Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


ULEZ Loophole

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Pete.
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:34 - 16 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have the same letter but if I put my bike reg into the ULEZ checker it still says I am subject to the charge. I expect it's just an admin delay but I've been in the ULEZ last week so waiting to see if I get a letter through or not.
____________________
a.k.a 'Geri'

132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Old Sod
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 16 Apr 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:52 - 16 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bhud wrote:

(snipped)
What you wrote above is very interesting. I just got wind of someone putting an old (early 80s) 4-cylinder 4-stroke (air-cooled, carburettored) bike through an approved TfL emissions testing station, and it passed easily, apparently. TfL sent him a letter acknowledging this and removing his bike (but only his and not every model of that bike, mind) from their ULEZ charging system.


Good for him!

I got an email back from Colin Brown, MAG's Director of Campaigns and Political Engagement, giving a link to an Excel spreadsheet for all types of vehicles. There are a few bikes that will breach the 0.15g/km, and oddly enough they are four strokes of less than 150cc and pre-Euro4. Four strokes of 150 - 250 don't fare quite so well, pre-Euro4 coming out above 0.15g/km. 250 - 750 Euro2 and greater are fine, and all the over 750's are clean. BUT, this is a spreadsheet that has been created by a MODELLING program, so there's a good possibility that real life analysing might show better results all round.

And those stinky two strokes - heh heh - less than 0.04g/km!

The link: https://naei.beis.gov.uk/resources/rtp_Copert5_NOxEFs_final.xlsx

With regard to 'Historics', Colin writes to say Roger Bibbings from the VMCC is doing some work on this, and has this quote from TfL:

"The ULEZ vehicle checker (found here: https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/check-your-vehicle-35896) only checks the emissions status of the vehicle, it does not take into account any exemption or discount that may apply to your vehicle.

This means it will reflect the vehicles compliance with ULEZ emissions standards, as demonstrated by either the Euro standard of the vehicle, Certificate of Compliance, or proof of emissions from an accredited test centre.

Vehicles registered with the DVLA with a historic tax class are an exemption and therefore will not be reflected in the emissions database, however if you attempt to pay for a vehicle which is exempt, our system will not accept the payment"


It is suggested that there will be many complaints raised by folk who are fined when their vehicle is actually exempt, and from those who pay the charge because they believe the online checker. We will be doing all we can to ensure that all complaints are formalised through the TfL complaints procedure to highlight the problems.

I would therefore encourage you to use the complaints procedure here: https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/ulez-make-an-enquiry-wizard

You can see their complaints policy here: https://content.tfl.gov.uk/tfl-complaints-handling-procedure.pdf

I'm not actively involved in MAG, just a member, but they need all the support available - i.e. subscriptions!

https://www.mag-uk.org/en/index/a6296 Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Pete.
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:36 - 25 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete. wrote:
I have the same letter but if I put my bike reg into the ULEZ checker it still says I am subject to the charge. I expect it's just an admin delay but I've been in the ULEZ last week so waiting to see if I get a letter through or not.


And guess what I got today? A PCN for using my bike in the ULEZ from the same people who sent me a letter 6 weeks ago saying that I was exempt.

A warning letter though, not a fine. I suspect that TFL's admin is burgeoning under the load and they've struggled with keeping the database up to date so dare not sent out actual fines or the resulting appeals will snow them right under.
____________________
a.k.a 'Geri'

132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:29 - 25 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

That ULEZ, did he not play for Man city?
I know Hee-Haw about footy though.
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Bhud
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Oct 2018
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:22 - 25 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you have a historic bike or are looking for emissions testing info and exemption for your older bike, you're on your own.

Unfortunately, I have to say that the things written here in this forum thread about possible exemptions and such hold no water. If Ronseal does what it says on the tin, MAG is the opposite of Ronseal and are best left out of the loop (as they apparently prefer, from my recent experience with them). In short, I tried to talk with them to get more info about what could be involved in the emissions testing process for a 1990s bike (i.e. is it static or roller, NOx-only or CO), and they had no knowledge of nor interest in the subject. It was just tombolas, beer, hamburgers, Ebay patches and hardly-ridden Harleys. Pretty bizarre really, as their website is as focussed as anything and doesn't mention how uncool they consider this subject as a discussion point.

Will be talking to that testing station in Bow next, and then to TfL. A shame we don't have a riders' rights advocacy group.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

colink98
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 27 Jun 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:17 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pete. wrote:
I'll stick my neck out and say that no pre-2007 carbed bike is going to be ULEZ compliant.


