Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Paradise Papers

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:02 - 07 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

.........................................................................
........................................................................
.........................................................................
........................................................................


.........................................................................
........................................................................
.........................................................................
........................................................................


Last edited by smegballs on 15:56 - 18 May 2021; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Val
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Nov 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:08 - 07 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not sure about moral. Potato-potatou.

But sure as hell is not fair. Cause most people don't have that nice opportunity to safe on taxes.

Means in order to be fair lets ban all offshore tax havens. Not to mention all criminal moneys from drugs, illegal arms dealing,slavery and prostitution are going there.

Probably the main reason why tax criminals financed Brexit:

Quote:
Banks, accountants and law firms that facilitate offshore tax schemes face a Europe-wide crackdown, according to a leak of draft legislation...commission’s proposals would further tighten the screw on British-based intermediaries in 2019


I say criminals because majority of offshore tax hiding is evasion which is dirty criminal activity (£80bln from £120bln total in UK)

No wonder Theresa May wants to close Serious Fraud Office.

https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2014/09/22/new-report-the-tax-gap-is-119-4-billion-and-rising/

Should have put that on a bus:
https://i.imgur.com/VtDPYAj.jpg
____________________
Adrian Monk: Unless I'm wrong, which, you know, I'm not...
Yamaha Fazer FZS 600, MT09, XSR 900
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

M.C
Super Spammer



Joined: 29 Sep 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:22 - 07 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

Freddyfruitbat wrote:
The Paradise Papers seem to me to be saying: "Rich people legally reduce their tax bills by moving their money offshore".

Um... didn't everybody already know that? What's the actual story?

That was the point of the programme (did you watch it)? How Apple was using one tax evasion I mean avoidance wait I mean evasion scam, I mean loophole no wait a minute scam, which was closed so they had to come up with a different one.

Also governments being complicit in creating legislation to help tax avoidance (or is it evasion?) is extremely unethical.

JonB wrote:
We should all make it a primary aim to pay the least amount of tax legally possible.

So if we all did it then what? It's funny how it's the same people on here who go on about a sense of entitlement, that think this is fine.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
- This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:13 - 07 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

Val wrote:
But sure as hell is not fair.

What's fair about a tax system that thrusts its hands into your pockets deeper and deeper as people reward you more and more for the value that you're bringing to them?
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Shaggy D.A.
Super Spammer



Joined: 12 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:55 - 07 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

JonB wrote:
I can wager 90% of people on this site would not bat an eyelid at having a conservatory installed at a 20% discount by paying the builder in cash off the books.


Bat an eyelid? I absolutely demand it Smile
____________________
Chances are quite high you are not in my Monkeysphere, and I don't care about you. Don't take it personally.
Currently : Royal Enfield 350 Meteor
Previously : CB100N > CB250RS > XJ900F > GT550 > GPZ750R/1000RX > AJS M16 > R100RT > Bullet 500 > CB500 > LS650P > Bullet Electra X & YBR125 > Bullet 350 "Superstar" & YBR125 Custom > Royal Enfield Classic 500 Despatch Limited Edition (28 of 200) & CB Two-Fifty Nighthawk > ER5
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:07 - 07 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

M.C wrote:
Also governments being complicit in creating legislation to help tax avoidance (or is it evasion?) is extremely unethical.



It's worse. There is a revolving door. HMRC hires consultants and takes on people from the big 4 tax firms. They work at HMRC and then go back to the big tax firms.

Dave Hartnett ex boss of HMRC went on quite a few dinners with big 4 tax firm bosses too. Just to enjoy the food and wine of course.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

oldpink
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:30 - 07 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

lots of every day "Normal" people can save on their taxes if you follow the rules and claim for everything you can
most people just pay without looking to see if they can claim rebates

though in one way or another every time you spend money you are paying a tax
whether its VAT or Import Duty added to your purchases
Council tax, Bedroom Tax, road tax

two things you can try to avoid but it will always catch up
Death + Taxes
____________________
I have become comfortably numb

Theory & hazard 24-may 2016, CBT 8th June 2016, MOD 1 2nd Aug 2016 Mod 2 2nd-Nov 2016 - Current bike CBR 600 RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

JonB
Afraid of Mileage



Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:39 - 07 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

M.C wrote:

So if we all did it then what? It's funny how it's the same people on here who go on about a sense of entitlement, that think this is fine.

The top 10 per cent pay 59% of all income tax, while the top 55% pay all of it. About 45% pay absolutely no income tax at all.

