Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Electric vehicles dirtier than ICE - at point of use

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

weasley
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:38 - 09 May 2016    Post subject: Electric vehicles dirtier than ICE - at point of use Reply with quote

This report claims that:

• A positive relationship exists between vehicle weight and non-exhaust emissions.
• Electric vehicles are 24% heavier than their conventional counterparts.
• Electric vehicle PM emissions are comparable to those of conventional vehicles.
• Non-exhaust sources account for 90% of PM10 and 85% of PM2.5 from traffic.
• Future policy should focus on reducing vehicle weight.

In summary, it reckons that the non-engine PM derives from tyres, brakes and the road surface breaking up and that heavier EVs make more of these than conventional vehicles. It mentions bikes in brief, reporting that they offer sometimes significantly lower brake wear, tyre wear and PM "resuspension" rates than cars and other vehicles.

This scotches the "zero emissions at point of use" description often afforded to EVs and doesn't even go into the more normal combustion emissions from whatever power source is charging them.
____________________
Yamaha XJ600 | Yamaha YZF600R Thundercat | KTM 990 SMT | BMW F900XR TE
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Lord Percy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:21 - 09 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quickly debunked here
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Derivative
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:51 - 09 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

To me, this all feels a bit like cigarettes all over again.

Yes, cars and bikes pollute. Go cycling on the A406 and tell me otherwise.

No, that doesn't mean we should ban them. They are useful. Smoking is also fun. For a while.

Electric vehicles will probably eventually be better in every imaginable way, but they're not quite there yet. (I'm hoping the Tesla Model 3 actually arrives as expected, but worried that it probably won't end up being a functional car for a few grand a decade on like a Mondeo.).

It's all going to happen, we just have to wait. Research doesn't happen overnight. The Model T didn't become the Veyron without a fight.


Last edited by Derivative on 16:01 - 09 May 2016; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:59 - 09 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

A man will never walk on the moon.
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

weasley
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:50 - 09 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lord Percy wrote:
Quickly debunked here


Good rebuttal. Thumbs Up

I am by no means supporting the theory, nor am I an EVphile, but it popped up in an email bulletin today.
____________________
Yamaha XJ600 | Yamaha YZF600R Thundercat | KTM 990 SMT | BMW F900XR TE
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Undinist
Nearly there...



Joined: 08 Oct 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:34 - 09 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't see the problem. If you want your vehicle to be cleaner than your ICE, just wash it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Lord Percy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:28 - 09 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Regarding electric cars etc, it is an interesting thing to see progress.

There's been talk of oil running out for a long time. Given how much longer I potentially have on this planet, and given the ongoing estimates for how much time we have left with current oil consumption (even though the goalposts seem to keep changing), I do wonder if I'll see the big change when oil-based commodities, i.e combustion engines, start getting a lot more expensive to own and run.

I like to think I'll be riding a super-efficient, scary-silent Tron bike in the coming decades. Not to mention the fact that busy city centres will be rid of all exhaust pollution; urban areas will be like feel like a walk in the countryside, and annoying engine loud noises will largely be a thing of the past.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ribenapigeon
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Feb 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:21 - 10 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Driver-less vehicles are what we should all fear. When mumsnet takes over and creates the new Mumsreich we just wont be allowed to drive/ride anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:32 - 10 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lord Percy wrote:
Quickly debunked here

That rebuts the reporting on it, not the study itself.

Which appears to simply say: we need to reduce non-exhaust particulates as well.

Why do you hate the planet?
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

doggone
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:59 - 10 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

weasley wrote:
Lord Percy wrote:
Quickly debunked here


Good rebuttal. Thumbs Up

I am by no means supporting the theory, nor am I an EVphile, but it popped up in an email bulletin today.

Isn't it just a lot of EV owners on a forum ranting about how it must be wrong?
The problem with electric vehicles is they are dragging round a lot of deadweight in batteries and the power is being generated remotely - still largely from fossil fuels - so after transmission losses which must be at least 50% by the time the battery is charged, the efficiency is pretty dreadful compared to burning fuel to directly drive the wheels.

Also making all these batteries is not without considerable environmental issues. They are probably made in China or India though so it must be OK.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:19 - 10 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

They have already successfully trialled driverless electric vehicles in MK. It's now just the political will and the financial risk in the way of making them a permanent fixture.

The latest idea being that where these vehicles go will become pedestrian and driverless only. No private cars/bikes. Therefore slowly turning the city centre into a car free zone.

Sod that.
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

RhynoCZ
Super Spammer



Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:17 - 10 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

The EV industry is just a sham. The only goal there is to get rich on taxpayers money. Although there are countries, where electric powered vehicles are taxed, just like the petrol/diesel cars, based on the energy a EV consumes per 100km.

