Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Liberal Democrats call for "Proportional Representation

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

JonB
Afraid of Mileage



Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:07 - 09 Mar 2008    Post subject: Liberal Democrats call for "Proportional Representation Reply with quote

https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7285814.stm

This is what the country desperately needs. It is a fairer and rather more truer form of democracy, our present system of first past the post makes a mockery of this as 60% of the voting population usually aren't represented. This stops people like Gordon Brown pushing through anti-terror laws at will.

Whether it will ever happen or not is debatable, but it's good sounds right now. To be honest i've always been a bit yellow, but their policies suit me as an individual moreso than any other party right now. Thumbs Up
____________________
Be careful whose advice you buy, but, be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it?s worth.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:14 - 09 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tony Blair was an ardent fan of PR before he was elected , guess what happened?.

and FWIW , Lib dems can say and do anything they want they'll never get elected and thus don't have to put any substance to their policies.

I've said it many times and I said it again, in open court in a case recently Gordon said that manifesto pledges and promises are NOT subject to legitimate expectation.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

cestrian
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:31 - 09 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree, a much fairer system, The only system which is fairer is the oldest system. The early government had no parties whatsoever, just two commoners from each county, representing their countymen(?) in the House of the Commoners (House of Commons). It was a wonderful system of check and balance whereby neither the commoners, the representatives nor the monarch could make decisions without the agreement of the others.
I've just included it in a manifesto I have written.

Regards
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bazza
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:20 - 09 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

cestrian wrote:
I've just included it in a manifesto I have written.


Sounds fascinating. What was the ratio of crayons used against crayons eaten?
____________________
"That's it. You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college."
'98 Ducati 750SS, '08 Suzuki GSX650F ©2004-2014, Bazza's Harmless Banter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:13 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

While it maybe a fairer system.
All it leads to is a lot more elections.
Lets face it internally parties can't agree, so what hope is there of different parties agreeing....
You also end up then with a lot of watered down policies that are worse than the full policy, just so it can be got through the system.

If they are going the PR route then we also need to look at making voting compulsory for everyone over 18. Even if its just means adding a box saying "I don't care"

Democracy is the right of the minority to rule the majority. Karma
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:29 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

PR means everyones vote counts, instead of the current charade of a 'democracy' where the majority's vote is worth about as much as used toilet-paper.

Sure, you end up with a govt that has far less power than the current dictatorship. And? Instead of having a bunch of criminal thugs who enact whatever the hell legislation they please, you get a mega-commitee that is so full of checks and balances the public end up enjoying the benefit of far more protection than they suffer of things needing to be done that don't get done.

Under PR I'd vote, everytime. Under the current system I'd sooner watch paint dry than waste my time voting for the choice between shite and shinola.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:30 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
Under PR I'd vote, everytime. Under the current system I'd sooner watch paint dry than waste my time voting for the choice between shite and shinola.


But if everyone who thought like you voted for the party that wanted to bring PR in, then it might happen, as it is now it never will.
Only by you getting of your soapbox and doing something will it ever change. Karma Thumbs Up

You will still get the same muppets in power, no matter which system is in place. The only thing with PR is that the big boys may not get it all their own way, and when that happens, It will be back to the poeple for another election...
You only have to look at other countries where PR is used to see how unstable the goverments are.

What is really needed is politicians who have the best interests of the people who voted them into power, not just towed the party line all the time.
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:43 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

iooi wrote:

But if everyone who thought like you voted for the party that wanted to bring PR in, then it might happen, as it is now it never will.
Only by you getting of your soapbox and doing something will it ever change. Karma Thumbs Up


Read again my post above,

Tony Blair promised to bring in PR if he won the 1997 election, he won , PR was NOT instated.

Funny enough he also said no more tax increases NI went up 1% (which is a 10% tax hike) , he also said no topup fees.

And as said I ardently campaigned against ID cards , printed things at my own cost , wrote many letters , what happened? , nothing... because the corporate bribes are more important than the desires of voters.

The only way to change things is to put them against the wall each and everytime a lie is told each and everytime a promise is reneged upon.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

cestrian
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:11 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

"What is really needed is politicians who have the best interests of the people who voted them into power, not just towed the party line all the time." - iooi

Which brings us right back to the old system of two commoners representing their county in the House of the Commoners.

