Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Middle-Sized Commuter Bike Suggestions

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Falco
Traffic Copper



Joined: 26 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:21 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Middle-Sized Commuter Bike Suggestions Reply with quote

While I love my CG125, I am starting to feel the urge for a bit more "oomph". My commute will also be tripling (to 30 miles each way) as of the start of next year so a bigger bike seems like a good idea.

I've had a look at some of the other threads on commuter bikes but having looked at the suggestions, none of them are what I am looking for (I have different criteria).

In descending order of importance, the criteria are:

Arrow Reliability: It's going to be used day in and day out, so a bike that can run without needing continual servicing (not that I am against maintaining the bike, I just don't want it to be a second job)

Arrow Ease of Repair/Simplicity: Chances are I am not going to be able to afford to put it into the shop except for major work, so something I can work on without needing to be a professional mechanic (being able to get hold of spares without having to sell my own organs is a bonus)

Arrow Fuel Consumption: No less than 60. Even 60 is pushing it. I know that bigger bikes can't match 125s, but 45mpg? That is car-level consumption, and thus not for me.

Arrow Speed: A fair amount of the journey will be on dual carriageway, so something that can cruise at 70 without struggling and with a bit extra left for overtaking. It would also be nice if it could do that with a passenger (though that will not be a regular thing).

Arrow Fairing: I don't have much experience of riding above 55mph but if possible, less fairing appeals to me because a) if I drop the bike there is less to scratch and b) It would be nice not to have to spend 30 minutes removing fairing, before I can even access the engine (or whatever is being worked on)

The fuel consumption requirement suggests to me that the engine size is not going to be much above 600cc (though I am happy to be corrected).

So far the list consists of CB500, CB500X and CB500f (see a pattern emerging).

All suggestions gratefully received. Reviews of bikes never seem to cover the sort of things I am looking for and I am hoping for some testimonials to give me some starting points for further research.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Commuter_Tim
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 May 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:35 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I loved my CG, but my CB500 seating position is a bit more 'forewardy' especially for the lanky.
It's a shame the footpegs on older models can't be adjusted, everything else about it I love.
____________________
The above post is most likely nonsensical.

I ride a Bandit 600... badly.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mauzo
Nova Slayer



Joined: 30 Jun 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:30 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Re: Middle-Sized Commuter Bike Suggestions Reply with quote

FredTheHorse wrote:
Arrow Fuel Consumption: No less than 60. Even 60 is pushing it. I know that bigger bikes can't match 125s, but 45mpg? That is car-level consumption, and thus not for me.


I don't get much better than 50ish on my CBF500, in practice. I don't know what the newer models are like in that regard but I can't see the older CB500s being any different, given that it's almost exactly the same bike. (I suppose it's possible some of the Euro-bollocks emissions stuff is affecting the economy?)

Other than that, it meets all your requirements.
____________________
'04 CG125, '07 CBF500
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:38 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Budget?

500s are a great capacity. I never saw less than mid 60 mpg out of my old carby GPZ (I have no idea how you could only get 50mpg out of a new CB500), it would do short trips, it would do motorways, it was docile when nannied and and fun when spanked. I'd have another.

On paper the new CB500s are a bit less powerful, but I'd expect they deliver their 35kW well. Honda have sold enough that parts should be fine, they've sorted any early issues. I can't see any rational reason not to get one.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mauzo
Nova Slayer



Joined: 30 Jun 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:25 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

CBF500, not CB500F. It's the same as the old (well, middle) CB500 but with bigger tyres, ABS and a monoshock. And a PAIR valve (and no doubt a leaner carb) for emissions. (And no bloody room under the seat.)
____________________
'04 CG125, '07 CBF500
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
ZX-7R This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

The Tot
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:44 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm looking at getting the CB500F/X/RR as well. The F's are on average 500-1000 quid cheaper than the X and RRs.

They do the job they do. You can keep up with traffic on the motorways at 80-95, accelerate reasonably and have a 200+ mile tank range for good measure. I had the CB500F as a hire bike on numerous occasions and preferred it to the NC700/750, because of the way it likes to rev.

Looking at the engine and chassis, the CB/R500's are pretty easy to service. The oil and filter is readily accessible, as are the spark plugs. 8000 mile service intervals don't sound too bad. Valves at 16k.

