Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


80mph Speed Limit

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:46 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: 80mph Speed Limit Reply with quote

Hi

Government document detailing the effects of raising the motorway speed limit to 80mph.

https://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_foi/documents/page/dft_foi_611725.pdf

Doesn't really fit with the horror stories they try to feed us.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Whosthedaddy
Super Spammer



Joined: 11 Dec 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:48 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

10 mph faster Rolling Eyes

Like people are going to stick to that.
____________________
Current : MSX 125 Past : CBR 900RR Monkeybike : c50 LAC : ZXR750 H2 : FZR600 : ZX7R P3 : YW100 : TRX850: Trophy 900 T309 : GSXR 600 L0: Monkeybike : XJ6S Whosthedaddy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Wave2k
G's Stalker



Joined: 06 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:05 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

It will never happen, if anything they will make it 60.

nanny state bollocks.
____________________
Ducati 1299 Panigale
2009 Corvette C6 z51
RS125->CBR400->RXS100->GSXR750K2->Ducati749S->CBR600RR5->TL1000R->DRz400->RSVR1000->Honda VTR SP1->CBR400->GSXR1000K6->Honda H100->CBR600RR3->Ducati1299
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

veeeffarr
Super Spammer



Joined: 22 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:30 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

And bikes are still restricted to 70? Bastards.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ram_doom
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:09 - 11 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I dont want it to change, I have a fear that if it goes up, then there will be a ZERO TOLERANCE approach to exceeding 80mph. Like fine and points for 1 mph over Confused

And that just wont do Thinking
____________________
TL1000s, KDX200
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

8316
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:18 - 11 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

can't believe only cars would be allowed to go faster.pigs
but it says 80mph may be "too much" and so 72.5mph is more realistic......... Rolling Eyes Laughing
Gimme a break!
____________________
Now own a Fireblade!! Speed Limits? Bah!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

MRX Steve
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:29 - 11 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Although it only mentioned an increase for cars and vans, i would expect it would include other vehicles such as bikes as they already share a speed limit. I think it just meant goods vehicles would not be getting a speed increase from the 60mph they are already set at.

It does say “a raised speed limit would be enforced”, so this could mean speed cameras along all our motorways. So maybe it would be best just leaving it as it is, as currently you can easily travel at around 75 - 80 without the police doing any thing about it.
____________________
Rieju MRX 50 Castrol Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

8316
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 08 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:15 - 11 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

MRX Steve wrote:

It does say “a raised speed limit would be enforced”, so this could mean speed cameras along all our motorways. So maybe it would be best just leaving it as it is, as currently you can easily travel at around 75 - 80 without the police doing any thing about it.


i think it possible to get away doing 90mph on the motorway now innit?

i do 45mph in 30's (at night on the pizza bike only of course.. Rolling Eyes ) regularly past police cars, and they don't have a problem with me doing that
____________________
Now own a Fireblade!! Speed Limits? Bah!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

deputy
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 12 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:03 - 12 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that given that the police don't seem to mind people doing 80 on the motorway, there is no point in changing, as someone has already mentioned they would probably enforce an 80mph speed limit.

What I did find interesting was that half of motorway accidents are caused by goods vehicles. As far as I am concerned all HGV's should be limited to the inside lane, as most motorway congestion seems to occur when a truck doing 60mph tries to overtake another doing 59mph and takes 2 miles to do it and hence then restricts 2 lanes to 60mph. This then means that all the cars/vans move in to the outside lane and that then clogs up. This is even worse on dual carriageways as the cars just get stuck behind. I have lost track of the number of times I have been stuck behind a truck doing a 3mile overtaking manoeuver, it is so bloody infuriating.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

chalky143
Traffic Copper



Joined: 07 Feb 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:40 - 12 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

it doesnt really matter anyway...people exceed the motorway speed limit anyway!
____________________
Current bike :: sv650 minitwin race bike
Previous bikes::cbr600 steelie race bike, 1989 Honda vfr750f, 2013 Honda fireblade, 2013 Ducati multistrata 1200s, 2012 Triumph street triple R, 1999 yamaha r6, vfr 800, ducati 600ss, vfr 400x2, ntv 650, bandit 600, cagiva mito 125, aprilia rs 50, honda c90x2, honda hornet 600x2, cbr 600, aprilia rx50, suzuki katana
My bike pics: https://www.bikepics.com/members/chalky143/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:44 - 12 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

deputy wrote:
As far as I am concerned all HGV's should be limited to the inside lane, as most motorway congestion seems to occur when a truck doing 60mph tries to overtake another doing 59mph and takes 2 miles to do it and hence then restricts 2 lanes to 60mph.

