Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


HDT Diesel motorbikes

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

DukeRed
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:35 - 09 Aug 2006    Post subject: HDT Diesel motorbikes Reply with quote

They've been talking about making one for the road for ages now but still can't find any suppliers. Anyone know when or if they'll be available?
____________________
Enjoy Life There's Plenty of Time to be Dead
https://www.janoner.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

craigs23
Mr Muscle



Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:39 - 09 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

No no no.

No.

Please no.

No.

La la la la la la la.

Shifty
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

MRX Steve
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:48 - 09 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Im sure if they don't already come road legal you could make it road legal. https://www.hdtusa.com/

But I dont really see why you would want a diesel bike
____________________
Rieju MRX 50 Castrol Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

PeteFM
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 30 Jun 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:21 - 09 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

low down torque surely... Rolling Eyes
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ram_doom
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:32 - 09 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

craigs23 wrote:
No no no.

No.

Please no.

No.

La la la la la la la.

Shifty


Laughing Thumbs Up
____________________
TL1000s, KDX200
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:33 - 09 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

You mean those military ones?

They were offering them for sale at one point but they were REDICULOUSLY expensive. In the region of US$20-30,000 as I recall. Which is a shame because I would have liked to have one too.

Not sure if they actually did sell any though.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:52 - 09 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Don't have a boat so have no need for an anchor which would be the main reason to buy a diesel.

Horrible things with no ability to rev and stuff all throttle response. Only plus point being they have plenty of low down torque but it is hardly difficult to change gear.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:26 - 09 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Massive MPG, long engine life. No more ignition wiring and faults thereof.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Jebus
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 10 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:32 - 09 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

they are also heavy, sound horriable aud only good when they are huge with massive power and in a beast of a 4wd truck!

yeah you wont get any ignition problems but you will get all the diesel problems and they got no real advantage apart from the military were having 1 type of fuel needed for all vehicles is usefull.
____________________
2nd time around Smile CBT: 8/9/11
125 Varadero
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:38 - 09 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

MPG would be nice, but not prepared to put up with a dodgy power delivery. Far prefer a 2 stroke with worse fuel consumption.

Engine lives of diesels are shrinking. Plenty of modern diesel car engines go pop at fairly low mileages.

As to being simple, they still need a hideously complicated and expensive injection pump and a turbo to get any reasonable amount of go.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Huambo81a
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 16 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:35 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://thekneeslider.com/archives/2005/02/25/thunder-star-1200-diesel-by-star-twin/

Power output begins at 80bhp and 165 foot pounds of torque, BUT, a bit of remapping of the engine controls increases this to 120bhp and 250 foot pounds at 5500rpm! The bike weighs 450 pounds

I`m all for evolution Razz

By the way, i read somewhere else that when in its 80bhp / 165lb ft guise, it returns 80mpg.
____________________
Present: 2017 KTM Super Adventure S
Past: 97 Bandit 600 / 05 Bandit 1200 / 03 ZX6-R / 2006 Tuono R / 2001 VFR 800 / 2010 Street Triple R / 2013 Speed Triple S / 2017 S1000XR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:43 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Huambo81a wrote:
Power output begins at 80bhp and 165 foot pounds of torque, BUT, a bit of remapping of the engine controls increases this to 120bhp and 250 foot pounds at 5500rpm! The bike weighs 450 pounds


Power is basically torque x rpm. 120hp at 5500rpm gives 115lb/ft of torque.

Be one hell of an incentive to be quicker than it off the lights. Imagine the black soot you would be covered in otherwise.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Huambo81a
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 16 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:07 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Huambo81a wrote:
Power output begins at 80bhp and 165 foot pounds of torque, BUT, a bit of remapping of the engine controls increases this to 120bhp and 250 foot pounds at 5500rpm! The bike weighs 450 pounds


Power is basically torque x rpm. 120hp at 5500rpm gives 115lb/ft of torque.

Be one hell of an incentive to be quicker than it off the lights. Imagine the black soot you would be covered in otherwise.