Performance-wise, it was quite similar to my '94 ZXR250C which had about 42 bhp, weighed 170kg wet and could hold it out on the motorways with cars (don't confuse yourself with the ninja250/300 here, the ZXR was the lil brother to the ZXR400L, but with a IL4 that would scream to 20k).

Honda, can't go far wrong for less than 4k.
____________________
The Tot 2019 Z1000SX - 2007 R1
Never argue with autism
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

bamt
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:44 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

For minimal servicing effort look for a shaft driven machine like a Deauville or Divvy 900. The Divvy is easier to get to for servicing as you can access lots of it (oil filter, air filter, plugs) without removing the bikini fairing.

Alternatively, don't get hung up on the mpg, but look at total cost of ownership. E.g. rather than spending (say - as you don't give a budget indication) £3k on a nice new-ish cb500, spend £1200 on an older Bandit 600. It won't do the same mpg, but the money saved pays for a lot of fuel and servicing, the naked Bandits are trivially easy to work on and parts availability is cheap/good.

It may sound obvious, but make sure that whatever you buy (especially if older) has the ability to mount a top box. I've found that racks for what were quite popular older bikes may be tricky to get hold of (Givi or whoever having discontinued them).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

talkToTheHat
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:48 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

SW Motec might help with the racks, the quicklock evo side pannier range fits on all kinds of things, particularly slightly sportier things that givi might only consider a topbox for. They have adapter kits so you can fit a number of leading brands' panniers.

I think part of the void in the luggage market is the death of the givi wingrack.
____________________
Bandit. does. everything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Robby
Dirty Old Man



Joined: 16 May 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:27 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

You've described a set of requirements that just about every middleweight bike ever made can meet, with the exception of fuel economy - and in reality, the cost difference between 45mpg and 60mpg is too small to bother counting. Something in the region of £2/week.

So this means you could consider:
Hornet/Fazer/Bandit 600
R6/CBR/GSXR/Ninja 600
CB/ER/GPz/GS 500
ER6/CBF500
NC700/Versys

And that's just from the big 4 Japanese manufacturers. Pick one you like the look of that's local and good condition, and buy it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

gorillaonabik...
Nearly there...



Joined: 31 Jul 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:27 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Blade with loud pipe and bike tracker. I commuted every day for more than 10 years including during winter on sports bikes, a couple of which were blades and:

- You'll have a great chance of winning the traffic light GP
- Quick, so you'll never be late
- With a loud pipe, no-one will throw a U-turn in front of you
- Loud pipe and sports bike looks means everyone else gets out of your way.
- Skinny so you can get your ass through those gaps.
- Will wheelie on the power so you can get that one wheel up any time you like. It'll come in useful at some point. Probably.
- If chased by police, can get away. This is genuinely useful. Allegedly.
- Really, really fun
- Certain kinds of women dig it. And those are the women you want to spend short amounts of time with.

Honda reliability, great to ride and you'll never look back... partly because you'll be going so fast you'll really have to keep looking forward.
____________________
FZR400 (blown engine), ZXR750 (blown engine), ZX6R (accident), CBR600 which had engine issues after which I learned to change gear..., CBR900, CBR924 (stolen), CB600, CB1300 (everything blew up), BMW K1300GT (written off, hit from rear while stationary), Bandit 1250 for a couple of months, Triumph Sprint ST 1050 (nicked) and somewhere in there, I wrote off a Ducati 748 at Cadwell.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rncv
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 22 Jun 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:45 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Robby wrote:
You've described a set of requirements that just about every middleweight bike ever made can meet, with the exception of fuel economy - and in reality, the cost difference between 45mpg and 60mpg is too small to bother counting. Something in the region of £2/week.

So this means you could consider:
Hornet/Fazer/Bandit 600
R6/CBR/GSXR/Ninja 600
CB/ER/GPz/GS 500
ER6/CBF500
NC700/Versys

And that's just from the big 4 Japanese manufacturers. Pick one you like the look of that's local and good condition, and buy it.


It's more like £10 a week, enough to cover the cost of the servicing.

