Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Bye bye 2 strokes!

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Jack_Cheese
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:17 - 19 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

NSR-Rulez wrote:
I think that everythings a bit odd here, as to learn on a bike you are restricted to a certain bhp, or power to weight ratio, so all the fazing out of 2t bikes will end up in more people going out and buying bigger bikes.


I agree, more people may put in for their test quicker to get bigger bikes, but i reckon less people will get into biking. The attraction of sneakily derestricting a 125 will disappear, as the four strokes are built to meet the restriction.

The price of 2-strokes will probably freeze on the used market, too. Wouldn't be suprised if they start to appreciate after a while either.

chiz wrote:
I read somewhere else that a 2 stroke car was built recently by some EU people. Basically a 4 stroke bottom end with 2 stroke top end and direct injection. Very clean, very powerful for size.


Probably an old saab, they first used 2t engines in their old cars, but switched to four stroke. I agree with you on the bike warming front, it's an absolute arse pain trying to warm up a 2t 125.

Jack
____________________
www.bikepics.com/members/jackcheese <--- NOW FOR SALE! 51 Plate Cagiva Planet 125
Quacker_boy: "Jack, you really are a dick!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:24 - 19 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jack_Cheese wrote:
I agree with you on the bike warming front, it's an absolute arse pain trying to warm up a 2t 125.


Just ride them off gently immediatly. Don't just sit their waiting for them to warm up.

And those who think that 4 strokes do not need warming up are kidding themselves. Less prone to sudden problems when cold than some modern 2 strokes, but more prone to long term engine damage.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Jack_Cheese
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:31 - 19 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Jack_Cheese wrote:
I agree with you on the bike warming front, it's an absolute arse pain trying to warm up a 2t 125.


Just ride them off gently immediatly. Don't just sit their waiting for them to warm up.

And those who think that 4 strokes do not need warming up are kidding themselves. Less prone to sudden problems when cold than some modern 2 strokes, but more prone to long term engine damage.

All the best

Keith


I normally have a smoke while it's idling, then keep the revs down for the first 2km.

I agree with you on the 4t warming, my bro wont even rev his car 'till it's warm.

Jack
____________________
www.bikepics.com/members/jackcheese <--- NOW FOR SALE! 51 Plate Cagiva Planet 125
Quacker_boy: "Jack, you really are a dick!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:35 - 19 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Cars are just as prone to it as well. In winter the oil temperature gauge in the car will often be barely registering anything after a 27 mile journey to work.

Letting it just sit their idling is just fouling the plug up. Personally I just start them up and ride off immediatly. Rarely needs any choke. Just keep below 5000rpm until it is up to temperature.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Vin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:52 - 19 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why do so many people think 2-strokes need to be left at idle to warm them up.
My TZR goes someting like this.
Switch on, marvel at the buzz from the power valve, full choke, two prods on kickstart (no no not our kickstart Rolling Eyes the kick start), engine starts, clouds of smoke,blip throttle a few times, clouds more smoke,take off choke, blip throttle another few times, some more smoke, then ride off keeping the revs down for a few miles. (in a cloud of smoke) Usually on the move within a minute.
The 4 strokes I owned..all be it years ago were much more difficult.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

18aprilia
I don't get it?



Joined: 09 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:01 - 19 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

That has got to be the biggest load of bullshit..... I have ever heard! 2strokes being phased out? go make your self a cup of tea boy!

( 2-strokes will never die out theres to many of them hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad )
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

phantomtek
Lil Joe Tek



Joined: 20 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:03 - 19 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

18aprilia wrote:
That has got to be the biggest load of bullshit..... I have ever heard! 2strokes being phased out? go make your self a cup of tea boy!

( 2-strokes will never die out theres to many of them hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad Evil or Very Mad )


You back then you muppet?

Phased out means a cease in production, not destroying the existing ones.

They will generally do that to themselves without proper maintainance.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

kal9001
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 02:02 - 20 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fule injection 2T would produce more power then a normal 2T wich would be ALOT morepower then any 4T we are going to see any time soon.

its an easy concept...

you have X number of holes in the wall (like current 2t use) these will be the exhaust ports, it will have X number of valves in the top (like current 4T these are the inlet valves. it has direct FI.
Unfortunately a Supercharger is pretty essential to this engine.
You have air under pressure entering the cylinder from the vales in the top, the air flows straight thru out the exhaust ports until the piston covers this up (at this point there is no fuel yet so that is just air being wasted)
Once the ports are covered the air immediately pressurizes in the cylinder at this point the valves close before there is any loss in power by the charger pushing the piston back down. Now we have the full compression action, the fuel is injected from one or several points around the top of the cylinder. Once the piston reaches TDC a spark starts the combustion cycle. This is pretty easy to understand.
Once the piston gets low enough the ports are uncovered again allowing the gasses to leave once the pressure is low enough to not cause a significant loss in power from the backflow the top valves open, the overlap ensures all exhaust gas is expelled before compression begins. This is a VERY short induction period and we start again…

It is a system that may not be suitable for high revs initially, but it would be economical (due to exhaust sensors that adjust the fuel air ratio) it would also use a sealed oil system which would mean it would be very reliable. It would be very expensive initially.
____________________
Anyone stupid enough to think we will drag a load of wooden horses full of soldiers into our city is certanley stupid enough to drag all of ours into theirs!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Jack_Cheese
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:26 - 20 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

The thing is, 2-strokes have to leak air/fuel out of the exhaust. It's what the expansion chamber is there for. Many 2-strokes also have an unusual profile in the top of the piston to regulate air/fuel leakage into the exhaust.

