|
Author |
Message |
Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Kickstart The Oracle
Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :
|
Posted: 13:59 - 19 Feb 2006 Post subject: Return to hidden cameras |
|
|
Hi
Here is more proof that speed cameras are nothing to do with safety.
https://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2045689,00.html
Hiding cameras and putting them on roads on which people speed but don't have accidents.
All the best
Keith
The Times wrote: |
Go slow: police win the right to camouflage speed cameras
By Ben Webster
The prominent yellow boxes may be harder to identify from next year
MOTORISTS face the return of hidden speed cameras after rules governing their siting and visibility cease to be enforced from April 2007.
Camera partnerships, which include police and local authorities, will be able to repaint yellow cameras to make them blend into the background.
They will also be able to install cameras where there is a speeding problem but little history of crashes.
At present the partnerships are bound by strict rules issued by the Department for Transport. The cameras must be painted bright yellow and be visible from at least 60m (200ft) away. They can be installed only at sites where there have been at least three collisions causing death or serious injury and three causing slight injury within a kilometre in the previous three years.
Many partnerships believe that the rules are too restrictive. Last autumn, Richard Brunstrom, the Chief Constable of North Wales Police, said that many more lives would be saved if there were more flexibility in camera location.
He said: “Parents often write to us and ask us to put a camera outside a school because the traffic is so dangerous. It’s very difficult to write back and say, ‘Please let us know when your son is killed and then we can consider putting a camera there.’ ”
Alistair Darling, the Transport Secretary, said in December that partnerships would no longer be able to keep the cash from camera fines to pay for more cameras. They will get grants from a central road safety fund to pay for cameras or alternative measures such as new markings or humps.
Ian Bell, the camera liaison officer for the Association of Chief Police Officers, said that regional differences were likely. “If a highway authority wants to install more cameras and they have the money there will be nothing to stop them. They may decide to put cameras in places the criteria do not currently allow, such as in villages and around schools.”
Lee Murphy, speed camera manager for Cheshire, said: “If the rules weren’t compulsory we could use cameras to tackle emerging trends rather than waiting for the minimum number of collisions.”
A Department of Transport spokesman said: “Local authorities will have freedom to use cameras where appropriate and where they see fit. But we do not want to see a return to the bad old days of cameras being hidden behind trees. We are minded to use guidance to achieve this, but if authorities flout it we will consider regulation. If they want to paint cameras grey we will want to know why.”
Kevin Delaney, the head of road safety at the RAC Foundation, said: “We are concerned that some partnerships will conceal cameras and risk losing the trust of motorists. It makes sense for cameras to be yellow because it slows people down at accident blackspots.”
Brake, a road safety charity, welcomed the new flexibility for partnerships. Mary Williams, its chief executive, said: “Requiring casualties before action is abhorrent and results in needless deaths. We welcome the opportunity for covert enforcement because too many motorists simply slow down briefly for a yellow camera.”
|
____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
HerbalDayZ |
This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
HerbalDayZ Banned
Joined: 02 Feb 2006 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
kal9001 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
kal9001 Trackday Trickster
Joined: 15 Aug 2005 Karma :
|
Posted: 15:05 - 19 Feb 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
hidden cameras serve only to make money, if noone sees them then they will just do the same speed and have the same problems as before the cam was there, but the govenment makes more money.
ifyou have visable cams outside schools and such, then people slow down, itdoesnt make as much money, but it does make the road safer for people.
what would you choose.
can i also point out that there was more in that then this, it also states that local councils cant keep the money from the fines, and it goes to a centeral fund that is then spread out according to need not greed. this will put less temptation on the local authority to put cams in money making positions.
I think that the local council shud be alowed to place cams, in built up areas where people are shown to be speeding alot (i.e. 60 in 40 and 30 zones) camera limits shud be set ATLEAST 5~10MPH above the limit to cancel out any inaccuracy (and lets be honest who desont do 35/40 in a 30)
in non built up areas cams can only be placed where there have been PROBLEMS (i.e. accidents) with speed
with both cases if there have been accidents then that 5~10MPH headroom can be eliminated.
also along with cameras there shud be something notifying drivers of why the cam is there i.e.asign for the school, or a accident site to make people aware of WHY they shud slow down saying "cos its the law" doesnt realy convince people notto do it
when you ask your mother if you can go out with your mates tonight and she says "no", you ask why and she says "because I say so" just brings to mind that all they want to do is control for no reason what so ever.
excess money from cams that isnt spent on more cams, or other traffic measures shud be given to the DSA who could use that to train drivers better and thus cause less accidents. ____________________ Anyone stupid enough to think we will drag a load of wooden horses full of soldiers into our city is certanley stupid enough to drag all of ours into theirs! |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Mister James |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Mister James I want to believe!
Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
veeeffarr |
This post is not being displayed .
|
veeeffarr Super Spammer
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 Karma :
|
Posted: 20:20 - 19 Feb 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
I don't speed in 30's/40's either, much to the constant pisstaking of my mates |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Chriss |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Chriss World Chat Champion
Joined: 07 May 2005 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Stevie GooGs |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Stevie GooGs World Chat Champion
Joined: 28 Oct 2005 Karma :
|
Posted: 21:58 - 19 Feb 2006 Post subject: Re: Return to hidden cameras |
|
|
Kickstart wrote: | Hi
Here is more proof that speed cameras are nothing to do with safety.
https://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2045689,00.html
Hiding cameras and putting them on roads on which people speed but don't have accidents.
All the best
Keith
The Times wrote: |
Go slow: police win the right to camouflage speed cameras
By Ben Webster
The prominent yellow boxes may be harder to identify from next year
MOTORISTS face the return of hidden speed cameras after rules governing their siting and visibility cease to be enforced from April 2007.
Camera partnerships, which include police and local authorities, will be able to repaint yellow cameras to make them blend into the background.
They will also be able to install cameras where there is a speeding problem but little history of crashes.
At present the partnerships are bound by strict rules issued by the Department for Transport. The cameras must be painted bright yellow and be visible from at least 60m (200ft) away. They can be installed only at sites where there have been at least three collisions causing death or serious injury and three causing slight injury within a kilometre in the previous three years.
Many partnerships believe that the rules are too restrictive. Last autumn, Richard Brunstrom, the Chief Constable of North Wales Police, said that many more lives would be saved if there were more flexibility in camera location.
He said: “Parents often write to us and ask us to put a camera outside a school because the traffic is so dangerous. It’s very difficult to write back and say, ‘Please let us know when your son is killed and then we can consider putting a camera there.’ ”
Alistair Darling, the Transport Secretary, said in December that partnerships would no longer be able to keep the cash from camera fines to pay for more cameras. They will get grants from a central road safety fund to pay for cameras or alternative measures such as new markings or humps.
Ian Bell, the camera liaison officer for the Association of Chief Police Officers, said that regional differences were likely. “If a highway authority wants to install more cameras and they have the money there will be nothing to stop them. They may decide to put cameras in places the criteria do not currently allow, such as in villages and around schools.”
Lee Murphy, speed camera manager for Cheshire, said: “If the rules weren’t compulsory we could use cameras to tackle emerging trends rather than waiting for the minimum number of collisions.”
A Department of Transport spokesman said: “Local authorities will have freedom to use cameras where appropriate and where they see fit. But we do not want to see a return to the bad old days of cameras being hidden behind trees. We are minded to use guidance to achieve this, but if authorities flout it we will consider regulation. If they want to paint cameras grey we will want to know why.”
Kevin Delaney, the head of road safety at the RAC Foundation, said: “We are concerned that some partnerships will conceal cameras and risk losing the trust of motorists. It makes sense for cameras to be yellow because it slows people down at accident blackspots.”
Brake, a road safety charity, welcomed the new flexibility for partnerships. Mary Williams, its chief executive, said: “Requiring casualties before action is abhorrent and results in needless deaths. We welcome the opportunity for covert enforcement because too many motorists simply slow down briefly for a yellow camera.”
|
|
Oh well, will have to use my satnav more than i want to as the POI database which will prob be banned soon enough. ____________________ Current: 2019 Yamaha T7 -> 2015 KTM Superduke R | 2000 Yamaha R1 Past -> 2009 KTM 990 SM -> 2005 kawasaki ZX10r -> 2000 Honda CBR 600 FY -> 2002 Honda XLV 125 Varadero
Bike Pics! -> My Photography Website |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Deano |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Deano World Chat Champion
Joined: 17 Feb 2003 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
kal9001 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
kal9001 Trackday Trickster
Joined: 15 Aug 2005 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
killa |
This post is not being displayed .
|
killa Won't Shut Up
Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Karma :
|
Posted: 13:18 - 20 Feb 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
As if they don’t do this already
I was caught by a van that was a plain white Transit sat in a lay-by, the only thing that would have given it away was the yellow and black markings on the rear doors which obviously are open so you can’t see them when it is colleting money for the day.
Which incidentally is my beef with them, they aren’t there all the time, usually sunny days, weekends, where speeds are over the limit, regardless of conditions.
