Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Rolling or Sliding ?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Metal_Mickey
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:38 - 01 Aug 2005    Post subject: Rolling or Sliding ? Reply with quote

Hi All,

Simple question, if you come off your bike while riding is it better for your body to roll or slide along the road ? "Better" in this case being defined as you coming out of the situation with the least possible number of injuries.

The reason I ask is because one of the motorcycle riders at work has made it clear that they believe that you should avoid wearing anything on your back (rucksack etc.) while riding. The reason they believe this is because they feel that if you were to come off then having something on your back would prevent your body from rolling, which is a problem because they feel that rolling is the best way to slow your body down when you come off your bike and so is safer.

My own opinion is that when you come off your bike you want to be as safe as possible by stoping quickly and having your body roll would probably be better at achieving this than sliding. However I also think that you are likely to incur more damage as a result of rolling, which is a problem if that is what you were trying to avoid in the first place. For this reason I tend to think sliding would probably be better.

Anyone else have any views on this ?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Trixie
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:44 - 01 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

It seems that rolling = more broken bones, sliding = gravel rash.

Depends on the type of accident I think. I'm hoping I never have to find out which is best - I've always had a car to break my fall up to now!!! Laughing
____________________
Dead nobodies in company cars...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:59 - 01 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Even if you are going to slide I wouldn't want to be wearing a rucksack, unless you want to be sliding face down which is what would happen.

I think rolling hurts more but slows you down quicker. I also reckon the biggest danger of being killed comes from sliding into either a solid stationary object or the path of another vehicle. From this point of view, the quicker you come to a halt, the better.

Many people will not see my point, imagine sliding on your arse at 60mph towards an armco barrier. Now consider would you like to risk a broken arm through rolling and not hit the armco or would you like to sail on into it whilst still doing maybe 30mph? I opted for a full-ragdoll in the foetal position which hurt at the time but meant I did not hit the solid metal barrier at speed.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

DEN MONKEY
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:02 - 01 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ive always wondered about carrying something substantial in a back pack, like shoes for example. If you were high sided or went over the handle bars and landed on you back. Surely this would increase your chances of ending up with some sort of back damage/injury. Or alternatively if it was something soft like clothing would it decrease any impact injuries??
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Chriss
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:16 - 01 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

DEN MONKEY wrote:
Ive always wondered about carrying something substantial in a back pack, like shoes for example. If you were high sided or went over the handle bars and landed on you back. Surely this would increase your chances of ending up with some sort of back damage/injury. Or alternatively if it was something soft like clothing would it decrease any impact injuries??


I came off on my way back from work, and I had a pair of safety shoes (big, heavy, steel toe caps and the lot) in my back pack, and it left it's mark on my back, through a decent back protector.

For that reason, I fancy a tank bag. Wink
____________________
TheShaggyDA: I've got 3 or 4 pairs that predate my wife, so at least 11.5 years old.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Gazdaman
I did a trackday!!!



Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:16 - 01 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

I came off at a roundabout, slid to a halt, no injuries whatsoever.

Slid for quite a long time too, I thank the leathers.

Gaz
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

jayluvmito
Crazy Courier



Joined: 15 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:20 - 01 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

i rolled, wasnt too painfull. the pain come from landing from about 8 ft up on my ankle, which subsecently *sp* broke my foot an ankle
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

jayluvmito
Crazy Courier



Joined: 15 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:21 - 01 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

i rolled, wasnt too painfull. the pain come from landing from about 8 ft up on my ankle, which subsecently *sp* broke my foot an ankle
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:27 - 01 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

On track, sliding is pretty much always best.

I would wonder if it would be more effective to stop yourself by trying to dig arms/legs etc in when sliding than rolling, but never been in a position to try it (a bad thing on track when I've crashed and there's plenty of run off).


I believe medical people may have mentioned that Goose's backpack may have saved his back!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Aikman666
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:36 - 01 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Your best to slide. If you are relatively aware of your situation and you need to slow fast, (providing you have decent protection) slam your forearms into the ground and keep them there, same with your heels. I saw Checka come off in the GP qualifiers last weekend, 100mph, just kind of slid on his arse, put his forearms down, and slid to a halt. He then got up and ran to the pits for his replacement bike. If he had came off in such a way that he rolled, then he definetly wouldent be running to the pits. At the end of the day, the more surface to surface contact you have, faster you slow.
____________________
Will work for petrol
My Design Blog
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

kb-zxr
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 01 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:20 - 02 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Backpack could be good if it contains a parachute Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Big Pete
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 18 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:28 - 02 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

rolling is bad news, especially at high speed. Your arms and legs will flail about with all sorts of serious joint injuries being the result. The same thing can happen to your neck, which at best results in paralysis and at worst kills you. Slide until it starts to burn through then roll onto a fresh patch of leather is the preffered method, altho its easier said than done. Gravel rash is bad, but it heals faster and has less long term effects than major joint damage.
____________________
Trust me, I`m an engineer
GarageOfPower.co.uk
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

bazza
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:45 - 02 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember reading something a while back to the effect the if you come off in front of the bike (highside), you tuck everything in and roll so that you keep moving and the bike doesn't hit you, equally, if you're behind the bike (lowside), you try to slide and slow down so you don't hit the bike.