Instead of talking about it, would you join a party which advocates such a system?

Regards
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

yambabe
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:28 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

cestrian wrote:
[i]Which brings us right back to the old system of two commoners representing their county in the House of the Commoners.



Forgive me if I've misunderstood you, but is that not pretty much what we have now except it's only one person?

Each person represents their single constituency (which are actually smaller than counties in general) do they not?

Anyone can stand for election if they are over 18 and not in prison or certifiably insane IIRC?

The procedure for standing for election is about as democratic as you can get, and I can't see how what you are proposing would differ from the present system.

Can you elaborate? Presumably anyone could stand as a "commoner" and put themselves up for election and it would then be up to the populace to vote for the person they felt most represented them. But once that vote had been cast how would your system work? Your "commoners" would be the equivalent of the current independents in Parliament surely, and while they are in the minority they are still there at the moment...........

If an independent whose policies matched my politics stood for election in my constituency I wouldn't hesitate to vote for him/her........... Confused
____________________
Sod falling in love, I wanna fall in chocolate. Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:28 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

iooi wrote:


What is really needed is politicians who have the best interests of the people who voted them into power, not just towed the party line all the time.


Exactly. Instead of corrupt individuals who main concern is themselves first and secondly the hand that feeds them (their party).

Unfortunately the human race has no underlying philosophy by which to inform politicians on how they should behave. Common individuals are not regarded by those in power as real people who count, they are regarded as numbers, a homogenous whole that has value only as such and not as individuals. That leads to heinous abuse (as we can see every day).

The few in power consider only their own happiness as important. They regard everyone else (us) as a means towards furthering that interest, even when it means that we are unhappy doing it.

Human civilisation has to be re-built from the ground up, on a firm philosophical basis that ensures the primacy of the greatest happiness for the greatest possible number of people, instead of the current practice of the greatest good for the fewest at the expense of the many.

The book is in my head, the motivation to write it is lacking. The older I get the less I give a shit.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

cestrian
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:44 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Babyyam, with respect, if you hadn't noticed we have a system whereby one party is elected to power in a first past the post voting system. That party is then controlled by the party whip, in other words, when Broon says jump, the whips tells every member of the party when to jump and in which direction to jump. So it's almost impossible to beat the governing party when it comes to a parliamentary vote.

Quote:
Each person represents their single constituency (which are actually smaller than counties in general) do they not?

Now here is the big problem. You are not being represented by your MP. If you believe you are represented by your MP, tell us how he/she has represented your views in parliament. Tell us when he actually sought your views before he voted on your behalf.

Quote:
The procedure for standing for election is about as democratic as you can get, and I can't see how what you are proposing would differ from the present system.

That doesn't make any sense but I think I know what you're trying to say. OK so you've jumped ahead a little. The system I propose is a simple one. There should be no political parties and therefor no whips. Every MP is allowed to vote according to the thoughts and feelings of their constituents. If the representative screws up, then he/she gets replaced. As for democracy, you may have read earlier that democracy is akin to mob rule. In your democratic system, a majority of just 51% will secure the vote, but the other 49% of the people will not be represented. That aint democratic.

Quote:
Your "commoners" would be the equivalent of the current independents in Parliament surely, and while they are in the minority they are still there at the moment

Imagine a whole government made up of independents, each one representing the real views of their constituents. No party whips to sway the vote.
ETA At present, MP's are serving themselves and the subversive few who are destroying our country and society, that are definitely NOT serving any of us. If you believe otherwise, wait until Wednesday to guage how they are serving the British people as a whole.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:44 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
Exactly. Instead of corrupt individuals who main concern is themselves first and secondly the hand that feeds them (their party).


I think many start off with the idea of serving the people who put them in their position, but that soon wains when the whip says YOU WILL vote this way, or lose the support of the party...
Lets face it, as you say its human nature, and the best they can hope for is 5 years in the job before they get kicked out.
Who wants to employ a ex backbencher who didn't do as he was told....
Not many directorships to be had with that attitude. Laughing

Only true Independents like the ex news guy in the white suit actually have the guts to stand up and be counted, but how a country could be run with 600 people like him, i have no idea.
I guess it would be worse than the farce now, as if everyone has their own agenda nothing would ever get done.

