Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


How long until my degree is worthless?....

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Dear Auntie BCF... Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:55 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: How long until my degree is worthless?.... Reply with quote

.... if it isn't worthless already Laughing Wink

So, back in 2014 I graduated with a shit grade (2:2) from mediocre to below-average course (BSc Mechanical Design & Manufacture) from a shit uni (Plymouth).

Given it's rather limited value to begin with.... How long roughly before it's completely worthless when seeking graduate employment?

My lifestyle last 2 years consists of working through the winter then going travelling somewhere for the summer. So it's not like I'm just sat on bennies... At the same time tho, security work isn't the best paid (altho they do effectively pay me to internet all day) so the chance of getting a proper job at some point would be nice....
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

owl
World Chat Champion



Joined: 21 Oct 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:07 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

don't know if this is helpful or not (or applicable), but saw this the other day and thought it was interesting... lots of "placements" although 2 years...

https://careers.triumph.co.uk/
____________________
Observation is the greatest source of wisdom.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

RhynoCZ
Super Spammer



Joined: 09 Mar 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:20 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

About 6 months after graduation. I know what I'm talking about, unfortunately. Rolling Eyes

It's still worthy, but only as a requirement to do a certain type of job.
In general, having a degree with no work experience is a problem on its own, although there are still some work positions for fresh graduates. You being not so ''fresh'' could raise a lot of questions.

Just the other day I was at a job interview, for a postion a secondary school graduate after a short course could do. I studied this, I have a masters degree at law, I know people doing this kind of job and they are thick, YET, after I told the interviewer that I have no work exp., as I spent the past 5 years studying, they tell me I'm not suitable for the position.
It was a court clerk postion, very easy job, the requirements they had were: MS Office and knowledge of Czech language. Rolling Eyes
____________________
'87 Honda XBR 500, '96 Kawasaki ZX7R P1, '90 Honda CB-1, '88 Kawasaki GPz550, MZ 150 ETZ
'95 Mercedes-Benz w202 C200 CGI, '98 Mercedes-Benz w210 E200 Kompressor
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:27 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

RhynoCZ wrote:

It's still worthy, but only as a requirement to do a certain type of job.
In general, having a degree with no work experience is a problem on its own, although there are still some work positions for fresh graduates. You being not so ''fresh'' could raise a lot of questions.


Yeah, I understand it from an employer's point of view: you want the keen kids straight out of uni with stuff fresh in their brains who really want to start building a professional career etc etc

So while there's no official "use-by" date printed, there is quite obviously a realistic limit in the real world.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

angryjonny
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:36 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

My belief, while at university, was that if I ever "went home" after graduating I'd be stuck there for good and would never work in a relevant career. For this reason I applied for (and was offered) jobs during my final year and was in NYC doing my induction week before my graduation ceremony.

I sort-of regret not taking any time off (because I've had none to speak of since) but I don't know how things would have worked out otherwise.

Edit: AFAIK, the company I work at now has no graduate program. We look for 2nd jobbers, 1-2 years out of uni, who have been broken-in by someone else. I believe this approach to recruitment is quite common. If you can get a graduate position (even on crap money) take it, in the knowledge you'll have a lot more appeal once you've got 18 months of "real world" behind you.

You're more likely to get a 1st job at a small company who need to set salaries as low as they can. Big companies with graduate programs will be visiting St Andrews and Durham etc, courting this year's output, looking for the most "corporate". Little companies, start-ups etc will be more likely to take a chance on someone a bit more... individual. Maybe you'll fly there, maybe you'll move on in 18 months, but your CV will be magnitudes stronger for it.


Last edited by angryjonny on 17:49 - 01 Nov 2016; edited 5 times in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Sload
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Aug 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:36 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't know, but if they didn't have experience I would want someone to have done really well in their degree before I considered them for a position. Prob not the best insight for you.

Try and apply for everything, don't leave it. Also it is a couple more years since I did my HNC, I would struggle to do the stuff on my own again now as I never use that academic element. If you don't use it you lose it and that is not taking into account out of date knowledge in your specific field, I would imagine design and manufacturing to be sensitive to that.
____________________
Honda Varadero >> Triumph Speed Four >> Honda CBR1100xx


Last edited by Sload on 19:24 - 01 Nov 2016; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:04 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Re: How long until my degree is worthless?.... Reply with quote

smegballs wrote:
....

So, back in 2014 I graduated with a shit grade (2:2)


Read could not be arsed to study/try.

smegballs wrote:

from mediocre to below-average course (BSc Mechanical Design & Manufacture) from a shit uni (Plymouth).


