|
Author |
Message |
smegballs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
smegballs World Chat Champion
Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Val |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Val World Chat Champion
Joined: 03 Nov 2012 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
M.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
M.C Super Spammer
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
- |
This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
- Super Spammer
Joined: 22 Oct 2013 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
The Shaggy D.A. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
The Shaggy D.A. Super Spammer
Joined: 12 Sep 2008 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Itchy Super Spammer
Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
oldpink |
This post is not being displayed .
|
oldpink World Chat Champion
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
JonB |
This post is not being displayed .
|
JonB Afraid of Mileage
Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Karma :
|
Posted: 22:39 - 07 Nov 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
M.C wrote: |
So if we all did it then what? It's funny how it's the same people on here who go on about a sense of entitlement, that think this is fine. |
The top 10 per cent pay 59% of all income tax, while the top 55% pay all of it. About 45% pay absolutely no income tax at all.
So 45% of the public who are eligible to vote for a government to manage the UK finances actually pay no income tax at all. Is it any wonder Corbyn is so popular? I’d love to vote for a party that would give me more - without me having to contribute anything extra.
I don’t think the state owes me anything. I use the NHS occasionally, the police and fire service are there if I need them. Our main roads are OK. I pay all the taxes that are required of me (I’m PAYE), a proportion of which are taxed at higher rate. I now apparently earn so much that I have to pay back child benefit. So a benefit from the state that I am entitled to through having a sprog is now taken away, yet I put plenty enough in the pot to be entitled to it. Is that moral?
By the way, a couple earning £49,999 each (total £99,998) would be fully entitled to child benefit under current UK law. An individual earning £50,000, but maybe whose wife stays at home to look after the kids has to start paying it back. Is that fair? ____________________ Be careful whose advice you buy, but, be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it?s worth. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
M.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
M.C Super Spammer
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Karma :
|
Posted: 23:21 - 07 Nov 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
oldpink wrote: | lots of every day "Normal" people can save on their taxes if you follow the rules and claim for everything you can
most people just pay without looking to see if they can claim rebates |
Yeah £60 a year
JonB wrote: | I don’t think the state owes me anything. I use the NHS occasionally, the police and fire service are there if I need them. Our main roads are OK. I pay all the taxes that are required of me (I’m PAYE), a proportion of which are taxed at higher rate. I now apparently earn so much that I have to pay back child benefit. So a benefit from the state that I am entitled to through having a sprog is now taken away, yet I put plenty enough in the pot to be entitled to it. Is that moral?
By the way, a couple earning £49,999 each (total £99,998) would be fully entitled to child benefit under current UK law. An individual earning £50,000, but maybe whose wife stays at home to look after the kids has to start paying it back. Is that fair? |
Entitlement FWIW I wouldn't give anyone a penny for breeding, and I do think all benefits should be means tested, although maybe it's applied unfairly. Don't we all have our own gripe? I didn't post anything about it on here, as I know I'd get zero sympathy, but I had an argument with the council as they found out I had savings and wanted me to pay more money. There isn't a single regulation that backs that up, as a 2 minute internet search shows, and it took 6 months to sort out |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
oldpink |
This post is not being displayed .
|
oldpink World Chat Champion
Joined: 02 Aug 2006 Karma :
|
Posted: 23:54 - 07 Nov 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah £60 a year
if your self employed you can claim of all sorts of things
Fuel tax travel expenses etc
buy a company vehicle (CBR 600RR)
if you have a dog its a watchdog protecting your business security claim vets bills and food etc
CCTV camera's to protect your assets business property and help your Ins on said company vehicle
Make sure your tax code is correct and your claiming every break your entitled to
no different than Apple or Starbucks
I've worked for company's that were set in the Seychelles
they bought me a Ninja 636 on a company loan in to keep me with them
the business was all internet based and had no actual office as such just a PO box address and a bank account No
these days its a bit more strict though ____________________ I have become comfortably numb
Theory & hazard 24-may 2016, CBT 8th June 2016, MOD 1 2nd Aug 2016 Mod 2 2nd-Nov 2016 - Current bike CBR 600 RR |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
M.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
M.C Super Spammer
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
arry |
This post is not being displayed .
|
arry Super Spammer
Joined: 03 Jan 2009 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Sun Wukong |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Sun Wukong World Chat Champion
Joined: 02 Nov 2014 Karma :
|
Posted: 09:14 - 08 Nov 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
Another perspective…
"Over the weekend, we witnessed the release of the “Paradise Papers.” This was another gigantic leak of financial records (similar to last year’s “Panama Papers”) which shows how clients of a Bermuda law firm have legally used foreign corporate and trust structures for privacy and tax mitigation.
Among the names unearthed so far are Madonna, U2’s Bono, actress Keira Knightley, Formula 1 star Lewis Hamilton, Queen Elizabeth II, and US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross.
And the public is outraged.
The basis of this outrage is that rich and powerful people are ‘hiding’ trillions of dollars in offshore tax havens like Switzerland and the Cayman Islands.
Journalists estimate the size of this offshore treasure trove to be between $10 trillion and $32 trillion.
Yet there’s absolutely no rational basis to support these assertions whatsoever.