I did once think of starting out on the path as a local councillor and went to a couple of their meetings.... Soon binned that idea when you realise just how much time is taken up, the bullshit you have to stand from all quarters, sure there is some ££ in recompense, but not enough to cover the loss of your free time. Only way to really do it is if you ain't got a proper job to do.
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

cestrian
World Chat Champion



Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:17 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Only true Independents like the ex news guy in the white suit actually have the guts to stand up and be counted, but how a country could be run with 600 people like him, i have no idea.
I guess it would be worse than the farce now, as if everyone has their own agenda nothing would ever get done.
- iooi

I'm not so sure. You only have to look at the decisions being made to reach an early conclusion that those decision are screwing the country into the ground.

Can we agree that Broon has squandered our reserves? And can we agree that taxation has risen at an amazing rate?
ETA Can you think of anything else which has risen at an alarming rate in the same time period?

Regards
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:11 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
The few in power consider only their own happiness as important. They regard everyone else (us) as a means towards furthering that interest, even when it means that we are unhappy doing it.

Human civilisation has to be re-built from the ground up, on a firm philosophical basis that ensures the primacy of the greatest happiness for the greatest possible number of people, instead of the current practice of the greatest good for the fewest at the expense of the many.

The book is in my head, the motivation to write it is lacking. The older I get the less I give a shit.


No an assassination market is what is needed, ie everybody effectively has a price on their head, and thus when somebody does something unpopular say invade Iraq, people get to spend their £10 of assassination market funds.

you putting £10 on me and me putting £10 on you is inconsequentual since £10 isn't much money where it becomes useful though is in large numbers.

Thus people press the red button on their remote control, with 1.5 million people protesting converted into assassin's pot the pot would have been 15 million pounds. Which would have attracted many many assassins.

Ditto increasing fuel tax , with 30 million drivers lets say 75% of them don't want an increase in tax, the assassin's pot would be £22.5 million.

This makes them make good decisions out of self preservation not out of greed.

Each citizen is given £10 a week to spend on the market.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:28 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

iooi wrote:
You only have to look at other countries where PR is used to see how unstable the goverments are.


Unstable government means one that cannot trample over the majorities wishes.

At least with PR the only laws that will pass are the ones that have almost universal support. If they don't have that level of support then I would suggest that they should't be passed anyway.

Should cut down on the number of knee jerk laws passed with the wishes of one small minority against another small minoritym with the majority not caring.

babyyam wrote:
Forgive me if I've misunderstood you, but is that not pretty much what we have now except it's only one person?


Trouble is that you are voting for an individual whose views (and whose support of your views when you voted for them) are over ruled by those running the party.

cestrian wrote:
In your democratic system, a majority of just 51% will secure the vote, but the other 49% of the people will not be represented. That aint democratic.


Rather worse than that. Could be 1.1% of the vote, as long as the other candidates get less than that.

Personal view. PR is a good system to keep them in check (pity the liberals these days have too many other nannying policies).

Failing that make voting compulsory with an option for none of the above. And none of the above means that a byelection is held and none of the previous candidates can stand.

Or just ban political parties entirely.

Politics. From the words poly, meaning many, and ticks, for blood sucking animals.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:29 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Itchy wrote:
Hetzer wrote:
The few in power consider only their own happiness as important. They regard everyone else (us) as a means towards furthering that interest, even when it means that we are unhappy doing it.

Human civilisation has to be re-built from the ground up, on a firm philosophical basis that ensures the primacy of the greatest happiness for the greatest possible number of people, instead of the current practice of the greatest good for the fewest at the expense of the many.

The book is in my head, the motivation to write it is lacking. The older I get the less I give a shit.


No an assassination market is what is needed, ie everybody effectively has a price on their head, and thus when somebody does something unpopular say invade Iraq, people get to spend their £10 of assassination market funds.

you putting £10 on me and me putting £10 on you is inconsequentual since £10 isn't much money where it becomes useful though is in large numbers.

Thus people press the red button on their remote control, with 1.5 million people protesting converted into assassin's pot the pot would have been 15 million pounds. Which would have attracted many many assassins.