2004 CBF600NA

COC shows Nox to be 0.1090 g/km
scanned copy of coc and v5 sent to TFL.
Bike now exempt from ULEZ.
____________________
PCX125 (stolen) - CBF600 (current)
Ride it like you stole it.
ride sensible and not like an idiot and you wont get 6 points in one week.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:46 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bhud wrote:
If you have a historic bike or are looking for emissions testing info and exemption for your older bike, you're on your own.

Unfortunately, I have to say that the things written here in this forum thread about possible exemptions and such hold no water. If Ronseal does what it says on the tin, MAG is the opposite of Ronseal and are best left out of the loop (as they apparently prefer, from my recent experience with them). In short, I tried to talk with them to get more info about what could be involved in the emissions testing process for a 1990s bike (i.e. is it static or roller, NOx-only or CO), and they had no knowledge of nor interest in the subject. It was just tombolas, beer, hamburgers, Ebay patches and hardly-ridden Harleys. Pretty bizarre really, as their website is as focussed as anything and doesn't mention how uncool they consider this subject as a discussion point.

Will be talking to that testing station in Bow next, and then to TfL. A shame we don't have a riders' rights advocacy group.


These 'club' style organisations aye seem to go the same way.
They do not have any teeth or sway with the politicians. They are offered lip service.
They had zero effect in stopping the fucking wankers DSA from going ahead with their ludicrous scheme of 'off road' testing for the eu 3rd directive.
They, together with some bearded bastirts from the cuntinent made a lot of noise in their respective governments and at Brussels with ZERO change.
The cnuts who change things are government.
We have elections and stuff in democratic states but that is only a show.
Pressure groups don't always work.

I think nuclear disarmament came about because the Ruskies became bankrupt due to their stupid fcuking Cum-unism the protesters were only dreaming.
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Old Sod
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 16 Apr 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:42 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Groups, or no group, there are few ways of influencing government no matter what approach is taken. If 17.4 million people can be ignored, what chance a few bikers or their groups.

Grass roots is the only way - Pete, take copies and snow them under. You appear to have proof of exemption, so use it - again and again and again.

More voices here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9fk5kBvrUQ

One for Sadiq:

https://i.ibb.co/gtn41Rh/000a-fingers-026.jpg
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Tdibs
Traffic Copper



Joined: 16 Jan 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:17 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Out of interest, what is the biggest factor holding back ~90's carb'd bike(s)? Lack of a cat/ais?

Would it be possible to meet the standards running a more restrictive air filter, downjetting? Evening if its running like shit just for the test. I assume you can get hold of the cylindrical honeycomb cat's in some bikes exhausts, then tac weld one into your link pipe?
____________________
Previous : 09 Vanvan 125| 02' Sv650s || Current: 1999 Xj600n | 1992 DR650 RSE | 2005 Fazer 1000
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:00 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Old Sod wrote:
Groups, or no group, there are few ways of influencing government no matter what approach is taken. If 17.4 million people can be ignored, what chance a few bikers or their groups.

Grass roots is the only way - Pete, take copies and snow them under. You appear to have proof of exemption, so use it - again and again and again.

More voices here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g9fk5kBvrUQ

One for Sadiq:

https://i.ibb.co/gtn41Rh/000a-fingers-026.jpg


That's not Sad-dick in that photo.

That's Tony Thatcher. No?
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Bhud
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Oct 2018
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:20 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tdibs wrote:
Out of interest, what is the biggest factor holding back ~90's carb'd bike(s)? Lack of a cat/ais?


Without giving too much away to TfL or anti-bike types who probably read this stuff with a certain glee, it's easy to get 1990s carb'd bikes through an emissions test if, as is suggested, NOx at a max of 0.15g/km is the only thing for which they test. This is because it's swings and roundabout between different types of emissions. More of one and less of the other sort of thing.

The issue is, in some cases manufacturers do not hold any NOx data at all for 1990s bikes - nobody was measuring for NOx back then. This is why a TfL-approved testing station was set up in Bow, East London. The suggestion is, and it doesn't seem to be confirmed at all but just a rumour at this point, that TfL will definitely accept NOx certification from that garage/testing station only. The problems are, among others:

1) Other emissions regions and zones across the country are in the pipeline, and nobody knows whether they will all accept NOx-only accreditation for 1990s bikes.
2) The accredited test is expensive.