All the best

Keith


Im not exactly sure what you mean regarding the Torque figures given, are you saying that its not 250lbft? I`m not sure the same math wirks with diesels, my friends 306 DTurbo is running 107bhp, and 190lbft of torque.
____________________
Present: 2017 KTM Super Adventure S
Past: 97 Bandit 600 / 05 Bandit 1200 / 03 ZX6-R / 2006 Tuono R / 2001 VFR 800 / 2010 Street Triple R / 2013 Speed Triple S / 2017 S1000XR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:25 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Huambo81a wrote:
Im not exactly sure what you mean regarding the Torque figures given, are you saying that its not 250lbft? I`m not sure the same math wirks with diesels, my friends 306 DTurbo is running 107bhp, and 190lbft of torque.


It might, but at totally different revs. At any particular engine speed torque and power are directly related.

Horsepower = (Torque x rpm) / 5,252

So if your friends car happened to be producing peak power and torque at the same rpm then, those revs would be 2950rpm.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

NSR Mick
World Chat Champion



Joined: 26 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:32 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Peak Torque on my Bora is at 1900 peak power is at 4000.
____________________
If you dont like the way that I ride.......Stop trying to keep up!!!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Huambo81a
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 16 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:37 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Huambo81a wrote:
Im not exactly sure what you mean regarding the Torque figures given, are you saying that its not 250lbft? I`m not sure the same math wirks with diesels, my friends 306 DTurbo is running 107bhp, and 190lbft of torque.


It might, but at totally different revs. At any particular engine speed torque and power are directly related.

Horsepower = (Torque x rpm) / 5,252

So if your friends car happened to be producing peak power and torque at the same rpm then, those revs would be 2950rpm.

All the best

Keith


Ahh, i see what you mean now. Yes thats true, Torque and HP are made at different revs. I believe on my old Bandit 12 max torque was 6k and max power was near 9k.

Still, if they can sort out the old smoking problem, i`d deffinitely be interested in a diesel bike!

As long as they could make it sound like a bike Razz
____________________
Present: 2017 KTM Super Adventure S
Past: 97 Bandit 600 / 05 Bandit 1200 / 03 ZX6-R / 2006 Tuono R / 2001 VFR 800 / 2010 Street Triple R / 2013 Speed Triple S / 2017 S1000XR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

mrchips
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:19 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Diesels have come along such a long way, wouldn't mind seeing the sheer torque offered from one on a bike if the actual units wern't so heavy. Then you'd get the boys doing remaps.
____________________
Northern Irish? www.nibikers.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

craigs23
Mr Muscle



Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:22 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Closest thing I can think of to a torquey, vibey, smelly, rattly, argicultural diesel on a bike is something like an underpowered, 'torquey', low revving v-twin.

Like a Harley.

At least some people think they sound nice.

The only nice sounding diesels are whisper quiet.

No thanks.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Skunkcap Freddie
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 20 Oct 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:43 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

think how noisy it would be if someone didn't service it.

you ever hear those white van men terrorising the streets with there racket lol
____________________
Northern Irish Biker? www.nibikers.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

stevo as b4
World Chat Champion



Joined: 17 Jul 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:12 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Id certainely have a ride on one to see what it is like? Im not against new technology or idea's and a deisel bike engine is something as yet un perfected and still has alot of potential for being improved and developed further. Maybe 2 stroke deisels are the best type of oil burners for a bike, as i expect they would be smaller and lighter than a 4stroke unit, and give at least the same power or more!

The development of the 4cylinder petrol engine for sports bikes, cannot go much further now surely? There is little progress or gains to be found now in this engine format and type. Look at 600cc sportsbikes for example. They often make 2-4bhp more with every new generation of machine, but along with that peak power gain, engine speeds rise, power delivery gets more and more peaky, and low down torque and midrange snap throttle response dissapears! That's not Progress, it's just making machines more and more difficult and involving to ride, and ultimately less road useable and more track focused. Even Moto GP bikes and the 500cc GP bikes before that, were not always being developed for more and more power each season, as teams and riders realised a long time ago that making a bike easier to ride, and more useable will always reduce lap times, than an ever higher bhp figure at a meaningless engine speed, and the big sacrifices in rideability that go with it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:23 - 10 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think people are getting lost in the whole performance issue.

