|
|
| Give 'em free dope? |
| Yep, give it to them free |
|
62% |
[ 18 ] |
| Nope, we should carry on as we are |
|
37% |
[ 11 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 29 |
|
| Author |
Message |
| gadfium |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 gadfium Trackday Trickster

Joined: 30 Jul 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 21:54 - 13 Sep 2006 Post subject: Smack/crack addicts |
 |
|
Was thinking about this the other day......I have in my past had the misfortune to work with a confirmed heroin addict (we called him Mr. Dead after the Harry Endfield show, cos he looked half-dead).
Now then, this wretch was a danger to himself and others (I once saw him smacked out working heavy machinery). he was so fooked that he couldn't drink his morning brew as he was dribbling into his cup......I am also fairly sick and tired of seeing dirty scruffy bar-stewards ligged out on the streets with scruffy dogs begging to feed their habit. This lead me to thinking about the amount of crimes that are committed to support dope habits....
My solution....every time that there is a major drugs bust/seizure I reckon that confirmed smack addicts should be given as much of the stuff free-of-charge, as they can pump into their rotten veins. This would have a number of advantages:
1: Crims wouldn't rob old dears for their habit as often,
2: The pushers would have a harder time selling their gear,
3: Total wasters/hardcore addicts would probably max out really quickly, thus shortening their miserable lives (meaning that that us taxpayers would pay less supporting them..think of dole, housing, jail cost etc, etc).
Give it to 'em free, the more that they can cram in the better....
I am not talking about a bit of blow....only the hard stuff, heroin, crack, meth etc. Nobody in todays world would get involved with this stuff not knowing the dangers.
Before anyone asks, I do not read the Daily Mail or Express and I consider myself liberal. Yes I have had my share of "recreational substances" and I think that it is right that society offers as much help to those that want to help themselves. For the rest of the wasters, let them kill themselves as quickly as possible... ____________________ Those who risk nothing, do nothing, achieve nothing, become nothing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| angryjonny |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 angryjonny World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 Sep 2006 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| craigie b |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 craigie b Citizen Smith

Joined: 26 Jul 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dragonfly |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dragonfly Super Spammer

Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| zaknafien |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 zaknafien

Joined: 25 Mar 2002 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dragonfly |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dragonfly Super Spammer

Joined: 05 Sep 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| craigie b |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 craigie b Citizen Smith

Joined: 26 Jul 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| pwntifex |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 pwntifex World Chat Champion

Joined: 23 Aug 2006 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Itchy Super Spammer

Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| innominate |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 innominate Brolly Dolly

Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| angryjonny |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 angryjonny World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 Sep 2006 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| craigie b |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 craigie b Citizen Smith

Joined: 26 Jul 2004 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 15:10 - 14 Sep 2006 Post subject: |
 |
|
societies view on illegal substances are hypocritical and fucked up. You can get seriously fucked up on goverment sponsored drugs like alcohol and fags but if you don't like the violent, bloated, black out-esque effects of drink or the way it lowers your self control, the waking up next to absolute strangers and the depression that a hang over leafves you with your pretty much fucked and out of options unless you go to the doctor and tell him your depressed (ahem, reality check, re-read as fucking unhappy because you thougt life owed you and now you've grown up to a mediocre existance you feel that this unhappiness must be depression because ever other fucker is so happy with their lifes).
I was chatting to this lass earlier on in the week who was on anti depressants becasue she was depressed. She wasn't depressed she was fucking unhappy because she had 15000 of debt and a boyfriend who treated her like shit. What does the doctor do? Prescribe her drugs which will numb her fucking brain over so she can forget about her problems. Happy days so its ok to get high if your unhappy and the doctor gives you drugs.
So the moral is its perfectly acceptable to get fucking monged out on valium, diazapam, opiates, codine, temazepam, thamelgesics if you have a problem but its fucking outrageous to say lets go out drop some E and dance the night away as them illegal drugs are bad....Have you ever met anyone who spent the last ten year on Valium? Its not a pretty sight.
Its a big bunch of government sponsored arse if you ask me...which nobody did  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| craigie b |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 craigie b Citizen Smith

Joined: 26 Jul 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Itchy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Itchy Super Spammer

Joined: 07 Apr 2005 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| angryjonny |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 angryjonny World Chat Champion

Joined: 01 Sep 2006 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 21:56 - 14 Sep 2006 Post subject: |
 |
|
I apologise... I've just realised how arsey the phrase "I think you'll find" reads. I'm turning into everything I hate.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Mister James |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Mister James I want to believe!

