Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Wanted man leaves country by wearing a veil

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Annabella
Like a person, only smaller



Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:43 - 20 Dec 2006    Post subject: Wanted man leaves country by wearing a veil Reply with quote

The BBC wrote:

Police seeking a man over the murder of Pc Sharon Beshenivsky are considering the theory he may have fled the UK dressed as a veiled Muslim woman.

It is understood West Yorkshire Police - who have not commented on reports about the veil theory - regard it only as one of a number of possibilities.

The wanted man, Mustaf Jamma, is the brother of Yusuf Jamma who was found guilty of the Pc's murder this week.

Mustaf Jamma is believed to be in his native Somalia.

The 26-year-old was released from jail six months before Pc Beshenivsky was killed.


They believe he may have used his sister's passport to leave the country.

Is passport control an example when Muslim women can be asked to remove their veil?
____________________
Avast! Pirates ahoy!
I did Cadwell! Very Happy
www.bikepics.com/members/bella
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:57 - 20 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Legally, yes it is. In practise, it's a seldom used power, and checks on people leaving the country are extremely flimsy and perfunctory.

I'm inclined to side with the Shadow Home Sec. who stated that not asking to see people's faces to compare against their passport during an all-ports murderer alert is a disgrace.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Annabella
Like a person, only smaller



Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:44 - 20 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you think that only those 'women' (woman in this case Laughing ) who have something to hide are those that would refuse to show their faces, or would extremely religious women be disinclined to accommodate the security?
____________________
Avast! Pirates ahoy!
I did Cadwell! Very Happy
www.bikepics.com/members/bella
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

angryjonny
World Chat Champion



Joined: 01 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:58 - 20 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

How much overlap should we allow between religion and the law? Should people be excused from certain rules and regulations that the rest of us have to adhere to, simply because of the particular fairytale they choose to believe?

If I invented my own religion (which by the very nature of religion as a concept is as equally valid as any other) how far could I stretch the rules before I was reined in?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

craigie b
Citizen Smith



Joined: 26 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:01 - 20 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

So much for enhanced securoty checks at airports, eh? Like bring aboard some shower gel is a threat to national security but not checking the faces of passengers against their passport. I just hop ethe media jumps on that issue rather than the 'veil issue again'.

And for the record of course I think a veil wearer should have to show their face at passport control, else it defeats the purpose of passport control!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

froggeh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:02 - 20 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is nothing to do with Muslims and veils. It is a peice of piss to leave the country if you're not flying, without barely a check... Channel tunnel, Ferry, or you can just pilot your own boat across to France.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Paivi
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:25 - 20 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think this is a case of veiled muslim women not being allowed or requested to remove their veils in the presence of a male passport control, I think it's more a case of passport control staff not caring who leaves the country.

Passport checks on leaving the UK at Heathrow are occasional only, to say the least, most of the time mine isn't checked. Flight crew are better at this than those people whose job it is.

Coming back, my ID card is always scanned in the machines, and they seem to be much stricter.

Mind you, I know somebody who's been in the UK as an illegal immigrant (non EU, overstayed his visa) and he's been free to come and go for years with no problems, several times a year from all SE airports and ferry ports. Only recently did the Home Office miraculously catch up with him and had him deported.

Every veiled person I've seen has removed the veil at passport control, they tend to choose the queue for the female controller. If none is available, they go to a male one and do the same.

But, as Froggeh said, not everybody leaves the country by commercial airlines. During my recent Eurotunnel trip on the bike, neither the UK, nor the French authorities were interested in seeing any ID from me, not in entering the countries, nor in leaving.
____________________
My other bike's a Monster... Wink


Last edited by Paivi on 12:44 - 20 Dec 2006; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

froggeh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:40 - 20 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Exactly. I think someone has come up with this non-story just to sir up the same old shit.

The guy could have left the country in any of the ways previously mentioned, or even use a male friend/family passport, grow/cut a beard, wear/remove glasses etc. It aint rocket science... In fact I reckon pretending to be a woman would be the least likely route, as it would be the most open to being caught, if someone did ask him to remove the veil.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

tokarev
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jan 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:00 - 20 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

It just adds credibility to my theory that Osama Bin Laden is actually living in Washington DC. He just is wearing a veil and pretending to be a woman.

No wonder they can't find him, they are looking in the wrong place! Laughing Razz
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

froggeh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:31 - 20 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

tokarev wrote:
It just adds credibility to my theory that Osama Bin Laden is actually living in Washington DC. He just is wearing a veil and pretending to be a woman.

No wonder they can't find him, they are looking in the wrong place! Laughing Razz


And here's me thinking he'd gone to the moon to live with Elvis and hitler.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Annabella
Like a person, only smaller



Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:37 - 20 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

froggeh wrote:
Exactly. I think someone has come up with this non-story just to sir up the same old shit.


My exact thoughts when I read the article was "Well this won't do much good for Islam/English relationships will it?"

