Kickstart
The Oracle
Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma : 
|
 Posted: 11:06 - 04 Jul 2008  Post subject: Speed camera operator sacked. |
 |
|
Hi
https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/lancashire/7487966.stm
Wonder how there were only 545 tickets cancelled. Probably these are the ones where they hadn't managed to bully the driver / rider into admitting guilt in exchange for a smaller fine / costs.
Also, as this guy blatatly lied on court papers to get these prosecutions why is he not being prosecuted for attempting to pervert the course of justice or perjury.
| BBC wrote: |
Speed camera error man is sacked
A Lancashire Police speed camera worker has been sacked for an error which led to 545 unsafe convictions and £35,000 in fines being refunded.
On various occasions between starting work in September 2006 and May 2007 he failed to ensure the cameras' distance measurement and alignment were correct. But he signed court papers saying they were correct, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) uncovered. On top of the refunded fines, about 1,500 penalty points were rescinded.
When the civilian employee, who worked in the force's Central Processing Unit, had 435 tapes of his work checked, it was found that 41 tapes were found to have faults through his failure to calibrate the cameras correctly.
Training review
He was the highest performing camera technician in the force in terms of offences captured. A file was prepared for the Crown Prosecution Service who determined there was insufficient evidence to bring criminal charges
However, the IPCC investigation has recommended the police force reviews its training of speed camera technicians and ensures regular checks are made of their work.
Two other members of staff from the Central Processing Unit are due to face disciplinary hearings by the force over inconsistencies to do with the processing of court paper work.
Naseem Malik, IPCC Commissioner for the North West, said: "This speed camera technician failed to undertake basic checks of the systems he was operating and as a result he undermined the integrity of hundreds of prosecutions.
Lessons learnt
"It would appear he was proud of his position as the top performing camera technician, but it would appear he pursued quantity at the expense of quality - and at the expense of hundreds of motorists.
"I applaud the fact that Lancashire Constabulary tackled this issue vigorously and it is worth noting that during the investigation the work of every other camera technician was checked and found to be in order."
Supt Martyn Leveridge of Lancashire Constabulary's Professional Standards Department added: "There have been lessons learnt from this investigation and the Constabulary will seek to progress areas of development so as to provide the highest quality of service to the communities of Lancashire.
"A full review of the training programme has taken place, as well as the supervision and processes involved in the work of the technicians.
"There are additional provisions now in place to regularly monitor the work of camera technicians in order to prevent this happening again in the future."
|
All the best
Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
iooi
Super Spammer
Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :  
|
| Posted: 06:09 - 05 Jul 2008 Post subject: |
|
|
Well i guess it's because he did check the calibration on other times, he should have.
Just makes you wonder if it was only done when a high percentage of the cases where the camera's were under his care were going to court, and someone thought strange.... Or a police person question why they had one..... 
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am...... |
|
Kickstart
The Oracle
Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :
|
|
Help & FAQs
Search BCF
Members
Groups
Events Calendar
rating
rating