Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Alternative powersource for motorbikes.

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

stryker
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:54 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Alternative powersource for motorbikes. Reply with quote

While browsing through the BBC news pages I noticed the article debating if oil production has peaked. On the feedback amongst the media controlled bush beating drones I noticed worrying comments about what we will do when oil runs low, which some think could be soon.

So here is the thought. While there are many alternative power sources for cars, such as hydrogen, what about motorbikes?

No, I don't consider a 9bhp bio-diesel powered bike an alternative for a nice shiny R1 when oil runs out. I'm thinking what could be done where the result would be a motorbike that looked, performed and operated like what we have now........ or will bikes as we know them change or disappear for ever?

Thoughts please.
____________________
Now what?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Vespa
Traffic Copper



Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:00 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

.

Last edited by Vespa on 20:51 - 01 Nov 2005; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:03 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Nothing. There is no source that would be as good.

Electric power is a non starter, except for vehicles used for very short journies and never used for long journies.

Hydrogen / natural gas / lpg all have weight and storage problems for use on a motorcycle.

Bio diesel is probably the easiest source, but you add loads of weigth and complexity (turbos, intercoolers, etc) to get anything like the same amount of power.

Alcohol is the best source for fuel, but still limited by the far greater volumes required for the same fuel range, and also by the higher refining costs compared to bio diesel.

Realistically bio diesel is probably the most likely long term solution.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Milo
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:05 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

There was a guy that used a VW Lupo diesel engine and stuck it in a bike.
Poo loads of torue, 400 mile tank range and a top speed he was too scared to try out.

I'd like manufacturers to try their hand at small diesel engines for bikes.

Then you've got the turbine engined's bike...but I think that's outside the remit of this post. Smile

There's a fuel cell bike I believe, though I can't remembe the spec or range.

There's electric scooters, though they're not exactly a replacement.
Didn't Honda demo a concept eNSR a few year ago?
____________________
Shaft drives rule. Razz
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:05 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Re: Alternative powersource for motorbikes. Reply with quote

4 wheeled vehicles can run on bio-diesel and produce about the same power.

Look at engine's from 50 years ago and see how far we've come; now imagine what we could do with another 50 years developing bio-diesel engines, considering we've already got a lot of the ground work done.

Don't see any reason that we couldn't have a bio-moto GP in the future Smile.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stryker
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:07 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alcohol has got a decent energy density though, there is also no waste in the refining proccess, surely if done on a massive scale costs could be made comparable to petrol......

hhm then again the refining proccess must take a lot of energy with all that heating.....

So bottom line, no petrol, no bikes..... at least as we know them.
____________________
Now what?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

extreme3d
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:08 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, forget all the fanciful electrical... solar-powered...hydrogen fuel cell crap..... these below are real and perfectly possible:
Gas: Essentially its very easy to convert to gas as after all a petrol engine already runs on a gas when it converts the petrol in a gaseous fuel/air mixture. buses, Fork-lifts, trucks now use gas and they are not exactly short on power are they?!

Alcohol? Drag racing cars and Indy car racing in the US use Methanol as their fuel - slow... I think not!! Some countries use 5 - 10% Ethanol mixed with petrol (called GASOHOL) and even this small added percentage will drastically reduce petrol consumption.

ultimately its not fuel we need to be worried about but PLASTIC. Few people seem to realise where this stuff comes from... OIL!! Look around you... what ISN'T made from this material now!!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

spitfire
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:09 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like diesel engines...if I could have one in my bike (same weight/power) I would, all that torque and no peaky revy power....my R6 would do more like 200miles to a tank full as well !
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stryker
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 30 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:10 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Most my bike is made of plastic Shocked Very Happy
____________________
Now what?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Suzuki
Roger



Joined: 03 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:31 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

stryker wrote:
Most my bike is made of plastic Shocked Very Happy

Have to make do with carbon fibre then I guess! Very Happy
____________________
<Simple> no I'm shaven Jon Razz
<Simple> it is a big enough hole.. I'll leave it now
Ride: 1999 Suzuki GSXR600 (yellow/black) IRC: Stats - Relationship Map
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:32 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Ethanol has about 2/3 the energy content of petrol by volume, hence you need a far larger fuel tank for the same range. Although with minimal changes you could run a bike on ethanol, knocking 30% off the range of a VTR1000 could mean a lot of walking Laughing .

Diesels I do not like. Poor throttle response (no throttle, so not surprising) and slow revving, they just do not appeal. Also fairly dirty emissions and the engines are heavy compared to petrol engines.

Although people say we should stop burning oil to keep it for making plastics, how many plastics can you actually make from the proportion of oil that is burnt? Or would that stuff just be pumped back into the ground it not burnt (not as far fetched as you might think).

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing


Last edited by Kickstart on 13:33 - 25 Aug 2005; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:33 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

spitfire wrote:
I like diesel engines...if I could have one in my bike (same weight/power) I would, all that torque and no peaky revy power....my R6 would do more like 200miles to a tank full as well !

