|
|
| Author |
Message |
| lingeringstin... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 lingeringstin... Spanner Monkey
Joined: 01 May 2014 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Pete. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Pete. Super Spammer

Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 07:52 - 22 Mar 2022 Post subject: |
 |
|
Many engines have both. Do you mean OHC or OHV?
In purely mechanical terms OHV because or the reduction of reciprocating masses. All of those long pushrods have to be accellerated and braked thousands of times a minute where the cam just goes round and round. ____________________ a.k.a 'Geri'
132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 13:02 - 22 Mar 2022 Post subject: |
 |
|
Are you beltist? Belts seem to be shite. Armstrong owners are constantly fucking with them but in fairness, they are also easy enough to change. Seen it done in a rally field. Mainly because they are mounted on one side of the engine more like a car.
Or you could go CX500 style and have both chain and rod?
I have both OHC and OHV bikes. They have pros and cons. Although it must be said my OHC bikes are gear-driven so the worry factor of a worn/loose camchain isn't something that happens for me.
OHV is very simple, easy to work on, easy to adjust. Failure mode is generally pretty safe, if a rod jumps, it generally means you have a bent rod and a closed valve and no piston hitting the valve.
OHC doesn't need messing with much but if a pain in the backside once it does. Adjustment can be fiddly, replacement is a major operation if the chain is in the middle of the bike. Failure mode is usually catastrophic.
The main argument for OHC is you can achieve higher rev speeds. Try that with OHV and you'll eventually experience valve float.
Or you could go back to 2-stroke and forget about all this valve nonsense. ____________________ “Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.”
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| lingeringstin... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 lingeringstin... Spanner Monkey
Joined: 01 May 2014 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| xX-Alex-Xx |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 xX-Alex-Xx World Chat Champion
Joined: 12 Sep 2019 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 16:03 - 22 Mar 2022 Post subject: |
 |
|
Push rods come from non overhead cams. Overhead cams are superior for efficiency, and it means you can have two of them (per head) Hence why so many Japanese car engines from the 80s and 90s have DOHC embossed on the cam covers in MASSIVE Letters.
In order to make overhead cams work, you need a way of driving them, and generally a chain is the way most motorcycle manufacturers have gone. Honda dipped into gears for a while but it's expensive and requires extraordinarily tight tolerances to work. Ducati used belts, but then found that when their bikes stood for a while they would often fail.
Camchains have the advantage of low maintenance and can last the life of the bike, however you need to be able to keep their tension, and some bikes chains weren't man enough meaning they often wore or failed in early camchain engines.
So, in summary you're asking the wrong question. The question should be are overhead cams better than cam in block, and the answer is in most circumstances, absolutely yes. ____________________ British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| WD Forte |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 WD Forte World Chat Champion

Joined: 17 Jun 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| tatters |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 tatters Exxon Valdez

Joined: 05 Jan 2004 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 19:56 - 22 Mar 2022 Post subject: |
 |
|
Never had an issue with push rod engines using solid lifters like on older bikes and older V8s but Dodge/GMC/Chevy V8s took a proven design and decided to add a roller on there valve lifters which fails. Which is what happened to my 2012 5.7 hemi one roller failed at 60k and destroyed the camshaft. Common issue that requires a engine rebuild.
Mine not only took out a camshaft lobe but caused the shaft to seize, breaking the timing sprocket off the end of the shaft and in turn bending all the valves and pushrods....
https://external-preview.redd.it/W4UxreOM9ur1AV24fGFsQJExiEl0Dgaoz_KHqM5oY3I.jpg?auto=webp&s=ff7edcc6a61b979978c799a55b97b814633af477 ____________________ Past:NRG50,AF1125(x2),NSR125RR,ZZR250,CX500,VFR400,KR1S,ZZR600(x2),CB400N,YZF1000(x2),KH125,Z200,FX400R,CBR954RR(x2)GPZ500S,GT550,VFR750F(x2),RD350N,XR650R,CBR600F,CB250,KDX250,YZF750R,CRM250,400EXC,KLR650,TTR600RE,DR350S,R100GSPD,RGV250,VMAX1200,DL650,KZ750 Present:G650XC,C12,CRF450X,1190ADV |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 4 years, 62 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|