Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Blinded by the Light

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Yosemity Sam
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:47 - 02 Oct 2006    Post subject: Blinded by the Light Reply with quote

MAG UK's response to the EU Commission's consultation on Daytime Running Lights can be downloaded at

https://www.network.mag-uk.org/oct06p15.html

(the paper is downloadable from a link at the bottom of the page)

To get the message over to the public we've entitled the press release 'Blinded by the Light' -

which is also a song written by Bruce Sringsteen and recorded by Manfred Mann's Earth Band

this is where you can read the music and hear the song:

https://www.angelfire.com/music3/mixedvariety/Wavs2/BlindedByTheLight.html

We'll be using this song to get the message over.

So, all together on the following chorus:

'Oh she was
Blinded by the light
Wrapped up like a deuce
Another runner in the night
Blinded by the light
Wrapped up like a deuce
Another runner in the night
Blinded by the light
Wrapped up like a deuce
Another runner in the night
Blinded by the light
Wrapped up like a deuce
Another runner in the night'

Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

froggeh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:21 - 02 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I must say, having been to Sweden many times (my other half is swedish), I can say I agree with it. Certainly never been blinded during the day. It's only when it gets dark that lights bother me. And I can guarantee that you can see vehicles further away.

I certainly would never turn my lights off on the bike.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:57 - 02 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

on newer bikes you have NO choice in the matter an SV I was oggling the other day (or rather the tasty rider had no light switch or seemed not to since 50mph does kinda warp your senses a little)
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ncrn
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:57 - 02 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

im never running my bike without my lights, i need all the help i can get so i dont get hit by a sleepy cager..
____________________
Past: 55 Sym Jet, 91 ZZR250, 03 NSR125R. Present: 97 ER-5.
https://www.nsr125.co.uk - NSR Owners forum.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:02 - 02 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

If anyone ever sold me a bike without an off switch for the lights, I'd fit one.

Lights are NOT always appropriate. Especially around dawn and dusk where changing light conditions can mean a sillouhette is far easier to see than a headlamp. Running lights can totally rob an observer of their distance and speed perception, especially with a single headlamp (so-called "feature integration").

I have been on the recieving end of a re-start incident at a junction where only the actions of a third party in creating a space for me avoided a serious accident. This was caused entirely by my headlamp becoming 'lost' in the headlamps of following vehicles. "Sorry, I didn't see you.", well, she didn't, all she saw was a cluster of bright lights coming out of a low sun. She would have seen me if my headlamp had been switched off.

There is also the concern that mandatory use of headlamps would be used as an excuse. "His headlight wasn't on, therefore it isn't my fault I T-boned him officer.".

Govenments own conclusions:
Quote:
Over 30% of our detailed sample of ROWV (right of way violations) accidents where a motorcyclist is not at fault involve a motorcyclist who is recorded as using daytime running lights or
reflective clothing, or both. It is likely that this figure is an underestimation, given that this information is not always recorded by police reliably.


Reeder et al. (1996) reported that the use of headlights in the daytime was found to be much more common, especially when compared with reflective clothing use, some of which was
found to be unacceptable to some users.

The work of Hole and Langham (1996) suggested that it might be unwise to concentrate on the traditional advice to motorcyclists to make themselves more conspicuous.

Research into motorcycle conspicuity has produced mixed results, e.g. Yuan (2000), and Hole and Langham have suggested that driver expectation, which is particularly seen in more experienced drivers in their research, is the main reason behind many drivers’
failure to see an approaching motorcycle.

The fact that many motorcyclists in our sample appear to be trying to make themselves more conspicuous but are not seen, nevertheless lends credence to the idea that there is something amiss in the cognitive processes of the other involved driver.

DFT study into motorcycle accidents

Well, it seems their own experts aren't convinced that daylight running lights make much of a difference, so why legislate on it?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mchaggis
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:27 - 02 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought the only reason the UK had compulsory lights always-on was because it was cheapest to manufacture like that for the whole of the EU, as the rest of the EU (maybe, I dunno) has to have them? Thinking

Like Stinkwheel says, there are very definately times when it is not clever to have your lights on, in particular when the roads are wet, therefore shiney, and you are riding with the sun behind you. You stand little enough chance of being seen with the glare from the sun, let alone adding more of your own.
____________________
I must not be a troll...
Mmmm, Guinness
Discovering the delights of Hammerite and a 3/4" brush. Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Yosemity Sam
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:35 - 02 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="mchaggis"]I thought the only reason the UK had compulsory lights always-on was because it was cheapest to manufacture like that for the whole of the EU, as the rest of the EU (maybe, I dunno) has to have them? Thinking quote]

The UK doesn't have compulsory lights always on. In fact the UK government is against Daytime Running Lights.

The motorcycle manufacturers have hard wired bikes so that they automatically switch on. But I've got an 11 year old Virago that isn't hard wired and I turn them on if I think it's necessary - but not always.

