Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


New energy, speed, science question...

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

killa
Won't Shut Up



Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:46 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: New energy, speed, science question... Reply with quote

So that particle accelerator thingy was on the nes yesterday, its being upgraded and then will be running next year. They are talking of new physics that will be found.
I’m assuming that propulsion will be something they’d be looking into, powering anything without much waste etc…

So, in space, if you have a craft of today’s spec and gave it engines like those on the enterprise, when you enter space and give it the beans how the hell will it hold?
I have images of them giving it full power and the thing implodes, disintegrates, atomises. This would be due to G force, drag etc… I know there is no oxygen in space, but any atmosphere will be punched through. Will it be a case of them having the power to get to the moon in an hour, but no craft to do it? Thinking
____________________
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
Bike:- Yamaha TRX850 | Killas Biking History | Killas Gaming History | Killas autmotive history
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

McGee
O RLY?



Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:49 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

/In before star trek geeks.


Killa, long day man ?
____________________
◙◙► K6 GSXR 600 ◄◙◙◙◙► K5 GSXR 1000 ◄◙◙◙◙► K5 GSXR 600 ◄◙◙◙◙► 96 RF600r ◄◙◙
◄◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙►◄◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙►◄◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙►
Its pronounced Jixxer!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

killa
Won't Shut Up



Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:55 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought of this yesterday....just confused me. Confused
____________________
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
Bike:- Yamaha TRX850 | Killas Biking History | Killas Gaming History | Killas autmotive history
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

pa_broon74
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:23 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Don't know about now, but in star trek they use force fields.

"Losing structural integrity Captain..."

In the real world (or universe) I think as long as you do everything gradually (no quick turns or accelerations) it would be ok. Plenty of space in, ummm, space to turn around. Thumbs Up

I think any ship built would be so massive, it wouldn't be able to do any abrupt manouvres.
____________________
Didn't catch anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ncrn
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:24 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well in space there is no air as you pointed out so you could rapidly accelerate with no real consequence to the ship in theory. I guess there would be problems with space debry hitting the ship and that could cause some damage.

It is possible that the ship could only go into orbit of a planet and from there a smaller ship would have to go to the surface one built like the current ships we use.

I'm not really sure they'll even find anything from this collision they're going to do, I hope its something cool though. It does make me laugh hearing theories from people suggesting that it will destroy the world when it happens..
____________________
Past: 55 Sym Jet, 91 ZZR250, 03 NSR125R. Present: 97 ER-5.
https://www.nsr125.co.uk - NSR Owners forum.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Visitor Q
$25 whore



Joined: 30 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:30 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Drag is a force caused by the friction of pushing through molecules in the air. Air is considered a fluid, just of less viscosity then water etc.
Hence you want a smooth shape.

In space you dont need that. No oxygen Wink

However any large ship would have to be built in space as youd never be able to get it to escape the earths (admittedly piss weak) gravity.

Also bare in mind all these drive just tend to work by forcing mass out the back, to push themselves along. It would be the stopping that would worry me.

But the actual hadron accelerator or whats its business (do a search for 'were doomed', was a thread on it a month or so back) is mainly for discovering new particles as i understand it.

The logistics of space travel hurt my brain, but i doubt we're going anywhere anywhere soon. Although i guess they could always use drives for cleaner, quicker travel round earth.
____________________
China traffic/travel bike vid - When I make a sweeping statement, please add the word 'statistically' in to the sentence before you bitch...
From September 2014 to January/February 2015 I will not be using any English, nor reading any. As such, I won't be on here. PM at will, but I won't be checking/posting unless in emergencies. Certainly not for the first couple of months. Please berate me savagely if I break that rule...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

ncrn
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:39 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

bonny_ricardo wrote:
Also bare in mind all these drive just tend to work by forcing mass out the back, to push themselves along. It would be the stopping that would worry me.


The engines would have to be designed so that they can go forwards or backwards, as long as they are built on the top sides or bottom of the ship then they would be able to force mass the other way and stop themselves fairly rapidly.
____________________
Past: 55 Sym Jet, 91 ZZR250, 03 NSR125R. Present: 97 ER-5.
https://www.nsr125.co.uk - NSR Owners forum.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Scotch Bonnet
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:42 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

ncrn wrote:
The engines would have to be designed so that they can go forwards or backwards, as long as they are built on the top sides or bottom of the ship then they would be able to force mass the other way and stop themselves fairly rapidly.

...or you just rotate the ship 180 degrees...

I could probably start talking about Delta V Budgets at this point, but I'll be good.
____________________
Hmmmm..... is it supposed to do that?
2001 CB500
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Annabella
Like a person, only smaller



Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:10 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Arthur C Clarke invented a very simple shield to use in front of ships. He suggested using an ice shield comprising of hexagonal blocks of ice all linked together.

Thumbs Up Songs of Distant Earth = a favourite book* Thumbs Up

*Christmas stocking filler recommendation for Sci-Fi lovers.
____________________
Avast! Pirates ahoy!
I did Cadwell! Very Happy
www.bikepics.com/members/bella
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

pa_broon74
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:17 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Annabella wrote:
Arthur C Clarke invented a very simple shield to use in front of ships. He suggested using an ice shield comprising of hexagonal blocks of ice all linked together.

