 23 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can't see why you'd want any vacuum in the crankcase, as wouldn't that increase pumping loses and make it more likely for the piston to try and draw oil mist up the bore or past the rings?

How do the modern Enfield engines have their breathing system plumbed in?

On my car engine I have a breather running into a catch can, with a filter on the top, and also a 22mm hose tapped into the block, that runs from the bottom of the catch tank and should act as a drain hose. In that hose is a steel mesh filter to try and stop oil mist rising into the catch tank, as well. I don't get much oil on the breather filter or under the bonnet, so it seems to work I guess.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Triton Thrasher
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:29 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevo as b4 wrote:
I can't see why you'd want any vacuum in the crankcase, as wouldn't that increase pumping loses and make it more likely for the piston to try and draw oil mist up the bore or past the rings?


The opposite is true.
____________________
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Triton Thrasher
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:38 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

What are you using as a one way valve?

Reed valves for 1970s BMWs work well, as do some that a German firm sells for Yamaha XS650s. The old Enfield duckbill worked ok too. Why not just copy the older Bullet exactly?

The reed valve should be close to the crankcase. I don't understand your description of the plumbing into the oil tank and all that. Block the hole that goes from crankcase through into oil tank.
____________________
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:34 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Triton Thrasher wrote:

The reed valve should be close to the crankcase. I don't understand your description of the plumbing into the oil tank and all that. Block the hole that goes from crankcase through into oil tank.


I'm using a standard diesel fuel-line non-return ball valve. It's dong a good job, I'm not getting any signififcant negative pressure beyond it. The breather hose smokes/steams like a little secondary exhaust on a cool morning.

Non-return valve
https://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f216/stinkwheel/distributor/CIMG1321_zps7225fd8d.jpg


Basically. The oil tank and crankcase are made of one (sawn in half) piece of aluminium casting. On the original design, the oil tank part is totally seperate. On the new design, there is a hole drilled through the web connecting the two (because Rupali).

To get at and block that hole. I would have to dismantle the entire engine (and I do mean ALL of it) into its componant parts. That is totally within my capability (but not necessarily within my available free time). BUT these engines are notoriously intolerant of being split. There are no dowels locating the two halves and it's far too easy to eccentricrically load a plain bearing on reassembly resulting in a trashed crank. If I split it, I'd want to put a roller bearing crank in and those cost £985 (+VAT) or £175 (+VAT) for just the big end. Much better would be to not touch the crank at all. It's done nearly 60k miles without a hiccough so it's a good one.

Modern enfields aren't really relevant. They are a unit construction engine and as such, bear no relationship to "real" bullets in the way their oiling and breather systems function..
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

spottedtango
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:41 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another problem with leaving a through draft in the oil chamber is its drawing air from outside which can be full of moisture and turn your oil faster.

Having a neutral crankcase pressure it won't draw any blowby out meaning that again the combustion gases mixing with the oil will turn the oil faster making it get more acidic. Also putting pressure on your engines seals

To try and answer your question you can have too much when the piston is on the upstroke, the vacuum in the case will sap power from the pistons upward movement. Too little vacuum or positive crankcase scenario and the case will become pressurised on the down stroke sapping some power on the pistons downward movement and as said before pressuring your seals. As for putting an exact value on what minimum vacuum negative vacuum should be I'm not sure however I did find a site explaining more of the details behind crankcase pressure more precisely the crankcase aspiration pressures for a single cylinder. Hope this helps.


https://nortonownersclub.org/support/technical-support-commando/crankcase-breathing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Triton Thrasher
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:05 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Consider that your oil burning may not be caused by the breather.

Anyway.....
A spring and ball diesel fuel valve like that will not open and shut fast enough and that one is rather distant from the crankcase.

BMW reed valve, about an inch diameter so needs something made to hold it.

https://bmwmotorcycletech.info/breather_valve.jpg

Scooter EGR valve, popular with the XS650 and Norton Commando crowd.

https://images.xs650shop.de/15_0677

Ok- isolating the tank from the crankcase is out, at least for now.
With an actual working reed type non-return valve, you may still manage to get some depression in the crankcase.

Thinking about it, the oil tank shouldn't need a breather of its own, if its air space connects to the crankcase and that has a breather.

You will never generate enough vacuum in the crankcase to do any harm, whatever people think that harm might be. Oil will still run down to the pump, because it is sitting in the same vacuum as the tank.

Smoke from the breather when the engine is cold doesn't matter if it stops when the engine warms up.
____________________
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

jimspeed
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:35 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Surely if the breathers are venting to atmosphere then you want them tee'd together then a valve and decent length of pipe ?
I'd be more worried about a vacuum on one pipe pulling in dirty dusty air into the crankcase
____________________
Hyosung cruise 125(passed test on, sold) Kawasaki el 252 (better than expected but sold on) Kawasaki GPZ500S first "big"bike.(sold) ZZR600 E5..Z750 2007,ER5, currently on a 2008 Enfield bullet electra x and loving it..
,"Alpha-9: Is there any correlation between dyno rod and dyno kits?"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

mysterious_rider
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:39 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

From what i know...
The crank needs to breath. There will be positive pressure in there (gases getting past rings) so i wouldnt fit a one way valve. Because it pulses too
That pipe you have built looks very skinny for the pulses that engines going to emit. Personally id lop it off and fit fatter tubing over the elbow joint and run it up and into nothing. Then cable tie it. Or like cars and fit it inside the airbox.

