Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Tazers are non lethal ya say?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:40 - 20 Jan 2008    Post subject: Tazers are non lethal ya say? Reply with quote

Another taser related death,

https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7198742.stm

It seems that the original hypothesis of tasers are non lethal is quickly becoming untrue, as with the mosquito anti teenager sonic device.

And NO I'm not saying threatening cops with knives is OK but I'm disputing the non lethal claim constantly made by the manufacturers , which no doubt MPs have shares and or shady backroom deals with.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Skudd
Super Spammer



Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:06 - 20 Jan 2008    Post subject: Re: Tazers are non lethal ya say? Reply with quote

Itchy wrote:
Another taser related death,

https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7198742.stm

It seems that the original hypothesis of tasers are non lethal is quickly becoming untrue, as with the mosquito anti teenager sonic device.

And NO I'm not saying threatening cops with knives is OK but I'm disputing the non lethal claim constantly made by the manufacturers , which no doubt MPs have shares and or shady backroom deals with.


All they need to say is that Usually it is none leathal but if you come at me with a knife or put me in any form of danger I will use a tazer. You will probably survive, but do you want to take the risk in the first place.
____________________
Famous last words of Humpty Dumpty. " Stop pushing me "
Petty Anarchists look at "1984".............. The Visionary looks at "Animal Farm".
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

McGee
O RLY?



Joined: 24 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:15 - 20 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

All police in the UK should be given the option to be armed.

If they don't want a firearm give 'em a tazer if they say yes give them a pistol.

Nuff said.
____________________
◙◙► K6 GSXR 600 ◄◙◙◙◙► K5 GSXR 1000 ◄◙◙◙◙► K5 GSXR 600 ◄◙◙◙◙► 96 RF600r ◄◙◙
◄◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙►◄◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙►◄◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙◙►
Its pronounced Jixxer!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Keir
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:24 - 20 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
When officers arrived at the house at about 1900 GMT on Saturday they were confronted by the armed man, police said.

He was then shot with the police Taser gun.

"The man went into the house where he inflicted a more serious injury on himself," said Bedfordshire Police.



"When officers found him, he was in urgent need of medical attention."



the way i read that the tazer had nothing to do with it. he was shot then went into the house where he infilcted more harm with the knife. Could it not be argued that he should have been re-tazered to avoid this?
____________________
Current : '08 Yamaha FZ1s
Previous: '99 Honda CBR 600FX, 03 ZX636 B1H, 99 Fazer 600 (red), 02 GSX-R 600 K2, 00 SV650s (red), 2008 ZX10R, 97 Bandit 1200N, 04 ZX6RR K1H, 04 GSX-R 1000, 98 Fazer 600 (gold), 05 Madness 110 Pit bike, 04 CR125R, 00 SV650s (black), 06 KTM 625 SMC, 99 SRAD 600 track bike, 03 SV650, 98 Bandit 1200N, Bandit 600SY, 03 GSX-R 600 K3, 01 GSX-R 600, 01 Fazer 600 (black), VFR 400 NC30 x3, 78 Honda Dream, 00 Speedfight 50
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:51 - 20 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

No I just object to the constant reference to non lethal , if they put a caveat ie non lethal in 9/10 cases fine , but calling it non lethal means that cops just thing don't worry won't do a thing to them might as well use it several times.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

powelly
World Chat Champion



Joined: 29 May 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:07 - 20 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

My first thought when I heard this was they taser him, he collapsed and he fell on the knife.

Clearly this scenario would have nothing to do with the taser in the same way that the guy that was covered in petrol and burst in to flames had nothing to do with the fact that he'd just been tasered too.
____________________
Yamaha RXS 100 > Gilera Runner 50 > Suzuki SV650SY
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

pwntifex
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:25 - 20 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

The reason the tazer is a dangerous weapon is because it is marketed as being in the same bracket as CS gas and the baton—that is, as non-lethal dehabilitant that causes little to no damage over the long term.
However, it is becoming obvious that this is not the case. I would rather our officers were armed with pistols (the gravity of which is understood by all, and that are unlikely to be employed except as a last resort) than this new technology, which nobody really understands, but that police forces seem eager to employ straight off the bat.
____________________
the warped one: This is a follow up from the thread 'my willy hurts'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:40 - 20 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

I always thought it came under the category of 'less lethal', like various 'soft' munitions such as rubber bullets/baton rounds?

