|
|
| Author |
Message |
| M1ghtyDUck |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 M1ghtyDUck Scooby Slapper

Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 18:15 - 08 Feb 2008 Post subject: Please help me get my head straight - insurance matter |
 |
|
Hi,
I'd really appreciate if someone could help me out here.
In short, a woman pulled out on me while I was filtering and hit me. Bike got written off category C, which I repaired off my own back and returned to the road.
Now then, claiming for the write off came around and, after about 3 months, the accident management company (carbrooke) affiliated with my insurance company (NIG) told me that the insurance company of the woman who had hit me (elephant) was offering me 50/50, so I'd get half the value of my bike + helmet. The problem with this is that should she claim I would lose my no claims bonus.
I then got a letter from my insurance saying a claim has been reported on my insurance, I guess from her - cheeky bitch, and asking me to call. I rang them up and they just wanted a bit of info like contact number, what happened to the bike, and then said "okay, its closed now, that was all we needed." And basically they're not involved now unless they get contacted again, I assume about the womans claim for damage.
I was like well hang on, what about my claim? They said I had to go through the other insurance company - elephant - for that.
So, does this mean I'm stuck with the 50/50 elephant offered even though i don't want to accept any liability (she pulled out on me! I had right of way, witness statement said the same thing). And if I do accept the 50/50, I guess that automatically means I accept some liability, so if the woman pursues her claim I'll lose my no claims bonus and have a higher premium?
Can anyone give me any tips on what to do? How do I push for a completely non fault claim?
Thanks so much for your help |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Stevep |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Stevep Scooby Slapper
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| M1ghtyDUck |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 M1ghtyDUck Scooby Slapper

Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Walloper |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Walloper Super Spammer

Joined: 24 Feb 2005 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| M1ghtyDUck |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 M1ghtyDUck Scooby Slapper

Joined: 24 Jul 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| T.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 T.C World Chat Champion

Joined: 05 Nov 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 21:17 - 08 Feb 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
| M1ghtyDUck wrote: | Thanks for your reply.
I think I need to give you a little more information. I am insured on third party only, so I was trying to make a claim on her third party insurance, not on mine.
As a result, the only way I can lose my no claims bonus is if she claims on my third party insurance. Am I right?
But essentially you're saying that in general, by filtering I'm going to get hit with a 50:50? Even if witness statement, right of way etc say its not my fault? Is there then no point trying to get legal advice to chase it? Meaning I have the choice between letting it hang, or accepting the 50:50. |
Being involved in an accient by no means guarantees that you are going to be held to 50/50 liability, it all depends onthe circumstances and the evidence available.
The case of Davis v Scroggins (2006) found the filtering motorcyclist to be completely blameless and full liability was awarded against the car driver, but this was supercedd by the cse of Farley v Buckley (2007) where the filtering motorcyclist was found to be entirely at fault.
However, case law is now removing the old case law of Powell v Moody (1966) which worked against every motorcyclist who filtered and was the standard defenceissued by third party insurers.
Now it has to be based on the circumstances and the evidence and more riders are winning 100% than ever before.
Legal expenses insurance is a complete waste of time and space, but a good specialist law firm will offer you a conditional fee agreement (no win no fee) which affords you legal representation with a firm of your choice (which you do not get with LEI) and ensues that you keep 100% of your compensation.
What you need to do as soon as possible is ensure that you get a letter of claim off to the third party as soon as possible stating that you hold them responsible for any damage and injury and why you hold them responsible. This letter should then be passed onto the third party insurers, and the fact that you only have TP insurance or LEI does not preclude you from making a claim against them.
Remember though that there is a statute of limitation, 5 years for damage only and 3 years for injury (with a few exceptions) which means that proceedings must be entered into during that time frame to avoid having to accept a derisory offer. ____________________ It is better to arrive 30 seconds late in this world, than 30 years early in the next |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Stevep |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Stevep Scooby Slapper
Joined: 22 Aug 2007 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 18 years, 226 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|