Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Lets change the law!

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  

Do you agree cars drivers should be educated more about motorbikes?
Yes - Motorcycle awerness incorperated into driving tests
31%
 31%  [ 19 ]
Yes - Be incorperated into theory lessons
16%
 16%  [ 10 ]
Yes - A compulsory day course aswell as the theory test
3%
 3%  [ 2 ]
Yes - All of the above
43%
 43%  [ 26 ]
No - Enough training about motorcycles to car drivers is already given
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
No - but it would good to see it available to car drivers
5%
 5%  [ 3 ]
Total Votes : 60

Author Message

ButtMonkey
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 02 Jun 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 03:39 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Lets change the law! Reply with quote

It seems that a lot of the time that when an accident involving a car and a motorcycle occurs the motorcyclist a lot of the time seems to get the blame. Either the car driver claims they didn't see them or they came from nowhere. This is not bikers fault but seems to becoming a legitimate excuse.

I think that something should be done in order to increase awareness of motorbikes and cars drivers should be educated further in how to handle the presence of motorcycles on the road because a lot of drivers are not sure what to do and how to respond and most of the time don't THINK BIKE.

Should motorcycle awareness and tolerance be part of a car drivers licence? For example, a day course in motorcycle awareness, actions and response.

If we all do something about it they will have to change the law for the safety of motorcyclists.

https://www.durbanbmwclub.co.za/images/Think_Bike_Poster.jpg


What does everyone think Question
____________________
If you suck on a t*t the movie gets an 18 rating. If you hack the t*t off with an axe it will be PG.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Trill
Nova Slayer



Joined: 14 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 05:51 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Voted one.. then saw four...

Completely agree mate cagers need an education.
____________________
Chrome don't get you home but it sure makes you look good pushing it there.
First bike: RS125 - Current bike: GSXR600 k6
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Delvard
Traffic Copper



Joined: 22 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:15 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here's one you missed out:

Do you agree that motorcyclists, who don't have a car license be educated more about cars.

Andy Wink
____________________
A thing of beauty is a joy for ever: Its loveliness increases; it will never Pass into nothingness; but still will keep A bower quiet for us, and a sleep Full of sweet dreams, and health, and quiet breathing.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Dazbo666
World Chat Champion



Joined: 06 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:27 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd been driving for something like 17 years before I took the plunge and changed religion to 2 wheels Wink
and I can honestly say that even with my years of road experience the CBT certainly started to open my eyes, and I realised how much my observation and awareness was lacking Embarassed

So since doing the theory, CBT and DAS last year I've been a keen supporter that car drivers (well, all road users) really should be made to take extra training and/or regular refresher courses Thumbs Up Wink
____________________
1st bike (Sept'06 - May'10) : 1991 GPZ500S / Current bike (since Nov 2009) : 2003 Suzuki Bandit 600N
Word of the day : DILLIGAF
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MRX Steve
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:40 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I voted that it should incorperated into theory lessons. But i think it should also be incorperated into driving tests, a day course could be good in theory but i think with all the people learning to drive they would just end up with huge waiting lists for people to do it.
____________________
Rieju MRX 50 Castrol Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

extreme3d
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:09 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

In a few Countries in Europe for any accident involving a motorcycle/scooter, the car driver is immediatly held responsible regardless of whose fault it actually was. As scooters and motorcycles are number wise on equal terms with cars in a lot of European cities and often the age limit for peds is 14, it's a useful law to ensure cars keep a good look out.

Dazbo666 wrote:
I'd been driving for something like 17 years before I took the plunge and changed religion to 2 wheels
and I can honestly say that even with my years of road experience the CBT certainly started to open my eyes, and I realised how much my observation and awareness was lacking


Not been driving cars for as along as 17 years, but yes I would agree, even the CBT opens your eyes a lot more. Everything you learn is new, for example you are never really trained to look at the road surface for problems when driving a car. Even something as simple as "a motorcycle can't brake on a bend" would be a good lesson to teach new car drivers.

Delvard wrote:
Here's one you missed out:

Do you agree that motorcyclists, who don't have a car license be educated more about cars.


BUT I also agree with this one. I have my car ticket, Dodsi who I ride with a lot doesn't... it shows..... in his lack of understanding of what a car can/can't do/see in a particular situation.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

getyerkneedow...
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:42 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was interviewd by BBC Radio York 2 years ago for this exact subject - how to reduce the number of deaths on North Yorkshires roads.