Had you considered a twin instead, as the r6 is very revvy, even for a 600. A 1000cc twin has a lot more in common with a tractor engine however, though don't expect great fuel consumption Razz.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:38 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Plastics aren't all made from oil...

Don't make the mistake of assuming that all plastics are the same. They aren't. There are over a thousand different types of man made polymers, and only a reasonably small proportion of those are made from oil.

So I'd stick to worrying about Petroleum blends... Smile
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

extreme3d
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:44 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:


Ethanol has about 2/3 the energy content of petrol by volume
All the best


True... but Methanol which is alcohol in its simplest form is much more powerful. But I do agree that is would be hard to produce it in the quanties required as a sole fuel.

Personally I feel gas is the way to go. There has been little R&D into dedicated light weight gas cylinders as up to now its been used in vehicles where weight is not such an issue so naturally they use containers already in use that wouldn't look out of place under your BBQ.... Don't forget aircraft also guzzle oil sourced fuel (Kerosine) and they won't exactly want to have to lug a big heavy steel container around with them! Most new materials are thought of in the aerospace industry (e.g. glass and carbon fibre) so before long I feel we will start to see lightweight gas tanks that can still hold a decent range of fuel.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:46 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Methanol makes more power per volume... less per molar mass... than petrol.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

John C
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:09 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I'd like manufacturers to try their hand at small diesel engines for bikes.

American military have them for financial / logistical reasons.

Put simply the only thing that uses petrol in the US army is motorbikes. Planes use kerosene and tanks / trucks / RV'v use diesel. Every time they go of to war they have to take a tanker of petrol around with them just for the bikes. They're eliminated this burden with this thing...

https://www.motorbikestoday.com/features/Articles/diesel_bikes.htm
https://www.f1engineering.com/diesel%20bike%20specs.html
https://news.thomasnet.com/IMT/archives/2005/03/diesel_motorcyc.html

spitfire wrote:
I like diesel engines...if I could have one in my bike (same weight/power) I would, all that torque and no peaky revy power....my R6 would do more like 200miles to a tank full as well !

If you want economy sit on a bus with 600 other people then you are only using 1 engine. Thumbs Up As for all that "peaky revy power" they call that fun.

Seriously for a second... A big V might well suit you better, something like the new 1000 V from Aprillia perhaps, but then they are a bit thirty apparently?

Kickstart wrote:
Poor throttle response (no throttle, so not surprising) and slow revving, they just do not appeal.

Thumbs Up


Last edited by John C on 08:40 - 26 Aug 2005; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Robby
Dirty Old Man



Joined: 16 May 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:32 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its a long way off.

Technology being very quick, and we don't have to restrict ourselves to one fuel here.

Alcohol. You need to burn more of it, so a tank doesn't last as long.
But if its only got 2/3rds of the enegry by volume compared to petrol, thats not too bad. 120 mile tank range instead of 160 on a commuter isn't too bad, you can always have a bigger fuel tank. Also 30-50 years more work on engine design and we can be expecting some pretty good fuel economy. They might even try using some efficient cylinder head design on bikes.

Diesel. Its slow to rev, its heavy. But look at diesels today compared with 10 years ago. We have ranges of small cars where the hot one in the range in the diesel (New mitsubishi colt/smart forfour). The diesel is now often slightly more powerful than the equivalent petrol (about 5-10% up). So in 10 years diesels have cracked the horsepower problem by better turbo design and being able to make decent high pressure injection pumps for the right cost.
Give it 10-20 years and I'll expect them to have sorted out the throttle response problem, particularly if some manufacturers start making diesel bikes in the time period.


I won't be worrying about it too much. Theres always going to be something to give me a kick.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

spitfire
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:37 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

spitfire wrote:
NSRSparkie
spitfire wrote:
I like diesel engines...if I could have one in my bike (same weight/power) I would, all that torque and no peaky revy power....my R6 would do more like 200miles to a tank full as well !

Do you need economy because now you're a pensioner you can't afford the petrol. Mr. Green Throw me a frikin' bone...If you want economy sit on a bus with 600 other people then you are only using 1 engine. Thumbs Up Seriously for a second... A big V might well suit you better, something like the new 1000 V from Aprillia perhaps?

Also fairly dirty emissions and the engines are heavy compared to petrol engines.



What wrong with wanting good fuel economy in any vehicle?

Unlike a lot of people who just polish their bike or ride it to the local biker pub on a sunday, I use my bike most days for commuting and I go touring as well, that means I get through a fair bit of fuel...I work hard so I don't have money to burn (excuse the pun).

*As you only have a little 125 and by the tone of your email I expect you are still a little nipper who lives at home with mummy and doesn't have a house to run, I expect mummy fills the bike up for you as well Laughing

Regarding a V twin, I might get one but I have heard they are a bit thirsty Laughing

Regarding emissions on diesel engines, thats not strictly true, the pariculates are larger than in petrol engines but not always worse, see attached doc.

