|
|
| Author |
Message |
| jjonth |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 jjonth Renault 5 Driver
Joined: 09 May 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 21:28 - 18 Jun 2006 Post subject: Re: Snetterton Tomorrow?? (19th) |
 |
|
You've probably got better sources of info from me, but I expect you won't need to brake on the startfinish straight at all.
Should be able to leave braking very late on the Revvet straight as well - only a tap for you I would have thought, then trail through the corner.
Have fun . |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| jjonth |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 jjonth Renault 5 Driver
Joined: 09 May 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 G The Voice of Reason
Joined: 02 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 21:44 - 18 Jun 2006 Post subject: |
 |
|
Sounds fairly reasonable - generally you probably want it so that it maxes out for a little bit on the straights, this it seems is faster as you can get there quicker so stay ahead of those that have a higher top speed, but only /just/ hit it - and of course you should have a bit better go for coming out of the corners.
Oh and corams should be *fun* on a GP bike, though it is a tad bumpy .
Also try and stay online at Riches (first corner), as there's a tarmac change if you go to wide which rather unsettles the bike. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| jjonth |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 jjonth Renault 5 Driver
Joined: 09 May 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| shot2bits |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 shot2bits Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 19 years, 227 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|