So 45% of the public who are eligible to vote for a government to manage the UK finances actually pay no income tax at all. Is it any wonder Corbyn is so popular? I’d love to vote for a party that would give me more - without me having to contribute anything extra.

I don’t think the state owes me anything. I use the NHS occasionally, the police and fire service are there if I need them. Our main roads are OK. I pay all the taxes that are required of me (I’m PAYE), a proportion of which are taxed at higher rate. I now apparently earn so much that I have to pay back child benefit. So a benefit from the state that I am entitled to through having a sprog is now taken away, yet I put plenty enough in the pot to be entitled to it. Is that moral?

By the way, a couple earning £49,999 each (total £99,998) would be fully entitled to child benefit under current UK law. An individual earning £50,000, but maybe whose wife stays at home to look after the kids has to start paying it back. Is that fair?
____________________
Be careful whose advice you buy, but, be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it?s worth.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

M.C
Super Spammer



Joined: 29 Sep 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:21 - 07 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

oldpink wrote:
lots of every day "Normal" people can save on their taxes if you follow the rules and claim for everything you can
most people just pay without looking to see if they can claim rebates

Yeah £60 a year Laughing

JonB wrote:
I don’t think the state owes me anything. I use the NHS occasionally, the police and fire service are there if I need them. Our main roads are OK. I pay all the taxes that are required of me (I’m PAYE), a proportion of which are taxed at higher rate. I now apparently earn so much that I have to pay back child benefit. So a benefit from the state that I am entitled to through having a sprog is now taken away, yet I put plenty enough in the pot to be entitled to it. Is that moral?

By the way, a couple earning £49,999 each (total £99,998) would be fully entitled to child benefit under current UK law. An individual earning £50,000, but maybe whose wife stays at home to look after the kids has to start paying it back. Is that fair?

Entitlement Wink FWIW I wouldn't give anyone a penny for breeding, and I do think all benefits should be means tested, although maybe it's applied unfairly. Don't we all have our own gripe? I didn't post anything about it on here, as I know I'd get zero sympathy, but I had an argument with the council as they found out I had savings and wanted me to pay more money. There isn't a single regulation that backs that up, as a 2 minute internet search shows, and it took 6 months to sort out Rolling Eyes
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

oldpink
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:54 - 07 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah £60 a year Laughing

if your self employed you can claim of all sorts of things
Fuel tax travel expenses etc
buy a company vehicle (CBR 600RR)
if you have a dog its a watchdog protecting your business security claim vets bills and food etc
CCTV camera's to protect your assets business property and help your Ins on said company vehicle
Make sure your tax code is correct and your claiming every break your entitled to
no different than Apple or Starbucks

I've worked for company's that were set in the Seychelles
they bought me a Ninja 636 on a company loan in to keep me with them
the business was all internet based and had no actual office as such just a PO box address and a bank account No
these days its a bit more strict though
____________________
I have become comfortably numb

Theory & hazard 24-may 2016, CBT 8th June 2016, MOD 1 2nd Aug 2016 Mod 2 2nd-Nov 2016 - Current bike CBR 600 RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

M.C
Super Spammer



Joined: 29 Sep 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:36 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

oldpink wrote:
no different than Apple or Starbucks

If you also funnelled all your profits offshore.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

arry
Super Spammer



Joined: 03 Jan 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:04 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

M.C wrote:

Entitlement Wink


That's a bit harsh to focus in on, especially given:

JonB wrote:
I don’t think the state owes me anything


There's a difference between being entitled to something and having a sense of entitlement.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Sun Wukong
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Nov 2014
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:14 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another perspective…

"Over the weekend, we witnessed the release of the “Paradise Papers.” This was another gigantic leak of financial records (similar to last year’s “Panama Papers”) which shows how clients of a Bermuda law firm have legally used foreign corporate and trust structures for privacy and tax mitigation.

Among the names unearthed so far are Madonna, U2’s Bono, actress Keira Knightley, Formula 1 star Lewis Hamilton, Queen Elizabeth II, and US Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross.

And the public is outraged.

The basis of this outrage is that rich and powerful people are ‘hiding’ trillions of dollars in offshore tax havens like Switzerland and the Cayman Islands.

Journalists estimate the size of this offshore treasure trove to be between $10 trillion and $32 trillion.

Yet there’s absolutely no rational basis to support these assertions whatsoever.

Consider that the ENTIRE banking system in Switzerland holds just $1.5 trillion in customer deposits.

In the Cayman Islands, non-resident customers hold less than $100 billion in deposits.

Jersey, one of the Channel Islands, has only $60 billion from non-resident depositors.

Bermuda, at the center of the most recent data leak, has an entire banking system worth just $19.2 billion.