With regard to point (2), for a large number of 1990s carb'd bikes, it's important to have clarification about what the test actually involves and which gases it measures. Also, it's important to confirm that TfL and/or other councils will actually accept a certificate from that testing station. If they're testing for more than NOx, it's a waste of time and money to put a 1990s bike through that test. If TfL might not accept the results of the test and grant an exemption, it would likewise be a waste of time and money.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

R1stu
Shrek!



Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:46 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
Pete. wrote:
It'll be a real money-spinner for the place that's authorised. £175 to tell you your carbed bike never stood a chance.


Part of what they do (As I understand it) Is basically to tweak your bike to pass. If they think they can make it pass they will. If they don't think it'll pass they'll tell you.

Apparently a 1998 FireBlade was made to pass somehow... (reported in this months Practical Sportsbike).


90s Honda ST1100 Passed ULEZ Test. (Only Just)

https://i.imgur.com/xsITv8d.jpg
____________________
Carbon closet tart! https://www.bikepics.com/members/r6stuk/02r6/
Stolen bike. 2000 R1: https://www.bikepics.com/members/r6stuk/00r1/
Current bike 1991 Honda ST1100 Pan European, 1986 Honda cb350sg (Finished)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:02 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

R1stu wrote:


Wot do the graphs show mate?

(Im not certain but I think the 1st one is your ECG whilst stood on one peg, battering around marble arch roundabout with a bird (you dont even know) on the back and an Indian carryout in one hand.)

I'm shite at understanding graphs. Crying or Very sad
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

R1stu
Shrek!



Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:13 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

MCN wrote:
R1stu wrote:


Wot do the graphs show mate?

(Im not certain but I think the 1st one is your ECG whilst stood on one peg, battering around marble arch roundabout with a bird (you dont even know) on the back and an Indian carryout in one hand.)

I'm shite at understanding graphs. Crying or Very sad


The middle graph I think. NoX 0.22
____________________
Carbon closet tart! https://www.bikepics.com/members/r6stuk/02r6/
Stolen bike. 2000 R1: https://www.bikepics.com/members/r6stuk/00r1/
Current bike 1991 Honda ST1100 Pan European, 1986 Honda cb350sg (Finished)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:44 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sound. Couldn't see nox on my phone. 👍
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Old Sod
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 16 Apr 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:09 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks like your bike was on the dyno for 3 minutes, and the throttle was blipped regularly with a few maintained spots at around 50mph (80kph).

As the test for NOx is supposed to be done at 20mph (30kph) the recorded NOx at three points at that speed seems to be well below 0.15g/km. The peaks all seem to be when the throttle is being opened, or closed (most of the time). But only you can say if you were there at the time of testing.

Overall, and despite one peak reaching 0.235 ish, the vast majority appear below 0.15 even at theoretical speeds of up to 50mph (80kph), and the bike travelling a theoretical 3kms.

Sound about right? Or am I mis-reading it?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Bhud
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Oct 2018
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:36 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bearing in mind the info here:
https://www.motorcyclenews.com/news/2019/march/ulez-test/
https://www.nationalemissionstestcentre.com/

it seems to be crystal clear now that they're only checking for NOx.

But the graphs for that example seem a bit unclear. The top graph has rpm on the y-axis, but the units are in increments of 20 up to 140, which is a bit confusing. If these numbers are in hundreds, then it suggests that the bike was blipped to 14krpm at one moment in the 3-minute test. I can't see any reason why they should do that, so they probably didn't.

Did they hold it open or just keep blipping it for 3 minutes?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

R1stu
Shrek!



Joined: 12 Mar 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:43 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's not my personal pan, but one of the club members. I do not believe he stayed for the test.
____________________
Carbon closet tart! https://www.bikepics.com/members/r6stuk/02r6/
Stolen bike. 2000 R1: https://www.bikepics.com/members/r6stuk/00r1/
Current bike 1991 Honda ST1100 Pan European, 1986 Honda cb350sg (Finished)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Pete.
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:20 - 26 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

ColinK98 wrote:
Pete. wrote:
I'll stick my neck out and say that no pre-2007 carbed bike is going to be ULEZ compliant.


2004 CBF600NA

COC shows Nox to be 0.1090 g/km
scanned copy of coc and v5 sent to TFL.
Bike now exempt from ULEZ.


Aye, it seems that whatever strange reasoning they have applied for the criteria means that a great many bikes will pass. Go figure..
____________________
a.k.a 'Geri'

132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Old Sod
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 16 Apr 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:57 - 27 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bhud wrote:

(snipped)
But the graphs for that example seem a bit unclear. The top graph has rpm on the y-axis, but the units are in increments of 20 up to 140, which is a bit confusing. If these numbers are in hundreds, then it suggests that the bike was blipped to 14krpm at one moment in the 3-minute test. I can't see any reason why they should do that, so they probably didn't.