Most cameras that catch you going over a red light are grey boxes.
Police with hand held cameras hide behind bushes.
Where I live, in the past month almost every road now has a large red patch with the speed indicated in white, it looks horrible and makes the riding so restricted. ____________________ Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
Bike:- Yamaha TRX850 | Killas Biking History | Killas Gaming History | Killas autmotive history |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist
Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Method |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Method World Chat Champion
Joined: 02 Nov 2004 Karma :
|
Posted: 13:51 - 20 Feb 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
Right, im getting a road angel for my bike.
I know they'll be illegal soon, but hey, they're only illegal when discovered... ____________________ CBT Aug '03 ... Gilera GSM 50 ... Honda NSR 125 Aug '04 ...
Full Test Dec 04... Suzuki GS500 Jan 05... Suzuki SV650 Mar 07... Gixxer 6 K5 May 08... Oh and my 'Rado
My Bikepics.com - No Brakes, No Gears... No Fear. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
killa |
This post is not being displayed .
|
killa Won't Shut Up
Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
map |
This post is not being displayed .
|
map Mr Calendar
Joined: 14 Jun 2004 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Vin |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Vin World Chat Champion
Joined: 02 Aug 2005 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist
Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :
|
Posted: 14:19 - 20 Feb 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
There are 'ruler' markings, just very small ones, like 'ticks' sticking out from the white lines at either side of the road. You can't see them due to the foreshortening. ____________________ “Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.”
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
killa |
This post is not being displayed .
|
killa Won't Shut Up
Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Karma :
|
Posted: 14:25 - 20 Feb 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
Thinking about it, what arguments can you have against this??#
They make out like that’s it, no two ways about it, you’re wrong, we’re right.
Imagine if you felt so strongly about this and won the lottery, you could make a short advertisement about the use of cameras and how the accident figures haven’t dropped dramatically because of them.
The people injured or killed by emergency vehicles is greater than the ones by the public aren’t they?
Imagine CCTV footage of it happening, and comments on screen like ‘They aren’t all angels’ or something, make it harrowing and make people think, just as they do. Accept this time it isn’t about money. ____________________ Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
Bike:- Yamaha TRX850 | Killas Biking History | Killas Gaming History | Killas autmotive history |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Vin |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Vin World Chat Champion
Joined: 02 Aug 2005 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
kb-zxr |
This post is not being displayed .
|
kb-zxr Could Be A Chat Bot
Joined: 01 Jun 2005 Karma :
|
Posted: 17:59 - 20 Feb 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmmm. How long until they get destroyed then
Recently read on here alterations to speeding/points coming into effect. Cough up.
Are speed camera images stored onboard a camera, or go direct to a external database? |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
XS1954 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
XS1954 Spanner Monkey
Joined: 22 Nov 2003 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Irezumi aka Reuben |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Irezumi aka Reuben Carrot Top
Joined: 28 Sep 2004 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
McJamweasel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
McJamweasel BCF Junkie
Joined: 22 Mar 2002 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist
Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
kb-zxr |
This post is not being displayed .
|
kb-zxr Could Be A Chat Bot
Joined: 01 Jun 2005 Karma :
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Bullet |
This post is not being displayed .
|
Bullet Trackday Trickster
Joined: 06 Jan 2006 Karma :
|
Posted: 23:58 - 20 Feb 2006 Post subject: |
|
|
im gona get ripped for this no doubt, but speed cameras can have a reasonable place in road safety, but in my opinion they are implemented in a way that is totally out of order at the moment.. more cameras blah blah blah, do what we want with the funds (more cameras instead of proper policing) but on the flip side how you guys can argue that cameras in dangerous spots and outside schools where thusfar no accidents have occured is a bad idea worries me, speeding infront of a school isnt just stupid, its utterly retarded. fixed hidden cameras are not the answer, stick with the high visability / high profile cameras but make them mobile.... and attach a copper that can actually judge for themselves with some level of reason as to if it was sufficiantly dangerous to warrent the bollocking! we have one such mobile van/copper on the island and numerous pointless fixed cameras that achieve nothing except 50 yards where everyone slows down and their concentration on the road lapses...
visable coppers with cameras allowed wherever they like
hidden stealthy fixed cameras allowed where they like ____________________ nonstop unicorns vomiting sunshine pills into a rainbow toilet
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
past: ZXR750 J1, K1 & H1, GPX600R, Yamaha Radian. present: ZXR750 J2, SP-1, CB350 |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
|
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 18 years, 67 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
|
|
|