The EU Commission wants to introduce Daytime Running Lights (DRL) for ALL vehicles, including trucks, cars, vans, motorcycles and to make it compulsory.

Most EU countries do not have compulsory DRL. (All Scandinavian countries do - but we've got evidence that the fatality rates are no different in Sweden than in this country and that Norway has a higher proportion of motorcycle fatalities due to collisions with cars that here.

The problem is that if all vehicles have to have DRL, then there will be times that motorcycles will blend in and won't be seen by car drivers and be hit - these collisions are typically called SMIDSYs.

Also there is concrete evidence from Denmark that the number of pedestrians and motorcyclists killed has increased since the introduction of DRL.

Finally, the biggest concern is that with compulsory DRL, car drivers will be less inclined to look for pedestrians and bikers and more importantly the insurance companies might use that as an excuse not to pay out.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

froggeh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:49 - 02 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is an interesting issue. My gut feeling tho, is that it's probably better on than off. Just going from experience in fading light conditions, especially when overcast or raining, So many vehicles without lights, very difficult to see 'em.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Yosemity Sam
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:59 - 02 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

froggeh wrote:
It is an interesting issue. My gut feeling tho, is that it's probably better on than off. Just going from experience in fading light conditions, especially when overcast or raining, So many vehicles without lights, very difficult to see 'em.


Yeah I understand that, but it should be a choice not compulsion. The Vienna Convention states that drivers (riders) should do everything possible to make themselves seen.

That's not the problem - pedestrians and riders may see car drivers, but that doesn't mean that car drivers will see them.

The real cause of casualties is human behaviour and what MAG is saying is that there needs to be road awareness training and testing for car drivers so that they actually 'look' for riders and pedestrians (and cyclists too) - rather than depend on headlights.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

bin
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:08 - 03 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

As a biker and car driver I cringe at bikers who ride with no lights on during any time of day....you cannot be seen and car drivers are not looking for you....even if they look at you they dont see you....
put your lights on and use the horn at the right time....dont assume that the driver of the vehicle has seen you...
ride defensively, be prepared to give way and have an escape route.
____________________
...its what you make of it...
...Silver Suzuki gsx1400...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Davo
Davo To The Rescue!



Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:15 - 03 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the other hand I've been extremely close to taking a bike out whilst driving, due to him using dipped headlights. The headlights did a brilliant job of "cloaking" the bike.

Had the guy of had his lights turned off he'd have created a nice dark silhouette and been visible.

Hence these day's when I'm riding the lights stay off until conditions require them (e.g. getting dark).

At the end of the day the thing most likely to prevent an accident is defensive positioning on the road.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:26 - 03 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

popwud wrote:
As a biker and car driver I cringe at bikers who ride with no lights on during any time of day....you cannot be seen and car drivers are not looking for you....even if they look at you they dont see you....


It would appear from any vaguely scientific study on the subject that they either don't see you, or see you and take no action on the information regardless of whether you have the lights on or not. This is not a good basis for useful legislation.

So cringe away. I want you to cringe. This means you have both seen me and assimilated the information that there is a motorcycle heading towards you.

Given what I have read up on tonight with regard to how drivers brains process the information given. The best way to avoid people pulling out on you is to present them with something they are not expecting to see. It's why flashing blue lights work on police cars.

I bet if I stuck a huge pair of fake plastic boobs on the front of my bike, people would be less likely to pull out on me than if I had the headlight on and was wearing a fluorescent vest. I vote we make this mandatory. Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Yosemity Sam
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:22 - 03 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Davo wrote:
On the other hand I've been extremely close to taking a bike out whilst driving, due to him using dipped headlights. The headlights did a brilliant job of "cloaking" the bike.

Had the guy of had his lights turned off he'd have created a nice dark silhouette and been visible.

Hence these day's when I'm riding the lights stay off until conditions require them (e.g. getting dark).

At the end of the day the thing most likely to prevent an accident is defensive positioning on the road.


Agree! defensive is good and so are avoidance techniques. but don't be too reliant on lights

[/img]
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

froggeh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:35 - 03 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yosemity Sam wrote:

Agree! defensive is good and so are avoidance techniques. but don't be too reliant on lights



Can you explain what the 2 images are supposed to represent?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Yosemity Sam
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:31 - 03 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

froggeh wrote:
Yosemity Sam wrote:

Agree! defensive is good and so are avoidance techniques. but don't be too reliant on lights



Can you explain what the 2 images are supposed to represent?


This is an example - when motorcycles have lights on - there is a chance you can see them, but if all vehicles have lights on then the motorcycle can be camoflaged by the other vehicle's lights - and therefore may not be seen.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

froggeh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:40 - 03 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yosemity Sam wrote:


This is an example - when motorcycles have lights on - there is a chance you can see them, but if all vehicles have lights on then the motorcycle can be camoflaged by the other vehicle's lights - and therefore may not be seen.