*If you are not a nipper and you dont live at home then I retract that paragraph !
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Vin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:43 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

1. Surely even with very efficient gas or diesel engines we are still relying on oil so will ultimately end up in the same position. Best plan is not to have kids and keep using. Cool

2. If we have diesel bikes what am I going to call 4-strokes?? Mini diesels?? Pseudo diesels?? Laughing


Last edited by Vin on 16:15 - 25 Aug 2005; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Robby
Dirty Old Man



Joined: 16 May 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:44 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

More to the point, what are you going to call a diesel 2-stroke?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

yorkshirelad3
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:45 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

this threads getting a bit bitchy, put the handbags away boys.

https://www.nancyfarmer.net/dolls/web/welcomepage_fn00x_034.jpg
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

spitfire
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:48 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vin wrote:
1. Surely even with very efficient gas or diesel engines we are still relying on oil so will ultimately end up in the same position. Best plan is not to have kids and keep using. Cool

2. If we have diesel bikes what am I going to called 4-strokes?? Mini diesels?? Pseudo diesels?? Laughing


I believe, although I could be wrong, they can/will be able to produce a diesel type oil from Rapeseed, which we can grow..mind you I don't know how much would be needed......the whole country would become yellow in the summer from rapeseed plants growing in every corner
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:19 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

extreme3d wrote:
True... but Methanol which is alcohol in its simplest form is much more powerful. But I do agree that is would be hard to produce it in the quanties required as a sole fuel.


Not sure it would be that difficult to grow the quantities required. After all we are spending massive amounts of money paying farmers to grow nothing, or to grow crops nobody wants (and there are various waste products that could also be used in the generation of the fuel).

However methanol has an even lower energy content by volume than ethanol. It is good for power because you can burn a far richer mixture but that is no use at all for fuel consumption by volume. Expect to require a fuel tank almost double the size for the same fuel range which brings all sorts of packaging issues.

I really do not expect the kind of improvements in diesels that some people think will happen. Throttle response is unlikely to change because there is no throttle (one of the main reasons why they are more fuel efficient, that and using fuel that has about 15% more energy by volume). And if you can put up with the complexity then you can improve petrol / alcohol engines by a similar amount (start using turbos to improve efficiency, or even start using the system Saab was developing with an engine with a variable compression ratio).

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

John C
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:14 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

I’ve not got the energy for a full-blown argument, and besides, the above was only meant in jest, however reading it back I can see how you took it the wrong way.

Quote:
What wrong with wanting good fuel economy in any vehicle?

Ok, I see your point in wanting good economy if you don’t have a car and ride a lot.

Wait no I don’t actually, wanting economy is one thing, but at the expense of performance??? Just…well… NO.

I think you’ll find your quarm is with the price of fuel not the inefficiency of the bike. In which case you could start a new post on the price of fuel, but I’m sure that that has been covered before.

Quote:
I expect you are still a little nipper who lives at home with mummy and doesn't have a house to run, I expect mummy fills the bike up for you as well

I resent this comment. Yes I live with my parent (no 's'), but I pay my way. I get through a fair chunk of fuel on the 125 despite getting good economy, and I also have a car to run. My annual mileage is probably more than yours, and on top of this I pay more than most do in a lifetime to insure two vehicles for 1 year, despite never making a claim.

I take pride in the fact that any thing I own I have saved up for, and paid for out right. I like to look after things once I have bought them, and like others to respect that. I also do alot of my own servicing / maintainance.

I work hard for the things in my life. I skinted myself to buy my bike, and I will do it all again soon to get a 600, It’s the price I pay for a hobby I love.

As for not having a home of my own… Well have you looked in the property guide recently? Buying a house is simply not am option for me at present. I will hopefully have enough money for a mortgage down payment when my share scheme matures in three years time. However this will not happen if I have to give up biking, as it simply means more to me.


The Quickies:
Quote:
Regarding emissions on diesel engines, thats not strictly true, the pariculates are larger than in petrol engines but not always worse, see attached doc.

True, but when people see the thick black smoke as you accelerate they will know instantly that you are a cheapskate.

Quote:
I use my bike most days for commuting

I use the bike or car every day for commuting, and then again in the afternoon…for fun!!!

Quote:
Unlike a lot of people who just polish their bike

I like to call this pride!!!

Quote:
tone of your email

What email!!!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Vin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:18 - 25 Aug 2005    Post subject: Reply with quote

spitfire wrote:
Vin wrote:
1. Surely even with very efficient gas or diesel engines we are still relying on oil so will ultimately end up in the same position. Best plan is not to have kids and keep using. Cool

2. If we have diesel bikes what am I going to called 4-strokes?? Mini diesels?? Pseudo diesels?? Laughing


I believe, although I could be wrong, they can/will be able to produce a diesel type oil from Rapeseed, which we can grow..mind you I don't know how much would be needed......the whole country would become yellow in the summer from rapeseed plants growing in every corner


You are quite right I had forgotton that. I have a feeling Malaysia is chopping down all the rain forest they have left and growing palm trees for a similar purpose. So that's OK then.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 20 years, 145 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.16 Sec - Server Load: 0.27 - MySQL Queries: 14 - Page Size: 142.08 Kb