|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Akiraprise |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Akiraprise Nitrous Nuisance
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 23:26 - 20 Jun 2005 Post subject: My Rights for a near-crash. |
 |
|
Hi, I just came back from one of the scariest experiences in my life and need your opinion into what happened and what I can do with it,
Basically I was going along a well known straight road over here i was speeding but no where near redlining my bike, until I came to the corner right at the end of this straight, where I changed down a gear (wasn't a sharp corner at all) and the bike slid on me, I was going virtually sideways down the road with the bike still under my control (In a way), I paniked and must've countersteered because the bike span out on me and luckily I didn't drop it or worse crash, I pulled over to the side of the road thinking I had a flat tyre or something, but no, my back wheel was COATED in oil, seems that something's failed in the bike and sprayed oil on the back wheel, now doing this without no warning is a VERY scary thought and I Don't trust my bike anymore.
Now, I'm not sure what leaked, I think it's either petrol, engine or gearbox fluid, maybe 2stroke oil but I doubt it. Now whatever it was it was a very good lubricant.
Now here comes the 'interesting' part if their's such thing, I took the bike into the garage today and told them I wanted my fork seals changed (they've busted), Starter motor fixed, a vibration in the engine and to LOOK OVER THE GEARBOX, which they 'apparently' did and found 'nothing wrong with it', so if it is the gearbox...what do I do? - They didn't fix the fork seals either :S.
Now I need your advise onto what to do, I was thinking of getting an independant mechanic to look over it and see what's gone wrong, get that in writing aswell and get Mac's Motors (offending garage) to pick the bike up and repair it.
Now do I have a case against the garage? SURELY that work is sloppy and must break the law if it nearly caused a crash, ideally I want the bike to be replacd, I've had NOTHING but trouble with it, ie:
https://www.bikechatforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=422940
I never got a reply from that letter or even an ackquoledgment from any of the people I sent it to, so that came about nothing but surely I have a huge case against the garage now that something obviously VERY dangerous is wrong with the bike, Should I go in tomorow and demand a replacement bike? As I REALLY don't trust this bike any longer, would you if your bike spilt oil all over your back wheel without you knowing?
I will be writing letters to:
Trading Standards
Watchdog
All major Motorbike Magazines
Mac's Motors
Derbi UK.
Any others?
I really need this sorted quickly as my bike is my life and I can't be without it for too long, any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
Thank you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Akiraprise |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Akiraprise Nitrous Nuisance
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Visitor Q |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Visitor Q $25 whore

Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 23:42 - 20 Jun 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Well, as i did my contract/consumer law paper today i can give you some names and terms to prattle at them.
Sale of goods and services act 1979 states all services must be carried out with due care and skill
Also if they try and limit liability you can explain that obviously the work was carried out to an unacceptable level, and you demand they amend the damages or else you are well within your rights to repudiate (terminate) the contract. If they try and wiggle out of it with an exclusion clause cite the unfair terms in consumer contracts regulations 1999 which leaves it to a court to decide whether an exclusion clause is 'unfair', or whether it defeats the main purpose of the contract.
In this case you bought a bike/had work done, it wasnt to standard, you want to be put in the position you should have been had they fulfilled there conditions of the bilateral contract. You have paid the full amount and therefore had due consideration, the onus is on them to fulfill their contract or you can seek damages.
Tbh though, its all puff, if they want to shaft you, they will. ____________________ China traffic/travel bike vid - When I make a sweeping statement, please add the word 'statistically' in to the sentence before you bitch...
From September 2014 to January/February 2015 I will not be using any English, nor reading any. As such, I won't be on here. PM at will, but I won't be checking/posting unless in emergencies. Certainly not for the first couple of months. Please berate me savagely if I break that rule... |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Akiraprise |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Akiraprise Nitrous Nuisance
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 18:18 - 22 Jun 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi
Overfill the gearbox on a 2 stroke and you will get a bit of oil out of there, but not much generally. Worn crankshaft main bearing seals would allow the gearbox to be presurised, but I would expect the ignition side one to wear first and that normally causes problems with the idle first (eg, the bike tries to idle at higher revs, with the idle adjuster having no effect).
Worn seals are often a sign of knackered main bearings.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| jimster |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 jimster Spanner Monkey

Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Bomberman |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Bomberman World Chat Champion

