Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Rule of Two - Rise of the Twins

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Easy-X
Super Spammer



Joined: 08 Mar 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:02 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Rule of Two - Rise of the Twins Reply with quote

So I got this through the mail:

https://www.honda.co.uk/motorcycles/range/touring/nt1100/overview.html

The fully automated Dad bike that is the Honda NT1100 Neutral 1,084cc parallel twin?! Seems like everything's going this way.
____________________
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401, Yamaha XSR700, Honda Rebel, Yamaha DT175, Suzuki SV650 (loan) Fazer 600, Keeway Superlight 125, 50cc turd scooter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

trevor saxe-coburg-gotha
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:49 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Re: Rule of Two - Rise of the Twins Reply with quote

Easy-X wrote:
So I got this through the mail:

https://www.honda.co.uk/motorcycles/range/touring/nt1100/overview.html

The fully automated Dad bike that is the Honda NT1100 Neutral 1,084cc parallel twin?! Seems like everything's going this way.


You mean manufacturers maximising the number of chassis / styles of machine they put the same engine in? I.e. in this case the africa twin? Or DCT tech? Or the use of parallel twin engines?

If the first, this has of course been going on for ages. If mean DCT tech, well, that's just because this is the CRF1100 engine. If you mean more twins everywhere, I don't know about that. I suppose though it is true that with adventure bikes being so popular, the il4 config seems to have been relegated.
____________________
"Life is a sexually transmitted disease and the mortality rate is one hundred percent."

Mobylette Type 50 ---> Raleigh Grifter ---> Neval Minsk 125
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

xX-Alex-Xx
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Sep 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:52 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yamaha has ruined the name of the R7 by putting a parallel twin in the new version. The original version is still to this day one of the best looking bikes ever, but making a new version and sticking a low powered parallel twin in it? Sick
____________________
DILLIGAF
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ThunderGuts
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Nov 2018
Karma :

PostPosted: 07:01 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

This new NT1100 is supposedly filling the boots of the sadly departed VFRX series. I don't think so - I won't be getting ridding of my Crossrunner for one of these. Of course, riding it I might form a different view, but I can't see how ever a parallel twin could be as engaging and charismatic as the V4.
____________________
TG.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:43 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've never been keen on parallel twins except in the guise of the old 2 smokes.

I have to say modern ones leave me totally cold.
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

A100man
World Chat Champion



Joined: 19 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:23 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

xX-Alex-Xx wrote:
Yamaha has ruined the name of the R7 by putting a parallel twin in the new version. The original version is still to this day one of the best looking bikes ever, but making a new version and sticking a low powered parallel twin in it? Sick


Huh the OW02 race bke? according to wiki they only made 500 so does that count??
____________________
Now: A100, GT250A, XJ598, FZ750

Then: Fizz, RS200, KL250, XJ550, Laverda Alpina, XJ600, FZS600
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

xX-Alex-Xx
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Sep 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:30 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

A100man wrote:
xX-Alex-Xx wrote:
Yamaha has ruined the name of the R7 by putting a parallel twin in the new version. The original version is still to this day one of the best looking bikes ever, but making a new version and sticking a low powered parallel twin in it? Sick


Huh the OW02 race bke? according to wiki they only made 500 so does that count??


Puts it in even more of the same league, right? I wonder what Nori Haga would do with the new 70hp model Laughing

I wonder where I can find 60 grand ...

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/255087862934?hash=item3b646be496:g:~MMAAOSwvHJgCFNF
____________________
DILLIGAF
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

rpsmith79
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Jan 2017
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:55 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

xX-Alex-Xx wrote:
Yamaha has ruined the name of the R7 by putting a parallel twin in the new version. The original version is still to this day one of the best looking bikes ever, but making a new version and sticking a low powered parallel twin in it? Sick


It's not just Yamaha though is it

Ford are doing a stirling job of ruining their car history, what with the new Puma being a bloated SUV Cross heap of shite, not the original small sporty warm/hot hatch

And then the Mustang Mach-e abonination, lets not even go there

I do see the point of the Yam R7 so, even if it shares zero DNA with it predecessor, in a similar way to the Aprilia RS/Tuono 660,

Supersports of old are dead, no one was buying them, yet everyone seems to morn their passing, hopefully these will be either a stepping stone to a litre superbike, or a happy medium for a proper road-biased fun bike
____________________
Current Bike: Honda CG125 ES4 // Honda CB600FS Hornet // Triumph Street Triple R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:47 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

Polarbear wrote:
I've never been keen on parallel twins except in the guise of the old 2 smokes.