Interesting to see so many people being more concerned about the security issue, which imo should have been the focus of the article not that someone may (they haven't been able to confirm this) have been able to leave the country using someone elses passport.
____________________
Avast! Pirates ahoy!
I did Cadwell! Very Happy
www.bikepics.com/members/bella
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

GodzGift
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:15 - 20 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

i dont think this is true
____________________
Bike Level: Amateur | CBT Passed
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:01 - 20 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

The article states that they are only considering the possibility, which is what investigations are all about - trying to work out what happened!

Regardless of the outcome, if the media coverage of this embarrasses Reid into tightening our border controls, then it can only be a good thing.

EDIT: Of more concern is the problem I see on a regular basis - criminals avoiding deportation to their home countries after committing offences here, because human rights legislation won't let us send them back. Once you have committed a serious offence, you've proven you cannot be trusted to be a decent citizen in this nation, and you should be on the first flight back to Mogadishu, in quick-cuffs with 3 burly escorts if required.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

GodzGift
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:05 - 21 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

well the investigation by the sun ( yes i know, ) one of the papers investigators/ journalists, was able to catch a flight to france dressed in the what ever its called ( BUKA?) full outfit, withouht being asked to show her face. even when she asked "do you want me to show my face".so on that note, there is a high chance that dude got away.

Mister James wrote:

EDIT: Of more concern is the problem I see on a regular basis - criminals avoiding deportation to their home countries after committing offences here, because human rights legislation won't let us send them back.


that must piss you right off @ work
____________________
Bike Level: Amateur | CBT Passed
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

froggeh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:48 - 21 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister James wrote:
The article states that they are only considering the possibility, which is what investigations are all about - trying to work out what happened!

Regardless of the outcome, if the media coverage of this embarrasses Reid into tightening our border controls, then it can only be a good thing.

EDIT: Of more concern is the problem I see on a regular basis - criminals avoiding deportation to their home countries after committing offences here, because human rights legislation won't let us send them back. Once you have committed a serious offence, you've proven you cannot be trusted to be a decent citizen in this nation, and you should be on the first flight back to Mogadishu, in quick-cuffs with 3 burly escorts if required.



It pisses me off too when people abuse our trust. But if sending someone back is basically a death sentence then I am against it. We should treat all people who are in the country equally. They break the law, then we deal with them with the law.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

GodzGift
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:59 - 21 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

yeah ok, lets just spend more of the taxpayers money, on trialing, sentencing and paying for them while theyre in prison. its cheaper and easier to send them back, so why not do it.

if they were so worried about theyre lives then would have behaved themselves. ???
____________________
Bike Level: Amateur | CBT Passed
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:10 - 21 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

froggeh wrote:

It pisses me off too when people abuse our trust. But if sending someone back is basically a death sentence then I am against it. We should treat all people who are in the country equally. They break the law, then we deal with them with the law.


How do you prove that they are telling the truth? The simple fact is that the vast majority of people who claim they will be killed in their own country are lying. They know the system, they know what they need to say to have a hope of asylum once caught by UKIS, and they will do or say anything to support their case.

There are whole organisations and support groups who help provide cover stories and testimonies, while immigration solicitors tend to recycle the same few stories of woe and persecution for all their clients, regardless of the actual facts. Many of those claiming asylum simply pass their application forms to their solicitor blank but signed, and let the brief come up with the story that he then informs the court/IO that he has "translated" for the client.

Even amongst those that we believe, there are many who are not worthy of our protection. Speak to a Jamaican about why he is in this country, and he'll often tell you it's because he killed someone, and the relatives are after him. Why should we then expend resources protecting this weasel from what many would say is righteous retribution, while he continues his criminality in our country?

Our history of providing asylum to the needy is something to be proud of, but until people like you realise that it isn't as clear cut as it seems on the news, it will be a practise that is continually abused by the majority. I have seen dozens of cases like these every single working day of the last 3 years. Many are perhaps pleasant people who probably won't do us a huge amount of harm - but starting off their tenure in this country by lying to the authorities and abusing our goodwill hardly speaks well of them.

Oh, and as for treating everyone equally, Foreign prisoners are almost always released from prison early, because criminal courts recommend them for deportation asap - blissfully unaware that the Immigration Service are likely to release them on bail and hope that they disappear.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

froggeh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:56 - 21 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister James wrote:
froggeh wrote:

It pisses me off too when people abuse our trust. But if sending someone back is basically a death sentence then I am against it. We should treat all people who are in the country equally. They break the law, then we deal with them with the law.


How do you prove that they are telling the truth? The simple fact is that the vast majority of people who claim they will be killed in their own country are lying. They know the system, they know what they need to say to have a hope of asylum once caught by UKIS, and they will do or say anything to support their case.

There are whole organisations and support groups who help provide cover stories and testimonies, while immigration solicitors tend to recycle the same few stories of woe and persecution for all their clients, regardless of the actual facts. Many of those claiming asylum simply pass their application forms to their solicitor blank but signed, and let the brief come up with the story that he then informs the court/IO that he has "translated" for the client.

Even amongst those that we believe, there are many who are not worthy of our protection. Speak to a Jamaican about why he is in this country, and he'll often tell you it's because he killed someone, and the relatives are after him. Why should we then expend resources protecting this weasel from what many would say is righteous retribution, while he continues his criminality in our country?

