Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


An Inconvenient Truth and Esso

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page Previous  1, 2
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:19 - 21 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

srkid wrote:
Sensational graphics would be a picture of ground zero with water over it and fish swimming around American flags, a satallite image with areas shaded is not what I would call sensational.


It is when the areas shown flooded would only get that way if sea level rises were about 10 times the level that anyone with any credibility claims.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Vincey B
Renault 5 Driver



Joined: 14 Oct 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:31 - 21 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is from the Royal Society Website :(https://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/landing.asp?id=1278)

International scientific consensus agrees that increasing levels of man-made greenhouse gases are leading to global climate change. Possible consequences of climate change include rising temperatures, changing sea levels, and impacts on global weather. These changes could have serious impacts on the world's organisms and on the lives of millions of people, especially those living in areas vulnerable to extreme natural conditions such as flooding and drought.

This is from the European Commision Website:
(https://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/home_en.htm)

Climate change is one of the greatest environmental, social and economic threats facing the planet.

Human activities that contribute to climate change include in particular the burning of fossil fuels and deforestation, both of which cause emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), the main gas responsible for climate change, as well as other 'greenhouse' gases. In order to bring climate change to a halt, global greenhouse gas emissions must be reduced significantly.

This is from the United Nations website:
(https://unfccc.int/essential_background/items/2877.php)

The average temperature of the earth's surface has risen by 0.6 degrees C since the late 1800s. It is expected to increase by another 1.4 to 5.8 degrees C by the year 2100 -- a rapid and profound change. Even if the minimum predicted increase takes place, it will be larger than any century-long trend in the last 10,000 years.



And we are sitting here discussing whether we should just let "nature take its course" and do absolutly nothing?!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:58 - 21 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

srkid wrote:
And we are sitting here discussing whether we should just let "nature take its course" and do absolutly nothing?!


No, discussing whether we can afford to do anything which will have any impact at all (considering that a 60% reduction on CO2 emissions seems to be what is claimed to be required, which would pretty much destroy the economy), and also whether CO2 is actually that much of a contributor to global warming.

None of your 3 quotes state any facts. They are full of "could" statements.

There is no point panicing and spending billions reducing CO2 emissions if 99% of the temperature change is natural and will happen anyway. Similarly there is no point in investing money in reducing CO2 emissions by methods which have more to do with big business than science.

We have about 27 years of accurate global temperature measurements. These show an decadal increase of 0.128 degrees. Pretty much all of that is in the past decade. Yes a cause for concern and investigation, and to find out what factors are contributing (eg, sun spot activity is found to corrolate with historical temperatur increases). Yes CO2 levels may well be a factor, but may also be a result (ice core samples have suggested that previous CO2 rises have occured following temperature increases).

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Retro-Man
Traffic Copper



Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:58 - 21 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

the simple fact in laymens terms that I understand is climate change whilst possibly being accellerated by humans is not caused by humans

FFS how long do we expect the big ball of burning fuel we call a sun to last.

life on this planet will end, it is inevitable....do you get it yet

if there is to be any future for the human race it is not on this planet, so stop wasting time bothering with this god forsaken rock and spend more time and effort on getting people off this shit hole
____________________
https://domharnessphotography.webs.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:17 - 21 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

craigie b wrote:

Saying you can do nothing about it is bollocks as well. Turn of your air con in the summer and bung some shorts on. Stop leaving everything on standby. Get energy saving lightbulbs. Shit like that would reduce our overall energy consumption and help us save resources and pollute less.



Thing is I already do that, nothing in this house is left on standby ever as everybody has to work, long hours
and is so knackered they just cook eat and fall asleep. every bulb except the toilet which is used infrequently
is an energy saving one , this house has no air con , the cars outside which are only used at weekends are
both 1 litre jobbies. and surprise surprise energy bills still went up.


There was this guy on Ch4 who did it even more extreme , he cut out ALL motorised transport , changed bulbs
walked to buy local food only , cycled to work, used NO heating , used an environmentally friendly electricity
company, took cold cold showers .took no holidays recycled everything, effect? saved 30% of his 10 tonnes of carbon, so with
hefty hefty cutbacks you save squat.

