Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Big Brother

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

duhawkz
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:39 - 20 Nov 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

No you've shown me an article where a fault was causing the device to activate as if someone has pushed the button.

The recordings were present in the guys google account plain as day.

Thats not even remotely similar to being caught covertly recording everything we say.
____________________
"The guy is a worthless cunt and I honestly believe I would be a slightly happier person if he died." - Chris-Red
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
- This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.

Im-a-Ridah
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:36 - 20 Nov 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

mpd72 wrote:
But I thought it was impossible for it to record and send back to Google without your permission?!

Clearly not...


They are reported to record accidentally quite a lot. So you could end up with huge amounts of your conversations stored by accident.

duhawkz wrote:
mpd72 wrote:

I wouldn't put it past them to be able to broadcast stuff back that people with your proxy idea won't be able to detect, such as end to end encrypted transmissions.


Even with E2E encryption, you still be able to see the packets on the wire. And while you wouldn't be able to read the contents you'd still be able to see the source, destination and the size of the packets, with that you'd be able to work out whether it was recording/transmitting everything or just specific events.


While I do agree with your general point there are ways around that. E.g you encrypt the data with AES client side, encrypt the AES key with a public key client side, then send all of that via Cloudflare. You can't read the data and you can't practically recover the key and it could be going to anywhere because its just disappearing into a CDN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Easy-X
Super Spammer



Joined: 08 Mar 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:35 - 21 Nov 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

I analyse network traffic all the time. Wireshark and Fiddler may be worth a look although they're not the most user friendly programs if you don't have a background in networking.

As far as how much Amazon and Google are listening to what you're saying... yes, all the time, so they can sell you shit. But recording everything and forwarding it all onto GCHQ? I doubt it. However, it wouldn't surprise me if someone on a government watch list had their devices "hacked" to do so but that's on a case-by-case basis.

No, you can't listen in on all the conversations in the country and then arrest everyone as basically everyone would be in jail and there'd be no one left to listen to anything.
____________________
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401, Yamaha XSR700, Honda Rebel, Yamaha DT175, Suzuki SV650 (loan) Fazer 600, Keeway Superlight 125, 50cc turd scooter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Im-a-Ridah
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 03:16 - 21 Nov 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Easy-X wrote:
I analyse network traffic all the time. Wireshark and Fiddler may be worth a look although they're not the most user friendly programs if you don't have a background in networking.

As far as how much Amazon and Google are listening to what you're saying... yes, all the time, so they can sell you shit. But recording everything and forwarding it all onto GCHQ? I doubt it. However, it wouldn't surprise me if someone on a government watch list had their devices "hacked" to do so but that's on a case-by-case basis.

No, you can't listen in on all the conversations in the country and then arrest everyone as basically everyone would be in jail and there'd be no one left to listen to anything.


Need a warrant for that.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

duhawkz
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:26 - 21 Nov 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

Im-a-Ridah wrote:

While I do agree with your general point there are ways around that. E.g you encrypt the data with AES client side, encrypt the AES key with a public key client side, then send all of that via Cloudflare. You can't read the data and you can't practically recover the key and it could be going to anywhere because its just disappearing into a CDN.


For the purposes of proving its sending more then it should be, it wouldn't really matter where it was sending the data, all you need do is demonstrate that the amount of data increases when you're talking in its general vicinity.

Someone has done it here - https://www.iot-tests.org/2017/06/careless-whisper-does-amazon-echo-send-data-in-silent-mode/
____________________
"The guy is a worthless cunt and I honestly believe I would be a slightly happier person if he died." - Chris-Red
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
- This post is not being displayed because the poster has bad karma. Unhide this post / all posts.

Im-a-Ridah
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:16 - 21 Nov 2019    Post subject: Reply with quote

duhawkz wrote:
Im-a-Ridah wrote:

While I do agree with your general point there are ways around that. E.g you encrypt the data with AES client side, encrypt the AES key with a public key client side, then send all of that via Cloudflare. You can't read the data and you can't practically recover the key and it could be going to anywhere because its just disappearing into a CDN.


For the purposes of proving its sending more then it should be, it wouldn't really matter where it was sending the data, all you need do is demonstrate that the amount of data increases when you're talking in its general vicinity.

Someone has done it here - https://www.iot-tests.org/2017/06/careless-whisper-does-amazon-echo-send-data-in-silent-mode/


It wouldn't have to work like that. It could either send data constantly, or collect it up and send it at random. Surveillence data wouldn't have to be sent as it is collected, more efficient to process it further and compress it down.

I say would be that is probably how they do it for real. It's not done on mass but we do know that the NSA and GCHQ engage in equipment interference on phones to do this kind of thing. You would like some proof though, of course Wink

Equipment Interference Code of Practice
Pursuant to Section 71 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000

1.6. This code applies to (i) any interference5 (whether remotely or otherwise) by the Intelligence Services, or persons acting on their behalf or in their support, with equipment6 producing electromagnetic, acoustic and other emissions, and (ii) information derived from any such interference, which is to be authorised under section 5 of the 1994 Act, in order to do any or all of the following: (a) obtain information from the equipment in pursuit of intelligence requirements; (b) obtain information concerning the ownership, nature and use of the equipment in pursuit of intelligence requirements; (c) locate and examine, remove, modify or substitute equipment hardware or software which is capable of yielding information of the type described in a) and b); (d) enable and facilitate surveillance activity by means of the equipment. “Information” may include communications content, and communications data as defined in section 21 of the 2000 Act.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/496069/53693_CoP_Equipment_Interference_Accessible.pdf
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 4 years, 147 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.07 Sec - Server Load: 0.22 - MySQL Queries: 17 - Page Size: 66.32 Kb