|
Author |
Message |
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
Posted: 11:55 - 18 Mar 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
Brilliant.
After years of investigation by Clintonites in the highest (or lowest) levels of their Deep State, they've still been unable to pin any Russia-Russia-Russia collusion on Trump. And yet they remain obsessed with it, as though there's still a smoking 45-minute-WMD to be found if they just! Keep! Believing!
Trump Derangement Syndrome writ large (note that the top definition is an example of Trump Derangement Syndrome). ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
- |
This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
- Super Spammer
Joined: 22 Oct 2013 Karma :
|
Posted: 09:06 - 24 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
Did I just hear that right on the radio news?
A court has has banned Trump from blocking trolls from his Twitter account, because it "violates their right to free speech"?
OK, so this court has just allowed a small group of anti-Trump snowflakes to win their case and has now given every snowflake on the planet the right to sabotage his Twitter account. Way to go.....
Quote: | Among those who brought the case was Maryland university professor Philip Cohen, who was blocked last year after posting an image of the president with words "corrupt, incompetent authoritarian". |
What next, the public allowed into parliament/congress/Whitehouse to heckle? Trump's private phone number to be handed out to all snowflakes and he must answer and can't block them?
The world has gone mad. Liberal snowflakes are everywhere and changing society and the rules without even being in power. It appears the law is being used a lot lately by snowflakes to enforce their world views on people. Think GollyWog cases and Count Dankula and his girfriend's Nazi Pug. ____________________ TZR250 2MA road, TZR250 1KT road, TZR250 2MA race, TDR250, YZF-750R Boost colours.
Jaguar S Type 3.0 V6 Sport R, VW Transporter T5 GP LWB Shuttle 140ps DSG. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Falco |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Falco Traffic Copper
Joined: 27 Nov 2015 Karma :
|
Posted: 12:37 - 24 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
mpd72 wrote: | Did I just hear that right on the radio news?
A court has has banned Trump from blocking trolls from his Twitter account, because it "violates their right to free speech"?
OK, so this court has just allowed a small group of anti-Trump snowflakes to win their case and has now given every snowflake on the planet the right to sabotage his Twitter account. Way to go.....
Quote: | Among those who brought the case was Maryland university professor Philip Cohen, who was blocked last year after posting an image of the president with words "corrupt, incompetent authoritarian". |
What next, the public allowed into parliament/congress/Whitehouse to heckle? Trump's private phone number to be handed out to all snowflakes and he must answer and can't block them?
The world has gone mad. Liberal snowflakes are everywhere and changing society and the rules without even being in power. It appears the law is being used a lot lately by snowflakes to enforce their world views on people. Think GollyWog cases and Count Dankula and his girfriend's Nazi Pug. |
No. He isn't supposed to block people anymore (not that there will be any enforcement). He can still mute them.
That's it. The rest of your post is complete nonsense.
EDIT: I misread the ruling. He actually *can* still block people, just not for their viewpoint alone. He can still mute anyone he pleases. ____________________ I tell you what, mathematically, I'm having it |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
- |
This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
- Super Spammer
Joined: 22 Oct 2013 Karma :
|
Posted: 14:33 - 24 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
Falco wrote: | mpd72 wrote: | Did I just hear that right on the radio news?
A court has has banned Trump from blocking trolls from his Twitter account, because it "violates their right to free speech"?
OK, so this court has just allowed a small group of anti-Trump snowflakes to win their case and has now given every snowflake on the planet the right to sabotage his Twitter account. Way to go.....
Quote: | Among those who brought the case was Maryland university professor Philip Cohen, who was blocked last year after posting an image of the president with words "corrupt, incompetent authoritarian". |
What next, the public allowed into parliament/congress/Whitehouse to heckle? Trump's private phone number to be handed out to all snowflakes and he must answer and can't block them?