I actually said exactly what you've said, that there should be more awareness for bikes incorporated into Car drivers Hazard Perception, Theory tests and also Practical tests.

But i think its also a two way street. Some riders dont drive, and therefore dont understand quite how difficult it can be to spot a bike. I beleive, strongly, that there should be more education on both sides of the fence. I propose that if you are doing your bike test, part of your training should take part in a car, so that you experience how hard it can be to spot motorcycles. Likewise, if you are doing a car test, you should have to spend a day riding a bike to experience just how vunerable we are and how easily it is for car drivers to almost kill us in a simple stupid move.

Say the normal 3 day crash riding courses, are upped to 4 days with the 4th day spent in a car. The normal 5 day crash driving courses are upped to 1 week and 1 day, with the extra day spent with a local bike riding school.

This way both parties get increased awareness of the other.

This said, i must say that i rode my bike and didnt drive for years, when i finally got a car, my mum said to me that i would change my view as i would realise just how hard it was to spot bikes.

Each bike which passed me, i knew was there - i guess being on a bike just teaches you that extra bit of observation skill which (most) car drivers are lacking - i dont want to tar everyone with the same brush.

What do you guys (and gals) think? Thumbs Up


EDIT - Just read Delvards comments - seems we both hit on the same thing. Embarassed


Last edited by getyerkneedown on 12:28 - 09 Jun 2006; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Finglonga
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:48 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Riders need to be taught also, there are alot of to be frank "Fuckin Iiots" out there, and not just on the small bikes. Big bikes too, the riders don't have a clue, and its mostly down to direct access. They take a days/weeks intensive course then pass a test and given a pocket rocket to kill themselves on. Then THEY are arrogant against car drivers because they THINK they know how to ride a big bike.
____________________
Andy Sez....
F.Y.Y.F.F.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Paul@125power
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:54 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with a lot of it. I know lots of bikers that drive cars and they all have said that ever since riding a bike they notice more. I think this is because of the very steep learning curve with harsh consequences involved ie Get it wrong and you could be killed.

delvard wrote:
Do you agree that motorcyclists, who don't have a car license be educated more about cars.


I don't agree with this as when you do your training/tests on motorcycles it is automatically directed to watching for cars and knowing that you are smaller and harder to spot but I do agree with the post that a lot bikers without car licences don't fully understand the limitations of cars.

From the replies above, to me the best cause of action would be to have a lot more bike awareness and make a car licence pass partly dependant on this.

Finglonga wrote:
Riders need to be taught also, there are alot of to be frank "Fuckin Iiots" out there, and not just on the small bikes. Big bikes too, the riders don't have a clue, and its mostly down to direct access. They take a days/weeks intensive course then pass a test and given a pocket rocket to kill themselves on. Then THEY are arrogant against car drivers because they THINK they know how to ride a big bike.


I agree with this and was going to suggest that would of been a good idea for a restriction 660cc or less (or 600cc or less) for the first 2 years after pass a DA. But, then I thought that this would be greatly unfair to the safer riders and would punish them in a way and would be unfair.

This is how I think the law should be when taking about motorcycles, i think it should remain the same with only these few extra additions and not the boat load the government was planning to use:

Arrow After passing an A2 licence and restricted to 33bhp the rider is then restricted to 600cc for a year after then can ride any bike.
Arrow After a DA pass, restricted to 600cc for 2 years.
Arrow An accelerated course can be taken to get above 600cc after the DA is done.
____________________
If at first you don't succeed.....destroy all evidence that you tried.

Yamaha YQ100 (RIP)......Honda CBR125R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

edd
Nearly there...



Joined: 06 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:18 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul@125power wrote:
Arrow After passing an A2 licence and restricted to 33bhp the rider is then restricted to 600cc for a year after then can ride any bike.
Arrow After a DA pass, restricted to 600cc for 2 years.
Arrow An accelerated course can be taken to get above 600cc after the DA is done.


I disagree with this, I think 2 years is too long for such a power restriction. Under 21's arent allowed to take the direct access route. It is puzzling that the government will target young riders with restriction, when young riders are already effectively restricted from jumping on big bikes by the insurance companies.