The flight oseas accounted for 20% of his carbon though and I don't travel much , too buried with work.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Didge
Traffic Copper



Joined: 02 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:43 - 21 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Man made global warming, is total and utter bollocks. How many millions of tons of poison gases are thrown into the atmosphere, and right up to the stratosphere, everytime a volcano decides to make itself known?
Mt. St. Helens probably slung more muck in the air, with one big bang, than man has done since the start of the industrial revolution.
Everyday, somewhere on the planet, including under the sea, gases are belching crap into the atmosphere from within the planets crust.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:58 - 21 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Didge wrote:
Mt. St. Helens probably slung more muck in the air, with one big bang, than man has done since the start of the industrial revolution.


Volcanos do emit a hell of a lot of CO2, but man made emissions dwarf it.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

gavin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:32 - 21 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060920/sc_nm/environment_warming_dc_1;_ylt=A0geumcs.BJFQHABzINQBQx.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Retro-Man
Traffic Copper



Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:55 - 21 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

/\/\/\

all well and good but I'm yet to see any real evidence that its either mostly caused by humans or that it can be stopped.

As Kickstart has said realistically we simply don't have a big enough sample size of data to indicate if this is simply a natural cycle or not.
____________________
https://domharnessphotography.webs.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

syl
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Dec 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:08 - 21 Sep 2006    Post subject: Re: An Inconvenient Truth and Esso Reply with quote

srkid wrote:
ExxonMobile, the oil company that ownes Esso petrol stations is the biggest culprit for funding organisations that promote the idea that there is some "debate" in the scientific community about climate change, when in fact there is a complete consensus that it is happening because of mankind.


There is still debate, although the greenies would like to think that there isn't. They can hardly argue about cutting greenhouse gasses to reduce global warming until it's established that global warming is unnatural. If it is decided that it is unnatural, then it has to be agreed that it is bad. That's not something that's easy to do so they want to sidestep the issue and get on with something that is - campaining that engines are bad.

The consensus is that man has increased warming, however it was going to get a bit warmer anyway and then it was going to get colder and we were going back into a glacial age. This may be postponed by 50,000 years but most agree that it will still happen. So, do you want it a bit warmer for a while or do you want it to just start getting a lot colder without the wait?

Despite being in an interglacial period, we are currently still in a glaceological Ice Age (a period of ice sheets in the northern and southern hemispheres) - of course it will get warmer at some point, all on it's own. If it stays warm for hundreds of thousands of years, that'll be the end of the Ice Age.
____________________
Current bike: Kawasaki Z750S
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:30 - 21 Sep 2006    Post subject: Re: An Inconvenient Truth and Esso Reply with quote

dmahon wrote:
There is still debate, although the greenies would like to think that there isn't.


It is deliberate policy to hide the debate.

The IPPR are influential. Check their marketing recommendations. On page 25:-

IPPR wrote:

Much of the noise in the climate change discourse comes from argument and counter-argument, and it is our recommendation that, at least for popular communications, interested agencies now need to treat the argument as having been won. This means simply behaving as if climate change exists and is real, and that individual actions are effective. This must be done by stepping away from the ‘advocates debate’ described earlier, rather than by stating and re-stating these things as fact.

The ‘facts’ need to be treated as being so taken-for-granted that they need not be spoken. The certainty of the Government’s new climate-change slogan – ‘Together this generation will tackle climate change’ (Defra 2006) – gives an example of this approach. It constructs, rather than claims, its own factuality.

Where science is invoked, it now needs to be as ‘lay science’ – offering lay explanations for what is being treated as a simple established scientific fact, just as the earth’s rotation or the water cycle are considered.


Basically, whatever the lack of knowledge pretend it is certain.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

gavin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:05 - 21 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

terry gilliam was right......IPPR....Information Adjustments, same thing.

i cant believe they would put a document in the public domain that clearly states that the government do control the media Shocked

Quote:
and it is our recommendation that, at least for popular communications, interested agencies now need to treat the argument as having been won.
.....or put another way, if you (the media) want information, you'll have to present it just as we say.

it really defies belief that they are so confident that they can get away with this steering of the public conciousness Exclamation Evil or Very Mad
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Didge
Traffic Copper



Joined: 02 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:10 - 22 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Didge wrote:
Mt. St. Helens probably slung more muck in the air, with one big bang, than man has done since the start of the industrial revolution.


