|
|
| Author |
Message |
| TheDonUK |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheDonUK World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 16:21 - 21 Dec 2008 Post subject: Parking Ticket Appeal - Advice Please |
 |
|
Hello BCF,
At the beginning of the month i received a PCN from my local london borough for parking in a loading bay outside a tesco for 3 minutes, as is my standard procedure for dealing with such things i sent an appeal on the grounds that being a motorcycle courier i was infact loading, and as such no contravention occured.
Now just to clear it up for you, I am a courier on and off but that day i was not working, i just nipped into tesco for a couple of minutes to pick something up. They have no way of knowing that and i am willing to lie about it...
They have responded that they reject my appeal on the following grounds, ill just type out the relevant parts of their response verbatim.
| Quote: | "The loading bay at the above location is designated for the use of goods vehicles and for the purpose of delivering or collecting goods or loading or unloading the vehicle. Where a bay is designated for the purposes of allowing vehicles to carry out loading/unloading or delivering/collecting goods, it must be apparent that such an activity is being carried out. It must also be necessary for the vehicle itself to be parked in the bay, i.e. the vehicle itself must be carrying the goods rather than the person.
I have viewed the CCTV footage between 14:04 and 14:06 hrs and it does not establish that any loading or unloading or a delivery or collection was taking place. I have noted that the motorist arrived back at the vehicle at approximately 14:07:00, however, the red bag that he was carrying was secured to his back rather than placed in the vehicle itself.
For the loading/unloading or delivery/collection exemption to apply, it must be apparent that the vehicle itself was being used for the aforementioned purposes rather than the person. If the vehicle is not necessary to carry the goods then there was no reason to have to use the bay itself.
I am satisfied that the contravention occurred, that the PCN was issued correctly and there are no grounds that warrant its cancellation" |
So i plan to appeal to the parking ajudicator, in the knowledge that somehting like 65% of appeals that make it that far are quashed. I want to appeal on the basis that i was loading, and the items i was picking up for my client were medicine from tesco, the nature of which would make it impracticle and perhaps dangerous to secure directly to the vehicle (no top box), and as such the rules surrounding loading, which are presumably designed with vans and lorries in mind do not apply to a motorcycle loading.
I can either claim the red bag i was wearing that they mentioned was used to carry said goods or that the goods were held on my person, but by the nature of a courier the vehicle was necessary as so i am entitled to load in a loading bay.
I hope this makes sense, and if i do goto the ajudicator i wont have too many problems "finding" a delivery note from that day and perhaps getting a witness statement to the effect of "I employed yada yada to pick up yada yada on x and x day"
That all said, how would you phrase the appeal?, and do i really have a leg to stand on here or am i fighting a loosing battle and should just pay the £50 (which i cant really afford tbh this close to christmas). ?
Any advice would be appreciated.  ____________________ [Current Bikes - GSXR-750 K5 & C90-97 ] [Previous Bikes: Runner 125, YBR 125, GS500, Bandit 600, Hornet 600, ZX6R-99, C90-99, R1-99, XT600E-04, GSXR-750 K4, CRF250L '16] |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| yen_powell |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 yen_powell World Chat Champion

Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TheDonUK |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheDonUK World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 17:56 - 21 Dec 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Richmond, And yes, they even sent me pictures of the sign, i dont think there are any avenues to explore down the road of signage, road markings etc, i think my only option is to argue i was infact loading. Im just unsure of how to word it. ____________________ [Current Bikes - GSXR-750 K5 & C90-97 ] [Previous Bikes: Runner 125, YBR 125, GS500, Bandit 600, Hornet 600, ZX6R-99, C90-99, R1-99, XT600E-04, GSXR-750 K4, CRF250L '16] |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| yen_powell |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 yen_powell World Chat Champion

Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TheDonUK |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheDonUK World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 18:42 - 21 Dec 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Im going out in a bit, i will ride past the bay in question and have a look, but TBH having submitted my original appeal on the grounds of something else i cant imagine it would look good for me to change now.
Tomorow i will write a draft appeal and post it on here,
Advice always welcome in the meantime  ____________________ [Current Bikes - GSXR-750 K5 & C90-97 ] [Previous Bikes: Runner 125, YBR 125, GS500, Bandit 600, Hornet 600, ZX6R-99, C90-99, R1-99, XT600E-04, GSXR-750 K4, CRF250L '16] |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Fortuna |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Fortuna World Chat Champion

Joined: 29 Oct 2004 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| powelly |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 powelly World Chat Champion

Joined: 29 May 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TheDonUK |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheDonUK World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 21:42 - 21 Dec 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Thats exactly my thinking, ie if i had medicine it could easily be in a pocket etc,
Oh and the bay is marked up correctly, i had a look earlier.
The thing that boils my blood more than anything about this extortion is the lack of common sense in this country, now enforced by CCTV, even by their own admission i was parked there for around 3 minutes... CCTV Snap snap 1984 pay us or else...
 ____________________ [Current Bikes - GSXR-750 K5 & C90-97 ] [Previous Bikes: Runner 125, YBR 125, GS500, Bandit 600, Hornet 600, ZX6R-99, C90-99, R1-99, XT600E-04, GSXR-750 K4, CRF250L '16] |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MattEMulsion |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MattEMulsion World Chat Champion