I'd suggest a BMW 650, it will do everything you ask of apart from looking very nice.
____________________
Current: 01' Bandit 600, 92' Goose 350
Previous: Lots!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

talkToTheHat
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:07 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I4 bikes go, bandit is piss cheap to run, great parts availability. Is likely that your local indepemdent keeps things like brake pads and gasket sets in stock so a problem can be turned around really quick, unlike my XV which involved getting most of the spares from japan. Hornet and Fazer likely to have similar levels of support. Time off the road is a critical consideration. BMW might have less parts availability as less indepemdents are likely to have bmw specific bits.

Consider also the cost of tyres, the most competetion is in the 17 inch sizes for common bikes, and there's really good choice.

Watch out for servicing costs, bandit 600s need valve clearences every 8000 miles. One cam operares both intake (or both exhaust) valves via a little fork arm with a locknut adjuster for each valve. Simpler and easier to adjust than shim and bucket but shim and bucket engines usually need this less often. If you're packing in the miles this might need doing more than once a year, but if you're doimg 16 thousand miles a year or more, servicing is piss cheap compared to petrol.

Appleyards did my clearances for £98, less than my local independent, who thought it would be between 120 and 180. They tend to come in under quote there and i think he was trying to sell me the fixed cost service package, which i usually go for as it's not oil, filter, air filter, sparkplugs, a bottle of brake fluid and an MOT more than the time it takes for valve clearences and i like to have someone else check my work once in a while. It mostly comes down to what you can do yourself.

What's your annual mileage? At 10000 miles a year the difference is about 260 quid between 45 and 60 mpg.
____________________
Bandit. does. everything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

talkToTheHat
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:33 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quick maths suggests you're looking at the other side of 16000 miles a year. Thats likely valves on shim and bucket bikes once a year and twice on older bikes, and 500 or more difference in fuel. Buying specifically for that commute id be after long service intervals and reasonable economy, and factoring in the lifespan of the bike.

A screen and faired in headlight (like bandit s, fazer etc) is brilliant in the winter. You stay a lot warmer as most of the wind goes around you, and stay a lot dryer too, particularly at higher speeds. Often better headlights are available when one lens is dip and the other is main. Fairing lowers are a waste of time,
____________________
Bandit. does. everything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stevo as b4
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:58 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Out of interest I wonder how much it saves the commuter only rider a year if a bike has;
Hydraulic tappets,
Shaft drive.
Grease nipples on all suspension linkages.
Good choice of tyres in sizes that are cheap to change.

Bodywork is a strange one I guess, it adds time and hassle to service the bike, but probably protects other parts if you drop it, and will add mpg due to aerodynamics, so I suppose a fairing is good for high mileage riders.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

linuxyeti
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:37 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi there

If it's costs you're looking at, why not a smasler displacement 250-400cc? Lower VED bracket, and should do up to 70 quite easily. Also, unfortunately, for the mog you're looking for, you might have to wait for a bike with a euro4 compliant engine. However, that'll be a new bike, and probably harder to work on due to the anti tamper measures.

I wouldn't entirely rule out chinese bikes, as you can see over time I've owned a few, with no issues for what was an 80 mile, now 50 round trip to work daily. Also if you are entirely dependent on the bike you may want to make sure you have a spare, just in case, you're 125 would probably do. I remember ending up relying on my Bullet, when both my VTX1300 and GS500 were off the road at the same time !!!
____________________
Beware what photos you upload, or link to on here, especially if you have family members on them
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Falco
Traffic Copper



Joined: 26 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:05 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Commuter_Tim wrote:
I loved my CG, but my CB500 seating position is a bit more 'forewardy' especially for the lanky.
It's a shame the footpegs on older models can't be adjusted, everything else about it I love.


Out of interest, how much more "forwardy"? I've only ever ridden the CG but I do like the upright position, the sports crouch looks decidedly uncomfortable (to my eyes anyway).

mauzo wrote:
FredTheHorse wrote:

Arrow Fuel Consumption: No less than 60. Even 60 is pushing it. I know that bigger bikes can't match 125s, but 45mpg? That is car-level consumption, and thus not for me.



I don't get much better than 50ish on my CBF500, in practice. I don't know what the newer models are like in that regard but I can't see the older CB500s being any different, given that it's almost exactly the same bike. (I suppose it's possible some of the Euro-bollocks emissions stuff is affecting the economy?)

Other than that, it meets all your requirements.