The world has gone mad. Liberal snowflakes are everywhere and changing society and the rules without even being in power. It appears the law is being used a lot lately by snowflakes to enforce their world views on people. Think GollyWog cases and Count Dankula and his girfriend's Nazi Pug. |
No. He isn't supposed to block people anymore (not that there will be any enforcement). He can still mute them.
That's it. The rest of your post is complete nonsense.
EDIT: I misread the ruling. He actually *can* still block people, just not for their viewpoint alone. He can still mute anyone he pleases. |
And of course, you'd be perfectly happy to have a law brought in stopping you from blocking people on social media?
Get out of it. I don't believe you.
What about his human rights? You know, like a right to privacy, when he chooses? ____________________ TZR250 2MA road, TZR250 1KT road, TZR250 2MA race, TDR250, YZF-750R Boost colours.
Jaguar S Type 3.0 V6 Sport R, VW Transporter T5 GP LWB Shuttle 140ps DSG. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Falco |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Falco Traffic Copper
Joined: 27 Nov 2015 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
Posted: 15:52 - 24 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, I see nukular war with North Korea is back on.
Cup of tea? ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
- |
This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
- Super Spammer
Joined: 22 Oct 2013 Karma :
|
Posted: 16:50 - 24 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
Falco wrote: | mpd72 wrote: | And of course, you'd be perfectly happy to have a law brought in stopping you from blocking people on social media?
Get out of it. I don't believe you.
What about his human rights? You know, like a right to privacy, when he chooses? |
If I were president of the US, using twitter as a public forum to make official announcements? I'd be happy with it. My happiness would be immaterial however, by using my twitter in an official role, those responding are granted 1A rights.
Right to privacy? If he wants to run a twitter account as trump (the man, not the president) he would be perfectly within his rights to block whoever he wanted. |
Haters got to hate eh?
How very grown up of the Snowflakes who threw their toys out of the pram for not being allowed to whine, abuse and publicly mock the president of the USA.
I know a lefty twat who spends his entire day verbally abusing anyone one Twitter who he sees as having a differing view to his hug a Muslim , liberal shite.
He hounds Tommy Robinson on an almost daily basis, even though Robinson or whatever his real name is, generally makes the hater look a 45 year old child with each response. ____________________ TZR250 2MA road, TZR250 1KT road, TZR250 2MA race, TDR250, YZF-750R Boost colours.
Jaguar S Type 3.0 V6 Sport R, VW Transporter T5 GP LWB Shuttle 140ps DSG. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Falco |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Falco Traffic Copper
Joined: 27 Nov 2015 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
cdlxxvi |
This post is not being displayed .
|
cdlxxvi Nearly there...
Joined: 13 Feb 2012 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
M.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
M.C Super Spammer
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Karma :
|
Posted: 19:57 - 24 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
Squawking when the talks were on, squawking now they're off, sounds like every Trump story for the last two years |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
doggone |
This post is not being displayed .
|
doggone World Chat Champion
Joined: 20 May 2004 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Suntan Sid |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Suntan Sid World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 May 2009 Karma :
|
Posted: 22:35 - 24 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
mpd72 wrote: | Haters got to hate eh?
How very grown up of the Snowflakes who threw their toys out of the pram for not being allowed to whine, abuse and publicly mock the president of the USA. |
Turns out they were right though, doesn't it?
This is what the judgement actually says:-
Quote: | This case requires us to consider whether a public official
may, consistent with the First Amendment, “block” a person from
his Twitter account in response to the political views that person
has expressed, and whether the analysis differs because that public
official is the President of the United States. The answer to
both questions is no. |
Whether you like it or not, the ruling has got sod all to do with, whatever today's buzzword is for people you don't agree with. It is a constitutional issue, an issue that turns out to be in violation of the first amendment.
