UK jobs, fuel shortgages etc. Brexit dividents?

[A100man]

We're actually still doing rather well comparative to say The Netherlands a coountry of 1/4 our size (approx) but half the net migration (400,000 last year to NL I believe).

Hence the popularity of Mr Wilders.

The left also want lower immigration to boost wages for the lower skilled jobs - that's what I heard anyway. Only Guardian readers want to promote unlimited immigration as it suits both their narrative and their living standards.
____________________
Now: A100, GT250A, XJ598, FZ750

Then: Fizz, RS200, KL250, XJ550, Laverda Alpina, XJ600, FZS600

[Nobby the Bastard]

Capitalists generally want immigration to reduce wages by increasing the pool of potential employees.
Conservatives don't because basically, well, racist.

Conversely....

Socialists generally don't want immigration because it reduces wages etc.
Liberals do because basically, well, liberals.



Me? I see food rotting in fields and a care system collapsing because we can't get anyone to do the work for the wages available.
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Sprint ST 1050

[A100man]

[M.C]

[Nobby the Bastard]

Has anyone taken socialist worker seriously for the last 30 years?
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Sprint ST 1050

[stinkwheel]

[Val]

Another bright Brexit news:

[MCN]

[Val]

[Val]

Another Brexit benefits kicked off

[Kawasaki Jimbo]

Controlling our borders, you say? Good Lord, where will it all end?

You say now you’re fine with a true federation and an EU army but Remainers were denying those things would ever happen.

You’re sleepwalking into an awful situation and it’s unlikely the UK/US alliance can save you all this time, though the threat to us still remains. We’re a shadow of what we once were, possibly thanks to allying ourselves so firmly with the European plan. When can we expect your army of occupation?

[Easy-X]

[Ste]

[Val]

[Val]

____________________
Adrian Monk: Unless I'm wrong, which, you know, I'm not...
Yamaha Fazer FZS 600, MT09, XSR 900

[doggone]

It would be handy to stamp out those pesky protests too if the soldiers weren't being set on their own people.

[Val]

[Val]

[Nobby the Bastard]

It would likely be made up of elements of each countries armed forces under a central command structure much like NATO or our own Joint Foces where elements of our Air force, Navy and Army are commanded from a single command rather than via their respective service.

I can't see the EU ever doing joint procurement like that, it would be command only.
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Sprint ST 1050

[Ste]

[Easy-X]

[MCN]

[stinkwheel]

If an EU army is based on the German model -which let's face it, it will be- it will have no remit for executive action. The deployment of such a force will be at the behest of, under discussion by and under the control of the parliament.

As such, in any situation where such an army would be useful, it would be tied up in interdepartmental bickering and micro-managing to such an extent that any threat would have either gone or become unmanageable by the time it gets the go-ahead to act. Even when it does, it's remit would be restrictive and inflexible.

Worst of all situations when it comes to military action.

But then there's what happens if you DO have a remit for executive action. Will member states be comfortable with their troops being deployed on the say-so of whomever is given that remit?
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.”
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.

[Val]

[Val]