The two stroke simply isn't worth wasting money on. A supercharged 4t 125, such as the one in peugeot's jetforce would be far easier to build, probably more economical, and a fair bit more reliable. The technology is here, and it meets emission regs, so why waste money on a 2-stroke that will eventually become impossible to engineer to meet emission regs anyway?

Jack
____________________
www.bikepics.com/members/jackcheese <--- NOW FOR SALE! 51 Plate Cagiva Planet 125
Quacker_boy: "Jack, you really are a dick!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Nath
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:06 - 20 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jack_Cheese wrote:
The thing is, 2-strokes have to leak air/fuel out of the exhaust. It's what the expansion chamber is there for.

If you are supercharging the engine, then there is no need for an expansion chamber.
____________________
Hard livin', hard luck.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Jack_Cheese
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:09 - 20 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nath wrote:
Jack_Cheese wrote:
The thing is, 2-strokes have to leak air/fuel out of the exhaust. It's what the expansion chamber is there for.

If you are supercharging the engine, then there is no need for an expansion chamber.


The expansion chamber forces it back in, as a compression wave strikes the reducing cone and is reflected back to the exhaust port. If you want power from a 2t, the expansion chamber is the easiest, most reliable way to get it.

Jack
____________________
www.bikepics.com/members/jackcheese <--- NOW FOR SALE! 51 Plate Cagiva Planet 125
Quacker_boy: "Jack, you really are a dick!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

critical_technique
Nova Slayer



Joined: 08 Jan 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:15 - 20 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

NC30UK wrote:
2 strokes are still more fun though!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:18 - 20 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jack_Cheese wrote:
The expansion chamber forces it back in, as a compression wave strikes the reducing cone and is reflected back to the exhaust port. If you want power from a 2t, the expansion chamber is the easiest, most reliable way to get it.


And 4 strokes do a similar trick to get power with the valve timing. Now pretty much banned from road use.

If you want to keep an expansion chamber then that is easily dealt with. Just inject the fuel into the combustion chamber once the exhaust port is closed. Oil is a slightly more tricky problem but can be solved.

Even forgeting an expansion chamber there is nothing to stop you using a supercharger and / or turbocharger on a 2 stroke and just taking advantage of twice the number of power strokes. Result would still be an engine that is cheaper to build and more powerful than a supercharged / turbocharged 4 stroke.

There are plenty of 2 strokes not fitted with expansion chamber. Compare a Honda H100 with a CB100N. Both Honda 100cc engine. Old designs. About the same power, except the 2 stroke produces its peak power at 6500rpm while the 4 stroke needs to be revved to 10000rpm or so. Oh, and the 2 stroke had no noticeable power band, just smooth power the whole way through.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Nath
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:18 - 20 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jack_Cheese wrote:
The expansion chamber forces it back in, as a compression wave strikes the reducing cone and is reflected back to the exhaust port. If you want power from a 2t, the expansion chamber is the easiest, most reliable way to get it.
You do not need to lecture me about the workings of two stroke engines, as I am perfectly aware of purpose of the backpressure. But we are talking about a hi-tech supercharged engine here. It doesn't need lost mixture to be forced back in as a) There is no mixture escaping, and b) The mixture is already forced in under a very high compression.

Yes, two strokes are traditionally used for their simplicity, but the only reason why we don't have complex ultra high performance two strokes is because of trends and comformity. The same reason why we still use poppet valves and telescopic fork suspension.
____________________
Hard livin', hard luck.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Jack_Cheese
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:42 - 20 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nath wrote:
Jack_Cheese wrote:
The expansion chamber forces it back in, as a compression wave strikes the reducing cone and is reflected back to the exhaust port. If you want power from a 2t, the expansion chamber is the easiest, most reliable way to get it.
You do not need to lecture me about the workings of two stroke engines, as I am perfectly aware of purpose of the backpressure. But we are talking about a hi-tech supercharged engine here. It doesn't need lost mixture to be forced back in as a) There is no mixture escaping, and b) The mixture is already forced in under a very high compression.

Yes, two strokes are traditionally used for their simplicity, but the only reason why we don't have complex ultra high performance two strokes is because of trends and comformity. The same reason why we still use poppet valves and telescopic fork suspension.


Sorry, didn't mean to be patronising, but surely the whole thing behind this is cost.