Had you considered what would happen when they come accross a vehicle doing 50 or even 40 mph?

So, we've now got a whole line of HGVs doing 40mph that can't move out of the inside lane. All well and good for you, until you come to a junction.
You want to pull off? The middle lane's doing 40, but you've got to slow to 40. So's the person behind you and so on. And that's if you can find a space to fit into, or course.

Also, no one's going to want to get into the inside lane early now, so you'll see a lot of twats diving in the last minute. This then sees people jumping into the outside lane at slow speed as the twat infront panic brakes when they see a space

Similar for getting onto a motorway. Traffic may well be doing twice the speed that the inside lane is.

Nice idea, but can't see it working in reality.
If I need to get from A to B quickly, I'll take the bike Smile.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

deputy
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 12 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:27 - 12 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
So, we've now got a whole line of HGVs doing 40mph that can't move out of the inside lane. All well and good for you, until you come to a junction.
You want to pull off? The middle lane's doing 40, but you've got to slow to 40. So's the person behind you and so on. And that's if you can find a space to fit into, or course.

Also, no one's going to want to get into the inside lane early now, so you'll see a lot of twats diving in the last minute. This then sees people jumping into the outside lane at slow speed as the twat infront panic brakes when they see a space

Similar for getting onto a motorway. Traffic may well be doing twice the speed that the inside lane is.

Nice idea, but can't see it working in reality.
If I need to get from A to B quickly, I'll take the bike Smile.


Well that is my next idea, fit all heavy goods vehicle with some sort of proximity detector that stops the bastards driving 3 feet from the vehicle in front, it annoys the hell out of me when you are driving at 60mph on a motorway/dual carriageway and some arsehole in a truck is close enough to kiss your exhaust pipe. Is it any wonder they have accidents, HGV's aren't exactly renowned for their stopping capabilities, yet they drive closer than everyone else!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:35 - 12 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't think I'm ever doing 60mph on a motorway in the inside lane unless I'm in me van.
It can take massive amounts of fuel to accelerate in a big lorry, so it can cost the driver a lot of money if they slow down, then have to accelerate again.

However people sitting up my arse in my car does annoy me (oddly enough, don't really have it happen on me bike Neutral ) - usually BMW X33/X5 drivers Rolling Eyes.

My 'big plan' for that is an amusingly named 'gapso', like a gatso, but measures the space between people.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ram_doom
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:47 - 13 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

G wrote:
'gapso', like a gatso, but measures the space between people.


Laughing Thumbs Up
____________________
TL1000s, KDX200
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

torpedo
Nova Slayer



Joined: 17 Dec 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:50 - 16 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

lol G, but you'd always get some bastard infront who slams his anchors on and makes you get fined for the reduced gap! Laughing

tbh its easy enough to do 90mph or even over a ton on a motorway on a motorcycle... just look where your bloody going lol.

two lorries beside one another? not a problem.... Twisted Evil
____________________
GS 500 E ...... and i like it
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

NSR Mick
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:57 - 16 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

deputy wrote:
Well that is my next idea, fit all heavy goods vehicle with some sort of proximity detector that stops the bastards driving 3 feet from the vehicle in front, it annoys the hell out of me when you are driving at 60mph on a motorway/dual carriageway and some arsehole in a truck is close enough to kiss your exhaust pipe. Is it any wonder they have accidents, HGV's aren't exactly renowned for their stopping capabilities, yet they drive closer than everyone else!


Trucks are limited to 56mph for a start and if you want to drive in the middle lane and hold them up thats your own look out. We never had the problem until the government made the restrictors law, so dont blame the truck drivers.

And as for trucks causing more accidents do you have anything to back up your claim?
____________________
If you dont like the way that I ride.......Stop trying to keep up!!!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

fuzz
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:28 - 17 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

gsxrmick wrote:
And as for trucks causing more accidents do you have anything to back up your claim?


Point number 10 in the link above states half of the accidents on motorways involve goods vehicles.
____________________
https://www.bikepics.com/members/fuzzbcf/
Bikes: '99 NSR125R, '00 SV650S, K1 GSX-R600, '97 CB500, K3 SV1000S, '16 VFR800
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

NinjaBoy
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:20 - 17 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

MRX Steve wrote:
It does say “a raised speed limit would be enforced”, so this could mean speed cameras along all our motorways. So maybe it would be best just leaving it as it is, as currently you can easily travel at around 75 - 80 without the police doing any thing about it.

