Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Police turnaround time

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Dom_
Points Mean Prizes



Joined: 02 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:12 - 14 Nov 2008    Post subject: Police turnaround time Reply with quote

Say someone was pulled over driving another mans car and was given a producer, the driver then: failed to produce or produced a fraudulent insurance certificate. How long would it take the police to get back to the original owner of the car about the situation?

2 weeks, 2 months, 6 months?

Also, what do the police actually do when you produce? Just photocopy the insurance certificate and look at it to check its legitimacy or phone the insurers up to confirm the legitimacy of it?

Not me btw, for a friend of a friend.

Cheers, Dom
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

yandy_yay
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:31 - 14 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well a Friend of mine has got a mate who knows this fella down the pub that if pally with the landlord who is friends with the bookmaker who knows Jack who knows Jill that works down SunHill and knows a Copper.

I'll ask my friend when i see him but i'd say it'll take a few weeks then because of al the people involved you'll probably get the answer to a different question.

So in anticipation of that eventuallity i'll give you a definative anwser now : -

42

It is the answer to the ultimate question of life the universe and * everything *

so its gotta be right, right ?
____________________
past bikes: (20 years ago) cg-125 (wriiten off), C-50 (thrashed n' finnaly scrapped), CZ-125 (nicked - never recovered, insurance payout was more than i paid for it !!!)
Current bikes: GN 125(now sold), Divvy 600s.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Cigaro
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Mar 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:42 - 14 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

When I've had a producer in the past they've just given the documents a quick glance over and that's been that.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

SlimRick
World Chat Champion



Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:17 - 14 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

IIRC, there's a tick box on producers so they either check the docs or record the details (photocopy them) depending on what the coppers ask for.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Mr Hammers
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Jul 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:36 - 14 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

In my experience, it's the day after when you really believe that they must have forgotten about it.
____________________
A Guide To Powerbands
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kris
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:11 - 14 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mr Hammers wrote:
In my experience, it's the day after when you really believe that they must have forgotten about it.


So true.

I failed to produce my particulars and they sent me a summons after about 2 months max.
____________________
NSR125RR - ZXR750H1 - ZX9R E1 - GSF600S - GSF600SK3 - VFR400-NC30 - SV1000N - ST1100-R - CBR900RR-R - GSF1200SK5 - GSF600SK1 - VFR1200FA - GSXR1000K2 - ZZR1400 D8F
www.prisonplanet.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Keir
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Apr 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:16 - 14 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

they have up to 6 months to issue summons.
If you produced a fake cert the chances are they wouldnt check if its authentic if it looked ok.
____________________
Current : '08 Yamaha FZ1s
Previous: '99 Honda CBR 600FX, 03 ZX636 B1H, 99 Fazer 600 (red), 02 GSX-R 600 K2, 00 SV650s (red), 2008 ZX10R, 97 Bandit 1200N, 04 ZX6RR K1H, 04 GSX-R 1000, 98 Fazer 600 (gold), 05 Madness 110 Pit bike, 04 CR125R, 00 SV650s (black), 06 KTM 625 SMC, 99 SRAD 600 track bike, 03 SV650, 98 Bandit 1200N, Bandit 600SY, 03 GSX-R 600 K3, 01 GSX-R 600, 01 Fazer 600 (black), VFR 400 NC30 x3, 78 Honda Dream, 00 Speedfight 50
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Dom_
Points Mean Prizes



Joined: 02 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:40 - 14 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Like I said, it's not me in the mess. I need my licence for my job, i'm not daft enough to put myself in that situation.

The owner of the car believed the driver had 3rd party insurance, but it turns out he didn't.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

SoND
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:20 - 15 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Took them 3 months to send me a summons and I got a £50 fine for it. I had the documents, just forgot to show them.
____________________
Go back to bed - You have no rights - "Streetfighters ~ Mainstream motorcycling's crackwhore sister."
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:26 - 15 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

These people need to sit down and have a talk then.