Interesting, I notice a fair amount of reports on fuelly showing that sort of range, though I wonder how much individual riding style and riding type affects that.

Rogerborg wrote:
Budget?

500s are a great capacity. I never saw less than mid 60 mpg out of my old carby GPZ (I have no idea how you could only get 50mpg out of a new CB500), it would do short trips, it would do motorways, it was docile when nannied and and fun when spanked. I'd have another.

On paper the new CB500s are a bit less powerful, but I'd expect they deliver their 35kW well. Honda have sold enough that parts should be fine, they've sorted any early issues. I can't see any rational reason not to get one.


The budget is around 3K. I could go higher but I'd like to keep the CG as an emergency backup/guinea-pig for when I try new things. Lower is (obviously better).
Sounds like a strong recommendation for the 500s (more generally I mean).

The Tot wrote:
I'm looking at getting the CB500F/X/RR as well. The F's are on average 500-1000 quid cheaper than the X and RRs.

They do the job they do. You can keep up with traffic on the motorways at 80-95, accelerate reasonably and have a 200+ mile tank range for good measure. I had the CB500F as a hire bike on numerous occasions and preferred it to the NC700/750, because of the way it likes to rev.

Looking at the engine and chassis, the CB/R500's are pretty easy to service. The oil and filter is readily accessible, as are the spark plugs. 8000 mile service intervals don't sound too bad. Valves at 16k.

Performance-wise, it was quite similar to my '94 ZXR250C which had about 42 bhp, weighed 170kg wet and could hold it out on the motorways with cars (don't confuse yourself with the ninja250/300 here, the ZXR was the lil brother to the ZXR400L, but with a IL4 that would scream to 20k).

Honda, can't go far wrong for less than 4k.


I hadn't got as far as looking at the price differentials yet, but that is definitely worth noting (The styling on the F does appeal to me though that is of low importance). Service intervals are when you are supposed to take it into the shop (as opposed to getting something specific fixed - I ask because I feel like I am on a constant round of repairs/maintenance, its rare for a fortnight to go by without me getting to some sort of milestone (chain/sprockets/brakes/oil change/spark plug/air filter ect ect).
Thats a good long while for the valve clearances though, I like that. What sort are they? (ie can I do them myself Razz)

bamt wrote:
For minimal servicing effort look for a shaft driven machine like a Deauville or Divvy 900. The Divvy is easier to get to for servicing as you can access lots of it (oil filter, air filter, plugs) without removing the bikini fairing.

Alternatively, don't get hung up on the mpg, but look at total cost of ownership. E.g. rather than spending (say - as you don't give a budget indication) £3k on a nice new-ish cb500, spend £1200 on an older Bandit 600. It won't do the same mpg, but the money saved pays for a lot of fuel and servicing, the naked Bandits are trivially easy to work on and parts availability is cheap/good.

It may sound obvious, but make sure that whatever you buy (especially if older) has the ability to mount a top box. I've found that racks for what were quite popular older bikes may be tricky to get hold of (Givi or whoever having discontinued them).


I like the sound of shaft driven bikes but with one reservation. Do they work really well and reliably, right up until they break, and then you need to take the whole engine apart to replace them?
I understand the point about mpg Vs total cost of ownership, but my plan is to use this for at least 2 years and hopefully more (ideally I'll use it till the cost of repairs is too high to justify it any more), so I am not sure if that initial saving makes sense over long term use.

Rncv wrote:
Robby wrote:

You've described a set of requirements that just about every middleweight bike ever made can meet, with the exception of fuel economy - and in reality, the cost difference between 45mpg and 60mpg is too small to bother counting. Something in the region of £2/week.

So this means you could consider:
Hornet/Fazer/Bandit 600
R6/CBR/GSXR/Ninja 600
CB/ER/GPz/GS 500
ER6/CBF500
NC700/Versys

And that's just from the big 4 Japanese manufacturers. Pick one you like the look of that's local and good condition, and buy it.



It's more like £10 a week, enough to cover the cost of the servicing.

I'd suggest a BMW 650, it will do everything you ask of apart from looking very nice.


Yes, my calculations put it at around £400 difference a year, not nothing, and especially not if paid out every year.