Ok - sorry for being dim... But in what situation is this bad.

If I am turning out of a junction, and glance to the right, in both situations I see that something is coming very visibly. If the bikes lights were off, then this is not the case.

I'm just trying to think of an actual situation where it makes a difference...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Yosemity Sam
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:59 - 03 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

froggeh wrote:
Yosemity Sam wrote:


This is an example - when motorcycles have lights on - there is a chance you can see them, but if all vehicles have lights on then the motorcycle can be camoflaged by the other vehicle's lights - and therefore may not be seen.


Ok - sorry for being dim... But in what situation is this bad.

If I am turning out of a junction, and glance to the right, in both situations I see that something is coming very visibly. If the bikes lights were off, then this is not the case.

I'm just trying to think of an actual situation where it makes a difference...


Rather than try to explain with short comments, can I suggest that you read MAG's paper on Daytime Running Lights - it's now on the dadrl website - so easier to get to.

www.dadrl.org.uk

www.dadrl.org.uk
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

bin
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:13 - 03 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yosemity Sam wrote:
Davo wrote:
On the other hand I've been extremely close to taking a bike out whilst driving, due to him using dipped headlights. The headlights did a brilliant job of "cloaking" the bike.

Had the guy of had his lights turned off he'd have created a nice dark silhouette and been visible.

Hence these day's when I'm riding the lights stay off until conditions require them (e.g. getting dark).

At the end of the day the thing most likely to prevent an accident is defensive positioning on the road.


Agree! defensive is good and so are avoidance techniques. but don't be too reliant on lights

[/img]


nice bit of photoshop there.....but if the rider had no light on he would be totally invisible if he was approaching from behind you....he would also not be clearly seen by you if you where approaching him.

A car driving with side lights in front of a car with dipped headlights is also very hard to see clearly....because you are looking at the brighter light....you will see them but its too late then.

Ride with your lights on dont be a silly silhouette, they draw chalk marks round silhouettes.
____________________
...its what you make of it...
...Silver Suzuki gsx1400...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:54 - 04 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm still waiting for someone to come up with an actual good, provable reason for why motorcycles should have daylight running lights.

Can anyone actually show that running with your lights on in daylight makes you less likely to have an accident?

I've taken the position in this debate that it doesn't make all that much difference, that the data is ambiguous at best and I've given a high powered study into the causes of motorcycle accidents to back this position up.

Anyone got anything else other than anecdote? I stand ready to be shot down in flames.

Justify your standpoint.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bin
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:50 - 04 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Simple.....IF you drive a car or lorry or bus anything other than two wheels like I have....be critical about your own observations of other 2wheel traffic and for a start take a bikesafe weekend.....but you may already have greater knowledge than the traffic police.
____________________
...its what you make of it...
...Silver Suzuki gsx1400...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:55 - 04 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Recently I saw, or didn't see a bike indicate. He had dipped lights on and I only saw the indicator as he turned, so I couldn't see the main beam of the headlight.

Also, there's issues with it being harder to see how far away a point light source is and that people may mis-interpret a vehicle with dipped lights going over a bumpy road as them 'flashing' their headlights.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bin
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:12 - 04 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Judging distant and speed comes with experience.....which is where you start your roadcraft after passing the test....you pass the road test if you have a lucky day...after then you either improve or dont give a damn.
____________________
...its what you make of it...
...Silver Suzuki gsx1400...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:17 - 04 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Judging distance and speed is made harder when you can see a single point light source in your mirror, rather than the shape of a motorbike and rider.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bin
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 27 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:13 - 04 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I can only reiterate G.....that it is experience as to how you react on what you see.....from a 4wheel point of view as you look through at least 2 thicknesses of glass it is difficult to judge speed etc. on that point of light....so what do you do....

From a bike point of view....ride defensively, cars have trouble judging where you are....anticipate before you overtake....ie is the vehicle in front about to overtake or change lanes or turn right or even swing right to turn left etc.... get your lights checked for alignment and dip....

Ride safe and enjoy your biking as I do.....these type of threads are good for discusion especially for born again and learners.
____________________
...its what you make of it...
...Silver Suzuki gsx1400...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mchaggis
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:18 - 04 Oct 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

The thing is though, I'd rather not have to rely on a car drivers experience to not think I'm actually the car behind me. If they just glance right and see two headlights and the car they think they belong to rather than me, then they might well pull out.

As my driving instructor loves to say, never put yourself in the situation where you're relying on luck and the skills of other drivers. Keep your life in your own hands I say.

Riding defensively is a big part of the solution. If I stay put they might mistake my headlight for that of a car behind me. If I move about on the road, they'll see me, as a car doesn't have a headlamp which moves side to side.
____________________
I must not be a troll...
Mmmm, Guinness
Discovering the delights of Hammerite and a 3/4" brush. Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 18 years, 270 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.45 Sec - Server Load: 3.42 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 138.86 Kb