Want to believe

[Freddyfruitba...]

[Kawasaki Jimbo]

This is turning into an interesting thread.

[-]

Good stuff!

That makes a bit of sense of it.
____________________
TZR250 2MA road, TZR250 1KT road, TZR250 2MA race, TDR250, YZF-750R Boost colours.
Jaguar S Type 3.0 V6 Sport R, VW Transporter T5 GP LWB Shuttle 140ps DSG.

[Kawasaki Jimbo]

[Polarbear]

[Islander]

[Chinaboy]

[Pjay]

[Hetzer]

So NASA couldn't have sent auto-landing stuff there, to give a bit of backup to the lie?

The camera that films the landing (rough as shit footage, because that made it easier to obfuscate), then the camera outside after the landing, no blast crater, no dust in the foot-pods.

The Hasselblad camera boss who said he had no way to explain how the pics of an astronaut with his back to the sun could have come out so clear unless there were very powerful lights illuminating the front of the astronaut.

On and on. Van Allen radiation belt, not survivable.

The evidence is overwhelming. Did you know, if you speed up the footage of them driving and jumping around on the moon by 100% it looks exactly like they're driving around in earth gravity? They halved the speed of the footage. The crudity of the scam and all the mistakes they made is what's so incredible about 'the moon landings'. Lol. But the old adage, "tell a big enough lie and nobody will question it" was certainly true. It fooled the world for years.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"

[Sister Sledge]

I'd forgotten about the Van Allen belt. Two bands of intense radiation which is so bad that astronauts could barely see because of bright spots of varying size obscuring their vision.
Have you ever seen video footage or stills taken near radioactive sources and there are millions of dots speckling everywhere? Yeah go through that belt and it's that but for humans.
I've read that it's so bad they attempted to shield their heads from it using water inside sheets - just so they could grab some sleep - it happens with eyes open or closed.

I've seen some compelling images which show men on the moon, the dark background etc. By upping the contrast people have been able to show the studio it was shot in. The building has regular flat walls with a domed top.

Yeah yeah get myself a foil hat but like I've said, some could well be real but a lot isn't.
____________________
CCM 404 DS

[RhynoCZ]

All the pictures from the moon have dark background and no stars (except the Sun) only because of exposure of the camera. The moon is very bright and reflective object, you may even see that every single night, when the moon is in an appropriate positions.

If they landed on the dark side of the moon and took pictures of the ''sky'' you'd see all the stars and probably other planets. They would also die, because of the very low temperatures, but that's besides the point.

Also, do not forget the time, when they were there. Most of the wide shot pictures are going to be composites. Just like every single picture of the planet Earth taken from the orbit.
____________________
'87 Honda XBR 500, '96 Kawasaki ZX7R P1, '90 Honda CB-1, '88 Kawasaki GPz550, MZ 150 ETZ
'95 Mercedes-Benz w202 C200 CGI, '98 Mercedes-Benz w210 E200 Kompressor

[MCN]

The Apollo missions marked the first event where humans traveled through the Van Allen belts, which was one of several radiation hazards known by mission planners.[32] The astronauts had low exposure in the Van Allen belts due to the short period of time spent flying through them. Apollo flight trajectories bypassed the inner belts completely, passing through the thinner areas of the outer belts.[25][33]

Astronauts' overall exposure was actually dominated by solar particles once outside Earth's magnetic field. The total radiation received by the astronauts varied from mission to mission but was measured to be between 0.16 and 1.14 rads (1.6 and 11.4 mGy), much less than the standard of 5 rem (50 mSv) per year set by the United States Atomic Energy Commission for people who work with radioactivity.[32]
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.

[Hetzer]

[Kawasaki Jimbo]

[M.C]

[RhynoCZ]

[Islander]

[MCN]

[MCN]

[Hetzer]

[Hetzer]

"1. The missions were tracked by amateurs, scientists and governments worldwide. There were far too many people involved in the various aspects of both the missions and tracking to keep a lid on any fakery. They went there, they returned."

Says who? You read it on the internet? Lol.

They also said ham radio nuts tracked the transmissions as NOT coming from the moon. "Atmospheric disturbances" or some such explanation was given. It was even put into the movie (Capricorn One or whatever). You can read that on the internet too.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"

[Kawasaki Jimbo]

[Pjay]

This is why we cant have nice things.
____________________
struan80 - I'll go first - satisfied tick 1

[weasley]

And yet Hasselblad themselves have a whole section about their cameras in space and on the Moon.

Oh wait, it’s on the internet.
____________________
Yamaha XJ600 | Yamaha YZF600R Thundercat | KTM 990 SMT | BMW F900XR TE

[Sister Sledge]

Did someone mention moon rocks not fake?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html

Took 50 years for people to suss that it was fake. All the radiation etc..

I still say that some was actual moon landings but a lot was footage made on Earth.
____________________
CCM 404 DS