And despite all the whining about Ireland as an offshore tax haven (despite a corporate rate of 12.5%), the country’s entire banking system has less than $200 billion.

Point is-- even if you assume that literally ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of the deposits in these countries are tied to tax evasion (which is obviously ridiculous), it doesn’t come anywhere close to the estimates the media keep reciting.

But no one ever questions the premise.

Everyone seems to believe in this myth that there’s tens of trillions of dollars hidden away evading taxes, even though all the data shows that this assertion is baseless.

Another basis of the public’s outrage is a belief that the clients of this Bermuda law firm were able to reduce their tax bills in ways that are only available to the ‘rich and powerful’.

Again, this is complete nonsense.

First off, EVERYONE has ways they reduce their tax bills.

People do this all the time… whether it’s shopping at a duty-free store or out-of-state to avoid sales tax, or perhaps holding an investment just a little bit longer before selling (in order to pay long-term capital gains, instead of the higher rate for short-term gains).

And these are all perfectly legal.

But for some reason when a rich guy does perfectly legal things to reduce his/her tax bill, the public is outraged.

Second, you don’t have to be rich or powerful or famous to set up a structure overseas.

Establishing a foreign company often costs less than $1,000-- hardly a billionaire’s price tag.

Most importantly, the public is outraged even though everything these rich folks are doing is completely legal.

The articles I’ve been reading about the Paradise Papers begrudgingly state that it’s completely legal to establish a foreign company to pay less tax.

And it is. Rational people take whatever reasonable, legal steps they can to reduce what they owe.

But people don’t like it. They feel that it’s ‘unfair’ for wealthy people to be able to slash their tax bills.

Yet according to individual income tax statistics published by the Internal Revenue Service, the top 3% of taxpayers in the United States pay more tax than everyone else in the country combined.

That’s already a pretty disproportionate ratio. Yet these angry socialists want top taxpayers to pay even more.

They seem to feel entitled to other people’s property and to put their hands in other people’s pockets.

It makes me wonder-- how much more would be enough? When does it stop?

If the public has a say over what someone else can legally do with his/her private property, perhaps we’re all entitled to sleep in Wilbur Ross’s house, or to take Bono’s Lamborghini out for a drive.

Again, the amazing thing here is that taking steps to reduce your taxes is completely legal.

What’s NOT legal is stealing private financial records from a law firm… which is exactly what a bunch of journalists did in order to publish the Paradise Papers.

But that criminality is not part of the discussion. And no public figure will dare call them out over it.

The only acceptable thing to say anymore is rich people = bad. Everyone else = good.

This is class warfare, plain and simple. People are out for blood once again. And it’s only the beginning"

Sovereign Man
____________________
Top cat
"Hard times lead to hard people. Hard people lead to good times. Good times lead to weak people. Weak people lead to hard times." Smegballs
"Oh and STE balloons would be one of the nicer things we would receive at the office, the amount of dog turd in jiffy bags is not funny." Jsmith86
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:27 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sun Wukong wrote:

This is class warfare, plain and simple. People are out for blood once again. And it’s only the beginning"



I remember that in University in an economics text book slightly different though.

The counter argument is that they managed to get wealthy by the environment and circumstances that exists primarily because of taxes and thus they benefit disproportionately from these things.


A factory would it exist without electricity, a workforce and roads to move stuff in and out of there? Who provides all of those things? Who benefits from those things?
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ScaredyCat
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 May 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:29 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

JonB wrote:
I now apparently earn so much that I have to pay back child benefit. So a benefit from the state that I am entitled to through having a sprog is now taken away, yet I put plenty enough in the pot to be entitled to it. Is that moral?


You're part of the problem. Why the fuck should the state give you anything just because you have a child? You clearly make enough money, state handouts are meant for people who can't afford to survive without them, not for spongers like you.

JonB wrote:
By the way, a couple earning £49,999 each (total £99,998) would be fully entitled to child benefit under current UK law. An individual earning £50,000, but maybe whose wife stays at home to look after the kids has to start paying it back. Is that fair?


It shouldn't happen at all. Only the poorest working should get state aid. £50k/year isn't poor, let alone £99k
____________________
Honda CBF125 ➝ NC700X
Honda CBF125 ↳ Speed Triple
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:08 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

Something to bear in mind is that wombyn get pension sense-of-entitlement credits while claiming baby farmer benefit. So Mrs B has to keep claiming it even though I get it clawed back out of my pocket come tax time.

That's just the tip of the messed up swings-and-roundabouts system that seems designed largely to keep accountants and state employees in a "job".