It wont be the cause your oil burning.

Oil burning could be leaky valves or rings. Probably caused by running the bike in like a pussy. Well its just a thought. Thumbs Up

How much oil loss are we talking? And how many miles she on? I considered one of these bikes but they are too small for me sadly.
____________________
KAWASAKIIIII
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Triton Thrasher
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:51 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

jimspeed wrote:
Surely if the breathers are venting to atmosphere then you want them tee'd together then a valve and decent length of pipe ?
I'd be more worried about a vacuum on one pipe pulling in dirty dusty air into the crankcase


The vacuum is supposed to be in the engine, upstream of the one way valve, not at the opening of a pipe to atmosphere.
____________________
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

jimspeed
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Mar 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:31 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Triton Thrasher wrote:
jimspeed wrote:
Surely if the breathers are venting to atmosphere then you want them tee'd together then a valve and decent length of pipe ?
I'd be more worried about a vacuum on one pipe pulling in dirty dusty air into the crankcase


The vacuum is supposed to be in the engine, upstream of the one way valve, not at the opening of a pipe to atmosphere.

The only time I've encountered a vacuum inside a motor is on a dry sumped rally engine with a massive scavenge pump. The engine itself was sealed with no breathers just a breather from the oil tank.
____________________
Hyosung cruise 125(passed test on, sold) Kawasaki el 252 (better than expected but sold on) Kawasaki GPZ500S first "big"bike.(sold) ZZR600 E5..Z750 2007,ER5, currently on a 2008 Enfield bullet electra x and loving it..
,"Alpha-9: Is there any correlation between dyno rod and dyno kits?"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Triton Thrasher
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:24 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

jimspeed wrote:
[

The only time I've encountered a vacuum inside a motor is on a dry sumped rally engine with a massive scavenge pump. The engine itself was sealed with no breathers just a breather from the oil tank.


With a one-way breather valve on a single cylinder or 360 degree twin, you can just about get enough of that effect to slow the oil leaks down.
____________________
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

spottedtango
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 04 Dec 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:21 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also when it comes to multi cylinder engines you'd think the crankcase pressure would remain fairly neutral (e.g in a 4cyl 2 pistons up 2 down) but because of the blowby the case becomes positively charged and that's why there's a need for a negative vacuum to vent the blowby to the atmosphere.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Triton Thrasher
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:40 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

A multi cylinder engine could be the answer.
____________________
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:57 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

mysterious_rider wrote:

That pipe you have built looks very skinny for the pulses that engines going to emit. Personally id lop it off and fit fatter tubing over the elbow joint and run it up and into nothing. Then cable tie it. Or like cars and fit it inside the airbox.


Would agree with this. Small crank case with the volume going up and down by 350cc continuously. Shoving 350cc of air (in both directions) through that pipe many times a second is asking a bit much.

The breathers Vincent owners I know use have about 4~5 times the area of that one.

All the best

Katy
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Robby
Dirty Old Man



Joined: 16 May 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:58 - 24 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

The way to balance this out on a modern (post-1970) Japanese engine is to vent the crankcase breather into the airbox, with a catch can or baffle plate in the middle to condense oil vapours, and no cocking around with one-way valves.

Can you try a similar thing? Ditch the valve, replace it with a catch can, and plumb the vent line into the back of your air filter. That should give you a balanced system pressure-wise. I would also consider a simple atmospheric vent (a small drilled hole) on the oil tank, probably on the filler cap.

Your current setup with the one-way valve must be giving a fairly high vacuum inside the crankcases when the piston is rising. I'm not sure how that is a bad thing, but it seems wrong. Balance is good, big pressure fluctuations are bad. The valve is forcing the pressure to fluctuate.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:26 - 25 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Something is causing the oil loss. It'll go through maybe 300ml every 150 miles. Always has from the day I got it with 300 miles on the clock. Now has closer to 60k. It's a pretty rediculous amount of oil to burn/lose.

Things I know it isn't include:

Leaks. Floor is clean.

Wet sumping. Never more than 30ml of oil if I undo the sump drain plug

Blowpast . I replaced the original piston thinking this was the problem. I then replaced the barrel and piston some time later when I cracked the original barrel while removing the head for a de-coke.

The newest one is a British made alloy barrel with a higher compression piston and wasn't really run in at all. I just rode it as normal for 200 miles then changed the oil and filter. I then rode it from Amsterdam to Leipzig in a day.

Over pressure. Scavenge pump pressure relief valve fitted. I have high flow oil pumps fitted but it burned just as much poil before I fitted them.

Excessive breathing. It breathes a lot, but not as much as it's using. It's mostly yakky emulsion-type vapour that comes out. Around 50ml every 150 miles if you put a bottle over the end of the breather. Just enough to mark its territory when parked.

