Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Ukraine war and when Russia will collaps?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19, 20  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Islander
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:16 - 22 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Polarbear wrote:


NATO policy was set up when it was the west v the east, an all or nothing MAD. Todays scenario is completely different. If Russia nuked Brum I am totally sure Berlin, Ankara, Washington etc. would be ecstatic about risking everything to support a nuclear response. It might go conventional, with the US putting troops on the ground but I actually doubt that. NATO has never been tested and I very much doubt it would survive past the first mushroom cloud as countries disassociate themselves so they don't get the next one.

But we will never know who is right until it happens. If they nuke Milton Keynes I won't be around to say 'I told you so'. If they nuke Kirkwall, you can die happy knowing they didn't mean it to land there. Cool


It still is west v east. NATO would have to follow its policy otherwise if they got away with hitting one NATO country then why not another and another and so on remembering that Putain wants the old Soviet territories back.

Also, our own launch systems are independent of US control. The only thing we're dependent on them for is spare parts for the actual missiles and once they're launched then that's no longer an issue. We manufacture and fit our own warheads.

Like I said, Russia would be committing suicide.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Islander
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:20 - 22 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kawasaki Jimbo wrote:
This new weapon is supposedly undetectable at launch. Unless the Russians claimed responsibility there would be weeks of ‘investigations’ and accusations all round (like the pipeline detonation, or the Novichok poisonings) until the moment for violent retaliation had passed. There would be fighting later when nations arrived to claim the island as their own though!


Erm no launch is undetectable. Neither is a nuclear detonation and one of the size necessary could only come from one country.

Anyway, it's a speculative piece of Russian state propaganda.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Easy-X
Super Spammer



Joined: 08 Mar 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:28 - 22 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's enough data collected at this point a seismologist in Indonesia could tell you where the bomb went off and who made it.
____________________
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401, Yamaha XSR700, Honda Rebel, Yamaha DT175, Suzuki SV650 (loan) Fazer 600, Keeway Superlight 125, 50cc turd scooter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Raffles
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:16 - 22 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby the Bastard wrote:
Pretty sure the French would be loosening their nukes the instant it happened.

Yep, The French will always have our back.
____________________
A good loser will always be a loser.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Nobby the Bastard
Harley Gaydar



Joined: 16 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:27 - 22 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Any nuke thrown at any NATO country will cause MAD and Putin knows that.

He hasn't had the nerve to even use a tactical one at Ukraine. He's not going to throw a strategic one at us first.

Wagner in Belarus are a bigger issue. If they attack Poland that becomes something that can be plausably denied as an attack on NATO by Russia.
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Sprint ST 1050
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kawasaki Jimbo
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:31 - 22 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Easy-X wrote:
There's enough data collected at this point a seismologist in Indonesia could tell you where the bomb went off and who made it.

Eventually, yes. Undersea noises. It’s not as obvious as missiles in the air though. The mystery but admittedly massive underwater explosion would be recorded but then the tsunami would hit almost immediately. So now the UK is gone, scoured of life. The deterrent didn’t work and there was insufficient warning. Radiation soon makes it very obvious this was no natural event. Is France going to retaliate with nuclear weapons knowing Russia will nuke them back?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Nobby the Bastard
Harley Gaydar



Joined: 16 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:42 - 22 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

The whole point of deterent is that you get back what you give.

When you know a nuke gets lobbed back you don't send one in the first place. The US wouldn't be able to stop us from doing that.

As I said, Wagner in Belarus right by Poland is a bigger problem.
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Sprint ST 1050
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kawasaki Jimbo
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 Oct 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:19 - 22 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

You’re missing the point. The deterrent didn’t work and there was insufficient warning to retaliate. A single NATO ally is gone. How does NATO respond?

Russia has been allowed to get away with a litany of violations: destruction of Nord Stream 2, invasion of Crimea, shoot down of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17, assassinations and incidental killings on UK soil including the the use of a nerve agent. No wonder Putin has been emboldened. Is he sane enough to step back? Who knows.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Nobby the Bastard
Harley Gaydar



Joined: 16 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:45 - 22 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kawasaki Jimbo wrote:
You’re missing the point. The deterrent didn’t work and there was insufficient warning to retaliate. A single NATO ally is gone. How does NATO respond?

Russia has been allowed to get away with a litany of violations: destruction of Nord Stream 2, invasion of Crimea, shoot down of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17, assassinations and incidental killings on UK soil including the the use of a nerve agent. No wonder Putin has been emboldened. Is he sane enough to step back? Who knows.


None of these happened on NATO territory and NORDstream was likely done by Ukraine.

Why do you think retaliation happens 1)at the same time and 2) depends on the UK to be functional?