Joined: 17 Aug 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 19:22 - 22 Jun 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
I remember your previous posts on this and I cannot believe that;
a) You haven't sued the garage already
b) You still keep taking it back to them
c) You dare ride that thing
Honestly mate, its a joke. Get your money back and run  ____________________ 'Allo! My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father, prepare to die!
'89 TZR 125 - '94 GPZ500s - ZK3 GSXR600 Alstare  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| cagiva gezzer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cagiva gezzer World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Mar 2003 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| mistergixer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mistergixer World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Jun 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 21:30 - 22 Jun 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Hi,
I had the unpleasant task of taking an Italjet dealer through the small claims court. I ended up winning, getting all my money back, plus costs, plus interest, and the best bit........i charged THEM for storing the bike in my garage after the case was settled.
Did you buy the bike new?
Did you pay cash or finance?
Finance affords better protection from a legal point of view.
You may well be within your rights to reject the machine as 'not fit for the purpose of use'.
I would reccomend you contact your local trading standards office as soon as, it's free and they know their shit!
Please feel free to contact me if you want any advice. ____________________ Space Monkey #7
Don Eladio is dead. His capos are dead. You have no one left to fight for. Fill your pockets and leave in peace. Or fight me and die!
Mistergixer's videos on YouTube |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Visitor Q |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Visitor Q $25 whore

Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 21:52 - 22 Jun 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
| jimster wrote: | | bonny_ricardo wrote: | Well, as i did my contract/consumer law paper today |
Good luck! Where are you studying?
I finished my law degree a couple of years ago, just finished the LPC and start my training contract early next year...eek!
| bonny_ricardo wrote: | Sale of goods and services act 1979 |
I second that, clearly allowing a bike on the road that's dangerous would be a breach of the "goods must be suitable for the purpose" test.
But rather than going that route, you could always just rescind the contract. Take the bike back and say "i want me cash in 30 seconds" Simple really! |
Tis purely an A2 course at college. Pretty easy tbh, exams are a bitch though. All done now.
Contract i probably got around 60% overall, maybe less. MY teacher was absolutely shit, not that thats an excuse. But the last teacher i had i got 100% on my january criminal law paper (criminal is so much more motivating). Its a long story, but basically she left right before the january exams this year, and left me with some shitter.
The other paper was (well the ones i answered) about morals/law comparisons and judicial creativity. Morals i think got full marks, even if the structure was a bit iffy and i did forget a few dates/points, but overall i wrote a fuck load of pertinent shite. Judicial creativity went a bit to pot. Put in everything i could remember, but in less detail and less connected then i would have wished. Only had 30 minutes to write a 30 mark essay (overshot when planning and then morals), so would expect 80% odd.
Not too bad i hope, should carry me into uni, along with my reasonable ish biology result (and absolute miserable failure in chemistry)
With regards to his contract, yes he probably can repudiate the contract. However they probably havent breached the conditions, just the warranties. So by fixing it they have at least tried to remedy their shortfallings. I have to admit i never had anywhere near this much trouble with my old gpr.
I do suggest you try and discuss with them, that although a bike cannot be expected to be completely reliable, it is ludicrously unreliable, and you are on the verge of severing the contract on the grounds of them/the product/the service supplied not fulfilling the implied conditions of your consumer contract.
Like i say though, it is pretty much all puff. ____________________ China traffic/travel bike vid - When I make a sweeping statement, please add the word 'statistically' in to the sentence before you bitch...
From September 2014 to January/February 2015 I will not be using any English, nor reading any. As such, I won't be on here. PM at will, but I won't be checking/posting unless in emergencies. Certainly not for the first couple of months. Please berate me savagely if I break that rule... |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| jimster |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 jimster Spanner Monkey

Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Visitor Q |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Visitor Q $25 whore

Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 00:22 - 23 Jun 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
| jimster wrote: |
| bonny_ricardo wrote: | Like i say though, it is pretty much all puff. |
Now that I don't agree with. You can get a court order, send round baliffs, make a statutory demand then make the company insolvent, and so on! |
In theory. I have had this discussion with my dad whos a finance director of a large publishing company repeatedly, and sadly he seems to quash all beleif in equal rights of justice. He is very cynical, but the lawsuits hes got away with, or been taken by
Laws only ever seem to be workable when used against you somehow
And yeh i know my stuff pretty well, but you always forget things in the exam etc. As for degree im doing zoology if i get the grades. Much as i like learning about it, i hate remembering it. If that makes sense. Not to mention the 'joy' of looking up case law etc. ____________________ China traffic/travel bike vid - When I make a sweeping statement, please add the word 'statistically' in to the sentence before you bitch...
From September 2014 to January/February 2015 I will not be using any English, nor reading any. As such, I won't be on here. PM at will, but I won't be checking/posting unless in emergencies. Certainly not for the first couple of months. Please berate me savagely if I break that rule... |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| jimster |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 jimster Spanner Monkey

Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Visitor Q |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Visitor Q $25 whore

Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| mchaggis |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mchaggis World Chat Champion

Joined: 09 May 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 01:28 - 23 Jun 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
Model essays? Are the questions now that predictable that you can just be spoonfed the answers? Saying that Secondary qualifications are getting easier is a gross understatement if that's the case.  ____________________ I must not be a troll...
Mmmm, Guinness
Discovering the delights of Hammerite and a 3/4" brush.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Visitor Q |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Visitor Q $25 whore

Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 01:36 - 23 Jun 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
| mchaggis wrote: | Model essays? Are the questions now that predictable that you can just be spoonfed the answers?  Saying that Secondary qualifications are getting easier is a gross understatement if that's the case.  |
Yes its very easy to recite off pat in 90 minutes two 30 mark questions, each about 8 pages long
And yes law has always been predictable exam wise. We get the odd interesting module where we have to apply the law, but all you do is learn the structure you apply it to. Law is just wordy over the top pretention for the most. Model answers help you fluff the essay.
For example, could you write for 45 minutes about the distinction of law and morality? Or whether judges display creativity? Both could be answer in one sentence or hundreds of pages. Its all about depth. And what your graded on is depth. Which means i had to learn shit loads of cases, quotes and points, and then structure that in an exam. Believe me, exams like biology with its structured questions with one word answers you get lead onto is a walk in the park. Yet i score better in law.... odd.
Also, it wasnt clear cut what we would get, i gambled and learnt those too backwards, when i should have learnt three incase one didnt come up. There are still risks. ____________________ China traffic/travel bike vid - When I make a sweeping statement, please add the word 'statistically' in to the sentence before you bitch...
From September 2014 to January/February 2015 I will not be using any English, nor reading any. As such, I won't be on here. PM at will, but I won't be checking/posting unless in emergencies. Certainly not for the first couple of months. Please berate me savagely if I break that rule... |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| mchaggis |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mchaggis World Chat Champion

Joined: 09 May 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 01:48 - 23 Jun 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
| bonny_ricardo wrote: | For example, could you write for 45 minutes about the distinction of law and morality? Or whether judges display creativity? |
Fair enough, horses for courses.
My mind doesn't work like that. I like facts, logical stuff, problem solving, mechanics and things which have solutions, rather than just hypothesising. Being taught physics because it described (our perceptions of) the mostly physical world/ universe and how you can manipulate it had a point to me. It was quite mickey mouse as once you learnt the basics of things, the rest of it just followed on quite logically.
I can see the value in both the above questions, but all this wordy stuff isn't really for me. Remembering reams of previous cases just so you can be sure to always apply the law equally? Damnit, just demolished my own argument.
Since I thought about those example questions I now can't stop thinking about them and exploring the idea of whether judges show creativity, I presume in sentencing? (No doubt you're not told that, just given a title and told to write.)
Good luck with the results and getting into whichever uni you're going for, on whichever course you're applying for.  ____________________ I must not be a troll...
Mmmm, Guinness
Discovering the delights of Hammerite and a 3/4" brush.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Visitor Q |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Visitor Q $25 whore

Joined: 30 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 02:01 - 23 Jun 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
| mchaggis wrote: | | bonny_ricardo wrote: | For example, could you write for 45 minutes about the distinction of law and morality? Or whether judges display creativity? |
Fair enough, horses for courses.
My mind doesn't work like that. I like facts, logical stuff, problem solving, mechanics and things which have solutions, rather than just hypothesising. Being taught physics because it described (our perceptions of) the mostly physical world/ universe and how you can manipulate it had a point to me. It was quite mickey mouse as once you learnt the basics of things, the rest of it just followed on quite logically.
I can see the value in both the above questions, but all this wordy stuff isn't really for me. Remembering reams of previous cases just so you can be sure to always apply the law equally? Damnit, just demolished my own argument.
Since I thought about those example questions I now can't stop thinking about them and exploring the idea of whether judges show creativity, I presume in sentencing? (No doubt you're not told that, just given a title and told to write.)
Good luck with the results and getting into whichever uni you're going for, on whichever course you're applying for.  |
Same as old boy, its why i cant 'get' chemistry. It is all made up. Its one of those subjects where every answer you give is 'well you would be 100% correct but for the completely irrelevant point you were never told but somehow are meant to know'.
Utter bullshit. It defies logic.
As for law, it is incredibly logical, however you just need to be good at vocalising your argument and displaying the right knowledge at the right time. Its an acquired skill believe me. And pot does it no good, which is why ive been 'dry' all this year, and my results are so much better for it.
As for judicial creativity, do a google for 'doctrine of judical precedent'. The essay basically went into how judge made law as opposed to statute law was useful in developing law, and how they made the most of their powers. My first law module was on it so it was simple revision.
As for morals, look up Lord devlin + Professor Hart's debate. Also R v Brown, altho i warn you that may be :notworksafe:, basically just discussing whether or not it is ethical for law to be based upon morals, or infact whether morals are based on law.
Bear in mind Law (as a subject) is very much like english lit., you have to make something out of nothing, however unlike english lit, you dont have to 'appreciate the microcosm of society as a whole displayed in lord of the flies' which is actually the shittest book every made, which has only enriched the world by giving us a fat kid to laugh at in english classes, and spawning the battle royale films. You actually take pertinent information, and use it in both proving and disproving the null-hypothesis, so to speak.
If and when i can be arsed, ill find some links to the law essays and pm you them, mine are all on paper and i loathe scanners. ____________________ China traffic/travel bike vid - When I make a sweeping statement, please add the word 'statistically' in to the sentence before you bitch...
From September 2014 to January/February 2015 I will not be using any English, nor reading any. As such, I won't be on here. PM at will, but I won't be checking/posting unless in emergencies. Certainly not for the first couple of months. Please berate me savagely if I break that rule... |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Akiraprise |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Akiraprise Nitrous Nuisance
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| R4nger |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 R4nger World Chat Champion