Read got shit grades from school, and this was the only choice, or get a job.

smegballs wrote:

My lifestyle last 2 years consists of working through the winter then going travelling somewhere for the summer. So it's not like I'm just sat on bennies... At the same time tho, security work isn't the best paid


Read can't be arsed to get a proper job. Just wants to toss it off.

smegballs wrote:

Given it's rather limited value to begin with.... How long roughly before it's completely worthless when seeking graduate employment?


I would keep quite about it...

smegballs wrote:

so the chance of getting a proper job at some point would be nice....


Well now you have got to find a job, but try to hide the past few years.

smegballs wrote:

if it isn't worthless already


I think you already know the answer to that one.

Sorry for the lack of "Emoticons" Just could not be arsed Laughing
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

pepperami
Super Spammer



Joined: 17 Jan 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:09 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Having read what you said and read the replies as well, I have a different point of view.

You have a degree and you didn`t fail and as such, you must of reached a certain standard.
The awarding bodies make the standards and they are national.
So if it`s Plymouth or Nottingham or anywhere else the exam standards should be the same.

I would give my eye teeth to have a degree and you should be proud of the fact you have one.
There are plenty of post graduates out there with firsts who cant find a job.

I was under the impression that a degree was a life long qualification.

My Penny Coin Penny Coin
____________________
I am the sum total of my own existence, what went before makes me who I am now!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:30 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

pepperami wrote:
Having read what you said and read the replies as well, I have a different point of view.

You have a degree and you didn`t fail and as such, you must of reached a certain standard.
The awarding bodies make the standards and they are national.
So if it`s Plymouth or Nottingham or anywhere else the exam standards should be the same.

I would give my eye teeth to have a degree and you should be proud of the fact you have one.
There are plenty of post graduates out there with firsts who cant find a job.

I was under the impression that a degree was a life long qualification.

My Penny Coin Penny Coin


I think you'd be right if I had worked hard and tried my best etc etc and got the grade I did. For an intelligent person who should have got a solid 2:1 at minimum, rather than scrape a 2:2 at 51% having this degree is embarrassing, as all it represents is my apathetic attitude and wasted opportunities.

In hindsight I wouldn't have gone to Uni and would still have my 4 years funding available to me. Sadly though no-one ever said at any point "don't worry about going to uni straight after A-levels, the a few years to decide what you want to do...." it was all uni!uni!uni! pushed at the time.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Sload
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Aug 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:31 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

pepperami wrote:
I was under the impression that a degree was a life long qualification.


Extreme and unlikely example to my final point. An electronics or even an electrical engineering graduate from 1970 who dropped out after graduating then dropped back on today would be lost in the field as such. The principles and backbone are the same but the technology and development since are astounding in reality. Some degrees to my knowledge are applicable to the backbone of the subject and actual application in todays reality hence they can become out of date as such.

They can still show a candidates ability which is reflected in achievement.
____________________
Honda Varadero >> Triumph Speed Four >> Honda CBR1100xx
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

M.C
Super Spammer



Joined: 29 Sep 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:32 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

pepperami wrote:
I was under the impression that a degree was a life long qualification.

A life long debt which doesn't make a great deal of difference (for a lot of people). I work with a qualified architect and other graduates, in a job which requires no qualifications. I know other graduates who work in Tesco.

I don't want to be mean to the OP but a crap grade in a mediocre (his words Wink) subject isn't going to make much difference to your job prospects. So that's one less thing to worry about Laughing

I made the same mistake, took an irrelevant BSc course at a shite uni, but I bailed after a year and paid off my £5700 of debt after about a year of working (that was a dark day Crying or Very sad).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:38 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess the real question is....

What's more useful.... My sister's 2:1 in Fine Art or my engineering 2:2??

Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Azoth
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:52 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your 2:2 in engineering may stand you in better stead in the long run than if you had had a 2:1 in engineering. From my experience, recruiters aren't drawn from the cream of the crop, and have a tendency towards feeling insecure. If you seem too smart, they resent you or doubt you.

I have a 2:1 in law, which I acquired a long time ago. Since then, I've done many things, including taken postgraduate qualifications in languages and related subjects. I've studied several languages, and maintain numerous interests, from motorcycles to creative coding (and have demos of this online). I have a portfolio (which is also visible online) of published in-print work in several languages. All of my claims about these things can be verified by looking up the publications or checking with my alma mater. This may all sound absolutely great, but it's only above-average for someone my age. Unfortunately, recruiters tend to be in their 20s, think they're the sharks and you're the small fish, and are lazy commission-driven salespeople who don't even understand biblio referencing. They don't check anything. They just feel insecure and, consequently, don't like my CV much. So, dialling down my CV has always been a major deal for me, whenever I've applied for jobs. Something to think about.
____________________
Safety in numbers
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

t121anf
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:57 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

IMO

If you want a graduate job 6 months, a year at best.