I have to say modern ones leave me totally cold.


Same here, but Honda seem to me to be generally good at taking the fun out of bikes, whatever configuration they are, with a few notable exceptions. And before the advent of 'proper' race reps, I actually can't recall; did they do a stroker to compete with RDs, the X7 or even KHs through the 70s and early 80s? Has my memory just gone blank on that (quite possible Rolling Eyes )?
____________________
Chickenystripgeezer's Biking Life (Latest update 19/10/18) Belgium, France, Italy, Austria tour 2016 Picos de Europa, Pyrenees and French Alps tour 2017 Scotland Trip 1, now with BONUS FEATURE edit, 5/10/19, on page 2 Scotland Trip 2 Luxembourg, Black Forest, Switzerland, Vosges Trip 2017
THERE'S MILLIONS OF CHICKENSTRIPS OUT THERE!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:52 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

rpsmith79 wrote:

It's not just Yamaha though is it

Ford are doing a stirling job of ruining their car history, what with the new Puma being a bloated SUV Cross heap of shite, not the original small sporty warm/hot hatch

And then the Mustang Mach-e abonination, lets not even go there

I do see the point of the Yam R7 so, even if it shares zero DNA with it predecessor, in a similar way to the Aprilia RS/Tuono 660,

Supersports of old are dead, no one was buying them, yet everyone seems to morn their passing, hopefully these will be either a stepping stone to a litre superbike, or a happy medium for a proper road-biased fun bike


At first I was going to dismiss your post as irrelevant to my answer, but then it got me thinking. The REAL reason why there has been a switch in engine configuration with bikes is a change in focus, and that change in focus has happened in a very similar way with cars. What is that change in focus you may ask? Well, it's very simple.

20 years ago, the biggest selling flagship bikes from any manufacturer were fully faired sportsbikes. You can argue whether they were sports tourers or supersports bikes or hyperbikes or whatever, but the focus was on a bike with speed and handling, with clip on handlebars and a relatively low weight, good chassis, strong brakes etc. The obvious engine to make these bikes work well is a multi, usually a four cylinder. Once you've set your focus on this type of bike, all the secondary supporting bikes in your range are based on the flagship engine which costs a fortune to develop. Take Yamaha for example, they made the R6, so their less focussed budget middleweight the FZ6 was a four cylinder based on an R6 engine. People complained of this because of the peakiness and revviness of the engine when supersports bikes became more focussed.

Fast forward 20 odd years, and now the flagship bike, the one everyone wants to own, the one the manufacturers put their focus on is no longer a sportsbike. It's an adventure bike. We can see a similar trend in the car world with the SUV with the crossover, with the soft roader. Fashion has changed, and now people want to fantasize that they live in Uzbekistan in a yurt and they somehow need enormous wheel articulation, high driving position and four wheel drive to live. This is clearly not the case, but it is nevetheless the fashion.

The trend with motorcycling does make a touch more sense as an upright bike with good visibilty and a squishy seat makes infinitely more sense for the road than a flat seated bike with clip ons whose bar postion is level with your backside. I still think that they are pointless, and a good sports tourer would do the job better, but that's a bit of a digression.

The reason why all new bikes seem to have 'dull' engine configurations now, is that all the R&D money goes into 'adventure' engines and not engines suitable for winning WSB races. They need to get their development money back by putting those engines into as many bikes as possible. I'm sure there is also an emissions angle too, with perhaps longer stroke twins being easier to pass Euro 5 than an oversquare four. Even so, I still think the answer is to do with what bikes the manufacturers are currently focussing on, and what development effort they've put in to those engines. Sportsbikes don't sell, and sports tourers aren't that popular. If you want to make one and have it make a profit, make one with an existing engine, or an engine you can put into a bike that WILL sell (in the case of the RS660). This new Africa Twin engined sports tourer is just a logical extension of that.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:52 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

rpsmith79 wrote:


And then the Mustang Mach-e abonination, lets not even go there


There's a bright orange late model Mustang that drives around here, and from a looks and sound point of view, I have to say, I'm quite smitten with it. What's the problem with them? (sorry, I went there! Laughing ).