Joined: 29 Aug 2004 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| c_dug |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 c_dug Super Spammer

Joined: 04 Sep 2007 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 02:06 - 22 Dec 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
I'd go for it, i cant see how they can say you didnt have anything on you (apart from if they somehow came across this thread ) as long as you can get a "delivery note" and a letter from "the client" then how can they say you weren't delivering?
My dad lives in Teddington by the way so its not inconcievable that you would be delivering to his address, if you want ill gladly say i ordered the medicine or whatever, PM me if you want to try that and we can sort something out.
also it could be worth giving this video a watch https://www.tpuc.org/node/494 from madmans thread in current affairs, the first half an hour basicly makes the point that things like parking offences cannot be upheld in court (or something like that) and a bunch of stuff about the difference between "person" and a "human being" in law which could work for you, its worth a watch
c_dug ____________________ I am a bellend, I am a man of constant sorrow, I am a gummy bear, I am a rock. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TheDonUK |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheDonUK World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 13:59 - 22 Dec 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Thanks for the offer dug, ill keep it in mind,
I just watched the link for about 45 minutes, I think he is operating on a very abstract level but is talking sense, in the differentiation between human being and person, Ie common law, Harm, loss or injury being applicable to everyone, and also policemen having discretion over common law, whereas statute law, which applies to parking tickets and the like has none at all and is on the basis of commercial intent... Quite interesting
Matt: thanks for the luck and i do accept your point that making up evidence is not an ideal situation... And yes i suppose according to the road traffic act of xxxx i was in the wrong for around 3 minutes, but surely common sense seeing a bike, parked in an empty bay for under 5 minutes, not causing an obstruction or depriving anyone of anything should not be fined...
I cant bring myself to just pay money (which i dont have) out of fear of the government essentially, Pay us £50 now or it gets more expensive and we will take you to court, they should fear us not vice-versa.
Im going to try and write up a response as best i can now.. ____________________ [Current Bikes - GSXR-750 K5 & C90-97 ] [Previous Bikes: Runner 125, YBR 125, GS500, Bandit 600, Hornet 600, ZX6R-99, C90-99, R1-99, XT600E-04, GSXR-750 K4, CRF250L '16] |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| c_dug |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 c_dug Super Spammer

Joined: 04 Sep 2007 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TheDonUK |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheDonUK World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 13:53 - 23 Dec 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
As a rough draft:
"In response to the rejection of my representations,
I maintain that on the date of the alleged contravention I was loading and thus in accordance with the bay restrictions.
The claim has been made that for the exemption to apply i must place goods in my vehicle,
As common sense would dictate the small nature of the medicines which i was employed to collect from the Tesco store were in my inner pocket at the time rather than somehow attached to my motorcycle as the council seems to suggest i should have done for this exemption to apply.
I reject their definition of what constitutes loading and furthermore claim that what they consider loading to be does not take into account motorcycle couriers and the nature of such work. Many items are unsuitable for placement inside the vehicle and thus are carried in alternative ways, this however does not change the fact that at the time in question i was loading, Delivery notes and witness statements will be produced in person to the ajudicator."
Thats very rough but as rough idea... how would you clean that up? ____________________ [Current Bikes - GSXR-750 K5 & C90-97 ] [Previous Bikes: Runner 125, YBR 125, GS500, Bandit 600, Hornet 600, ZX6R-99, C90-99, R1-99, XT600E-04, GSXR-750 K4, CRF250L '16] |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| st3v3 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 st3v3 Super Spammer