The thing i'm trying to get at most is why bother? Take the cbr125. It succeeded the nsr, which according to most was a far superior bike in every way. But the cbr125 was probably easier to develop, sold for less, and sold a hell of a lot quicker, meaning honda got lots more money.

Manufacturers will eventually have to face that developing a 2-stroke to meet emissions regulation will be less economical than trying to make a 4-stroke as powerful as the 2-stroke.

The 2-stroke will eventually be phased out.

Jack
____________________
www.bikepics.com/members/jackcheese <--- NOW FOR SALE! 51 Plate Cagiva Planet 125
Quacker_boy: "Jack, you really are a dick!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:57 - 20 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jack_Cheese wrote:
Sorry, didn't mean to be patronising, but surely the whole thing behind this is cost.


Very true, and a 2 stroke engine is a hell of a lot cheaper to make than a 4 stroke. Use direct fuel injection and you add to the cost (but then the 4 strokes need fuel injection as well), but you still have a basic engine with 3 moving parts against far more in a 4 stroke. Results in a 2 stroke engine being cheaper, smaller and lighter.

Jack_Cheese wrote:
The thing i'm trying to get at most is why bother? Take the cbr125. It succeeded the nsr, which according to most was a far superior bike in every way. But the cbr125 was probably easier to develop, sold for less, and sold a hell of a lot quicker, meaning honda got lots more money.


CBR is a special case as it is targeted at a market where the max power is restricted (almost all the 2 strokes in the class were developed when most European countries allowed learners to ride full power 125s). It would be easy to produce a 2 stroke with the same low level of engineering at an even lower cost. The CBR is designed to the same cheaper standard as things like the original TZR125 (a bike that was 1/3 cheaper than the original AF1).

Jack_Cheese wrote:
Manufacturers will eventually have to face that developing a 2-stroke to meet emissions regulation will be less economical than trying to make a 4-stroke as powerful as the 2-stroke.


Something that is not possible. Simply put the chances of getting 25~30hp from a 125 4 stroke for road use is nil in the short term. Aprilia already have their Ditech system in use on their scooters. This could easily go onto the RS125 but would result in a loss of power (doesn't work at high revs yet apparently). However it would still be easily more powerful and cleaner than the CBR.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Jack_Cheese
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:09 - 20 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Surely peugeot can't be that far off 25hp with the jetforce compressor. I've heard of gilera 180 motors pumping out 27bhp at the rear wheel, and that's naturally aspirated. A supercharged 125 can't be so far off.

Jack
____________________
www.bikepics.com/members/jackcheese <--- NOW FOR SALE! 51 Plate Cagiva Planet 125
Quacker_boy: "Jack, you really are a dick!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:23 - 20 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Think the Jetforce is a claimed 19hp, so a long way short of a full power 125 2 stroke (and bolting an expensive supercharger onto the side of an already more expensive to make engine will increase prices even more). The supercharged version of the Jetforce is also almost 60% more expensive than the normal version.

The Gilera 180 engine might be 27hp (no idea, take your word for it), but with almost a 50% capacity advantage it should manage a comparable figure (scaled down to 125cc that is about 19hp).

Need to also be careful about quoting claimed figures and where they are claimed (crank, back wheel, rider imagination) and real back wheel figures from a dyno (and then watch out for people claiming dodgy inflated figures).

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

fuzz
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:46 - 20 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

bish777 wrote:
Look at diesel 2 strokes in lorries and trains, they run a low pressure supercharger to blow mixture into a conventional two stroke inlet port, then the exhaust escapes from poppet valves in the top.


https://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/diesel-two-stroke.gif

Makes sense now with the aid of a diagram Mr. Green

This is the spec of a 2 stroke diesel engine used on trains:

* Cylinder diameter - 9-1/16 inches
* Piston stroke - 10 inches
* Displacement per cylinder - 654 cubic inches
* Number of cylinders - 16 or 20
* Compression ratio - 14.5:1
* Exhaust valves per cylinder - 4
* Engine weight -
o 16 cylinders: 34,526 pounds / 15,661 kg
o 20 cylinders: 40,144 pounds / 18,209 kg (The oil pan alone weighs over a ton!)
* Idle speed - 315 rotations per minute (rpm)
* Full speed - 900 rpm
* Power - 4300 bhp

Shocked Stick that in your Punto!
____________________
https://www.bikepics.com/members/fuzzbcf/
Bikes: '99 NSR125R, '00 SV650S, K1 GSX-R600, '97 CB500, K3 SV1000S, '16 VFR800
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

jok
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:07 - 21 Feb 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

fuzz wrote:

* Displacement per cylinder - 654 cubic inches
* Number of cylinders - 16 or 20
(...)

*stick into google* ... Shocked

Edit:The original came out all wrong.
____________________
CG125 (stolen->recovered!) || Wars do not decide who's right, only who's left.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 18 years, 67 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Page 4 of 4

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.08 Sec - Server Load: 0.64 - MySQL Queries: 17 - Page Size: 128.43 Kb