Our Boomers sit at the bottom of the ocean and are largely undetectable and have standing orders where the UK gets nuked.
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Sprint ST 1050
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Raffles
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:46 - 22 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kawasaki Jimbo wrote:
The deterrent didn’t work and there was insufficient warning to retaliate.

That's why our response vehicles are remote and many fathoms below the surface.
____________________
A good loser will always be a loser.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Islander
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:05 - 22 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kawasaki Jimbo wrote:

Eventually, yes. Undersea noises. It’s not as obvious as missiles in the air though. The mystery but admittedly massive underwater explosion would be recorded but then the tsunami would hit almost immediately. So now the UK is gone, scoured of life. The deterrent didn’t work and there was insufficient warning. Radiation soon makes it very obvious this was no natural event. Is France going to retaliate with nuclear weapons knowing Russia will nuke them back?


Nuclear explosions have an entirely different profile to any other kind. The flash would be spotted by any number of satellites, the gamma ray and neutron emission would also be picked up. All of this would lead to the conclusion that a major power capable of delivering and detonating a 100 megaton device was responsible. All the evidence would immediately point to Russia especially as they're responsible for creating propaganda about such an event. That would trigger an immediate nuclear retaliation from NATO as one of their members had been attacked...

I'll reiterate though, it's just Russian State propaganda...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Islander
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:06 - 22 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobby the Bastard wrote:
Any nuke thrown at any NATO country will cause MAD and Putin knows that.

He hasn't had the nerve to even use a tactical one at Ukraine. He's not going to throw a strategic one at us first.

Wagner in Belarus are a bigger issue. If they attack Poland that becomes something that can be plausably denied as an attack on NATO by Russia.


It would probably be seen as an attack on a NATO member by Belarus. Retaliation would follow.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Bhud
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Oct 2018
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:03 - 23 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why didn't Putin go in hard and heavy with tactical nukes at the start?
Why did he do his enemy a "minor injury"?

It doesn't add up and it doesn't make sense to me.

He gave Ukraine time to go and prepare an all-out defence of its territory. Ukraine took the opportunity to make alliances, obtain arms and supplies and a huge amount of money, and prepare a strong defence. At the outset, though, it wasn't so capable.

This may be a naive question, but NATO had no defensive agreements or alliance with Ukraine. Ukraine was not in a position to attack Crimea or to launch retaliatory strikes on Russian territory. Ukraine didn't even have drones, as far as I know. So, why didn't he hit all major Ukrainian cities with tactical nuclear weapons at the start?

Let's say he had. Of course, there would be fallout and damage to Russia resulting from this sudden, overwhelming nuclear attack. But Sweden would not be a NATO member. Crimea would stay theirs. The Baltic would be open for the use of Russian nuclear-armed vessels to maintain a threat level. And he would predominantly have used mercenaries rather than undermined his standing in Russia by having a call-up and then opening rifts in his command and control.

The cost of attacking gingerly using conventional means would always be allowing Ukraine to prepare a defence. And the consequence of defence would be fighting, resulting in a loss of some Russian capability as well as damage to Russian territories.

So it seems to me there is no benefit to Russia here in having held back at the outset. The incursion into the predominantly Russian regions looks like it left absolutely all of Ukraine's ability to push back unchecked. Right now, it just looks very stupid. Unless there's something more to it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:38 - 23 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

He didn't use Nukes at first because, as they have repeatedly demonstrated, the Ruskies are s4it at intelligence.
They expected Ukraine to crumble when they annexed the Crimean peninsula, they expected their political rule to be toppled by continuous propaganda, they mistakenly believe a4 miles of tanks, several airstrikes and threat of total invasion would cause Ukraine to surrender.
They thought the West (their perceived enemies) would sit and watch.
They say NATO is threatening Russia by placing bases in neighbouring countries.

Who much wrong can they be?
The only support for the kunts from anyone that I have actually heard, is from mad Ruskies and the dumb 'we hate the west' Zlamic pricks that I meet at work.

None of them affect world policy by reason of wit.
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 05:32 - 23 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Putin considers Ukraine to be part of Russia so if he'd used nuclear weapons, it would be like nuking himself.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Islander
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Aug 2012
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:45 - 23 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bhud wrote:


This may be a naive question, but NATO had no defensive agreements or alliance with Ukraine. Ukraine was not in a position to attack Crimea or to launch retaliatory strikes on Russian territory. Ukraine didn't even have drones, as far as I know. So, why didn't he hit all major Ukrainian cities with tactical nuclear weapons at the start?


You might want to look up the 1994 Budapest Memorandum. Ukraine gave up it's considerable nuclear arsenal (it had the third largest stockpile of nuclear weapons in the world at the time) left by the former Soviet Union on its breakup in return for assurances of security and sovereignty.

It's not a NATO agreement but it does involve the USA and the UK.