OK so let's say they raise the speed limit:-

1) People will drive 10MPH faster than the allowed speed limit so 90 will be 'the new 80' as it were

2) If the new limit were to be enforced, you'd end up needing either:-
- Police every 50 feet to pick up all the speeders (because let's face it basically everyone goes faster than 70 on the motorway), which means they need more money to hire more police, buy more police cars/bikes etc
OR
- Some kind of automated system to save police the above job which would cost millions aswell

If the first one were to be used, you'd end up seeing blue flashing lights on the hard shoulder every 50 feet - and it's a fact when people see blue flashing lights on the hard shoulder they slow down - so this will cause the congestion to get worse.

I don't think the police will think this through if they do decide to bring this into action Confused
____________________
.: NinjaBoy :.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:07 - 17 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

NinjaBoy wrote:
1) People will drive 10MPH faster than the allowed speed limit so 90 will be 'the new 80' as it were


No evidence that this is true, and studies have found the opposite to be true.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Luke_Retrofly
Silly Lesbian



Joined: 05 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:06 - 18 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi
Yeah Ive heard that studies show, that if the speed limit is something more sensible then people will stick to.

Take really built up residential areas, you will see alot of poeple going 30 because it makes sense.

On the motorway 70 is a stupid number so no one bothers.

Its not speed cameras or traffic cops that are the problem, its the law we need to change.

Luke
____________________
Flounced - Long overdue
Fuck you bitch I'm in the top 10 list I can do the what the fuck I want!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

APNess
Trackday Trickster



Joined: 08 Jun 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:21 - 18 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

As has been mentioned, most people do 80 ish anyway, which translates into around 73mph real speed. If speed limit is up to 80 most people will do 90 (around 83mph) but I personally think it should only be in those lanes where chevrons are marked and there is a requirement to keep 2 chevrons between you and the vehicle in front (they appear on the M62 from Leeds to Manchester in places, and I think are a good idea, as most seem to abide by them).

I don't think it's speed that's the problem on the motorway, it's people driving too close to the vehicle in front that's the problem, and not being able to see someone up ahead bung their brakes on, so that the first thing they know about a car in front slowing down is when the smash the back of it.

Consideration should also be given to the legal limits of tyre tread too if the speed limit rises. Sit at a higher speed all day and your thin near illegal tyres are gonna get hotter faster and risk going pop...

Those are just my thoughts - I don't know what system/safeguards are in place in Germany but they've had fast roads for years and probably lower accident/death rates, so it proves that speed on it's own isn't the problem, it's crap driving.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Rookie
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:11 - 18 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

NinjaBoy wrote:

OR
- Some kind of automated system to save police the above job which would cost millions aswell

I don't think the police will think this through if they do decide to bring this into action Confused


That's what they've gone for. ANPR systems on every motorway in the country within 10 years I think. They're already up and running around Birmingham, but they don't issue tickets, they just alert the police.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Clanger
Stirrer



Joined: 27 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:37 - 19 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

The thing about GAPS is that some stoopid bugger will always fill it, no matter what you do...so in effect you end up going backwards!

In Holland and Brussels lorries arent allowed to drive on Sundays, I think thats a splendid idea...they should make that applicable to people towing caravans too!


(opens a big can of worms)
____________________
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter won't mind - Dr. Seuss
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Teaman
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Dec 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:48 - 20 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

How will it be enforced due to the fluctuation in the speedo's acuracy the faster you go.
If they nab you for going too fast you could use this in court (although for you to be going 81 the speedo will most likely be reading 90)
its impossible to police effectively and fairly so they will start with the minority like bikers,
is it the autobahn where any speed is fine as long as your safe, tale gating will get a heavy bolocking and so on,


How about, instead of changing the speed limit, start enforcing correct lane useage I have noticed an increece in needing to undertake muppets doing 70 in the middle or fast lane when the inner lane is clear.
I dont use the inner lane if i can help it 1 due to having to over take lorrys all the time and 2 due to the lane damage by lorrys throwing my bike left to right
____________________
There is no point in ranting about someone stupid because there is nothing u can do about it. There is no cure for stupid.
Someone stupid does not realise they r stupid.stupidity is indistinguishable from malice U just have to accept that some people are thick as p1gsh1t and work around them.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:00 - 20 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Clanger wrote:
The thing about GAPS is that some stoopid bugger will always fill it, no matter what you do...so in effect you end up going backwards!

I for one would sit in the outside/middle lane a lot less in my van if I knew there was a space I could pull back out to when I pull in to let people past.

However usally if I pull in I end up not being able to pull out again because of no gaps, then getting stuck behind an even slower moving vehicle, meaning that it's even harder to overtake.
So, I often just stay in the middle/outside lane and hold people up.

The way I see it, if you want to get past, get a bike Wink.
(As the sticker on me car says!)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 17 years, 265 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.14 Sec - Server Load: 0.21 - MySQL Queries: 17 - Page Size: 143.54 Kb