I'm no great fan of the US of A, however they have a legally binding constitution. You can whine about it all you want, try and blame it on people who have differing opinions from you and use all the usual buzzwords to describe them. The fact is it's a point of law. ____________________ "Everybody needs money, that's why they call it money!" |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
M.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
M.C Super Spammer
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Karma :
|
Posted: 22:45 - 24 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
Suntan Sid wrote: | Quote: | This case requires us to consider whether a public official
may, consistent with the First Amendment, “block” a person from
his Twitter account in response to the political views that person
has expressed, and whether the analysis differs because that public
official is the President of the United States. The answer to
both questions is no. |
Whether you like it or not, the ruling has got sod all to do with, whatever today's buzzword is for people you don't agree with. It is a constitutional issue, an issue that turns out to be in violation of the first amendment.
I'm no great fan of the US of A, however they have a legally binding constitution. You can whine about it all you want, try and blame it on people who have differing opinions from you and use all the usual buzzwords to describe them. The fact is it's a point of law. |
You're right:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances even if in hundreds of years that consists of directing an angry electronic communication towards the president.
How did they know to add that last bit |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
M.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
M.C Super Spammer
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Karma :
|
Posted: 01:18 - 25 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Falco |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Falco Traffic Copper
Joined: 27 Nov 2015 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
- |
This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
- Super Spammer
Joined: 22 Oct 2013 Karma :
|
Posted: 09:13 - 25 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
Suntan Sid wrote: | mpd72 wrote: | Haters got to hate eh?
How very grown up of the Snowflakes who threw their toys out of the pram for not being allowed to whine, abuse and publicly mock the president of the USA. |
Turns out they were right though, doesn't it?
This is what the judgement actually says:-
Quote: | This case requires us to consider whether a public official
may, consistent with the First Amendment, “block” a person from
his Twitter account in response to the political views that person
has expressed, and whether the analysis differs because that public
official is the President of the United States. The answer to
both questions is no. |
Whether you like it or not, the ruling has got sod all to do with, whatever today's buzzword is for people you don't agree with. It is a constitutional issue, an issue that turns out to be in violation of the first amendment.
I'm no great fan of the US of A, however they have a legally binding constitution. You can whine about it all you want, try and blame it on people who have differing opinions from you and use all the usual buzzwords to describe them. The fact is it's a point of law. |
Ah, so the constitution is all about allowing haters to hate on social media. Gotcha. Clear as mud, never realised that's why it was written.
Personally, I think it's bizarre that a court has decided that one of the hate targets for the left has been denied the right to stop those haters from trolling him.
Who decides the difference between "a different political opinion" and "acting like a twat" on his social media account? I should imagine the boundary would be pretty hard to define. ____________________ TZR250 2MA road, TZR250 1KT road, TZR250 2MA race, TDR250, YZF-750R Boost colours.
Jaguar S Type 3.0 V6 Sport R, VW Transporter T5 GP LWB Shuttle 140ps DSG. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Falco |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Falco Traffic Copper
Joined: 27 Nov 2015 Karma :
|
Posted: 12:11 - 25 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
mpd72 wrote: |
Personally, I think it's bizarre that a court has decided that one of the hate targets for the left has been denied the right to stop those haters from trolling him.
Who decides the difference between "a different political opinion" and "acting like a twat" on his social media account? I should imagine the boundary would be pretty hard to define. |
It's a good thing the court decided no such thing then, isn't it. For someone who unironically uses the term "snowflake" you seem awfully concerned about Trump having a safe space free from differing opinions.
Once more, he CAN block trolls and he can legitimately mute people whose political views he doesn't like, he just can't block them.
It's really quite simple to tell the difference. "Trump you fuck-stick, your behaviour in Iran is totally myopic" - not protected, though it includes political views, it is abusive and is thus fair game for blockage. real world example
"Trump, you are an incompetent leader, your behaviour in Iran is totally myopic" - protected, not abusive, expressive of a political view. real world example
But even if his skin is so thin he can't bear to see people disagree with him he can still mute them. ____________________ I tell you what, mathematically, I'm having it |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
Posted: 14:11 - 25 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
He can mute them biglier than anyone has ever muted anyone before. We're going to mute all the violent animals, it's going to be great. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
- |
This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
- Super Spammer
Joined: 22 Oct 2013 Karma :
|
Posted: 14:44 - 25 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
Falco wrote: | mpd72 wrote: |
Personally, I think it's bizarre that a court has decided that one of the hate targets for the left has been denied the right to stop those haters from trolling him.