I'm 19 years old, coming to the end of my restriction period, surely since I was allegedly an adult a year ago, I should be able to sit the direct access test? I can sign myself up to go to war in Iraq, but I cant take the direct access test? it seems all wrong.

Plenty of "born again bikers" kill themselves on 600cc machines, and the current restriction policy is farcical, everybody either de-restricts, or doesnt bother restrictiong in the first place. I think a more sensible attitude would be to restrict people in a more modular fashion. BHP restriction doesnt work, it doesnt work on 125's, it doesnt work on A2 tests.

If there are going to be limits, they should be made across a year, start at 250cc and go up 100cc every month, meaning that 45 year old men having a mid-life crisis will have to practice riding a bike on a smaller less dangerous machine, before they can go out and buy this year's 1000cc nutter bike. Confused
____________________
Bluespark Automotive - Diesel Tuning for Performance and Economy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

getyerkneedow...
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:27 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

In terms of restrictions consider this for a moment.

It is ONLY motorcyclists who have restrictions on their licenses.

There is NOTHING to stop some rich 17yo going out and buying a top of the range sports car. He doesnt have to have restrictions on his license. He doesnt have to sit various tests at different ages to get different cars or powers etc.

So if we are not a targeted minority group like the government keep saying, why are we restricted?

Lets remove the restrictions, you sit one bike test aged 17 and can ride any bike.

After a while, all the crashes would result in the insurance companies charging proportionately, and it would be like the car situation now. You need to be older, more experienced to get a bigger faster better bike. No need for discrimiating against differing age groups.

This is not a personal held view, just something i thought about.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Paul@125power
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 01 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:29 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

getyerkneedown wrote:
In terms of restrictions consider this for a moment.

It is ONLY motorcyclists who have restrictions on their licenses.

There is NOTHING to stop some rich 17yo going out and buying a top of the range sports car. He doesnt have to have restrictions on his license. He doesnt have to sit various tests at different ages to get different cars or powers etc.

So if we are not a targeted minority group like the government keep saying, why are we restricted?

Lets remove the restrictions, you sit one bike test aged 17 and can ride any bike.

After a while, all the crashes would result in the insurance companies charging proportionately, and it would be like the car situation now. You need to be older, more experienced to get a bigger faster better bike. No need for discrimiating against differing age groups.

This is not a personal held view, just something i thought about.


That's a very good idea. I agree. Thumbs Up
____________________
If at first you don't succeed.....destroy all evidence that you tried.

Yamaha YQ100 (RIP)......Honda CBR125R
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

headlamp
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Nov 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:15 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like extreme3d I had been driving for many many years before I got on two wheels about 8 years ago. Whilst I agree with the 'spirit' of the thread. I disagree with general thread that drivers should be made more aware specifically of bikes. I perceive this not to be the problem with drivers generally, but more to do with the fact that a high proportion of people driving have little 'road sense' and awareness of what's going on around them, distracted by the gadgets in their car & conversations on their mobiles.

The general impression I get, particularly when riding the journeys I do, in and around London, is that once people are in their metal bubble they are oblivious to all around them, and become totally selfish & consider themselves to be immune from the dangers that exist on the road.

A few ads on TV, speed cameras here & there and occasional 'Slow Down' or 'Drive on the Left' signs are not going to change the behaviour of these drivers. What is needed is a sustained & on-going training programme for drivers - more widespread than the IAM programme - and drivers that take part, should be rewarded with significantly lower insurance premiums.
____________________
Using a mobile phone while driving a car should be made a capital offence!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

map
Mr Calendar



Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:32 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've always thought it would be a good idea to include a 1 day CBT type test/exam into the car driving test. It would increase awareness of bikes and also make the person aware of just how vunerable bikes can be.

I know that doesn't address the issue of all those that already have their car licence but at least it would be a start. You could also make it compulsary for anyone involved in a traffic accident (non pedestrian type) prior to being allowed back on the road.

Just some thoughts.
____________________
...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger? Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Ahmato_
Crazy Courier



Joined: 03 Jun 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:10 - 09 Jun 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Couldn't agree more.
____________________
SavageKymco wrote: lol yea yea, im just gettin food here, keep my strength up you know. all this killing takes a lot out of a guy Ha ha
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 20 years, 73 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.14 Sec - Server Load: 0.3 - MySQL Queries: 16 - Page Size: 102.15 Kb