|
Author |
Message |
WR450_geezer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 WR450_geezer Nobody likes me

Joined: 09 Jul 2005 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 11:12 - 13 Feb 2006 Post subject: New Wembley |
 |
|
The new Wembley seems pretty cool, rather expensive though.
Some facts
-The Wembley Arch is 133m high, taller than the London Eye
-It weighs 1,650 tonnes and supports the 7,000-tonne roof
-On a clear evening, it can be seen from Canary Wharf, 13 miles away
-It is made of British steel, supplied by Corus
-It was initially worked on in Cleveland then transported south to be joined together
-The stadium will have 2,000 toilets - more than any other building in the world
-The 11-acre roof makes it the biggest stadium in the world with every seat under cover
-The total project cost was put at £757m - when work began
-The two giant screens are each the size of 60 standard TVs
-The legroom for each seat is more than in the old Royal Box ____________________ Siggi, ''Fack, having Daz around is like living next door to PC-World, with a hole in the wall.'' |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
distortion |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 distortion Nearly there...

Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 11:18 - 13 Feb 2006 Post subject: |
 |
|
Looks good from the picture. I was in London last year when they were putting the arch up
Ive been told its only going to be an 80k seater stadium. Think they could have made it at least 100k seater though. I mean some Spanish League teams stadiums are over 100k seater stadiums.
And if im right Old Trafford will soon be close to 80k seater as soon as they have finished off the corners they have started. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
killa |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 killa Won't Shut Up

Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Karma :  
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
WR450_geezer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 WR450_geezer Nobody likes me

Joined: 09 Jul 2005 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Misc |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Misc World Chat Champion
Joined: 15 Aug 2005 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
distortion |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 distortion Nearly there...

Joined: 08 Mar 2005 Karma :     
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
cqueen |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 cqueen World Chat Champion

Joined: 13 Apr 2005 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 12:35 - 13 Feb 2006 Post subject: |
 |
|
I agree, 80,000 isnt exactly mega, especially for £800 million!
The millenium stadium in Cardiff holds 74,000 and cost £130million ?!
https://www.stadiumguide.com/millenium.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Silver |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Silver World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Oct 2004 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 21:17 - 13 Feb 2006 Post subject: |
 |
|
WR450_geezer wrote: | Agree with you there mate, Real Madrids Stadium is something like 120, 000 dont see the point in making it 80, 000. I'm sure theres a valid reason though. Not enough money probably. |
Madrid's ground, the Bernabéu, hold's about 80,000. You're probably thinking of Barcelona's ground (The Camp Nou) which holds almost 99,000, and I think is the biggest in Spain. There are a few bigger, there was one somewhere in South America that held about 120,000 but was deemed dangerous.
distortion wrote: | Ive been told its only going to be an 80k seater stadium. Think they could have made it at least 100k seater though. I mean some Spanish League teams stadiums are over 100k seater stadiums.
And if im right Old Trafford will soon be close to 80k seater as soon as they have finished off the corners they have started. |
As above. Numbers are all very well, but, as anyone who's been to a big ground well tell you - do you really want to sit forty metres above the pitch and a hundred metres away from it? All you'd see is 22 match stick men running around! I think quality rather than quantity is the order. The facilities are supposed to be world class. You go to some Premier League grounds and they're pretty basic.
killa wrote: | And all that to watch a bunch of cry baby nonces in shorts kick a bag of wind around a bit of grass.  |
Why have you started playing?
I suppose the Olympics is a waste of time too? After all Wembley did help secure it. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
mattsmith95 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mattsmith95 Traffic Copper
Joined: 03 Oct 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 22:03 - 13 Feb 2006 Post subject: |
 |
|
Shame it will not be built in time for the FA CUP like was promised  |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
0ni |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 0ni World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 23:25 - 13 Feb 2006 Post subject: |
 |
|
In terms of size and grandeur I think it should have went for being the biggest seated footie stadium in the world - 100K+. It is in the supposed home of football after all. By changing the angle of the stands and making them a little higher shouldn't compromise the view from the stands. Been to games all over Europe and apart from Paradise the greatest stadium I have been to is the Nou Camp. Which is the sort of ground that I am talking about. Must be an intimidating place to play - and England need all the help they can get  ____________________ Its a lovely day, just wait until some bastard spoils it. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
killa |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 killa Won't Shut Up

Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Karma :  
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Marcg868 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Marcg868 World Chat Champion
Joined: 20 Jan 2005 Karma :     
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 19 years, 96 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|