|
Author |
Message |
littlewing |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 littlewing Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Karma :   
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
EddyJones |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 EddyJones Crazy Courier
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 11:07 - 13 Feb 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Im in the same position as you and ive bought a zxr 400, Ive yet to get it on the road properly but I have rode down a duel carrageway/home. Seems plenty fast enough as a first big bike and the handeling is meant to be excellent  |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Eddie Hitler |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Eddie Hitler World Chat Champion

Joined: 05 Nov 2007 Karma :  
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
daz_d_biker |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 daz_d_biker Spanner Monkey
Joined: 01 Aug 2007 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 11:25 - 13 Feb 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Not fancy a v4? Id say zxr. I think theyre the largest sporty 400. Plenty fast enough for the road and sound ace with a race can like any IL4 How about a cbr600f? An older steel framed one, they are cheap as chips and excellent bikes. Just get it restricted until you're used to it as a bit faster than a 400.
If you buy an rvf400 i have some restrictors if anyone wants them.
Daz. ____________________ "bikes are replaceable - but a complete nutter aint." |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Matt06 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Matt06 World Chat Champion

Joined: 17 Nov 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 14:08 - 13 Feb 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
If you're planning on keeping your bike restricted then get a supermoto with a lively single cylinder engine. It will take the restriction well and you will be left with plenty to have fun with. Like the DRZ400 or something.
I used to have a ZXR400 and it was awesome, completely shit restricted though. Absolutely nothing there when you open the throttle. Without is a different story . ____________________ Current: MT-10, Bandit, Grom, GPZ500
Previous: YBR125, GSXR400, ZXR400, MT-03, NTV650, R6, z750, ZX6R, MT-09 |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Fahd |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Fahd World Chat Champion

Joined: 17 Jan 2006 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 16:27 - 13 Feb 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Honda CBR 400RR. They're reasonably cheap if you look around and are stupidly fast for a first bike.  ____________________ I Ride: Honda CBR 400RR.
I Drive: Audi S3. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 17:05 - 13 Feb 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Here's an example of a thread where everyone advises the person to get the bike that *they* own, because its obviously the best.
Here are the facts of the situation:
The newest 400 sports you'll find will be minimum of 5 years old (ZXR400). Most other sports 400's will be 15+ years old. Even with the best build quality in the world, the large majority will be shagged. Even the shagged ones are overpriced IMO, and only now are prices coming down to a sensible level. People are asking £2k for a RVF400 thats ten years old. A ten year old CBR600 wouldn't fetch that much by a long way!
400s aren't all that when restricted. If you're going to restrict it, then why limit your choice anyway?
SV650's only make 10bhp more, but actually cost a lot less to insure. Sports 400's are in insurance group 12, whereas the faired SV is group 10, and the unfaired group 9. Restriction does not affect insurance at all.
an SV650 is physically bigger than a 400, so looks like a bigger bike. I believe an SV will take restriction better than a 400.
SV650's are a lot cheaper to buy, and most of them aren't shagged, even the cheap ones. An unshagged SV will handle as well as a shagged 400, and a sorted SV will handle as well as a sorted 400.
Most 400's are grey imports, which means they probably spent 6 months of their lives strapped down in a crate. This isn't good for the suspension! Also parts and dealer backup may be an issue.
The SV is a better first bike than a sports 400. Its more practical, its newer, it handles just as well (unless you're paying through the nose for a sorted 400) its slightly quicker in terms of power, Its cheaper to buy, cheaper to insure, at least as cheap to run and looks physically bigger than a sports 400.
Buy with the head and not with the heart, and you'll end up with an SV every time.  ____________________ British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Blau Zedong |
This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
 Blau Zedong Banned

Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Karma :     
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
binge |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 binge Emo Kiddy

Joined: 02 Jul 2004 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 18:25 - 13 Feb 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Ok heres a thing.
You buy an un-forgiving 400cc sports bike. To be fair, you need to be a good rider to ride one fast.
You spend your restricted period learning how to ride a slow bike, fast.
2 years later, you jump onto a modern, Forgiving 600cc bike. And you wipe the floor with the average "show off" 600 rider.
Thats my plan anyway.
If you have your heart set on a supersport 400 bike. Then id seriously recommend a Honda.
Yes! I bum Lick honda. But ive also seen my mates with Suzuki 400s, Kawasaki 400s and Yamaha 400s.
Although the Kwak has the best spec of the bunch with USD forks and producing the most power. It will also make you a mechanic by the time you come to sell it!
Hondas, MAIN problem with them is the regulator. My dog can change a regulator!
If id had the choice to start over, Id of probably still bought a 400. I dont know why, They don't have a lot going for them to be honest. But they are good fun to ride because they do need to be ridden hard to be ridden fast. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
S1KE |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 S1KE Brolly Dolly

