Bondit 400 vs Bandit 600

2f2f · Derestricted Danger Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Karma :

I passed my test just yesterday and wanted to know which would be best. Can they both be restricted, would I save a lot on insurance on the 400, are they both as reliable, are servicing costs any different, are there any problems servicing the 400 as they are grey imports. Just want answers before buying because I have seen some much cheaper 400 bandits.
Thanks

2f2f · Derestricted Danger Joined: 12 Aug 2004 Karma :

Im also looking at a Kawasaki ER-5 as Ive seen one for £1250ono 1999 with under 7000miles. Are these any good? and can they be restricted?

TOM M · World Chat Champion Joined: 18 Mar 2005 Karma :

Yes i think all 3 of the bikes listed can be restricted Thumbs Up

____________________
Now owner of a 1200 Bandit

craigs23 · Mr Muscle Joined: 08 Jun 2005 Karma :

I owned a Bandit 400 for 2 years (unrestricted), didn't think too much of it, it was just used as a commuter bike really. Quite fun though, reasonably quick, but nothing special.

With a restricted licence you can restrict anything you like, irrespective of capacity. Because of this I'd go for the 600. Would be easier to buy, get parts for, modify, etc, and then offer more power (over the 400) and enjoyment once the restrictors are out (after 2 years). Just a better long term buy really.

Groove · World Chat Champion Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Karma :

id go with the bandit 600. dont no what a "bondit 400" is Razz

____________________
|| Past: 1991 Kawasaki ZXR 250 ~ 2003 Honda CBR 600 F Sport ~ 2004 Kawasaki ZX6R B1H 636 ~ 1999 Yamaha R1 ~ 1999 Kawasaki ZX6R J ~ 2004 Kawasaki ZX6R B1H 636 ~ 1998 Honda VTR1000F Firestorm ~ K1 GSXR 600 Track bike ~ K6 GSXR 1000 ~ 2006 Speed Triple 1050 || Current: 2005 R1 https://www.adrucore.co.uk