Quote:
Supersports of old are dead, no one was buying them, yet everyone seems to morn their passing, hopefully these will be either a stepping stone to a litre superbike, or a happy medium for a proper road-biased fun bike


I think they just got too good, too sharp and powerful for most riders (which would include me, even if my injuries didn't stop me from taking advantage of them anyway). I loved it when they were all developing in the 80s and 90s. Each new one blew you away with what they could do, and mostly, they were still everyday usable.
____________________
Chickenystripgeezer's Biking Life (Latest update 19/10/18) Belgium, France, Italy, Austria tour 2016 Picos de Europa, Pyrenees and French Alps tour 2017 Scotland Trip 1, now with BONUS FEATURE edit, 5/10/19, on page 2 Scotland Trip 2 Luxembourg, Black Forest, Switzerland, Vosges Trip 2017
THERE'S MILLIONS OF CHICKENSTRIPS OUT THERE!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:55 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

chickenstrip wrote:
Same here, but Honda seem to me to be generally good at taking the fun out of bikes, whatever configuration they are, with a few notable exceptions. And before the advent of 'proper' race reps, I actually can't recall; did they do a stroker to compete with RDs, the X7 or even KHs through the 70s and early 80s? Has my memory just gone blank on that (quite possible Rolling Eyes )?


Sochiro Honda HATED two strokes. The MX engineers got a two stroke MX engine past him by saying it was a ditchpump engine...
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:57 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
chickenstrip wrote:
Same here, but Honda seem to me to be generally good at taking the fun out of bikes, whatever configuration they are, with a few notable exceptions. And before the advent of 'proper' race reps, I actually can't recall; did they do a stroker to compete with RDs, the X7 or even KHs through the 70s and early 80s? Has my memory just gone blank on that (quite possible Rolling Eyes )?


Sochiro Honda HATED two strokes. The MX engineers got a two stroke MX engine past him by saying it was a ditchpump engine...


So I'm right that they never competed on that front in the heyday of the smokey 250s? Funny how I never really gave it a thought before.
____________________
Chickenystripgeezer's Biking Life (Latest update 19/10/18) Belgium, France, Italy, Austria tour 2016 Picos de Europa, Pyrenees and French Alps tour 2017 Scotland Trip 1, now with BONUS FEATURE edit, 5/10/19, on page 2 Scotland Trip 2 Luxembourg, Black Forest, Switzerland, Vosges Trip 2017
THERE'S MILLIONS OF CHICKENSTRIPS OUT THERE!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

rpsmith79
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Jan 2017
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:21 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

chickenstrip wrote:
rpsmith79 wrote:


And then the Mustang Mach-e abonination, lets not even go there


There's a bright orange late model Mustang that drives around here, and from a looks and sound point of view, I have to say, I'm quite smitten with it. What's the problem with them? (sorry, I went there! Laughing ).


Not the regular Mustang, i'm talking about the Mustang Mach-e

The all electric, SUV, 4 door, high riding abonination

https://www.bikechatforums.com/download.php?id=105137
____________________
Current Bike: Honda CG125 ES4 // Honda CB600FS Hornet // Triumph Street Triple R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:24 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hmm, just looks like any other car. Alright as far as everyday cars go, but doesn't look like anything to write home about. Doesn't look like it should be wearing a Mustang badge, that's for sure. A Honda badge maybe Laughing
____________________
Chickenystripgeezer's Biking Life (Latest update 19/10/18) Belgium, France, Italy, Austria tour 2016 Picos de Europa, Pyrenees and French Alps tour 2017 Scotland Trip 1, now with BONUS FEATURE edit, 5/10/19, on page 2 Scotland Trip 2 Luxembourg, Black Forest, Switzerland, Vosges Trip 2017
THERE'S MILLIONS OF CHICKENSTRIPS OUT THERE!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

rpsmith79
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Jan 2017
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:36 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

chickenstrip wrote:
Hmm, just looks like any other car. Alright as far as everyday cars go, but doesn't look like anything to write home about. Doesn't look like it should be wearing a Mustang badge, that's for sure. A Honda badge maybe Laughing