I have to say, your use of this particular story to highlight your (valid) concerns is as suspect as any mis-use of the description 'non-lethal' - as it's clear that the Tazer had no direct link to the guy's death.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

pwntifex
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:56 - 21 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister James wrote:
I always thought it came under the category of 'less lethal', like various 'soft' munitions such as rubber bullets/baton rounds?

I have to say, your use of this particular story to highlight your (valid) concerns is as suspect as any mis-use of the description 'non-lethal' - as it's clear that the Tazer had no direct link to the guy's death.

You're right, my comment has nothing to do with this case at all. I was just using it as a place to comment upon tazers in general.

I'm not sure on the official categorization of the tazer in terms of lethality; I suppose you would know better than I. But I feel there is a discrepancy here, in that (I suspect) most police officers armed with rubber bullets and baton rounds, to take your example, would be unlikely to use them as a first-contact solution; that is, before exhausting all other possibilities. Perhaps it's because the rounds are fired from a gun, I don't know. But the tazer seems to be regarded as harmless, or at least its lethal effects glossed over to the extreme. The 'testing' issue re: the weapon is also worrying, but that is a slightly different argument.
____________________
the warped one: This is a follow up from the thread 'my willy hurts'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:09 - 21 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

pwntifex wrote:

You're right, my comment has nothing to do with this case at all. I was just using it as a place to comment upon tazers in general.


I wasn't specifically referring to your comments - more the original post than anything else.

Quote:

But I feel there is a discrepancy here, in that (I suspect) most police officers armed with rubber bullets and baton rounds, to take your example, would be unlikely to use them as a first-contact solution; that is, before exhausting all other possibilities.


Again, valid concerns - I just wonder how much of the problem is down to perception issues and the way the media present the facts to us?

There certainly does seem to be an eagerness for 2nd rate enforcement types in the states to jolt people with Tazers, but I'm not sure I've seen any evidence to suggest they've been used with the same abandon here.

This news story, for example, states that officers were threatened with a knife by someone already showing signs of having been involved in a violent struggle. Depending on the level of threat, I think it entirely appropriate that he be subdued by any means the officers on the scene felt necessary.

In my line of work, force is always the tool of last resort - but I don't employ it sparingly if I feel that my well being is at stake.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:33 - 21 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's very clear that the Tazer is a potentially lethal weapon, regardless of what the lying scum say to the contrary. Anybody with a pace-maker, or a weak heart/heart with electrical issues, is at risk of death from being given 50k volts.

But that won't stop their indiscriminate use. Unfortunately the average copper will view it as a new toy and be gagging to use it so long as he can dress it up with a suitable form of words and cover his ass. Guy in the street gives it a bit of verbal attitude, he'll be zapped and the report will say "threatning behaviour & resisting arrest". You know how it goes, same old same old.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

SoND
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:02 - 21 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Death puts PSNI use of taser guns in doubt.

https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/mheyojcwcwey/rss2/

Quote:
“However, the fact is people have very real concerns about the deployment of tasers by the PSNI.

“They are not less lethal weapons and we do not know the impact on the physiology or mental state of the people they are used on.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

colin1
Captain Safety



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:03 - 21 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

their mistake was not restraining him immediately after tazering him.

Being tazered is going to be a traumatic experience, so if someone is mentally unstable, its not really going to make them calm down. If anything its gonna make them freak out.

So once you have tazered them, you can get control of them, and then keep them under control, rather than let them run off and do something else thats silly.

I agree with Hetzer that in the future its quite possible that people will be tazered for giving a bit of attitude.

In most ways this is bad, but I think its actually better than being beaten up over a bit of attitude, as it still is more controlled than hitting someone with a baton. The physical effects of being tazered wont usually last as long as the physical effect of being given a thorough kicking in the back of a meat wagon.