I keep coming back to oil stems. However, I replaced the valve guides for longer ones. Then after the original head dropped it's valve seat, I fitted a tuned head from Hitchocks performance which has been fettled by men in brown coats. I've since fitted valve stem oil seals (off an old mini of all things).

None of the above made any difference. Junking the catch-can stopped the mayonaise problem that was slowly killing it.

It doesn't smoke much. Certainly not once it's warm. It apparently gives out a little puff of smoke on the overrun. It also smokes pretty badly if you park it on the sidestand with the engine running (to the point it'll oil-up and conk out). I have no idea why.

It seems a bit pointless venting the oil tank by drilling a hole when it has a hose-tail fitted. It's currently tucked up inside the battery box so it doesn't suck in too many nasties. I may stick a small K&N over the end of the hose if it seems better.

For interest, I just went and found a picture of what functioned adequately as a breather for the first 65 years of the production run on these bikes which is what I've tried to replicate. It's just a stub into the crankcase with a rubber duckbill on the end.
https://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f216/stinkwheel/standardbreather.jpg

Triton: That EGR valve looks interesting. I've also heard of people using turbo check valves. My concern is how much liquid will it cope with?
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Triton Thrasher
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:35 - 25 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suppose you are already using good thick 20W/50 oil.

How does a scavenge relief valve work? On first thoughts it sounds like a bad idea. You want all the oil in the cases to be sent back to the tank, pronto.

So you're another one with a valve seat falling out!
____________________
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:50 - 25 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Triton Thrasher wrote:

How does a scavenge relief valve work? On first thoughts it sounds like a bad idea. You want all the oil in the cases to be sent back to the tank, pronto.


Scavenge pump sends oil up to the rockers/top end, it then falls back down the pushrod tunnel into the timing chest and from there finds its way back into the oil tank.

If the pressure becomes excessive, it puts a lot of load on the drive-gear of the oil pump spinde. If that happens for a long time, it can strip the teeth off with catastrophic results.

Up to the 1970's they had an internal pressure relief valve that bled excess pressure from the oilway back into the timing chest.

Later ones did not and simply rely on the pump body being sprung away from its facing in the caseof excess pressure in the scavenge side. This was inadequate and probably responsible for a lot of the reliability issues they had in the 80's. The standard solution was to drill a bigger hole in the top of the rocker blocks and leave out a sealing o-ring to make them leaky and prevent pressure building up.

I've fitted an aftermarket pressure relief valve (designed for the bike) so I can leave the rockers as being pressure fed like they were supposed to be without risking catastrophic oil pump failure.

EDIT: I'm going to check out how much gas it's breathing tonight by cunning use of bits of hose, washing up basin and bottles.

There may be video.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:18 - 25 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
Up to the 1970's they had an internal pressure relief valve that bled excess pressure from the oilway back into the timing chest.


Isn't said relief valve a pretty standard part of all 4-stroke lubrication systems?

Jesus Christ Enfield, why were you so pikey?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:39 - 25 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

smegballs wrote:

Isn't said relief valve a pretty standard part of all 4-stroke lubrication systems?

Jesus Christ Enfield, why were you so pikey?


Because Royal Enfield had gone bust. The Indian factory kept making and selling them because nobody told them to stop.

They had A slution for the pressure relief, it just wasn't a very good one.

One thing about these bikes is they make you think about exactly how an engine works.

They also just keep running. Like said dropped exhaust valve seat. The engine hadn't stopped running as such, it was just down on power a bit and backfired a lot on the overrun.

Properly checked the ignition timing at the weekend (with a timing disc and everything). It was 15 degrees out. Adjusting it has made no perceptable difference to either ease of starting or performance.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mysterious_rider
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Sep 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:27 - 25 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hm. Change brand of oil. It shouldnt get that mucky . maybe thats its loss. Emulsifying and chucking it out of the breather. Better that stuff stays out though..

Different oil and report back?

I still think its burning some too . can you see/smell it?
____________________
KAWASAKIIIII
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:38 - 25 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

It gets whatever oil is cheap now given how much it uses.

I generally use a high detergent diesel oil but I've tried it with all sorts.

I even wondered if I was overfilling it, so I pumped it out to completely empty and filled with the specified oil volume which took it to the middle of the dipstick.

I'm also pretty sure it's burning the oil. The question is WHY? The fact is, nothing I've done has made much difference to the oil consumption and there are no top-end engine componants that haven't been replaced with higher quality ones.

I'm even wondering if I should get (another) new piston and have it bored a bit tighter than spec.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Triton Thrasher
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 16 Oct 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:46 - 25 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

What spec is it bored to now?

Alloy barrels call for a smaller piston clearance than cast iron.
____________________
Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:47 - 25 Jan 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Triton Thrasher wrote:
What spec is it bored to now?

Alloy barrels call for a smaller piston clearance than cast iron.


Dunno. Piston and barrel were supplied complete by Hitchcocks.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 8 years, 93 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> The Workshop All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.10 Sec - Server Load: 0.79 - MySQL Queries: 17 - Page Size: 147.15 Kb