Anyway, If you know how they fabricate the li-Ion batteries and solar panels, then you know it requires a huge amounts of higly corrosive and toxic compounds. Look at how they get lithium for the batteries, for instance.
I was talking about this in the comment section to a video about electric vehicles (fullychargedshow or elsewhere, not sure) and people went mental. They just don't realize that driving a EV is just moving the problem with CO2 and other stuff elsewhere (knowing driving petrol/diesel cars produce next to nothing in CO2 compared to the livestock)

PS: I mention the solar panels, because the first thing people will always say is, the EV can run on energy made with solar panels. Thumbs Up
____________________
'87 Honda XBR 500, '96 Kawasaki ZX7R P1, '90 Honda CB-1, '88 Kawasaki GPz550, MZ 150 ETZ
'95 Mercedes-Benz w202 C200 CGI, '98 Mercedes-Benz w210 E200 Kompressor
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Lord Percy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:00 - 10 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

RhynoCZ wrote:
They just don't realize that driving a EV is just moving the problem with CO2 and other stuff elsewhere


doggone wrote:

the power is being generated remotely - still largely from fossil fuels - so after transmission losses which must be at least 50% by the time the battery is charged, the efficiency is pretty dreadful compared to burning fuel to directly drive the wheels.



Inefficient usage of fossil fuel power. All the more reason to abandon it and get on with accepting nuclear.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:03 - 10 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

RhynoCZ wrote:
The EV industry is just a sham. The only goal there is to get rich on taxpayers money. Although there are countries, where electric powered vehicles are taxed, just like the petrol/diesel cars, based on the energy a EV consumes per 100km.

Anyway, If you know how they fabricate the li-Ion batteries and solar panels, then you know it requires a huge amounts of higly corrosive and toxic compounds. Look at how they get lithium for the batteries, for instance.
I was talking about this in the comment section to a video about electric vehicles (fullychargedshow or elsewhere, not sure) and people went mental. They just don't realize that driving a EV is just moving the problem with CO2 and other stuff elsewhere (knowing driving petrol/diesel cars produce next to nothing in CO2 compared to the livestock)

PS: I mention the solar panels, because the first thing people will always say is, the EV can run on energy made with solar panels. Thumbs Up


How much CO2 and Methane do 5 billion humans produce. Easy answer to global warming, a good war, crusade or sterilisation/eradication of anyone I don't like. Cool
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

RhynoCZ
Super Spammer



Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:23 - 10 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lord Percy wrote:
Inefficient usage of fossil fuel power. All the more reason to abandon it and get on with accepting nuclear.


I do agree, but again, people would moan about nuclear waste. Then again, they do not realize, that nuclear waste recycling is a thing and it gets more and more efficient. It is a great risk, but a risk worth the try to use nuclear powerplants. I think nuclear power is safe and clean.

All you get from a nuclear power plant is the used fuel (can be stored and recycled several times and they get better at it) and vapour from the cooling system.
A coal power plant gives you vapour as well + dust of all sorts spreaded in several miles radius OR taken by the wind tens and hundreds of miles away. The dust/smog that we all then breath and causes health problems.
____________________
'87 Honda XBR 500, '96 Kawasaki ZX7R P1, '90 Honda CB-1, '88 Kawasaki GPz550, MZ 150 ETZ
'95 Mercedes-Benz w202 C200 CGI, '98 Mercedes-Benz w210 E200 Kompressor
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:11 - 10 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Polarbear wrote:
How much CO2 and Methane do 5 billion humans produce. Easy answer to global warming, a good war, crusade or sterilisation/eradication of anyone I don't like. Cool

Did you gas a couple of billion already, you sly devil?

Greenpeace founder praises CO2 and high population.

Oh, them ecomentals are maaaaad.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:10 - 10 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Polarbear wrote:
They have already successfully trialled driverless electric vehicles in MK. It's now just the political will and the financial risk in the way of making them a permanent fixture.



What do they look like? I might go and get crashed into by one. Razz
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ben90
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 06 Feb 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:25 - 10 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did read an interesting article about how instead of 'green' EV cars fueled ultimately by dirty power stations, not to mention all of the filth from making the batteries and so on, we should look more into dirty cars fueled by green power stations

https://www.audi.co.uk/content/dam/audi/production/RestOfSite/AboutAudi/LatestNews/04_2015/Audi%20e-diesel%20-%20the%20chemical%20reactions.jpg

Pros I can see:
- already compatible with over 50% of vehicles already on road (no need to scrap millions of perfectly serviceable vehicles) with 'e-petrol' on the way for the other ~50%
- no charge times
- likely far more carbon neutral than EV vehicles

I guess the big con is you'll still get high levels of pollution in cities.
____________________
Yamaha FZ6 S2
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:03 - 11 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wafer_Thin_Ham wrote:
Polarbear wrote:
They have already successfully trialled driverless electric vehicles in MK. It's now just the political will and the financial risk in the way of making them a permanent fixture.