Our history of providing asylum to the needy is something to be proud of, but until people like you realise that it isn't as clear cut as it seems on the news, it will be a practise that is continually abused by the majority. I have seen dozens of cases like these every single working day of the last 3 years. Many are perhaps pleasant people who probably won't do us a huge amount of harm - but starting off their tenure in this country by lying to the authorities and abusing our goodwill hardly speaks well of them.

Oh, and as for treating everyone equally, Foreign prisoners are almost always released from prison early, because criminal courts recommend them for deportation asap - blissfully unaware that the Immigration Service are likely to release them on bail and hope that they disappear.


People like you. Cheeky sod.
I am well aware of the problems, and I agree they need to be sorted ASAP.
But I detest it when people come out with crass comments such as
"He has lost his right to human rights"
In the end if we want to regard ourselves as a humane, and civilised society (quite unlike most of the places where these people come from), then we need to act civilised and humane.

The people baying for blood, or screaming at unconvicted arrestees, or dismissing human rights without a thought, are the people I would like to see the country rid of.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

GodzGift
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:09 - 21 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok can someone disagree so i can slate them off ???
____________________
Bike Level: Amateur | CBT Passed
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:11 - 21 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

froggeh wrote:


People like you. Cheeky sod.
I am well aware of the problems, and I agree they need to be sorted ASAP.



I suggest you stop disagreeing with me if that is the case.

Quote:

But I detest it when people come out with crass comments such as
"He has lost his right to human rights"
In the end if we want to regard ourselves as a humane, and civilised society (quite unlike most of the places where these people come from), then we need to act civilised and humane.

The people baying for blood, or screaming at unconvicted arrestees, or dismissing human rights without a thought, are the people I would like to see the country rid of.


I fail to see how any of the above applies to me.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

froggeh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:50 - 21 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister James wrote:
froggeh wrote:

But I detest it when people come out with crass comments such as
"He has lost his right to human rights"
In the end if we want to regard ourselves as a humane, and civilised society (quite unlike most of the places where these people come from), then we need to act civilised and humane.

The people baying for blood, or screaming at unconvicted arrestees, or dismissing human rights without a thought, are the people I would like to see the country rid of.


I fail to see how any of the above applies to me.


It doesn't. I was ranting Smile

I just hate to see sweeping generalisations as in "Send them back to where they came from" - with no caveat

I have no problem with deporting foreign nationals who commit heinous crimes, provided we can get an agreement from their respective governments and we are sure beyond reason that they will not be subject to unreasonable conditions... such as torture, or death sentence.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:30 - 21 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are once again missing the point, and you obviously did feel your rant applied to me, because you gave my post a negative rating.

I wish to deport ANY illegal immigrant who has committed ANY crime - they have shown that we do not require their presence in this country, as they cannot be trusted to act other than in the way that has resulted in their own countries being hell-holes. We do not need or want that to happen here any more than it already is.

Take a look at this story:

https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6192507.stm

2 of the perps were illegal immigrants. I bet you huge sums of cash that when they have served their paltry sentences, they are not deported, but remain in this country thanks to spurious and invented claims that they would face persecution in their home countries.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

froggeh
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:45 - 21 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister James wrote:
You are once again missing the point, and you obviously did feel your rant applied to me, because you gave my post a negative rating...


It wasn't. And the negative rating is because I feel strongly against the blanket deportation of immigrants who commit crime. I am very much against the death penalty, and thankfully the more forward thinking nations in the world are too. If you send someone back to their death, then you are approving the death penalty.

I don't like people who do these things any more than you do, I just would not bring myself to their level. Once you do that, you lose the moral high ground, and become no better youself.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ColdInsomnia
World Chat Champion



Joined: 30 Jun 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:46 - 21 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

As far as I'm concerned, if your an immigrant living in this country it's a privilege and not a right.

Treat the country and it's laws with respect and you'll be protected by them.
Treat the country like a disposable money pot with citizens you can steal off for the next five years, and you deserve to be sent back to whatever shitbekistan that you crawled out of.
____________________
Yamaha YB100 | Yamaha TZR125 | Yamaha XJ600S | Suzuki GSF600
"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives. I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That's what's insane about it."
John Lennon
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:32 - 21 Dec 2006    Post subject: Reply with quote

froggeh wrote:
Mister James wrote:
You are once again missing the point, and you obviously did feel your rant applied to me, because you gave my post a negative rating...


It wasn't. And the negative rating is because I feel strongly against the blanket deportation of immigrants who commit crime. I am very much against the death penalty, and thankfully the more forward thinking nations in the world are too. If you send someone back to their death, then you are approving the death penalty.

I don't like people who do these things any more than you do, I just would not bring myself to their level. Once you do that, you lose the moral high ground, and become no better youself.


Once again - have you considered that they may be telling porkies? Why should our justice system grind to a halt because they tell un-provable lies? I'm not trying to be rude, but you really don't seem to have a clue as to the nature of this problem. I applaud your humane instincts, but the principles you cherish simply do not apply in the overwhelming majority of asylum/criminal cases. They rely on affable suckers like you to weight the system in their favour.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 19 years, 36 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 0.55 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 143.15 Kb