Consider that the ENTIRE banking system in Switzerland holds just $1.5 trillion in customer deposits.
In the Cayman Islands, non-resident customers hold less than $100 billion in deposits.
Jersey, one of the Channel Islands, has only $60 billion from non-resident depositors.
Bermuda, at the center of the most recent data leak, has an entire banking system worth just $19.2 billion.
And despite all the whining about Ireland as an offshore tax haven (despite a corporate rate of 12.5%), the country’s entire banking system has less than $200 billion.
Point is-- even if you assume that literally ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of the deposits in these countries are tied to tax evasion (which is obviously ridiculous), it doesn’t come anywhere close to the estimates the media keep reciting.
But no one ever questions the premise.
Everyone seems to believe in this myth that there’s tens of trillions of dollars hidden away evading taxes, even though all the data shows that this assertion is baseless.
Another basis of the public’s outrage is a belief that the clients of this Bermuda law firm were able to reduce their tax bills in ways that are only available to the ‘rich and powerful’.
Again, this is complete nonsense.
First off, EVERYONE has ways they reduce their tax bills.
People do this all the time… whether it’s shopping at a duty-free store or out-of-state to avoid sales tax, or perhaps holding an investment just a little bit longer before selling (in order to pay long-term capital gains, instead of the higher rate for short-term gains).
And these are all perfectly legal.
But for some reason when a rich guy does perfectly legal things to reduce his/her tax bill, the public is outraged.
Second, you don’t have to be rich or powerful or famous to set up a structure overseas.
Establishing a foreign company often costs less than $1,000-- hardly a billionaire’s price tag.
Most importantly, the public is outraged even though everything these rich folks are doing is completely legal.
The articles I’ve been reading about the Paradise Papers begrudgingly state that it’s completely legal to establish a foreign company to pay less tax.
And it is. Rational people take whatever reasonable, legal steps they can to reduce what they owe.
But people don’t like it. They feel that it’s ‘unfair’ for wealthy people to be able to slash their tax bills.
Yet according to individual income tax statistics published by the Internal Revenue Service, the top 3% of taxpayers in the United States pay more tax than everyone else in the country combined.
That’s already a pretty disproportionate ratio. Yet these angry socialists want top taxpayers to pay even more.
They seem to feel entitled to other people’s property and to put their hands in other people’s pockets.
It makes me wonder-- how much more would be enough? When does it stop?
If the public has a say over what someone else can legally do with his/her private property, perhaps we’re all entitled to sleep in Wilbur Ross’s house, or to take Bono’s Lamborghini out for a drive.
Again, the amazing thing here is that taking steps to reduce your taxes is completely legal.
What’s NOT legal is stealing private financial records from a law firm… which is exactly what a bunch of journalists did in order to publish the Paradise Papers.
But that criminality is not part of the discussion. And no public figure will dare call them out over it.
The only acceptable thing to say anymore is rich people = bad. Everyone else = good.
This is class warfare, plain and simple. People are out for blood once again. And it’s only the beginning"
Sovereign Man ____________________ Top cat
"Hard times lead to hard people. Hard people lead to good times. Good times lead to weak people. Weak people lead to hard times." Smegballs
"Oh and STE balloons would be one of the nicer things we would receive at the office, the amount of dog turd in jiffy bags is not funny." Jsmith86 |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Itchy Super Spammer
Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
ScaredyCat |
This post is not being displayed .
|
ScaredyCat World Chat Champion
Joined: 19 May 2012 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
Posted: 10:08 - 08 Nov 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
Something to bear in mind is that wombyn get pension sense-of-entitlement credits while claiming baby farmer benefit. So Mrs B has to keep claiming it even though I get it clawed back out of my pocket come tax time.
That's just the tip of the messed up swings-and-roundabouts system that seems designed largely to keep accountants and state employees in a "job".
Lulz, I presented "Bernie Sander's'" flat rate, zero loopholes business tax plans to the office SJW, and he fully endorsed them as fair and just until I revealed that's the Trump plan. His face soured all the milk in the kitchen (not a taxable benefit). ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Kawasaki Jimbo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Kawasaki Jimbo World Chat Champion
Joined: 09 Oct 2015 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
chris-red |
This post is not being displayed .
|
chris-red Have you considered a TDM?
Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Itchy Super Spammer
Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Itchy Super Spammer
Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Rogerborg |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Rogerborg nimbA
Joined: 26 Oct 2010 Karma :
|
Posted: 16:19 - 08 Nov 2017 Post subject: |
|
|
Itchy wrote: | The state doesn't want to jail you. Prison is expensive. They just want their money. |
<you-dont-say.png>
Ultimately it's all extorted with menaces though, so the consideration has to be: how do you draft a law where one one side of a fine line you're fine and the other you're fined and jailed if you tell them to do one?
And they want any money rather than no money. After a fouled-up TUPE transfer this year, I'm currently being under-taxed considerably. When this comes out, probably in early 2019, you can bet that I'll be offering to pay off the footpads at £1 a week, as that's all I can afford, such poor, very distress. ____________________ Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Pjay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Pjay World Chat Champion
Joined: 18 Jan 2016 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
M.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
M.C Super Spammer
Joined: 29 Sep 2015 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 6 years, 172 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
|
|
|