Joined: 05 Jan 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| jimster |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 jimster Spanner Monkey

Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 17:10 - 23 Jun 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Akiraprise wrote: | They didn't find the problem for the gearbox-
secondly they replaced my clutch plates - they didn't tell me they'd do that - So now I owe them 250 quid :'( |
Reading this thread, I can't believe you're letting them get away with all this.
(1) They CANNOT do work which you did not agree they could do, and then try to charge you for it! You cannot have a contract without both parties reaching a "meeting of the minds". Tell them you're not paying anything as you didn't authorise the work.
(2) If they haven't found the problem with the gearbox and haven't even bothered cleaning the rear wheel, they are almost certainly in breach of their obligations under the Sale of Goods Act.
(3) Assuming your description of the bike's problems is accurate, it would appear that the bike was sold in breach of the Sale of Goods Act which reuires that the bike be of satisfactory quality and fit for the purpose, and if it isn't you are entitled to a prompt repair. If they can't find out what the problem is, then you're probably entitled to ask for a replacement bike.
(4) If they changed week-old oil for no reason, they're attempting to rip you off and might be guilty of deception under the Theft Act 1968.
This link has a good summary of your rights
https://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/cgi-bin/calitem.cgi?file=ADV0043-1011.txt
If I was in your position, I'd threaten to sue them, and I'd do it! It'll only cost you £50 to sue them, which if you win you'll recover from the other side. The court has lots of helpful leaflets to help you with the process.
If you don't want to do that, get in touch with your local citizens advice bureau, or your local trading standards office.
https://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/index.cfm
or
https://www.adviceguide.org.uk/
Don't let them grind you down! ____________________ Current: Yamaha Diversion XJ900
Previous: Yamaha Diversion 600cc, Piaggio Zip 50cc, Honda CG125-W, Siamoto Caddy 50cc moped |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Akiraprise |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Akiraprise Nitrous Nuisance
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| jimster |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 jimster Spanner Monkey

Joined: 16 Mar 2005 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 18:00 - 23 Jun 2005 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Akiraprise wrote: | I admit to getting pushed around with things like this :S |
Hmm, complaining is stressful, but it's worth the stress to make sure you don't get ripped off.
Have you decided whether you want to keep this bike and get it repaired properly, or get a refund or replacement? Once you've decided, then get in touch with the dealer telling them what you want to happen, and be firm. If you don't want to talk to them face to face about it, write a letter instead. You need to decide quickly though, because if you want to get a replacement bike you'll have to tell them as soon as possible otherwise they can argue that you have accepted their breach of contract, which only leaves you entitled to compensation or a repair.
If they refuse to honour their obligations, then definitely give trading standards or the CAB a ring. With what sounds like such a clear-cut case as this, they'll be able to sort you out and might even write a letter for you.
Any dealer selling a dangerous bike deserves what they get, in my opinion. They've got to learn!
PS And whatever else you do, DO NOT pay them the £250 unless you gave them permission to do chargeable work. They have no leg to stand on if you didn't.
-edit- about the oil, is it true that can't you reuse it? Can someone who knows confirm that? ____________________ Current: Yamaha Diversion XJ900
Previous: Yamaha Diversion 600cc, Piaggio Zip 50cc, Honda CG125-W, Siamoto Caddy 50cc moped |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 20 years, 184 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|