If I got a diesel bike, I wouldn't expect it to go particularly fast or accelerate particularly hard.

I WOULD expect it to go anywhere, carry lots of luggage without feeling like it was loaded down, have a massive range and run all day long.

I reckon the bike in question would do that.

Horses for courses, if I were comparing bikes to cars, I would call that bike a Toyota Hilux. Excellent cars for their purpose but hardly speed machines.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bish777
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Nov 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 03:30 - 11 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Imagine a diesel CG125

CG125TD

fuel tank only needs filling at every service.

Would be nice after my tuned dipsomaniacal GSXR.
____________________
GSXR1100J
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Zimbo
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:35 - 11 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I saw that thunderstar run in Holland, it looks ok I thought, good effort. Claimed to return up to 120mpg, based on a modified VW Lupo TDi engine, more torque than a Triumph Rocket 3, i doubt it'd beat petrol superbikes off the lights but overtakes and high speed cruising would be great!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

craigs23
Mr Muscle



Joined: 08 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:08 - 11 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The development of the 4cylinder petrol engine for sports bikes, cannot go much further now surely? There is little progress or gains to be found now in this engine format and type. Look at 600cc sportsbikes for example. They often make 2-4bhp more with every new generation of machine, but along with that peak power gain, engine speeds rise, power delivery gets more and more peaky, and low down torque and midrange snap throttle response dissapears! That's not Progress, it's just making machines more and more difficult and involving to ride, and ultimately less road useable and more track focused. Even Moto GP bikes and the 500cc GP bikes before that, were not always being developed for more and more power each season, as teams and riders realised a long time ago that making a bike easier to ride, and more useable will always reduce lap times, than an ever higher bhp figure at a meaningless engine speed, and the big sacrifices in rideability that go with it.


Yes and No. Look at the broader range of motorcycles on offer today.

No - Have you noticed how good the litre class is these days? The K6 Gixer for example, is said to be good enough to have been a front runner on a WSB grid not too long ago. 160bhp of relatively useage, fuss free, realiable power in a chasis weighing under 200kgs wet. That's progress, considering anyone can buy one for £9k or so and it's a bike that's as happy pottling down to the shops as it is at lapping the Isle of Man at 120mph+ average. We've never had it so good.

Yes- I believe the 600s on the other hand aren't going in the right direction. Latest R6, albeit the best selling, is a good example of this. Some like the almost 2 stroke delivery and the diminutive scale of the thing. I, don't. I can only recall when Bike detuned one and every test rider (they brought in a handful of Joe Bloggs) preferred its better spread of power and torque, as well as improved roll on due to more midrange. Such elements made me ignore moving onto a 600 from my previous RVF - I wanted a better engine for the road; only extra cubes gave me that at the moment (as well as the other search criteria for my next bike).

There will always be a power war in MotoGP - it gives a positive advantage from one bike to the other. It's all about the delivery and controllability of that power, through engine tuning or techno-wizardry whether this can be translated from rider to race pace/wins. All the tests I've read on such bikes have commented on how stupidly powerful they are throughout the range as well as a ballistic top end - they're more of a road-translateable bike in comparison to the old strokers - which can only mean good things for the upcoming developments in road bike technology.

Take another look at the Desmond RR to see whether the 4 cylinder petrol engine is now becoming obsolete and run its course.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

DukeRed
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Mar 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:27 - 17 Aug 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Reasons I want one are as stink wheel says.

+

I can run it on homemade biofuel or with a bit of tinkering vegetable oil. Cheep!
Since my last incident I realised the freedom of the bike is far more important than the rush and adrenalin.
I can't imagine a better bike to go incredibly long distances in bad conditions/ road. It's what it was built for.
I like the idea of being able to cross a desert if I wanted to.
It looks really good as well, especially with a bit of rust/dirt!?
https://www.peace65.freeserve.co.uk/Pictures/m1030m1jp8.jpg
https://www.hdtusa.com/images/L_USMC.jpg
____________________
Enjoy Life There's Plenty of Time to be Dead
https://www.janoner.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 19 years, 173 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.08 Sec - Server Load: 0.63 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 136.11 Kb