Yep, it seems every automotive manufacturer is dredging the archives for historical models they can reintroduce/reinvent in the hope of making the next Mini/Fiat 500

Haven't Vauxhall recently reintroduced the Viva or something
____________________
Current Bike: Honda CG125 ES4 // Honda CB600FS Hornet // Triumph Street Triple R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:45 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

rpsmith79 wrote:


Haven't Vauxhall recently reintroduced the Viva or something


Dunno, I don't really 'do' cars.
____________________
Chickenystripgeezer's Biking Life (Latest update 19/10/18) Belgium, France, Italy, Austria tour 2016 Picos de Europa, Pyrenees and French Alps tour 2017 Scotland Trip 1, now with BONUS FEATURE edit, 5/10/19, on page 2 Scotland Trip 2 Luxembourg, Black Forest, Switzerland, Vosges Trip 2017
THERE'S MILLIONS OF CHICKENSTRIPS OUT THERE!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

trevor saxe-coburg-gotha
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 Nov 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:13 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
At first I was going to dismiss your post as irrelevant to my answer, but then it got me thinking. The REAL reason why there has been a switch in engine configuration with bikes is a change in focus, and that change in focus has happened in a very similar way with cars. What is that change in focus you may ask? Well, it's very simple.

20 years ago, the biggest selling flagship bikes from any manufacturer were fully faired sportsbikes. You can argue whether they were sports tourers or supersports bikes or hyperbikes or whatever, but the focus was on a bike with speed and handling, with clip on handlebars and a relatively low weight, good chassis, strong brakes etc. The obvious engine to make these bikes work well is a multi, usually a four cylinder. Once you've set your focus on this type of bike, all the secondary supporting bikes in your range are based on the flagship engine which costs a fortune to develop. Take Yamaha for example, they made the R6, so their less focussed budget middleweight the FZ6 was a four cylinder based on an R6 engine. People complained of this because of the peakiness and revviness of the engine when supersports bikes became more focussed.

Fast forward 20 odd years, and now the flagship bike, the one everyone wants to own, the one the manufacturers put their focus on is no longer a sportsbike. It's an adventure bike. We can see a similar trend in the car world with the SUV with the crossover, with the soft roader. Fashion has changed, and now people want to fantasize that they live in Uzbekistan in a yurt and they somehow need enormous wheel articulation, high driving position and four wheel drive to live. This is clearly not the case, but it is nevetheless the fashion.

The trend with motorcycling does make a touch more sense as an upright bike with good visibilty and a squishy seat makes infinitely more sense for the road than a flat seated bike with clip ons whose bar postion is level with your backside. I still think that they are pointless, and a good sports tourer would do the job better, but that's a bit of a digression.

The reason why all new bikes seem to have 'dull' engine configurations now, is that all the R&D money goes into 'adventure' engines and not engines suitable for winning WSB races. They need to get their development money back by putting those engines into as many bikes as possible. I'm sure there is also an emissions angle too, with perhaps longer stroke twins being easier to pass Euro 5 than an oversquare four. Even so, I still think the answer is to do with what bikes the manufacturers are currently focussing on, and what development effort they've put in to those engines. Sportsbikes don't sell, and sports tourers aren't that popular. If you want to make one and have it make a profit, make one with an existing engine, or an engine you can put into a bike that WILL sell (in the case of the RS660). This new Africa Twin engined sports tourer is just a logical extension of that.


I feel like I said that in one sentence.
____________________
"Life is a sexually transmitted disease and the mortality rate is one hundred percent."

Mobylette Type 50 ---> Raleigh Grifter ---> Neval Minsk 125
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:19 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

So on paper, pretty much a VFR750 from 30 years ago with slightly better fuel consumption.

Paralell twins CAN be entertaining. The old GPZ500s had a whole lot of character and the dying gasps of MZ had a litre twin that packed a punch.

TRX800 behaved more like a v-twin with its 270 degree firing order, Enfields new twins do a similar thing and sound fantastic. I notice this also has 270 degree crank. Oversquare engine too.