Lulz, I presented "Bernie Sander's'" flat rate, zero loopholes business tax plans to the office SJW, and he fully endorsed them as fair and just until I revealed that's the Trump plan. His face soured all the milk in the kitchen (not a taxable benefit).
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kawasaki Jimbo
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:38 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sun Wukong wrote:
And the public is outraged.

Is it though? I get the impression that political opponents and journalists love these opportunities to bring powerful people down, whilst the public hardly gives a stuff. The Press likes to think it portrays the mood of the people but I doubt it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chris-red
Have you considered a TDM?



Joined: 21 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:13 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most of the stuff in Panorama I doubt was legal, at the best it is questionable.


The main method seemed to be...

Person does a job.
Gets paid to a company registered abroad with little/no tax.
Company 'Loans' the person money. (Tax Free)
Loan is not paid back.


That can't be legal.
____________________
Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:41 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

chris-red wrote:
That can't be legal.

We still operate a system where things are prohibited rather than permitted.

How long do you think you should have to pay back a loan before the State steps in and jails you?

The question is not rhetorical, because if you can't precisely define illegality, how are you going to prosecute it?
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:09 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

chris-red wrote:
Loan is not paid back. That can't be legal.



Oh that tax scheme? IIRC it was done domestically in the UK. Inland Revenue (before becoming HMRC) said no after not doing anything about it for years so it was deemed evasion and illegal.


I did some tax work for some footballers for a very well known football club and this avoidance scheme was done by pretty much all of the players and many of the staff.

It's pretty much as you describe the players did not take wages they took 'loans'

It went one of three ways.

They took 'loans' the company was then folded to kill the loan.

They took 'loans' as directors. This made their directors loan accounts overdrawn under ITEPA 2003?4 I forget then around a certain date the loan would be paid back in full to create a banking entry and then the loan would be re-issued again.

Inland Revenue clamped down on it.


There was then something where the players clubbed together and bought shares from each other at overinflated prices to create artificial losses.

Inland Revenue then said no.


HMRC can't see into the overseas companies and this is probably how they're getting away with it.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:12 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rogerborg wrote:
State steps in and jails you?


The state doesn't want to jail you. Prison is expensive. They just want their money.

In recent times HMRC seem to have realised that killing companies to get their monies means no more future money. So they'll issue penalties and let you go on our merry way.


If HMRC/Government really wanted to crack down on the law they could get 2-4 million prosecutions tomorrow. If you recall BCF 10 years ago there were loads of people advising others to lie on mortgages and stuff.


Hell trading standards could prosecute every fish and chipshop in the UK over their Vinegar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=642x2Y3Zla0

But they don't as it would require them to leave their offices.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rogerborg
nimbA



Joined: 26 Oct 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:19 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

Itchy wrote:
The state doesn't want to jail you. Prison is expensive. They just want their money.

<you-dont-say.png>

Ultimately it's all extorted with menaces though, so the consideration has to be: how do you draft a law where one one side of a fine line you're fine and the other you're fined and jailed if you tell them to do one?

And they want any money rather than no money. After a fouled-up TUPE transfer this year, I'm currently being under-taxed considerably. When this comes out, probably in early 2019, you can bet that I'll be offering to pay off the footpads at £1 a week, as that's all I can afford, such poor, very distress. Whistle
____________________
Biking is 1/20th as dangerous as horse riding.
GONE: HN125-8, LF-250B, GPz 305, GPZ 500S, Burgman 400 // RIDING: F650GS (800 twin), Royal Enfield Bullet Electra 500 AVL, Ninja 250R because racebike
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Pjay
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Jan 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:31 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm all for legal tax avoidance.
People even married to pay less tax. The Scum.
____________________
struan80 - I'll go first - satisfied tick 1
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

M.C
Super Spammer



Joined: 29 Sep 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:27 - 08 Nov 2017    Post subject: Reply with quote

arry wrote:
M.C wrote:

Entitlement Wink


That's a bit harsh to focus in on, especially given:

JonB wrote:
I don’t think the state owes me anything


There's a difference between being entitled to something and having a sense of entitlement.

The wink indicated I was taking the piss but he's going on about something he doesn't receive and think he should? It's common on here for people (not talking about Jon) to go on about benefit scum, then gloss over the benefits they receive (such as child benefit), and ignore all the costs involved of their parasite I mean lovely child, regardless of if they're a window licker and actually a bad investment.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 6 years, 172 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 2 of 6

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.13 Sec - Server Load: 0.77 - MySQL Queries: 17 - Page Size: 156.34 Kb