What do they look like? I might go and get crashed into by one. Razz


https://assets1.heart.co.uk/2015/06/driverless-car-1423581101-large-article-0.jpg
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

kawashima
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:04 - 11 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Small EV like Renault twizy. Our gov call it Ultra- small car. My thought on this. 250cc engine on these small car instead of motor/battery.
Gov always try to go for EV as a environmental view point.
But my thought is 3000cc to 250cc engine conversion is more environmentally friendly than trying to introduce non-practical low tank mileage EV cars unsuccessfully.
I went for Eco fair at Mie pref, talked with Public officials from Mie pref demonstrating Ultra- small EV cars. Our regulation is 125cc is max size for Ultra- small car, which is so advantageous for EV system, and no one make engine powered Ultra- small car. I told them larger engine should be allowed, otherwise Ultra- small cars won't replace K-cars. But they told me Ultra- small cars are not substitute for K-cars.
So no, they aren't try to introduce Ultra- small cars seriously. That's just an Eco-appeal. Disappointed.
____________________
own:2020 Serow 250
owned: 2012 YB125SP, 2008 TDM900, 2005 W650, 2002 LS125R, 2002 CB400SF, NS50F, C50 / Trip to UK(2009), Hokkaido touring(2013)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

RhynoCZ
Super Spammer



Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:27 - 11 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

kawashima wrote:
Small EV like Renault twizy. Our gov call it Ultra- small car. My thought on this. 250cc engine on these small car instead of motor/battery.
Gov always try to go for EV as a environmental view point.
But my thought is 3000cc to 250cc engine conversion is more environmentally friendly than trying to introduce non-practical low tank mileage EV cars unsuccessfully.
I went for Eco fair at Mie pref, talked with Public officials from Mie pref demonstrating Ultra- small EV cars. Our regulation is 125cc is max size for Ultra- small car, which is so advantageous for EV system, and no one make engine powered Ultra- small car. I told them larger engine should be allowed, otherwise Ultra- small cars won't replace K-cars. But they told me Ultra- small cars are not substitute for K-cars.
So no, they aren't try to introduce Ultra- small cars seriously. That's just an Eco-appeal. Disappointed.


I thought the K(kei)-cars were the ''Ultra-small'' cars in Japan. Thinking
____________________
'87 Honda XBR 500, '96 Kawasaki ZX7R P1, '90 Honda CB-1, '88 Kawasaki GPz550, MZ 150 ETZ
'95 Mercedes-Benz w202 C200 CGI, '98 Mercedes-Benz w210 E200 Kompressor
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

skatefreak
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:32 - 11 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would love to see Hydrogen used in combustion engines...
Petrol ICE's apparently aren't to far from being able to run on hydrogen however a hydrogen fuel cell would be more efficient (but less entertaining i suspect)...

With the infrastructure for LPG already out there to an extent it means distribution problems have already been largely overcome and it would also solve the great problem of inconsistency of 'green energy' sources...
Its always a good time to be chugging away making hydrogen.

One down side is it is still fairly in-efficient to make hydrogen via electrolysis and would make fuel expensive until this were overcome with a more efficient method.

Emissions won't get any greener than that Very Happy

On another note, I run my car on Waste Vegetable oil I pick up from an Indian restaurant across town.

Some suggest, although it still produces emissions they should be considered carbon neutral because the carbon has been taken from the atmosphere when the crop was grown.

Does this give me extra green credentials?

I do it mostly because filling up for 0 pence per liter makes me smile more than any green credentials Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Lord Percy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:47 - 11 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I keep telling people to read this book: Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air

It goes into pretty much everything, including the efficiency of various modes of transport.

https://i68.tinypic.com/l86s1.jpg
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

kawashima
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:59 - 12 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

RhynoCZ wrote:
I thought the K(kei)-cars were the ''Ultra-small'' cars in Japan. Thinking
K car(660cc) is now heavier than KP61 starlet. These cars will be more useable with 250cc engine.
- - -
I found trolly bus at the bottom of picture.
And I want induction charging technology be more mature, which will make trolly bus pole less. By this, car won't need huge batteries and will be lighter. More motor drive motorcycles will be made. Major roads will be equipped with induction charging system. To go small roads, use small battery. Drivers will be charged by the usage of electricity. Electricity is efficient being used real time, not being charged. This is my prediction (50years from now)
- - -
To carry Petrol to each petrol stations, tank rollies consume diesel. I wonder how much percentage of diesel is used for carrying petrol. This inefficiency is same for Hydrogen or other fuels.
- - -
How electricity should be generated, I want to hope Nuclear power will be more and more safer.
____________________
own:2020 Serow 250
owned: 2012 YB125SP, 2008 TDM900, 2005 W650, 2002 LS125R, 2002 CB400SF, NS50F, C50 / Trip to UK(2009), Hokkaido touring(2013)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:14 - 12 May 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I believe that there's a lot of loss in electricity distribution, especially if you use alternating current. Induction charging is an interesting idea, but I wonder about the energy requirements, the power, the heat losses. Cutting through a live induction charging circuit when digging up the roads might be a very unpleasant experience.

I see that Glasgow has just breached WHO air pollution limits for both PM2.5 and PM10. Sad

Those are primarily from diesel vehicles, and the actual city centre is filled mostly with diesel buses and taxis, but when have facts ever got in the way of ecomentalism. I just hope I'm far enough out to not be hammered by the inevitable swinging of a big, blunt instrument.
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 9 years, 226 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.14 Sec - Server Load: 1.2 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 139.16 Kb