Definately interested in the BMW 650, any idea about ease of servicing/ getting parts? As it looks quite nice otherwise, if a little pricey (and great mpg) - assuming you mean the BMW F650GS?

talkToTheHat wrote:


As I4 bikes go, bandit is piss cheap to run, great parts availability. Is likely that your local indepemdent keeps things like brake pads and gasket sets in stock so a problem can be turned around really quick, unlike my XV which involved getting most of the spares from japan. Hornet and Fazer likely to have similar levels of support. Time off the road is a critical consideration. BMW might have less parts availability as less indepemdents are likely to have bmw specific bits.

Consider also the cost of tyres, the most competetion is in the 17 inch sizes for common bikes, and there's really good choice.

Watch out for servicing costs, bandit 600s need valve clearences every 8000 miles. One cam operares both intake (or both exhaust) valves via a little fork arm with a locknut adjuster for each valve. Simpler and easier to adjust than shim and bucket but shim and bucket engines usually need this less often. If you're packing in the miles this might need doing more than once a year, but if you're doimg 16 thousand miles a year or more, servicing is piss cheap compared to petrol.

Appleyards did my clearances for £98, less than my local independent, who thought it would be between 120 and 180. They tend to come in under quote there and i think he was trying to sell me the fixed cost service package, which i usually go for as it's not oil, filter, air filter, sparkplugs, a bottle of brake fluid and an MOT more than the time it takes for valve clearences and i like to have someone else check my work once in a while. It mostly comes down to what you can do yourself.

What's your annual mileage? At 10000 miles a year the difference is about 260 quid between 45 and 60 mpg.

Quick maths suggests you're looking at the other side of 16000 miles a year. Thats likely valves on shim and bucket bikes once a year and twice on older bikes, and 500 or more difference in fuel. Buying specifically for that commute id be after long service intervals and reasonable economy, and factoring in the lifespan of the bike.

A screen and faired in headlight (like bandit s, fazer etc) is brilliant in the winter. You stay a lot warmer as most of the wind goes around you, and stay a lot dryer too, particularly at higher speeds. Often better headlights are available when one lens is dip and the other is main. Fairing lowers are a waste of time,


Yeah, the availability of parts will make a big difference to turn around (though hopefully I'll be able to have 2 bikes so it won't be such a nightmare if something goes wrong with the main bike).
If I can do the valve clearances myself (at least most of the time), then 8000 is good for me (my CG clearances are checked every 5000 miles so its nice to have the extra time, on the other hand, doing them on the CG takes about 30 minutes -not counting getting the rocker cover off).
I honestly don't know what my free time is going to look like except that I expect to be commuting 5 days a week for most (ie ~50 weeks) of the year, but I enjoy working on the bike myself, and generally I don't have a huge amount of disposable income. I am also restricted in that the bike lives outside under a cover, so I can only really work on it when the weather is good (I don't like to talk about the time I had to refit the generator cover under the bike cover while it was pissing down with rain....I need a damn garage!).

The annual millage will be at least 16,000 miles. That is just for the commute, I will also be using it for pleasure/messing about/visiting friends and so forth. The lifespan of the bike is as long as I can make it (once I get a bike that does what I need, I don't expect to change it. I wouldn't change up from the CG if it could do what I wanted), so yes, long service intervals and good economy are high on the list.

I'm going back and forth on the bandit/fazer, I am not sure I can live with the lower mpg compared the CB500 (of all types). More research needed I think.

Many thanks for the suggestions so far guys, just the sort of information I was looking for.[/i]
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Falco
Traffic Copper



Joined: 26 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:13 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

linuxyeti wrote:
Hi there

If it's costs you're looking at, why not a smasler displacement 250-400cc? Lower VED bracket, and should do up to 70 quite easily. Also, unfortunately, for the mog you're looking for, you might have to wait for a bike with a euro4 compliant engine. However, that'll be a new bike, and probably harder to work on due to the anti tamper measures.

I wouldn't entirely rule out chinese bikes, as you can see over time I've owned a few, with no issues for what was an 80 mile, now 50 round trip to work daily. Also if you are entirely dependent on the bike you may want to make sure you have a spare, just in case, you're 125 would probably do. I remember ending up relying on my Bullet, when both my VTX1300 and GS500 were off the road at the same time !!!