It is not unknown for the police to give the registered keeper two options when they catch a third party driving their car without insurance:

1) He was driving the car WITH the keepers permission. In this case the police can prosecute BOTH parties for no insurance (the driver for driving without insurance, the keeper for allowing him to). Usually 6 points each, a fairly hefty fine (up to £5000) and possible discretionary ban.

OR

2) He was driving the car WITHOUT the keepers permission. In this case they could prosecute the driver for driving without insurance AND taking without consent. Taking without consent is a criminal offence which can carry a custodial or community sentence and a fine, ban and penalty points.

Best to have an agreement over what is to be done.

I'd suggest option 1 and a gentelmans agreement that the driver pays the fine and increase in insurance for the keeper as being the fair way to proceed.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Dom_
Points Mean Prizes



Joined: 02 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:03 - 15 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheers Stinkwheel.

I think the registered keeper is out of the situation now, he has a valid receipt from a garage (where he had a clutch fitted) stating the car was dropped off and collected on two dates between which was when the car was pulled over.
So hopefully for my friend, any action from the police will be dismissed as he has proof the car was not in his possession but the garages.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

yandy_yay
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:12 - 15 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

someone is for the high jump !

Out of interest what kind of car is it ?

Andy
____________________
past bikes: (20 years ago) cg-125 (wriiten off), C-50 (thrashed n' finnaly scrapped), CZ-125 (nicked - never recovered, insurance payout was more than i paid for it !!!)
Current bikes: GN 125(now sold), Divvy 600s.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Dom_
Points Mean Prizes



Joined: 02 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:47 - 15 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good job they have long legs then!

The car? It's one with 5 wheels including the steering wheel.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

amnesia
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 21 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:36 - 15 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dom_ wrote:
Good job they have long legs then!

The car? It's one with 5 wheels including the steering wheel.


Sounds like a spanner monkey wanted a quick go in something he couldn't afford!
____________________
25/7 I'm a God-damn Rock Star
"Arguing about the best 125 is like arguing which Spice Girl could sing best"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:47 - 15 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dom_ wrote:
Cheers Stinkwheel.

I think the registered keeper is out of the situation now, he has a valid receipt from a garage (where he had a clutch fitted) stating the car was dropped off and collected on two dates between which was when the car was pulled over.
So hopefully for my friend, any action from the police will be dismissed as he has proof the car was not in his possession but the garages.


It's a good thing for the registered keeper that the garage keeps such accurate records. Especially helpful because any car in their posession will automatically be covered under their garage insurance policy regardless of which employee was driving it. They must be breathing a sigh of relief.

It would be best to be aware that there is a vague possability that the driver could be held to account for why he did not produce the necessary documents but this is a much lesser charge. Assuming of course that the police properly established the identity of the driver at the time of the stop.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Chriss
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:06 - 15 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

For what it's worth, a friend of mine was driving his brothers car, with no insurance. So my friend just produced his brothers documents (even photocard), even though they have different details. The documents all matched up, so all was good. Dunno if that'll help your situation.
____________________
TheShaggyDA: I've got 3 or 4 pairs that predate my wife, so at least 11.5 years old.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Fortuna
World Chat Champion



Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:43 - 15 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

You do all know that the police have access to the insurance database now?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Dom_
Points Mean Prizes



Joined: 02 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:28 - 16 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:


It's a good thing for the registered keeper that the garage keeps such accurate records. Especially helpful because any car in their posession will automatically be covered under their garage insurance policy regardless of which employee was driving it. They must be breathing a sigh of relief.

It would be best to be aware that there is a vague possability that the driver could be held to account for why he did not produce the necessary documents but this is a much lesser charge. Assuming of course that the police properly established the identity of the driver at the time of the stop.


The drivers details were correctly established at the time, he doesn't usually work for that garage but they brought him in for a day or two due to the work load. Apparently the type of policy they have is an open one, which means any employee can drive any car at any time with the registered keepers and policy holders permission. So hopefully for my friend, all being well, he should hear nothing off this.

If the worse comes to the worse he'll probably say fuck it and say the bloke took the car out without consent because after all, why should he take the wrap for something which wasn't his fault.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Chriss
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 May 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:34 - 16 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fortuna wrote:
You do all know that the police have access to the insurance database now?