You might argue that access was controlled by Moscow anyway but the Soviets had a rather loose command and control system for their nuclear weapons so there was no guarantee of security at the moment of the Memorandum, and over time Ukraine could easily have taken full control. They had the expertise and the means of maintenance including access to tritium to ensure that the weapons remained viable.

It was a huge leap of faith on the part of the Ukrainian Government as well as those of Kazakhstan and Belarus and it is a formal and legal agreement. Russia has broken it's side of this but the USA and the UK are maintaining theirs and it's this that has helped keep Putain at bay.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Nobby the Bastard
Harley Gaydar



Joined: 16 Aug 2013
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:00 - 23 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yep, this is why Putin was using 'Ukraine was actively seeking nukes' as a justification.
____________________
trevor saxe-coburg-gotha:"Remember this simple rule - scooters are for men who like to feel the breeze on their huge, flapping cunt lips."
Sprint ST 1050
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Easy-X
Super Spammer



Joined: 08 Mar 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:35 - 23 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Russian TV speculating on seaside nukes is spraying whipped cream on a turd - hardly makes the lies more palatable.
____________________
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401, Yamaha XSR700, Honda Rebel, Yamaha DT175, Suzuki SV650 (loan) Fazer 600, Keeway Superlight 125, 50cc turd scooter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:39 - 23 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Easy-X wrote:
Russian TV speculating on seaside nukes is spraying whipped cream on a turd - hardly makes the lies more palatable.


Russian TV. Must be as Full of Shit as China and N. Korea TV. Very Happy

The Muddled East TV takes a beating though.

It's fucking nauseous, between auld heid-bangers sat around arguing and debating what gawd meant in the Kooran and Drearie AF Jypshain Soap.
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:30 - 23 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

People believe what they read. We believe we are right because the media says so. Russian people believe they are right because the media says so.

As they say, One mans terrorist is anothers liberator.

Too many people believe the western propaganda and this is from someone whose father was a Royal navy captain, whose stepfather was a major in the Royal engineers, whose mother was a wren and who has been in the RNR for 20 odd years.

Do you really think Russians don't believe what their new shows?

We all believe what we want to believe.
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Easy-X
Super Spammer



Joined: 08 Mar 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:38 - 23 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Polarbear wrote:
People believe what they read. We believe we are right because the media says so. Russian people believe they are right because the media says so.

As they say, One mans terrorist is anothers liberator.

Too many people believe the western propaganda and this is from someone whose father was a Royal navy captain, whose stepfather was a major in the Royal engineers, whose mother was a wren and who has been in the RNR for 20 odd years.

Do you really think Russians don't believe what their new shows?

We all believe what we want to believe.


No. I personally don't know anyone who buys the MSM narrative in this country wholesale. Bits and pieces maybe but if I had a pound every time I heard "Apparently, according to the Guardian/BBC/Daily Mail/etc." I'd be retired by now Sad Whether people are upset or merely resigned to eating another shit sandwich is another matter.

From what I hear about Russia there's the truth and the truth and that's a holdover from the old Soviet days. There's a big difference between going along with something and whole-heartedly supporting it.
____________________
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401, Yamaha XSR700, Honda Rebel, Yamaha DT175, Suzuki SV650 (loan) Fazer 600, Keeway Superlight 125, 50cc turd scooter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:43 - 23 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Easy-X wrote:


No. I personally don't know anyone who buys the MSM narrative in this country wholesale


Theres a bunch on here that lap up the nuggets thrown at them.
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Easy-X
Super Spammer



Joined: 08 Mar 2019
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:01 - 23 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Polarbear wrote:
Easy-X wrote:


No. I personally don't know anyone who buys the MSM narrative in this country wholesale


Theres a bunch on here that lap up the nuggets thrown at them.


I don't count knowing someone over the Internet as "personal" (much as I love each and every one of you) but thankfully the conformists are only a teeny-weeny minority*

*This height joke was made in memory of fallen member Dyslexic Dave
____________________
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401, Yamaha XSR700, Honda Rebel, Yamaha DT175, Suzuki SV650 (loan) Fazer 600, Keeway Superlight 125, 50cc turd scooter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:07 - 23 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

Easy-X wrote:

I don't count knowing someone over the Internet as "personal" (much as I love each and every one of you) but thankfully the conformists are only a teeny-weeny minority*

*This height joke was made in memory of fallen member Dyslexic Dave


Ahh!!! Wub
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MCN
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2015
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:16 - 24 Jul 2023    Post subject: Reply with quote

FFS you two.
Get a room.

(or a cabin.)
____________________
Disclaimer: The comments above may be predicted text and not necessarily the opinion of MCN.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19, 20  Next
Page 18 of 20

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.10 Sec - Server Load: 0.85 - MySQL Queries: 17 - Page Size: 141.62 Kb