Ditto increasing fuel tax , with 30 million drivers lets say 75% of them don't want an increase in tax, the assassin's pot would be £22.5 million.

This makes them make good decisions out of self preservation not out of greed.

Each citizen is given £10 a week to spend on the market.


What happens when a politician doesn't cut taxes by 25%, even though proof exists that it's simply not workable in the short-term? Loads of monkies having him assassinated coz they're too thick to understand economical science?

Part of the reason politicians hold the common man in contempt (and abuse him) is because the common man isn't the sharpest chisel in the tool-box.

What politicians don't grasp is that contempt for a natural condition is no excuse or reason for taking advantage and using the common man like a serf. Basic principle of civilised humanity: the strong protect the weak.
What you can't do is grant the weak the power to exterminate the strong with unjust cause.

Present govt excluded of course; there are almost no politicians who aren't slime-sucking curs deserving of the sharp side of a shovel through the base of the skull.

Politicians represent human nature at it's very worst. Every vile and low characteristic is exemplified by them and their kind...and they lead us. Sheer insanity, on the face of it. But so long as nobody of intellect and the very best of human nature steps up to the plate the rot will continue. Because no average cretin can make a difference, and nor will one ever try (and if he did he'd fail immediately).

And when you look at the work of some of the greatest philosophers, and how much incredible influence their dreck has wielded, one begins to get an idea of the enormity of the problem facing our species.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:12 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:

Unstable government means one that cannot trample over the majorities wishes.

At least with PR the only laws that will pass are the ones that have almost universal support. If they don't have that level of support then I would suggest that they should't be passed anyway.

Should cut down on the number of knee jerk laws passed with the wishes of one small minority against another small minority with the majority not caring.
All the best

Keith


Trouble is that, often nothing gets done as, as soon as something happens that they can't agree on then its election time, comes up again and guess what, its back to the vote again...
Sometimes laws have to be passed that people don't like for the good of others.
With the PR system there is also the risk that laws that the majority of people support could not be passed due to a few who are holding a gov in power not agreeing to them and holding the main party to ransom over the fact they would no longer be in power.
So it works both ways.

Would you really want to see the likes of the BNP or some new founded non British party being the one's who keep the rest in government.

There are pro's and con's to both systems.

At least with 1st past the post we tend to get a stable government for a decent period, and their idea's have chance to be proved right or wrong.

You could just imagine how it could be with 2 parties fighting it out, but only staying in power thanks to a minority group. One saying we are going to be spending masses of public money on public services while in power, something happens and they are ousted after a year to be replaced by a lot who then cut back the public services, only to be ousted a year later...
I think you get the idea that there could be no stability and it would be far worse than what we have now. If anything like that was to happen all it would lead to is one Almighty economic crash...


I am neither pro either camp, just realistic that no matter what method of voting is in place it will still end up like now, with the vast majority of people unhappy with the bunch in power.
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

JonB
Afraid of Mileage



Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:19 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah but even with PR, the BNP with such a minority would have to get a bill ratified by all parties before the bill is passed.

PR is the way forward. No doubt about it.
____________________
Be careful whose advice you buy, but, be patient with those who supply it. Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it?s worth.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:24 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

iooi wrote:


At least with 1st past the post we tend to get a stable government for a decent period, and their idea's have chance to be proved right or wrong.


They've been having their ideas proved wrong for over two hundred years, and things have been getting progressively worse. Why? Because everything they do is geared to the benefit of the few at the expense of the many. You cannot run a humane society on that kind of basis.

PR has it's disadvantages, but it would be far better for a few things that need to be done not getting done than a whole load of shite that doesn't need doing being done purely because it benefits a small cabal of parasites.

This is the simple truth...govt doesn't serve the people, it serves it's own very small class, and abuses the people to that end. PR is a very effective way of stopping that kind of rot.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:56 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

iooi wrote:
Trouble is that, often nothing gets done as, as soon as something happens that they can't agree on then its election time, comes up again and guess what, its back to the vote again...
Sometimes laws have to be passed that people don't like for the good of others.


Personally most of the time nothing does need doing. That is part of the problem, as often it seems the politicians seem to think that "something must be done". Just lands up screwing things up.