If you want a job with a degree requirement, life.

Some jobs it's a must, without it you just won't get past the application, sad really.

We have a few people in the degree merry-go-round, got the qualification but no experience. Degree gets them an interview and then they fail due to lack of experienc despite working in the field but in a different job.

Also if I had a 2:2 I doubt I'd shout about it, just put BSc (Hons) Title, as said a 2:2 just makes you look lazy.

Doubt many employers care about where you got it either, unless it's Cambridge, Oxford, Durham etc. Or a particular uni is known for the field, i.e. Newcastle and medicine.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

angryjonny
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:03 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tawny wrote:
Your 2:2 in engineering may stand you in better stead in the long run than if you had had a 2:1 in engineering. From my experience, recruiters aren't drawn from the cream of the crop, and have a tendency towards feeling insecure. If you seem too smart, they resent you or doubt you.


I've never seen a recruiter interested in anything other than their commission for placing a candidate. They couldn't give a crap about who you are or what you've done. They want the easiest candidate to place. They don't want to be searching for jobs for Joe Awkward when they could have already banked their commission from Nigel Straightforward and moved on to the next one. No-one is going to get all la-de-dah over a 2:1.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Azoth
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:11 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

angryjonny wrote:
I've never seen a recruiter interested in anything other than their commission for placing a candidate. They couldn't give a crap about who you are or what you've done. They want the easiest candidate to place. They don't want to be searching for jobs for Joe Awkward when they could have already banked their commission from Nigel Straightforward and moved on to the next one. No-one is going to get all la-de-dah over a 2:1.


I don't follow you. Why did you just tell me this? On the surface, you're agreeing with what I just told smegballs.

Looking a little closer, and you associate academic achievement with being la-de-dah and awkward.

Could it possibly be because you work in recruitment, and you do actually give a crap about who people are and what people have done, and if you get the bad feels (envy or inadequacy) you don't like that one little bit? Because recruiters aren't one tenth as pragmatic as they claim, a lot of people over the age of 30 have to 'tailor' their CV to the job.
____________________
Safety in numbers
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Sload
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Aug 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:32 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nah he is right, recruiters fire cvs off to employers, they get paid on commission, if you seem to fit the bill you are with a shot. The argument comes up when you are in the interview for the most part.
____________________
Honda Varadero >> Triumph Speed Four >> Honda CBR1100xx
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Azoth
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:39 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Recruiters fire off CVs to employers based on what they think their chances of success are. That's absolutely true.

Now find a different way of saying that, except this time try to cover up your own lack of achievement for whoever's making you feel all jelly, by using some choice words, like 'la-de-dah' and 'Joe Awkward'. That's what our resident career expert did.
____________________
Safety in numbers
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Lord Percy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:56 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

My younger brother got a 2:2 in chemistry from an ok, uni Russell Group I think. He seems convinced his degree is useless and as such is now a total waster going in every direction without any actual direction. Last thing I heard was he'd floated the idea of joining the Royal Marines...

He also graduated two years ago.

Personally I think his degree still has some worth. Probably wouldn't be able to get straight into a 'good' role but he could shoehorn his way into a chemicals-related company doing some basic office boy stuff, then see what happens next.

The same could surely be done with a 2:2 Design/Manufacture degree. Aim for a relevant industry, but aim a bit lower in a job that doesn't necessarily use the degree at all. Then your foot's in the door and the rest is up to how you perform and/or how deeply your dare to brown your nose.

Tawny wrote:
angryjonny wrote:
I've never seen a recruiter interested in anything other than their commission for placing a candidate. They couldn't give a crap about who you are or what you've done. They want the easiest candidate to place. They don't want to be searching for jobs for Joe Awkward when they could have already banked their commission from Nigel Straightforward and moved on to the next one. No-one is going to get all la-de-dah over a 2:1.


I don't follow you. Why did you just tell me this? On the surface, you're agreeing with what I just told smegballs.

Looking a little closer, and you associate academic achievement with being la-de-dah and awkward.

Could it possibly be because you work in recruitment, and you do actually give a crap about who people are and what people have done, and if you get the bad feels (envy or inadequacy) you don't like that one little bit? Because recruiters aren't one tenth as pragmatic as they claim, a lot of people over the age of 30 have to 'tailor' their CV to the job.


Sorry but this just isn't right and your opinion of recruitment agents is utterly absurd.