Joined: 10 Aug 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| innominate |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 innominate Brolly Dolly

Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| killa |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 killa Won't Shut Up

Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| JonB |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 JonB Afraid of Mileage

Joined: 03 Jun 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Annabella |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Annabella Like a person, only smaller

Joined: 03 Feb 2002 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 10:33 - 15 Sep 2006 Post subject: |
 |
|
Community Prescribing anyone?
Drug addicts are entitled to treatment at addiction services where they are monitored by a drug worker regularly, some go for daily appointments, others weekly, and a rare few (who are stable) monthly.
They each have an individual recovery programme that consists of precribed doses of methadone, this is gradually reduced and to ensure they are not taking other drugs on top they are routinely tested. Part of the prescription is a drug that makes them really very ill should they take or drink anything on top of the drugs. The addiction services are supported by local pharmacies and the police.
A long article but worth reading if you are interested on the guidelines and targets Drug Action Teams (and this PCTs) are expected to reach... this includes reduction of drug related deaths, reduction of drug related crime and increased numbers of clients completing treatment programmes.
| The Department of Health wrote: |
Drug treatment
For partners across sectors involved in Drug Action Teams - addressing drug treatment - the LPSA process provides a tremendous opportunity to bring focus and profile at a local level with the aim of achieving significant change. With the scope for councils to apportion pump priming and reward monies, there is also the prospect of resources that can underpin the process of joint working.
The PSA target for drug treatment, as set out in the “Improvement , Expansion and Reform: The Next 3 Years Priorities and Planning Framework 2003-2006”, is set out below:
Increase the participation of problem drug users in drug treatment programmes by 55% by 2004 and by 100% by 2008, and increase year on year the proportion of users successfully sustaining or completing treatment programmes.
* The target includes an ‘outcome’ element to address how clients sustain or complete their treatment programmes. Councils including the target within their LPSA will need to include some measure to address this.
We have been able to engage the support of the National Treatment Agency (NTA) in looking at the proposals from councils on these targets. We would therefore encourage councils to establish early contact with NTA regional managers when this target is being considered.
Key questions and considerations for councils
1. Will your DAT be able to commit to a level of performance that represents a challenging and evidently clear stretch above the national target rate?
2. Will you be able to include other performance measures in presenting your target (discussed later).
3. The decision that a council takes about which targets to choose will be a balancing of national and local priorities. Where does drug treatment sit in within your corporate priorities?
4. Be aware that there is scope to access pump-priming monies and upon successful completion of the agreed target, there is the performance reward grant. This may be a useful incentive to draw in partner commitment. You may need to establish agreement locally for how the reward grant will be allocated to your area of work.
5. Remember that the council will first of all be looking at targets where weaknesses have been identified in the social services. DH will be asking the council to do this as a matter of priority, but that still leaves scope for a drug treatment target.
Councils have suggested to us that they do not collect data on either the numbers of people that complete their programme nor how many are drug free after 6 months because:
* it is extremely difficult data to collect due to the general chaotic nature of drug users
* this is not necessarily something that they are aiming to achieve with all clients.
The outcomes that are expected from engaging with drug users can vary from becoming drug free and maintaining that status to going on maintenance programmes, or staying in some kind of structured counselling or groupwork for years in order that they remain abstinent, so they would be drug free but would never leave the programme.
The negotiation of these targets is done principally by the Commission for Social Care in the regions. NTA regional managers have also begun to play an important and supportive role in working with the Commission for Social Care and the DH LPSA team when councils have proposed these targets. To find out who the Commission for Social Care contact is for any particular council and for general questions contact sarbjeet.gill@dh.gsi.gov.uk
Developing the LPSA target
Taking the target, the NTA expect that year on year increases of treatment of 11%, taken as an average for the purposes of negotiation of the LPSA. LPSA targets should exceed this.
Other targets that NTA would encourage for inclusion in agreements are:
* number of GPs involved in providing services to drug addicts. The national target for this is 30% of all GPs by 2004.
* reducing drug related deaths by 20% by 2004.
* financial targets expressed through a maintaining of levels of investment.
In terms of outcomes there are targets which would be useful to include but some are hard to measure unless DATs invested in qualitative independent surveys, perhaps through a local university. However NTA would encourage these as this would support the development of a national evidence base on what makes effective treatment.
The outcomes would be:
* fewer drug related deaths
* less drug-related crime (police data would be available for this through statistics on shoplifting, residential burglaries and other crimes linked to drug problems)
* health gain (reduction in reported diseases such as HIV, hepatitis, and general health)
* psychiatric and mental health
* social functioning
|
____________________ Avast! Pirates ahoy!
I did Cadwell!
www.bikepics.com/members/bella |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| craigie b |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 craigie b Citizen Smith

Joined: 26 Jul 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Annabella |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Annabella Like a person, only smaller

Joined: 03 Feb 2002 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| killa |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 killa Won't Shut Up

Joined: 18 Oct 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Annabella |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Annabella Like a person, only smaller

Joined: 03 Feb 2002 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 19 years, 94 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|