Volcanos do emit a hell of a lot of CO2, but man made emissions dwarf it.

All the best

Keith


Sorry. Got to disagree with that. I think you'll find it's the other way around, by a huge margin. In fact, volcanos, and other geological activity, have always been one of the big factors in altering the climate of this planet, and in fact, that of many others.
Man's pollution is minimal in comparison.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

gavin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:27 - 22 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

heres a spanner to throw in the works.


It is claimed that a cow is responsible for as much greenhouse gas in its lifetime as the average car. Researchers estimate that the world cattle herd yields around 15-20 per cent all methane (CH4) generated by human activity - up to 100 million tonnes per year. Methane is 25 times more potent than CO2 in causing global warming.

And in California, regulators say dairy cows in the state's San Joaquin Valley produce more smog-forming gases than cars......

like i said, its human activity per se that is the root of the problem. but what are we to do, stop eating? stop breeding?Confused

if global warming is real, which i suspect it is, then we as a species have some very difficult decisions to make....

also i suspect there is a large amount of hysteresis in the temperature changes, and if we stopped all human activity that contributes to global warming right now, it would take tens, maybe hundreds of years for the effect to be noticed.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Retro-Man
Traffic Copper



Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:54 - 22 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

gavin wrote:
heres a spanner to throw in the works.


It is claimed that a cow is responsible for as much greenhouse gas in its lifetime as the average car. Researchers estimate that the world cattle herd yields around 15-20 per cent all methane (CH4) generated by human activity - up to 100 million tonnes per year. Methane is 25 times more potent than CO2 in causing global warming.

And in California, regulators say dairy cows in the state's San Joaquin Valley produce more smog-forming gases than cars......

like i said, its human activity per se that is the root of the problem. but what are we to do, stop eating? stop breeding?Confused

.


Rolling Eyes yeah and of course us humans invented the cow type species Rolling Eyes
____________________
https://domharnessphotography.webs.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

gavin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:15 - 22 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

well in a way we did. cattle are a domesticated animal, selectively bred from their wild ancestors to give high milk and meat yeilds.

there has been a population explosion in all kinds of livestock in the last 50 years in the developed world. there were almost exactly twice as many cattle in the UK in 2004 than in 1939, and it is likely that increase is reflected the world over. during that same period the human population of the uk increased by a very small amount.

there are nearly as many head if cattle in the UK now as there are cars - and they produce similar levels of emissions, but those emissions are many mant times more contributary to global warming.

this kind of increase is not natural, and there are many, many times more cattle in the world than there would have been if man had not intervened. not only that, they are far bigger, heavier, and more voracious. it is a double edged sword. there are many more cattle than there should be, and they produce far more emissions per head than wild cattle. and it is mankinds doing.


dont get me started on the chickens..... Rolling Eyes Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Retro-Man
Traffic Copper



Joined: 21 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:42 - 22 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

ah yes but this just counter acts the near extinction of american bison
____________________
https://domharnessphotography.webs.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

gavin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:14 - 22 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

in the united states only, yes. there are as many cattle now as there were estimated to be bison, before the white man came. but they are intensively farmed and live shorter lives. but there is also the rest of the world to think about.

human population figures are even more startling. there are now 6.6 Billion people in the world compared to just 2.3 billion people only 50 years ago. go back 200 years and there were less than a billion people on earth....

in fifty years time there are expected to be nearly nine billion people on earth..all consuming, all competing...do the math......koyoto wont work....in fact i cant see anything currently on offer that will work.

we are all racing ever faster to get first place in our own demise....
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

zaknafien




Joined: 25 Mar 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:28 - 22 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forget trying to 'save the earth' it's a resource and nothing more, pump all the cash into finding a way to get permanently off this rock.
____________________
02 Firestorm.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:31 - 22 Sep 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

We can stop global warming tommorow , unfortunately it is unpleasant the solution that is

we need to pour several trillion tons of Iron Fe into the oceans this will stimuate
algae growth to an extreme , and kill ALL marine life which means no fish n chips
suck up ALL the C02 in the atmosphere and it we bugger up the calculation in how
much Fe to use will do exactly what global warming'll do ice age 5!.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 19 years, 85 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.14 Sec - Server Load: 0.56 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 124.22 Kb