Sorry I missed your reply while I was constructing the mega answer! I would be quite happy with the 250-400cc range as long as it can manage motorway speeds (ie 80+) for extended periods without knackering the engine and do so with a passenger when the need arises. The other requirements I have can be covered by any size of bike so those 2 are the main issues with smaller engines as I see it.

As for Chinese bikes, I am not so sure. I am not much of a natural mechanical, so I really need a Haynes (or equivalent) for servicing, which don't really exist for the Chinese copies.
I am entirely dependent on the bike, which means when it breaks at the moment, its a bloody nightmare! Yes, I am hoping to keep the cost of the new bike below 3K so I can keep the CG as a back-up/learning victim.

I doubt I will be able to afford a new bike, but even if I could the idea of anti-tamper measures irritates me. Means I would have to take it for official (rip-off?) servicing if anything goes wrong. I disagree with this on principle.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

linuxyeti
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:02 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi
Snap!! I'm not really a mechanic, however, standard servicing is pretty universal, and there are lots of howtos online for many bikes Smile
____________________
Beware what photos you upload, or link to on here, especially if you have family members on them
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

.....
Quote Me Happy



Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:03 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deauville.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Commuter_Tim
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 May 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:55 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

FredTheHorse wrote:
Commuter_Tim wrote:
I loved my CG, but my CB500 seating position is a bit more 'forewardy' especially for the lanky.
It's a shame the footpegs on older models can't be adjusted, everything else about it I love.


Out of interest, how much more "forwardy"? I've only ever ridden the CG but I do like the upright position, the sports crouch looks decidedly uncomfortable (to my eyes anyway).


It's not so bad really compared to a lot of other 'sports' style bikes, just I have back problems so it is noticable.
I find because I'm mostly leg, that I have to shift where I sit so that my feet are in the correct position for the pegs.

Checkout www.cycle-ergo.com you can input your height etc and choose bikes to compare seating position.
____________________
The above post is most likely nonsensical.

I ride a Bandit 600... badly.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Tot
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:28 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Robby wrote:
You've described a set of requirements that just about every middleweight bike ever made can meet, with the exception of fuel economy - and in reality, the cost difference between 45mpg and 60mpg is too small to bother counting. Something in the region of £2/week.


Bro, I calculated this to see if I should get a second bike or use the R1 for my 70 mile daily commute and the difference between 40mpg vs 65mpg was £900 a year based on current fuel prices of £1.05. (assuming 47 week working year - 17500 annual miles).

That does not include servicing costs - 8000 miles minor/16000 major. Tyres - 5000 rear and 7000 front. Chains - 16000 if you keep it well maintained and are moderately aggressive with your throttle.

Anyway, back to the OP, the fewer the cylinders for a commuter, the better. Fewer consumables (spark plugs, though this is very negligible). Smaller capacity bikes (sub 100bhp) tend to be a lot more light-footed on their chain wear if you keep it lubed and maintained. Either fit a scotoiler on it, or if you want to keep it as part of your weekly checklist, just get yourself a litre of no-nonsense chainsaw oil and apply it with a brush every 200 odd miles, or whenever required. Clean the chain with paraffin every so often and it's golden!

Most of the costs will be to do with the general upkeep of the bike if you're doing that many miles, so if you can keep the costs of consumables and servicing down by doing it yourself, you're onto a winner.

Generally less bodywork (bar a screen or upper fairing), the better. Get yourself some ACF50 and coat the exposed parts of the bike to prevent corrosion.

But generally, if you're doing that many miles, having 2 bikes will work out, just so that you have a backup. For me, having another bike with another insurance policy (with zero NCB) wouldn't cost me much - £150-£170 at best for any of the 500s, but you may want to check that too! Only reason I'm doing this is that the cheapest multi bike quote I got was about £320 and when you consider that it costs me £150 to insure the R1, it just makes more sense.
____________________
The Tot 2019 Z1000SX - 2007 R1
Never argue with autism
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Falco
Traffic Copper



Joined: 26 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:30 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Tot wrote:
Robby wrote:
You've described a set of requirements that just about every middleweight bike ever made can meet, with the exception of fuel economy - and in reality, the cost difference between 45mpg and 60mpg is too small to bother counting. Something in the region of £2/week.