I would prefer no new laws to bad new laws.

iooi wrote:
With the PR system there is also the risk that laws that the majority of people support could not be passed due to a few who are holding a gov in power not agreeing to them and holding the main party to ransom over the fact they would no longer be in power.
So it works both ways.


Only if you have the elected representatives behaving like squabbling children. It needs cooperation, and if they cannot even manage that then there is little reason why their policies should come in.

Mind you, exactly the same could happen in the current system.

iooi wrote:
Would you really want to see the likes of the BNP or some new founded non British party being the one's who keep the rest in government.


Do you really want anyone in power who would stoop so low as to cooperate with such a party just to get a grip on power.

iooi wrote:
At least with 1st past the post we tend to get a stable government for a decent period, and their idea's have chance to be proved right or wrong.


Down side is that you land up with a country run by a party elected by a small minority, and a good chance that they have enough of a parliamentory majority to force anything through.

iooi wrote:
I am neither pro either camp, just realistic that no matter what method of voting is in place it will still end up like now, with the vast majority of people unhappy with the bunch in power.


At least the parliamentory representatives might vaguely represent the views of the population. Unlike the current situation. After all in the 2005 election the lib-dems got 22% of the votes yet only got 9.6% of the seats. The UKIP got 2.5 times the votes of the DUP, yet the UKIP got no seats and the DUP got 9 seats.

Parliament is hardly representative of the votes of the population. How many don't bother voting because they live in an area that is dominated by party X which they don't agree with, hence they feel their vote is a waste.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:12 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Parliament is hardly representative of the votes of the population. How many don't bother voting because they live in an area that is dominated by party X which they don't agree with, hence they feel their vote is a waste.


Sure the Gov of today and the past hardly reflect the majority of voters.
As to not voting, well thats their own fault....

Until people learn that to make change you have to get off your backside and do something about it, then it will never happen.

Apathy rules Ok...
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

bazza
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:31 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Parliament is hardly representative of the votes of the population. How many don't bother voting because they live in an area that is dominated by party X which they don't agree with, hence they feel their vote is a waste.


And yet, if everyone who felt that way voted against them, they'd be out.

Of course, without PR, they'd just end up with someone equally untrustworthy from another party, but until something lights a fire under their collective arses[1], the electorate will just continue shuffle along in numb acquiesence to more laws, more taxes, more restrictions etc.



[1]Now if that ever happened, Westminster would collectively shit itself.
____________________
"That's it. You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college."
'98 Ducati 750SS, '08 Suzuki GSX650F ©2004-2014, Bazza's Harmless Banter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:33 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

iooi wrote:
Quote:
Parliament is hardly representative of the votes of the population. How many don't bother voting because they live in an area that is dominated by party X which they don't agree with, hence they feel their vote is a waste.


Sure the Gov of today and the past hardly reflect the majority of voters.
As to not voting, well thats their own fault....

Until people learn that to make change you have to get off your backside and do something about it, then it will never happen.

Apathy rules Ok...


Do what exactly? Vote Labour? Conservative? Lib-Dem? Or for any one of the whacko fringe parties? That'll make "change"?

The system is utterly corrupt, and "getting off your backside" and engaging with it will change absolutely squat. Which is what most people recognize and why they don't waste their time voting. There are more important things to do, like picking ones nose or mowing the lawn.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"


Last edited by Hetzer on 21:58 - 10 Mar 2008; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:36 - 10 Mar 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

iooi wrote:
As to not voting, well thats their own fault....

Until people learn that to make change you have to get off your backside and do something about it, then it will never happen.


Problem is that under the curent system even if they did bother it is almost certainly not going to have an effect. Entirely possible under the current system to get the majority of the votes. That is the problem the lib-dems have. Their support is spread fairly evenly, so depsite a substantial number of votes they are locally outvoted.

Look at the last results. 605,973 for the UKIP and not a single seat won. It is very obvious that many votes are worthless due to the current voting system. 8 parties between them collected ~5% of the votes without any seats.

By the way, check 1974. Even under the current dodgy system you can have a party not win yet still form a minority government.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 17 years, 130 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.28 Sec - Server Load: 3.81 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 158.29 Kb