Would you like some Magic Beans?

[Kawasaki Jimbo]

[Freddyfruitba...]

[Ste]

[Rebel]

[Nobby the Bastard]

Do we have to get into the difference between ionising and non-ionising radiation again?


Every electrical device creates an electromagnet field.
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Sprint ST 1050

[Rebel]

“A growing body of scientific literature documents evidence of nonthermal cellular damage from non-ionising wireless radiation used in telecommunications. This RF EMR has been shown to cause an array of adverse effects on DNA integrity, cellular membranes, gene expression, protein synthesis, neuronal function, the blood-brain barrier, melatonin production, sperm damage, and immune dysfunction”.
Dr. C. Russell 5 G wireless : Public health implications

And so it goes on..
https://www.saferemr.com/2017/09/5g-wireless-technology-is-5g-harmful-to.html

mountains of evidence that this insufficiently tested technology using non ionising radiation is harmful.

[Nobby the Bastard]

Are you on the Glastonbury town council? That's full of gitters who are scared of 5g non ionizing radiation but happily have an electric cooker in their hovels.
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Sprint ST 1050

[Easy-X]

[Rebel]

We are discussing specifically the untried 5G technology which by all indications is not intended to eradicate world famine but to facilitate our transhumanised transition into the new driverless, smart fridge, point cloud surveillance zones.

[Kawasaki Jimbo]

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/science/5g-cellphones-wireless-cancer.html

[Rebel]

Great, two scientists, here's two hundred and fifty who think different, (despite the NY times claim they represent the entire medical scientific establishment).

https://www.5gappeal.eu/signatories-to-scientists-5g-appeal/

and another one hundred and thirty three papers and presentations that also disagree

https://www.saferemr.com/2017/09/5g-wireless-technology-is-5g-harmful-to.html

Check it out, an immense archive of publications and presentations on non-ionizing electromagnetic fields.

bit.ly/EmfPortal5G

You won't find a peer-reviewed, empirical study of the biologic or health effects from exposure to 5G radiation though, because none have been published. Hence, those who claim that 5G is safe because it complies with radiofrequency exposure guidelines are peddling falsehood.

But as I stated at the beginning of this thread my patience for intransigence is limited. You do you lads, get two and make a set of headphones.

[kolu]

[Kawasaki Jimbo]

[bhinso]

So literally on the same day that "-" disappears, milfhunter and the like reappear peddling this sh1te.

Is this a coincidence

[Easy-X]

I'm still wondering what we're meant to do with this information? Go and burn down some cell towers? Write to your MP?
____________________
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401, Yamaha XSR700, Honda Rebel, Yamaha DT175, Suzuki SV650 (loan) Fazer 600, Keeway Superlight 125, 50cc turd scooter

[bhinso]

I think we should have a Black Lives matter protest

[Easy-X]