Bro, I calculated this to see if I should get a second bike or use the R1 for my 70 mile daily commute and the difference between 40mpg vs 65mpg was £900 a year based on current fuel prices of £1.05. (assuming 47 week working year - 17500 annual miles).

That does not include servicing costs - 8000 miles minor/16000 major. Tyres - 5000 rear and 7000 front. Chains - 16000 if you keep it well maintained and are moderately aggressive with your throttle.

Anyway, back to the OP, the fewer the cylinders for a commuter, the better. Fewer consumables (spark plugs, though this is very negligible). Smaller capacity bikes (sub 100bhp) tend to be a lot more light-footed on their chain wear if you keep it lubed and maintained. Either fit a scotoiler on it, or if you want to keep it as part of your weekly checklist, just get yourself a litre of no-nonsense chainsaw oil and apply it with a brush every 200 odd miles, or whenever required. Clean the chain with paraffin every so often and it's golden!

Most of the costs will be to do with the general upkeep of the bike if you're doing that many miles, so if you can keep the costs of consumables and servicing down by doing it yourself, you're onto a winner.

Generally less bodywork (bar a screen or upper fairing), the better. Get yourself some ACF50 and coat the exposed parts of the bike to prevent corrosion.

But generally, if you're doing that many miles, having 2 bikes will work out, just so that you have a backup. For me, having another bike with another insurance policy (with zero NCB) wouldn't cost me much - £150-£170 at best for any of the 500s, but you may want to check that too! Only reason I'm doing this is that the cheapest multi bike quote I got was about £320 and when you consider that it costs me £150 to insure the R1, it just makes more sense.


As far as I can see all the bikes I am considering (CB500, CBF500, CB500F, CB500X and BMW F650GS) are all twin cylinder so I guess there isn't much of a choice to make there? I also note those bikes listed above are all well below 100bhp (the BMW is closest at 71) but that is good information to have nonetheless.
I do plan to get a scotoiler for this bike but it's not really worth it for the CG as it only does ~500 miles per month. Easier to do it myself.

Doing the servicing myself is certainly the plan! but that does rather rely on the bike being simple enough for me to understand and work on Razz

Looking at the relatively low price of the CBF500s, I wonder if it might not be worth getting the BMW as the main and selling the CG (its been treated pretty well..apart from being dropped a few times Embarassed) to get a CBF500. (suddenly, all the people on here with multiple bikes begins to make sense.... Thinking) I suppose I will have to see what the difference in insurance would be.

Thanks for the advice in any case.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Commuter_Tim
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 May 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:08 - 26 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

FredTheHorse wrote:

Doing the servicing myself is certainly the plan! but that does rather rely on the bike being simple enough for me to understand and work on Razz


If you can work on a CG you can work on a CB500 ...a CBF500 or CB500X you will be looking at ABS and more calipers to deal with.
All of them likely has shims instead of Tappets tho, so valve clearance is more of a bitch.

I'm currently shopping around for a 'backup' 125 (to ride most of the time tbh), maybe a CG again.
____________________
The above post is most likely nonsensical.

I ride a Bandit 600... badly.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Falco
Traffic Copper



Joined: 26 Nov 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:18 - 27 Mar 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Commuter_Tim wrote:
FredTheHorse wrote:

Doing the servicing myself is certainly the plan! but that does rather rely on the bike being simple enough for me to understand and work on Razz


If you can work on a CG you can work on a CB500 ...a CBF500 or CB500X you will be looking at ABS and more calipers to deal with.
All of them likely has shims instead of Tappets tho, so valve clearance is more of a bitch.

I'm currently shopping around for a 'backup' 125 (to ride most of the time tbh), maybe a CG again.


That's an excellent point, I hadn't considered that. I think that the CBF500 has ABS as an optional extra on both models. Something to think on.

Not wild about the shims, but at least they need longer before adjusting. First time is always the worst (ie slowest and most likely to be done wrong).

The CG as a back-up is a nice idea. It's a nice little bike and its ability to take almost anything you throw at it is pretty impressive. If the commute it was going to be a back up for wasn't such a pain when you struggle to reach 65 I'd be much more inclined to keep it (I've done it on the CG a couple of times already, the dual carriageway portions are pretty hair-raising on a CG).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 9 years, 344 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.23 Sec - Server Load: 1.4 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 155.01 Kb