They call them meat wagons because of the blood they have to hose out at the end of the night.

Its standard (unofficial) policy, to grab a trouble maker, take him into the van and teach him a lesson.
____________________
colin1 is officially faster than god
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

SoND
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:31 - 21 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

colin1 wrote:
In most ways this is bad, but I think its actually better than being beaten up over a bit of attitude, as it still is more controlled than hitting someone with a baton. The physical effects of being tazered wont usually last as long as the physical effect of being given a thorough kicking in the back of a meat wagon.


The tazer makes it so lazy though as seen with countless of videos of police abusing them. Keep the batons and manual beatings, stop the filth being lazy and power mad.

link above wrote:
Officers who deploy them have to decide if the person is behaving in way that would otherwise result in a firearm being discharged.


The tazer should be considered on the same level as a regular gun and investigations everytime they have been used. Might be one way to kerb the abuse.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

colin1
Captain Safety



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:00 - 21 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think one thing with normal injuries, is that you can show them as evidence that you have suffered.

Suffer being tazered, and you have very little to show.

As you say, a cop is gonna think less about using his tazer, than his baton.

They used to make all new uk coppers be on the recieving end of peper spray or cs spray or whatever they use, so they know its effect and dont use it without due cause.

They arent allowed to do that now due to health and safety laws, which will be the same for tazers, but i think they should have to experience it themselves before they go around zapping people.
____________________
colin1 is officially faster than god
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:42 - 21 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

colin1 wrote:
I think one thing with normal injuries, is that you can show them as evidence that you have suffered.


Depends on the injuries I guess. Control and restraint allows you to inflict huge amounts of pain without obvious marking or permanent damage, while some bruising and marking can lend support to an inaccurate version of events - I've been involved in several instances where an individual deliberately inflicted injuries upon himself and then claimed it was due to an assault by staff.

Quote:

As you say, a cop is gonna think less about using his tazer, than his baton.


Batons don't eject little paper markers when they're used, nor keep a record of how many times they are employed like Tazers do.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:56 - 21 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister James wrote:


Batons don't eject little paper markers when they're used, nor keep a record of how many times they are employed like Tazers do.


I seem to remember a scene in fiction "The Shield" , where baton use was less about beatings more about key areas to hit ie backs of knees so people fall over.

But batons do leave bruises , and if used 'forefully' spill blood everywhere ,

When I saw somebody beat up with fists and feet he left loads of blood all over the place , as did I when I was beaten up badly.

Also I seem to recall seeing the country side alliance marching on London and various pictures of cops with batons without the rubber covers beating protestors bloody.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:41 - 21 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Itchy wrote:

I seem to remember a scene in fiction "The Shield" , where baton use was less about beatings more about key areas to hit ie backs of knees so people fall over.


One of my favourite shows - and correct; as it happens, I'm trained to carry the PR24 side-handled baton. Most moves involve jabs/blows to nerve clusters and soft-spots to force an involuntary reaction.

Quote:

Also I seem to recall seeing the country side alliance marching on London and various pictures of cops with batons without the rubber covers beating protestors bloody.


Most batons don't come with rubber covers - mine certainly doesn't - kinda defeats the object.

I do remember several arty pictures of those demonstrations - none of which showed the context in which baton strikes were allegedly used.

There's always two sides to a story, and while I support the CA, I can't deny that there were some utter tossers present at that march who were deliberately provoking the police.

It amuses me that - once again - people who usually decry the bias in the media are happy to accept news stories at face value when it suits them.
____________________
>Soultrader Mister James, I bet you are a copper
>Bazza Wow. Eyes like a shithouse rat, you...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:48 - 21 Jan 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister James wrote:


It amuses me that - once again - people who usually decry the bias in the media are happy to accept news stories at face value when it suits them.


I think you'll find that it's because of the bias that when something is shown it's going to be indicative of a particularly heinous outrage.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 18 years, 74 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 1.73 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 116.48 Kb