Did they hold it open or just keep blipping it for 3 minutes?


It's not crystal clear, a scanned in copy from a flatbed scanner would be clearer, but to me it looks like the top table is reading Speed (kph) rather than rpm.
The middle says User Analog 1, and the bottom Distance (m), which I take to be metres.

Certainly they have measured NOx in the middle table.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:11 - 27 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Old Sod wrote:
Bhud wrote:

(snipped)
But the graphs for that example seem a bit unclear. The top graph has rpm on the y-axis, but the units are in increments of 20 up to 140, which is a bit confusing. If these numbers are in hundreds, then it suggests that the bike was blipped to 14krpm at one moment in the 3-minute test. I can't see any reason why they should do that, so they probably didn't.

Did they hold it open or just keep blipping it for 3 minutes?


It's not crystal clear, a scanned in copy from a flatbed scanner would be clearer, but to me it looks like the top table is reading Speed (kph) rather than rpm.
The middle says User Analog 1, and the bottom Distance (m), which I take to be metres.

Certainly they have measured NOx in the middle table.


They obviously used the same criteria as DSA.
The dictate cums from European Parliament so it all in SI units. The pricks. 🤣
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Old Sod
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 16 Apr 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:18 - 28 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Came a cross this today through an email :

https://www.londonreconnections.com/2019/ulez-why-the-slightly-lower-emission-zone-matters/

Be warned, it comes with a TfL sponsorship, and judging by the quality or lack thereof in the 'comments', make sure your heart pills are to hand . . . .

Ignorance can be cured. Stupidity cannot. I think I would live longer - not through breathing Londons air (not that I do now, though far cleaner than when I grew up there), but refraining from reading crap on the internet.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Bhud
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Oct 2018
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:25 - 28 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Old Sod wrote:
Came a cross this today through an email :

https://www.londonreconnections.com/2019/ulez-why-the-slightly-lower-emission-zone-matters/

Be warned, it comes with a TfL sponsorship,


Manufacture consent by paying a media/IT content creator firm, and if all else fails drag out the rent-a-mob lot, Eradication Rebellion or even schoolchildren. Yes, it seems to be their usual tactic. They play dirty.

One of the problems with ULEZ exemptions for motorcycles is that, given what they're trying to say through paid-for websites like that one, TfL do seem to be frothing at the mouth for a shifting-the-goalposts move after so-called "ULEZ Phase 2". Phase 1 is in effect, and it's currently possible with a lot of effort and some expense to work around it. Phase 2 will likely be the same, but in my assessment nothing will satisfy them until private vehicles are eradicated and there is no longer any competition for rail and bus travel (hence, they say "electric vehicles aren't the solution").

I reckon this means they will say, in the run-up to 2021, that Euro 3 for bikes isn't good enough and the goalposts need to move to Euro 4.

There's big money behind all this. Heathrow expansion is never mentioned as a cause for pollution or even the destruction of whole villages - Heathrow airport is owned by Chinese big money, London is owned by Russian, Chinese and Arab investment and holding companies. There seems to be only judicial review left.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Old Sod
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 16 Apr 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:17 - 28 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agree with that Bhud, and no prizes for guessing who owns the judiciary!

What makes my piss boil is the namby pamby way almost all the commentors think their air is sacrosanct to the point of happily coughing up loadsamoney so they can carry on driving/riding, and that's OK. Or forking out masses of dosh for bus and train tickets for transport types that don't go where or when you want to - and still create Particle Matter.

I grew up in North London in the fifties, and if you could see 200yds down the road it was a clear day - and we had Trolleybuses - and I used to cycle to work in Regents Park five mile away - no cycle lanes, no bus lanes, but still plenty of traffic that respected each others presence.

They screw us over because they Can. Period. And sweet FA can be done.

I need to go for a ride . . . .
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:15 - 29 Apr 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bohys and Girls and non-specific genders.
Politicians do not like motorbikes.
Ever since the working man became motorised in the sixties the governments have had a dripping hard-on for preventing motorbikes.
Do not forget, motorbikes are dangerous. 🤣
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 4 years, 356 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 2 of 5

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.10 Sec - Server Load: 0.3 - MySQL Queries: 17 - Page Size: 149.43 Kb