Who decides the difference between "a different political opinion" and "acting like a twat" on his social media account? I should imagine the boundary would be pretty hard to define. |
It's a good thing the court decided no such thing then, isn't it. For someone who unironically uses the term "snowflake" you seem awfully concerned about Trump having a safe space free from differing opinions.
Once more, he CAN block trolls and he can legitimately mute people whose political views he doesn't like, he just can't block them.
It's really quite simple to tell the difference. "Trump you fuck-stick, your behaviour in Iran is totally myopic" - not protected, though it includes political views, it is abusive and is thus fair game for blockage. real world example
"Trump, you are an incompetent leader, your behaviour in Iran is totally myopic" - protected, not abusive, expressive of a political view. real world example
But even if his skin is so thin he can't bear to see people disagree with him he can still mute them. |
I bet you'd be perfectly happy with millions of people telling you that your yogurt weaving lefty views are that of an incompetent myopic.
I mean, it's everyone's right and not in the least bit abusive, yes? ____________________ TZR250 2MA road, TZR250 1KT road, TZR250 2MA race, TDR250, YZF-750R Boost colours.
Jaguar S Type 3.0 V6 Sport R, VW Transporter T5 GP LWB Shuttle 140ps DSG. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Itchy Super Spammer
Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Suntan Sid |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Suntan Sid World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 May 2009 Karma :
|
Posted: 19:49 - 25 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
mpd72 wrote: | Ah, so the constitution is all about allowing haters to hate on social media. |
No, the constitution, in the US, is legally binding!
mpd72 wrote: | Gotcha. Clear as mud, never realised that's why it was written. |
Whatever, what does this even mean?
mpd72 wrote: | Personally, I think it's bizarre that a court has decided that one of the hate targets for the left has been denied the right to stop those haters from trolling him. |
The alternative is called a dictatorship!
mpd72 wrote: | Who decides the difference between "a different political opinion" and "acting like a twat" on his social media account? I should imagine the boundary would be pretty hard to define. |
Err, the boundary has, obviously, been defined within the ruling being discussed. ____________________ "Everybody needs money, that's why they call it money!" |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
- |
This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
- Super Spammer
Joined: 22 Oct 2013 Karma :
|
Posted: 11:15 - 26 May 2018 Post subject: |
|
|
Suntan Sid wrote: | mpd72 wrote: | Ah, so the constitution is all about allowing haters to hate on social media. |
No, the constitution, in the US, is legally binding!
mpd72 wrote: | Gotcha. Clear as mud, never realised that's why it was written. |
Whatever, what does this even mean?
mpd72 wrote: | Personally, I think it's bizarre that a court has decided that one of the hate targets for the left has been denied the right to stop those haters from trolling him. |
The alternative is called a dictatorship!
mpd72 wrote: | Who decides the difference between "a different political opinion" and "acting like a twat" on his social media account? I should imagine the boundary would be pretty hard to define. |
Err, the boundary has, obviously, been defined within the ruling being discussed. |
It's a personal social media account FFS! What the feck right has a court to decide who he can block and who he can't?
Maybe in your socialist fantasy world, this is how things would be. Not in the real world though. If there's anyone doing the dictatorship here, it's the snowflakes abusing the law to have a dig at and the enjoyment of being able to control access to Trumps personal Twitter account. ____________________ TZR250 2MA road, TZR250 1KT road, TZR250 2MA race, TDR250, YZF-750R Boost colours.
Jaguar S Type 3.0 V6 Sport R, VW Transporter T5 GP LWB Shuttle 140ps DSG. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 5 years, 330 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
|
|
|