It makes zero sense to not choose the best candidate for the job.

Sounds more like you have a bad case of sour grapes, to be honest.

Quote:
Recruiters fire off CVs to employers based on what they think their chances of success are. That's absolutely true.


This contradicts your previous assertion wherein you said recruiters only help sub-par candidates due to some sort of inferiority complex.

Quote:
I have a portfolio (which is also visible online) of published in-print work in several languages.


Show us then Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Sload
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Aug 2011
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:00 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tawny wrote:
Now find a different way of saying that, except this time try to cover up your own lack of achievement for whoever's making you feel all jelly, by using some choice words, like 'la-de-dah' and 'Joe Awkward'. That's what our resident career expert did.


I really didnt pick that up from him.
____________________
Honda Varadero >> Triumph Speed Four >> Honda CBR1100xx
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Azoth
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:15 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lord Percy wrote:
It makes zero sense to not choose the best candidate for the job.


A couple of points.

First, the 'best' decisions aren't the only decisions that 'make sense'.
Second, decisions that 'make sense' include decisions based on false assumptions.
Third, it should be obvious that the 'best candidate for the job' isn't always recruited, as this isn't a perfect world. Or is it?

Just to give an example from what this guy has been telling us about his company. They want graduates with exactly 1-2 years' experience in another job.
Only one reason for that: it saves them in recruitment costs. Actual 'reason' given: they value the candidates' experience. If that were true, then they would recruit older people. But no, older people are too expensive. So, the main consideration for that company is staffing costs, and everything else is BS. They can't get the 'best' candidate for the job because they can't afford him. So they look in the places where they think they will get the best bang for their buck, which isn't the same thing.

Quote:
Sounds more like you have a bad case of sour grapes, to be honest.


Absolutely none of your business.
Further, I might have sour grapes and be correct in my estimation of the foibles of recruitment agents (which, by the way, was my original point).

Quote:
This contradicts your previous assertion wherein you said recruiters only help sub-par candidates due to some sort of inferiority complex.


I made no such assertion.

My assertion was that recruiters 'help' candidates whose CVs are inferior or equal to their own, due to a clear inferiority complex (which is what I believe most of them have).
Not 'sub-par' candidates, nor unsuitable candidates. Just ones that don't make them feel too bad about how they've spent their own time. A sort of reverse snobbery.

Quote:
Show us then Very Happy


Eh? I like motorbikes. I respect you all, and I appreciate our shared interest, but I don't know any of you. Every day someone is dick-swinging in the Dear Auntie BCF about what they've done in life, or how much dollah they have. Either that or what a failure they are. I only wanted to talk about motorbikes but I got drawn in. Laughing
If it's going to be an issue, I don't mind PM'ing you, but I would prefer it's kept private.
____________________
Safety in numbers
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Azoth
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:25 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sload wrote:
I really didnt pick that up from him.


I recognised that the OP's post means that he's going through a crisis, and as a result he believes, right now, that 3 years of his life have been wasted ('worthless'). He feels bad and inadequate for no reason, and he's still a fresh graduate. So our recruitment guy wades in, tells him 'well it's fine for me because I'm such a big success that I walked straight into a graduate job in my chosen field before my graduation day!' Everything he says after that point is designed to big himself up and put others ('subtly') down, from the OP to me.

How on earth does he define a Joe Awkward, other than to say he's a Johnny Straightforward and therefore he's the standard by which others are to be measured? It's one thing to set yourself up as an experienced person and another as the yardstick by which others are examined and universally found wanting. Anything they've done which he hasn't is of no interest. Anything he's done and they haven't is clear and evident proof of his innate superiority. Such a childishly simple formula. Not uncommon at all.
____________________
Safety in numbers
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Lord Percy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:40 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tawny wrote:

Not 'sub-par' candidates, nor unsuitable candidates. Just ones that don't make them feel too bad about how they've spent their own time. A sort of reverse snobbery.


Don't agree with this at all, it makes zero sense.

My younger brother's mate got into recruitment (after a 2:2 degree in Law and Philosophy at a non-Russell Group uni. He interviewed well and spoke honestly about his low grade, saying he simply didn't really enjoy law and lost interest). He works for a recruitment firm in London that head hunts high calibre candidates to do whatever it is that high calibre candidates do in the capital.

Are you telling me he almost certainly has an inferiority complex and jeopardises his own career prospects by only dealing with people he thinks he's better than? And therefore he sends swathes of not-very-good candidates to London firms even though they're specifically looking to hire good candidates? In fact, every firm everywhere is looking to hire good candidates.

There just isn't any logic to what you're saying, other than to say, "Well they didn't pick me so they must be doing their job wrong."