Thumbs Up Songs of Distant Earth = a favourite book* Thumbs Up

*Christmas stocking filler recommendation for Sci-Fi lovers.


I've read that too. It's a good 'un. They had a sky lift too to transport the ice up into orbit... I was given Islands in the Sky when I left primary 7, first proper book I read.

I think in Star Trek they had a warp field... Personally, I'd quite like my own holodeck.
____________________
Didn't catch anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Visitor Q
$25 whore



Joined: 30 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:21 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

pa_broon74 wrote:
Personally, I'd quite like my own holodeck.


Wouldnt we all WinkWink
____________________
China traffic/travel bike vid - When I make a sweeping statement, please add the word 'statistically' in to the sentence before you bitch...
From September 2014 to January/February 2015 I will not be using any English, nor reading any. As such, I won't be on here. PM at will, but I won't be checking/posting unless in emergencies. Certainly not for the first couple of months. Please berate me savagely if I break that rule...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

killa
Won't Shut Up



Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:21 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

So if you travel in a modern day ship at new rediculous speeds with this new propultion unit, would the front of the ship become far too hot or would it be no bother because there is no air?

If so, would it just be the forces on the ship if the craft had to perform a manouvre at this speed that would potentionally blow it to pieces?
____________________
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
Bike:- Yamaha TRX850 | Killas Biking History | Killas Gaming History | Killas autmotive history
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:26 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

A ship capable of moving that fast would need some kind of field that would hold every molecule in the same relative position (I think Star Trek calls it an 'Inertial Dampening Field'). Something that would be part and parcel of an anti-gravity drive (so my intuition tells me). The same field would also act as a shield. Thinking
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Fawbish
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Jan 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:32 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The logistics of space travel hurt my brain, but i doubt we're going anywhere anywhere soon.


I wouldnt say that.


At the moment theyre developing something called an electrosail

Basically, creates a massive (think 2-3 km square) "sail", using electromagnetic fields? (or so I've read, my terminology is shite - i was out last night and am still rough lol)

This sail latches on to light particles - light that is given from the stars moves extremely quick, and theyve figured that capturing this light and transforming it into moving energy is a good idea.

They reckon instead of it taking a life time to get to the edge of our solar system, their simulations say it would take 15 years to reach it.

I find this sort of stuff stupidly interesting - and think its well worth following.


As for the particle accelerator thing - theyre trying to re-create the big bang on a molecular level arent they? Id have said the big bang was on a molecular level before, for it to have worked....therefore I wouldnt say it was out of the question to possibly worry that it might destroy the earth Laughing or take a large chunk of it out Thumbs Up

EDIT: And taking hetzer 's point, if you needed a gravity drive as a pre-requisite, that would solve the problem of having to build the ship in space - and you could build it on earth, yes?
____________________
"Oh....it looks like Average Joe's is forfeiting the match!" - "Yeah, its a risky strategy but lets see if it pays off for 'em Cotton."


Last edited by Fawbish on 16:36 - 13 Dec 2007; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Visitor Q
$25 whore



Joined: 30 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:35 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fawbish wrote:
Quote:
The logistics of space travel hurt my brain, but i doubt we're going anywhere anywhere soon.


I wouldnt say that.


At the moment theyre developing something called an electrosail

Basically, creates a massive (think 2-3 km square) "sail", using electromagnetic fields? (or so I've read, my terminology is shite - i was out last night and am still rough lol)

This sail latches on to light particles - light that is given from the stars moves extremely quick, and theyve figured that capturing this light and transforming it into moving energy is a good idea.

They reckon instead of it taking a life time to get to the edge of our solar system, their simulations say it would take 15 years to reach it.

I find this sort of stuff stupidly interesting - and think its well worth following.


As for the particle accelerator thing - their trying to re-create the big bang on a molecular level arent they? Id have said the big bang was on a molecular level before, for it to have worked....therefore I wouldnt say it was out of the question to possibly worry that it might destroy the earth Laughing or take a large chunk of it out Thumbs Up


Aye... 15 years to reach our solar systems edge... Find out how long it would take to get to the next solar system, let alone inhibited planets.
____________________
China traffic/travel bike vid - When I make a sweeping statement, please add the word 'statistically' in to the sentence before you bitch...
From September 2014 to January/February 2015 I will not be using any English, nor reading any. As such, I won't be on here. PM at will, but I won't be checking/posting unless in emergencies. Certainly not for the first couple of months. Please berate me savagely if I break that rule...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Ben.
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:49 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

even if you can travel at the speed of light (were not even close to it yet) it would take a few life times to just reach another solar system. then when you take into acount the size of stars in other galaxys, they would quite happily swallow the space ship thingy if it cant even escape earths atmosphere. black holes are everywhere as well. im quite happy to stay on earth thanks... Rolling Eyes
____________________
follow my racing season
Race bike - R6
Road bike - sv650
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:53 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Electro-sails, atomic motors, it's all a load of tosh. Without an anti-gravity drive, powered by Zero-Point energy, we ain't going nowhere.