Joined: 20 May 2007 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 19:00 - 13 Feb 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
i agree with binge  ____________________ random twat!
* xbox live mickeyc26
* zx6r b1h 2004 GREEN ! |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
phk6 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 phk6 Nearly there...
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Karma :     
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Deano |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Deano World Chat Champion

Joined: 17 Feb 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 22:47 - 13 Feb 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
buying as 400 will teach you thrash a bike properly if you decide to ride like that. as I felt I could get my 400 to closest to the limit than any other bike ive ever owned.
Marjay has good points but the little hondas build quality wins over suzuki by far.
parts are cheap just look at ebay. I picked up a set of forks for £10 try getting a set of SV forks for that
a whole set of fairings for £200 from a chinese importer. there is massive amounts of information over on 400greybike.
If your having trouble deciding over a 400 choose a honda. you can pick them up for around £1000. yes RVF's can go for silly money but I've seen them go for £1500.
Parts availability is still widely available as Ive never had any problems ordering parts for my NC from any shop that I've used. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
gmanxiii |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 gmanxiii World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Nov 2006 Karma :   
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
TUG |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TUG World Chat Champion
Joined: 12 May 2007 Karma :  
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Deckx |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Deckx Nearly there...

Joined: 09 Apr 2007 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 02:01 - 14 Feb 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
if you're going for a 400, i'd go for a zxr, especially if you get low milage less than 10 years old as they still look the biz. !!
I wouldn't touch a FZR and all the CBR's are pushing on with age, as well as getting a bit dated looking.
Surprised you haven't mentioned a vfr/rvf ? although am i the only one that thinks that a IL4 sounds way better than V4. (I don't usually admit that as i own a rvf ) |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
damz |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 damz World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Jul 2007 Karma :  
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Ben. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ben. World Chat Champion

Joined: 10 Jul 2007 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 03:37 - 14 Feb 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
www.kgcycles.com
do nice fairings for an sv if you want it to look sporty.
the power of the bike wont kill you, its how responsable the rider is...
i think sv's can look cool if you hve the cash...  ____________________ follow my racing season
Race bike - R6
Road bike - sv650 |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Wafer_Thin_Ham |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Wafer_Thin_Ham Super Spammer

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 10:16 - 14 Feb 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
MarJay |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarJay But it's British!

Joined: 15 Sep 2003 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 11:28 - 14 Feb 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
XlonewolfX wrote: |
I agree with you both, but if a noob gets a SV650 like another user on this forum when they arnt used to a 33bhp 400 they will prolly end up dead before a few months, power isnt always everything, a 400 is a very capable bike, and like i say all the time to no avail, i can keep up with decent 600's unless its on a long straight.
And 400's are unforgiving but if well looked after or a cbr400 they will live for a long time to come. |
400 = 60bhp
SV650 = 70bhp
Does 10bhp really turn a bike from a placid new rider friendly teddy bear to a fire breathing widowmaker? Especially when more than likely they'll both be at 33bhp anyway?
Your reasoning is flawed.
400's aren't 'unforgiving' however they are uncomfortable and impractical. Whereas the SV is definately forgiving, comfortable and practical, and when not restricted, slightly faster than a 400.
The ony things you have to look out for on an SV are :
1) Corrosion
2) Don't change down too many gears and then dump the clutch as the back wheel might lock
But then, this is only the same as most other Japanese bikes anyway... ____________________ British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Wave2k |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Wave2k G's Stalker

Joined: 06 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
littlewing |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 littlewing Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Karma :   
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Wafer_Thin_Ham |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Wafer_Thin_Ham Super Spammer

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
littlewing |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 littlewing Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Karma :   
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
littlewing |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 littlewing Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 10 Jan 2008 Karma :   
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 17 years, 93 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|