Whether you have the reactions/presence of mind to work all this out as you and the bike part company is a different matter.

In my lowside, I slid on my side then rolled to my feet ready to start dodging traffic as I was in the middle of a crossroads. Then I went and stopped the doddering old cont who'd just walked out into the traffic in front of me from wandering off home. Mad
____________________
"That's it. You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college."
'98 Ducati 750SS, '08 Suzuki GSX650F ©2004-2014, Bazza's Harmless Banter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

beast rider
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:15 - 02 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

well from personal experience two weeks ago i did both and got injuries from both.

Large cut down to the bone on my elbow, cracked rib and muscle/ligament damage in shoulder from initial fall and rolling.

And

Road rash from eventually sliding to a stop
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Walloper
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:26 - 02 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sliding wins it. Feels better, Slows you down better and Looks much better.
Rolling sucks! Banging your limbs against that imovable object (Earth) is sore. I did that. I still talk with a limp.
____________________
W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Dom_
Points Mean Prizes



Joined: 02 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 03:04 - 02 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sliding wins, came off 3 times only damage i got was a cut knee. Rolling would involve me battering my body all over the floor imo.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

ash t
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 Dec 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 03:06 - 02 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rolling is more artistic.

Did anybody see Carlos Checa sliding down the track during qualifying at Sachsenring on Saturday? He slid on his ass, for about 100 metres, creating puffs of smoke, and a nice red line down the track where his ass slid.
____________________
When You're Starting To Choke, Take Some Pills With Your Coke, Its Hyserical
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

awj72
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 10 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:19 - 02 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gazdaman wrote:
I came off at a roundabout, slid to a halt, no injuries whatsoever.

Slid for quite a long time too, I thank the leathers.

Gaz



All I can say there is DITTO Crying or Very sad nearly a week now & still feels like someone's given my arm a good whack with a bat!!
____________________
Woe to you, o earth & sea, for the devil sends the beast with wrath............
(my ebay clearout...... https://search.ebay.co.uk/_W0QQsassZawj72QQhtZ-1 )
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Annabella
Like a person, only smaller



Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:09 - 02 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are pros and cons to everything... my rucksack prevented me from breaking my spine when I came off, but it has left permanent damage to my back.

Mike - mister Jon says sliding Wink
____________________
Avast! Pirates ahoy!
I did Cadwell! Very Happy
www.bikepics.com/members/bella
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Metal_Mickey
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 29 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:13 - 02 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi All,

Couple more questions then based on your replys.

1) To the people that suffered gravel rash as a result of a slide, were you wearing leathers at the time or was the slide severe enough that the leathers you were wearing weren't enough to protect you ?

2) Do you actually believe that sliding stops you quicker than rolling ? i.e. Sliding is great in a track environment which is designed to be as free of hazards as possible, however the same can't be said for a normal road. So if you were in the situation that Stinkwheel mentioned above and had time to make a choice one way or the other, which would you choose ?

In short... More input !
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

veeeffarr
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:01 - 02 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Really wish I hadn't read this thread! Anyone wanna buy a CG?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Walloper
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:29 - 02 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Ye canny change the laws o' physics!"
Moments and Newtons rules dictate most of what happens when you 'get off' a bike.
A body will move in the direction of force etc.
Sliding will slow you as fast as rolling. Possibly faster, as friction acts against the latent force/energy.
I dumped a brand new bike on a bend, slid for 50yds on my arse and stood up to watch the beast disintigrate on the kerb.
But if not wearing CE armour and kevlar stuff I would have been eating grapes and hospital food for a week I'm sure.
Hit something solid and that's that. Same as in any accident.
The secret is: Learn to ride properly.
Boring, but this is unavoidable Skywalker.
PS. Sliding still looks and feels better than rolling.
____________________
W-ireless A-rtificial L-ifeform L-imited to O-bservation P-eacekeeping and E-fficient R-epair
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 20 years, 326 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 0.89 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 117.75 Kb