Not trying to be insulting here but it does seem you're trying very hard to find reasons to blame other people for your being knocked back.

Quote:

Quote:
Show us then Very Happy


Eh? I like motorbikes. I respect you all, and I appreciate our shared interest, but I don't know any of you. Every day someone is dick-swinging in the Dear Auntie BCF about what they've done in life, or how much dollah they have. Either that or what a failure they are. I only wanted to talk about motorbikes but I got drawn in. Laughing
If it's going to be an issue, I don't mind PM'ing you, but I would prefer it's kept private.


No need, after what you've said I'd feel like I was prying.

Though it does seem a bit odd to come out and say you've done X, Y and Z, then turn around and decide it's not available for public scrutiny.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Azoth
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 07 Jul 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:01 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lord Percy wrote:

Don't agree with this at all, it makes zero sense.


It makes perfect sense to me that human beings are fallible and make irrational decisions. But you seem to be unwilling to admit it even as a remote possibility. Your faith in recruitment agents appears to border on theodicy, tantamount to saying that this is 'the best of all possible worlds'.

Quote:
My younger brother's mate got into recruitment (after a 2:2 degree in Law and Philosophy at a non-Russell Group uni. He interviewed well and spoke honestly about his low grade, saying he simply didn't really enjoy law and lost interest). He works for a recruitment firm in London that head hunts high calibre candidates to do whatever it is that high calibre candidates do in the capital.

Are you telling me he almost certainly has an inferiority complex


I can only tell you the answer to that question based on my own life experience as a person who studied law but didn't go into law. That's something I have in common with your brother. I don't know your brother but nobody is that unique. We all have the same drives. Yes, he's happy to have found a job, and he thinks it's a career. Maybe it is. How long does anyone stay in sales? How long is a piece of string? You can put a positive spin on everything. Your brother is mostly happy with his job while he has it. But he's still human, and he's working with recruitment spivs, little better than estate agents. So when he sees a CV with an Oxbridge law degree he will treat it less favourably than a CV with a law degree from an ex-poly. Assuming he has a choice between sending one or the other, he will send the latter.

Quote:
and jeopardises his own career prospects by only dealing with people he thinks he's better than?


We can put adjectives before nouns as we please, but it doesn't make things equal. Career prospects as a recruitment agent vs career prospects as a lawyer. Both are spiv occupations. One has better pay and prestige. The other is a sales job.
However, and this is important, there is nothing to jeopardise, and considerable flexibility, in who your brother chooses to put forward for a job. Whoever is chosen, as long as it's 'his' candidate, he gets a commission. But a lawyer has to give sound and competent advice and legal services. There is no room for personal opinion.

Quote:
And therefore he sends swathes of not-very-good candidates to London firms even though they're specifically looking to hire good candidates? In fact, every firm everywhere is looking to hire good candidates.


This is a bit disingenuous. There is no 'good' candidate, only the best you can afford. To be honest, everything you told me about your brother just flies in the face of common sense. He must feel terrible, and envious, if he's placing trainee solicitors in firms when he couldn't make the cut. Why shouldn't he? It shouldn't count against him. He's human.

Quote:
There just isn't any logic to what you're saying, other than to say, "Well they didn't pick me so they must be doing their job wrong."


Please don't waste my time with ad hominems. I've never once mentioned any job application I've ever made. You've alleged that your brother isn't envious of people who achieved much more than him, even though he deals with their CVs as a recruiter. Let's take that as given. You've also alleged that I have a case of 'sour grapes'. Based on what? Nothing.

Quote:
Not trying to be insulting here but it does seem you're trying very hard to find reasons to blame other people for your being knocked back.


I never once mentioned being 'knocked back'. More ad hominem nonsense from a stranger who can't base his argument on the issues but has to personalise it.

Quote:
Though it does seem a bit odd to come out and say you've done X, Y and Z, then turn around and decide it's not available for public scrutiny.


If it's odd to you that people should tell you that anything about themselves is private, I have nothing further to say, apart from, if your brother really is a recruitment agent for law firms, let's have his LinkedIn profile.
____________________
Safety in numbers
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

angryjonny
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:16 - 01 Nov 2016    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've used recruiters twice, when I've been job hunting. Both cases I've received good advice about how to structure my CV, been put forward for multiple jobs and ended up with a choice of offers to pick from. No hint of bitterness. I guess I was Nigel Straightforward. Or the agents I used all had 1sts.

2:1 from a Russell Group university.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 9 years, 120 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Dear Auntie BCF... All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.15 Sec - Server Load: 0.79 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 149.88 Kb