You need to exceed light velocity, and you need something that will both generate an inertial dampening effect and provide a shield. Anti-grav will do all of that, and I strongly suspect we already have it.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:54 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

half_lyfe wrote:
even if you can travel at the speed of light (were not even close to it yet) it would take a few life times to just reach another solar system. then when you take into acount the size of stars in other galaxys, they would quite happily swallow the space ship thingy if it cant even escape earths atmosphere. black holes are everywhere as well. im quite happy to stay on earth thanks... Rolling Eyes


I suspect that travelling faster than the velocity of light bends time and space such that you can pop out anywhere in the univesrse within a matter of seconds.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Scotch Bonnet
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:06 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

half_lyfe wrote:
even if you can travel at the speed of light ... it would take a few life times to just reach another solar system.


No it wouldn't, there are plenty of stars within 10 light years, so if we could travel at the speed of light they'd take less than 10 years.

We can't do c anyway, so it's academic, but still.
____________________
Hmmmm..... is it supposed to do that?
2001 CB500
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ben.
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Jul 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:09 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scotch Bonnet wrote:
half_lyfe wrote:
even if you can travel at the speed of light ... it would take a few life times to just reach another solar system.


No it wouldn't, there are plenty of stars within 10 light years, so if we could travel at the speed of light they'd take less than 10 years.

We can't do c anyway, so it's academic, but still.


hmm i think the nearest star is 18 light years away or something, but we know whats there, i meant to an unknow galaxy.
and traveling faster than light, is getting into the fourth dimension. cant electrons appear and disapear light years away in an instant? i read somewhere they got an electron to get from new york to london in a milisecond or something... Confused
____________________
follow my racing season
Race bike - R6
Road bike - sv650
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Scotch Bonnet
Scooby Slapper



Joined: 23 Jul 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:13 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah, screw this, I'm gonna do my own space thread, with Blackjack and Hookers. Wink
____________________
Hmmmm..... is it supposed to do that?
2001 CB500
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Visitor Q
$25 whore



Joined: 30 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:40 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Righty, lets save time. Im very busy at the moment and cant arsed ranting again...

Heres the last thread on the matter, second half covers space travel pretty well

We're doomed!
____________________
China traffic/travel bike vid - When I make a sweeping statement, please add the word 'statistically' in to the sentence before you bitch...
From September 2014 to January/February 2015 I will not be using any English, nor reading any. As such, I won't be on here. PM at will, but I won't be checking/posting unless in emergencies. Certainly not for the first couple of months. Please berate me savagely if I break that rule...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:19 - 13 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scotch Bonnet wrote:

No it wouldn't, there are plenty of stars within 10 light years, so if we could travel at the speed of light they'd take less than 10 years.

We can't do c anyway, so it's academic, but still.


We HAVE built an engine that is theoretically capable of near light-speed flight though. It's called an ion drive. They accelerate VERY slowly but they keep on accelerating.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.”
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Phoenix
Twisted Firestarter



Joined: 01 Aug 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 04:06 - 14 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

Xenon propulsion (Ion) has been in use for a while, think there was a recent one launched. But it still relies on Xenon gas reserves, and the increase in speed is so slow that I imagine, can't be sure without calculating it, it'd take thousands of years to approach the speed of light, by which time the gas would've run out, frozen solid or the ship would've been destroyed.

The problem is when you start hitting ridiculous speeds so much as a bit of rock the size of a ball bearing hitting the ship would probably be able to cause absurd amounts of damage due to the speed involved, which is why some kind of shield would be needed. There's also the case of space gases, nebulae etc which would be similar (but not as severe) to flying through an atmosphere in terms of friction.

Ice shield, made of hexagonal blocks of ice. Novel, but i don't see how it could possibly be of any use at stoping million mph lumps of rock in space.

I've always thought the best way of making something go really fast would be to build a centrifuge in space with the probe mounted on an arm, so to slingshot it. Could possibly go in the completely wrong direction when released if somebody doesn't calculate things correctly, or rip the whole thing to bits when it reaches a certain rotational speed. Be a one way trip of course too, could volunteer a few people here for that one? Wink
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

killa
Won't Shut Up



Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:40 - 14 Dec 2007    Post subject: Reply with quote

I remember reading somewhere that space rubbish floating around the earth travels fast, so quick infact a bolt could pass through you so quickly you probably wouldn't notice at first.
This always bemused me as there are satellites out there that have been functionaing for years, i imagined with all the crap up there they would end up looking like some sort of cheese with loads of holes in.

It does boggle my mind how you can be travelling at something like 10,000mph or so and avoid space debris. A rock the size of a golf ball at that speed packs some punch surely, so the ship would have to be made from some heavily thick armour, or indeed have some sort of force field.

I don't know how to calulate G-force but does G-force only exist when you have gravity?
____________________
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
Bike:- Yamaha TRX850 | Killas Biking History | Killas Gaming History | Killas autmotive history
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 18 years, 302 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.12 Sec - Server Load: 0.74 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 146.02 Kb