I wouldn't totally write it off, it might be more entertaining that you'd think. A few more ponies wouldn't go amiss, 100bhp out of an 1100cc sports tourer seems a tad on the anaemic side.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

redeem ouzzer
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Oct 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:27 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

chickenstrip wrote:


Same here, but Honda seem to me to be generally good at taking the fun out of bikes, whatever configuration they are, with a few notable exceptions. And before the advent of 'proper' race reps, I actually can't recall; did they do a stroker to compete with RDs, the X7 or even KHs through the 70s and early 80s? Has my memory just gone blank on that (quite possible Rolling Eyes )?


I can't think of a single Honda 2T road bike from the 70's other than maybe the odd shopping moped.

I'd like to think things changed when they entered GP's in 1979 with the NR500 and threw millions of dollars R&D at being clever only to win absolutely fuck all in two seasons against 2T opposition.

They moved to a 500 2T afterwards and had instant success which also heralded a range of 2T roadbikes in the early 80's. They did make the NSR250 which is the best of it's type, not bad for a company that a few years earlier wouldn't touch a stroker.
____________________
Be a REAL MAN!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

xX-Alex-Xx
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Sep 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:41 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

rpsmith79 wrote:
xX-Alex-Xx wrote:
Yamaha has ruined the name of the R7 by putting a parallel twin in the new version. The original version is still to this day one of the best looking bikes ever, but making a new version and sticking a low powered parallel twin in it? Sick


It's not just Yamaha though is it

Ford are doing a stirling job of ruining their car history, what with the new Puma being a bloated SUV Cross heap of shite, not the original small sporty warm/hot hatch


Nah, lots do it. Doesn't make it right.

I had one of the "original" Pumas - absolutely loved it until it cost more to put through the MOT every year than the car was worth so got rid of it. Damn near impossible to stop the rear arches rusting too..... When they anncounced a new version was coming I was genuinely interested until ... well you've seen it. Nothing like the original.
____________________
DILLIGAF
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:14 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

redeem ouzzer wrote:


...a range of 2T roadbikes in the early 80's. They did make the NSR250 which is the best of it's type, not bad for a company that a few years earlier wouldn't touch a stroker.


That's what I meant by the advent of 'proper' race reps, and I did acknowledge there were a few notable exceptions to their lack of fun-factor bikes. Was more talking about how I perceive them when I hear the Honda name generally.
____________________
Chickenystripgeezer's Biking Life (Latest update 19/10/18) Belgium, France, Italy, Austria tour 2016 Picos de Europa, Pyrenees and French Alps tour 2017 Scotland Trip 1, now with BONUS FEATURE edit, 5/10/19, on page 2 Scotland Trip 2 Luxembourg, Black Forest, Switzerland, Vosges Trip 2017
THERE'S MILLIONS OF CHICKENSTRIPS OUT THERE!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

chickenstrip
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Dec 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:24 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:


Paralell twins CAN be entertaining....the dying gasps of MZ had a litre twin that packed a punch.


I'd never heard of that, so had to go and have a look:

https://mcn-images.bauersecure.com/upload/996/images/01287500.jpg

Come on, you can hardly call that an MZ! Laughing
Doesn't change my overall view when I hear that name.

Quote:
TRX800 behaved more like a v-twin with its 270 degree firing order


This is one that actually does pique my interest a bit. Seen some lovely modified ones too.
____________________
Chickenystripgeezer's Biking Life (Latest update 19/10/18) Belgium, France, Italy, Austria tour 2016 Picos de Europa, Pyrenees and French Alps tour 2017 Scotland Trip 1, now with BONUS FEATURE edit, 5/10/19, on page 2 Scotland Trip 2 Luxembourg, Black Forest, Switzerland, Vosges Trip 2017
THERE'S MILLIONS OF CHICKENSTRIPS OUT THERE!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ThatDippyTwat
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Aug 2016
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:24 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's even less of a VFR than the later 800's. I'll stick to my gear driven cams.
____________________
'98 VFR800 (touring) - '12 VFR800 Crosrunner (Commuting) - '01 KDX220 (Big Green Antisocial Machine)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:37 - 22 Oct 2021    Post subject: Reply with quote

trevor saxe-coburg-gotha wrote:
I feel like I said that in one sentence.


Thanks for your contribution.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 2 years, 180 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.12 Sec - Server Load: 0.3 - MySQL Queries: 17 - Page Size: 159.78 Kb