Which is often not kept up to date.
____________________
TheShaggyDA: I've got 3 or 4 pairs that predate my wife, so at least 11.5 years old.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Im-a-Ridah
World Chat Champion



Joined: 20 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:37 - 16 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
These people need to sit down and have a talk then.

It is not unknown for the police to give the registered keeper two options when they catch a third party driving their car without insurance:

1) He was driving the car WITH the keepers permission. In this case the police can prosecute BOTH parties for no insurance (the driver for driving without insurance, the keeper for allowing him to). Usually 6 points each, a fairly hefty fine (up to £5000) and possible discretionary ban.

OR

2) He was driving the car WITHOUT the keepers permission. In this case they could prosecute the driver for driving without insurance AND taking without consent. Taking without consent is a criminal offence which can carry a custodial or community sentence and a fine, ban and penalty points.

Best to have an agreement over what is to be done.

I'd suggest option 1 and a gentelmans agreement that the driver pays the fine and increase in insurance for the keeper as being the fair way to proceed.


Or option 2 and the registered keeper refuses to press charges over the theft, TWOC will be interesting in court with the victim of the theft standing for the defence! There is also the option of the registered keeper just using his/her right to silence Wink
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:46 - 16 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Im-a-Ridah wrote:


Or option 2 and the registered keeper refuses to press charges over the theft, TWOC will be interesting in court with the victim of the theft standing for the defence! There is also the option of the registered keeper just using his/her right to silence Wink


Wouldn't work, because then they'd go for option 1. Standing for the defence would be the same as saying it was taken WITH your permission.

Also, your right to silence has been significantly erroded "It may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something you later rely on in court". If you stand silent they'll charge both of you for driving without insurance. If you suddenly decide it was taken without consent, they'll want to know why you didn't mention this at the time.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:45 - 16 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've wondered; what if you say something along the lines of "I didn't explicitly give them permission"; then if it comes to them in court for TWOC basically say "well, I don't mind that they did, they knew I wouldn't have a problem with it".
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Fortuna
World Chat Champion



Joined: 29 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:58 - 17 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chriss wrote:
Fortuna wrote:
You do all know that the police have access to the insurance database now?


Which is often not kept up to date.

Only because it was a new system. It's a lot more efficient than it used to be.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

The999Kid
World Chat Champion



Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:42 - 17 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

amnesia wrote:
Dom_ wrote:
Good job they have long legs then!

The car? It's one with 5 wheels including the steering wheel.


Sounds like a spanner monkey wanted a quick go in something he couldn't afford!


I thought Spanner monkeys were insured to drive anything they have a license for as long as they are either taking it to a registered garage for scheduled work, or returning it to the original owner after completion of scheduled work?

G wrote:
something about changing your response in court
I understand that as perjury, as you are changing evidence the prosecution are using to claim a conviction...? Just my take on that situation....
____________________
NDB 19/10/1989 - 1/11/2010 |Nowhere.Elyseum wrote: I get the distinct feeling that Tim should be our secret weapon for future trolling. I don't know many people that can rip the piss in Iambic pentameter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

quacker_boy
Cuddle Bitch



Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:15 - 17 Nov 2008    Post subject: Reply with quote

Depends on the garage really, Bridge Motorcycles who I work for have insurance covering the mechanics to take out other people's bikes on a 'trade' plate when we do something even as basic as an oil and filter change, the bike is taken for a quick ride around a choice of a few circuits which come to no more than 3 miles and the guys don't go over the speed limit at all.

If the mechanic working in the garage was either dumb enough to go out without a trade plate on or take it out and then remove it and go ragging it around then someone like him shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a toolbox, let alone a professional garage. I hope he likes bending over.
____________________
wizzzard wrote: Imagine God just stopping by, tidying your front room up and then quietly letting himself out again. Statisticly more likely to happen than Korn being on here.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 17 years, 269 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.15 Sec - Server Load: 0.97 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 135.35 Kb