Joined: 16 Oct 2006 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 14:36 - 23 Dec 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Surely they can't take it upon themselves to decide how something is used? It's like if DHL carry a parcel on the dashboard instead of in the back it's not counted as a courier service...
Fight it, there's no common sense in charge in this country anymore and you have nothing to lose that you aren't aware of already.
If a Tesco's van is parked there and the driver is on a break instead of actually loading, does that mean he's in contravention of the 'rules' too? I doubt he'd get nabbed on it tho....
I'd send that as is, it's to the point and professional, I'm just glad I use a tank bag.  ____________________ Roger wrote: Women don't get damp for clingy puppies. Get some better happy pills, hit the gym & buy a medallion the size of a dinner plate. Job done |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 15:25 - 23 Dec 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
Also sounds like time to be making a freedom of information request for the CCTV footage. These things often get "Lost" (ie, can't be arsed looking for it/CD on someones desk etc). That seldom goes down well when things go to court.
I can state as absolute fact that claims in letters such as you received about exidence seen and site visits are often wholly fabricated.
I recall Edinburgh council claiming to have visited a site where I was allegedly illegally parked (I too was loading, in a transit van, parked at the end of a cul-de-sac). I had contested it on the basis that I was loading, that the road markings were so worn as to be illegible and that there was no statuatory signage in evidence.
They responded saying they had done a site visit and the restriction was in force. I replied demanding a written appology for lying and an immediate dropping of the ticket or I would produce their letter in court along with photographs and witness statements showing the piece of road in question had been converted to a wheelie bin storage area prior to the date their inspection was supposedly carried out. ____________________ “Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.”
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TheDonUK |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheDonUK World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 16:32 - 23 Dec 2008 Post subject: |
 |
|
The first thing before i even sent my intial appeal to the council was to ask for evidence, They sent me around 6 pictures, 4 of which show my bike in the bay at varying levels of zoom (remembering the ticket was issued from a solitary CCTV camera which i did not know about at the time), and the other two were photo's one of them had taken of the sign from foot level.
In response to i think yen_powell earlier in the thread i had a look at the bay and sign and i dont think there is much scope for appeal down that route, i think they may have shot themselves in the foot in the way they rejected, ie stating it has to be in the vehicle etc.
From what i understand this will not goto court though only to an adjudicator, and the hearing will only be me and him, so im relying on my ability to explain in person to him/her the situation and hope they see sense.
Ill clean up that little statement i made and send it off tomorow.
If it fails ill grudgingly pay and become ever more disgruntled with this country. ____________________ [Current Bikes - GSXR-750 K5 & C90-97 ] [Previous Bikes: Runner 125, YBR 125, GS500, Bandit 600, Hornet 600, ZX6R-99, C90-99, R1-99, XT600E-04, GSXR-750 K4, CRF250L '16] |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| owdamer |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 owdamer World Chat Champion
Joined: 06 Oct 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| MarkJ |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 MarkJ World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Apr 2006 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| The Disapproving Brit |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 The Disapproving Brit World Chat Champion

Joined: 10 Sep 2008 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sickpup |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sickpup Old Timer

Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TheDonUK |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheDonUK World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 16:59 - 28 Dec 2008 Post subject: Re: Parking Ticket Appeal - Advice Please |
 |
|
Cheers Sickpup,
I used your point about the 7.5 tonne a4 box logic and the lack of minimum weight restrictions in the final appeal i sent,
I will update this post when i hear something.  ____________________ [Current Bikes - GSXR-750 K5 & C90-97 ] [Previous Bikes: Runner 125, YBR 125, GS500, Bandit 600, Hornet 600, ZX6R-99, C90-99, R1-99, XT600E-04, GSXR-750 K4, CRF250L '16] |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TheDonUK |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheDonUK World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 13:45 - 10 Mar 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
The council out of hand rejected, and today i had my Ajudicators hearing, and it all came down to whether he thought my bike falls under the definition of goods vehicle. He dident give a decision today said he wants to think about it for a bit but he will probably find against me...
Oh well... ____________________ [Current Bikes - GSXR-750 K5 & C90-97 ] [Previous Bikes: Runner 125, YBR 125, GS500, Bandit 600, Hornet 600, ZX6R-99, C90-99, R1-99, XT600E-04, GSXR-750 K4, CRF250L '16] |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| The Shaggy D.A. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 The Shaggy D.A. Super Spammer

Joined: 12 Sep 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 13:51 - 10 Mar 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
I wouldn't be surprised if they were so petty to look at the in store CCTV, see what till you used at what time, then checked the till receipt to see what "medicine" you bought. ____________________ Chances are quite high you are not in my Monkeysphere, and I don't care about you. Don't take it personally.
Currently : Royal Enfield 350 Meteor
Previously : CB100N > CB250RS > XJ900F > GT550 > GPZ750R/1000RX > AJS M16 > R100RT > Bullet 500 > CB500 > LS650P > Bullet Electra X & YBR125 > Bullet 350 "Superstar" & YBR125 Custom > Royal Enfield Classic 500 Despatch Limited Edition (28 of 200) & CB Two-Fifty Nighthawk > ER5 |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| TheDonUK |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TheDonUK World Chat Champion

Joined: 20 Feb 2006 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 17:32 - 10 Mar 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
The Ajudicators/Council have no access to in store CCTV,
In the evidence the council submitted there was a DVD showing highly exciting and relevant footage of me walking to my bike, putting on my lid...
The Ajudicator (who incidentally are no longer based at New Zealand House but are now next to Angel tube station) was some toff barrister, he accepted that i was collecting goods, but as the PCN charge was "Using a bay intended for a different type of vehicle" or somesuch he said the contention point was if my bike classes as a Goods vehicle under the 1988 Road traffic act section 192,
Which defines a goods vehicle as "any motor vehicle constructed or adapted for the carriage of goods", my feeble argument was that my bike was constructed as a race bike with a racing cowell and that the removal of it and me adding bungee points constitutes adaptation for goods.
From the tone of the whole thing i reckon he is about 70/80% likely to find in favour of the scum council, usually though they give the decision right away, we both agreed it was an interesting point.
Wish me luck, i cant afford the full whack ticket now... ____________________ [Current Bikes - GSXR-750 K5 & C90-97 ] [Previous Bikes: Runner 125, YBR 125, GS500, Bandit 600, Hornet 600, ZX6R-99, C90-99, R1-99, XT600E-04, GSXR-750 K4, CRF250L '16] |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| powelly |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 powelly World Chat Champion

Joined: 29 May 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 17 years, 205 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|