Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


New law: Uninsured taxxed vehicles MUST be insured

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:29 - 21 Jan 2009    Post subject: New law: Uninsured taxxed vehicles MUST be insured Reply with quote

Very, very boo Thumbs Down.

From here: https://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Nl1/Newsroom/DG_174086


Uninsured drivers left with nowhere to hide

* Published: Tuesday, 20 January 2009

Tough new powers to tackle the selfish minority of uninsured drivers who cost law-abiding motorists £400m each year were set out by Road Safety Minister Jim Fitzpatrick today.


Uninsured motorists

* latest estimates are that around 6.5% (around 2 million) of GB motorists drive uninsured
* the penalty for driving without insurance is a maximum fine of £5,000 and 6-8 penalty points
* around 300,000 offenders are convicted for uninsured driving every year.

The new measures will make it an offence to keep an uninsured vehicle - rather than just to drive when uninsured - making it easier to catch uninsured drivers and keep them off the roads.

Under the new system:

* the DVLA will work in partnership with the insurance industry to identify uninsured vehicles
* motorists will receive a letter telling them that their vehicle appears to be uninsured and warning them that they will be fined unless they insure it within a set period
* if the keeper fails to insure the vehicle they will be given a £100 fine
* if the vehicle remains uninsured - regardless of whether the fine is paid - it could then be seized and destroyed.

Uninsured driving adds around £30 a year to every motorist's insurance premium - amounting to more than £400m a year in additional premiums. It is also estimated that uninsured and untraced drivers kill 160 people and injure 23,000 every year.

The government has already given the police powers to seize and destroy vehicles being driven uninsured, along with improved access to the Motor Insurance Database to enhance their capability to detect uninsured driving by using Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) equipment. Police removed around 150,000 vehicles in 2007 - more than 400 a day.

Last year a new offence of causing death by driving while unlicensed, disqualified or uninsured was introduced.

Jim Fitzpatrick said: ""The selfish minority of drivers who refuse to insure their cars push up premiums for other motorists and kill or injure thousands of people each year."

""Increased police powers already mean more than 400 uninsured vehicles are seized every day but these tough new measures will leave uninsured drivers with nowhere to hide.""
Further information

The public consultation published today sets out details of how it is proposed that the offence would be enforced. The consultation runs until 16 April 2009 and copies are available on the DfT website.



So, people with more of an idea exactly how the UK governmental system works; what can we do about it?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:33 - 21 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

This has been discussed at length on the I spy thread.

Short of an armed insurrection nothing you can do about it, other than leave for other shores.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:41 - 21 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah, my bad, I make an effort to avoid that section; I can't handle some of the blinded tin-foil hat style people Smile.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

jack_zxr400
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jul 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:49 - 21 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

i got hit by an uninsured driver a year back and the claim still hasnt been sorted

but ive got mixed feelings about this Confused
____________________
Previous Bike: ZXR 400
Current Bike: R6
Test Date: 8/8/2008-PASSED
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ajb
Crazy Courier



Joined: 14 May 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:03 - 21 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's out for consultation.

Forward you thoughts (in a concise and intellectual manner of course).

Also, for any uninsured drivers out there, the key to beating this silly law is just don't own your own vehicle, drive someone elses !!! Rolling Eyes
____________________
CBR125R '05 > CB500 '00 > CBR600F '99
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Poseidon
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:32 - 21 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I could see this as being very beneficial!!! my wifes car is proper dead (old ford fester... it happens! Rolling Eyes ). These new rules state that if we leave it un-insured and don't pay the fine, they'll seize and destroy the vehicle!!! I was quoted £20 for that kinda service!
____________________
1977 Honda CG125
2002 Ducati Monster S4 (currently restoring)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mad4it028
World Chat Champion



Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:39 - 21 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

so what happen to people like me with a few cars and a few bikes i have to insure all of them even tho some wont be used for the year and kept in storage?insured storage at that
____________________
always looking to buy bikes crashed ,unfinished projects,none runners pm me
currently riding kawasaki z1000 only bike ive ever loved
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Poseidon
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Aug 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:43 - 21 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

On a more serious note though... If you have a car in need of repair, it's still taxed but insurance has run out, you get fines and threats of removal of your property, yet if you burgle houses, mug old women, beat the living daylights out of people etc you get a friendly (free) warning and sent on your way (ASBO, cautions etc)

Yet again the motorist is an easy/affluent target
____________________
1977 Honda CG125
2002 Ducati Monster S4 (currently restoring)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:44 - 21 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're ok if they're SORN'd... however my bikes are often taxed, but not insured.
You can get tax returned (and do get a refund)... but that's on a per month basis that will end up taking a lot of time and I suspect even more money to get right.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:10 - 21 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

They can't crush it if they don't know where it is.

I have refused to participate in the SORN system on the basis that it is a stupid waste of my time and effort which achieves nothing. A decision which to-date has resulted in exactly no consequences whatsoever.

I suspect this insurance thing will function in the same way.

The general incompetance and laziness exhibited by the Swansea employment creation scheme known as the DVLA works both ways. It took them 12 years and six attempts to spell my name correctly on my driving licence. I expect them to exhibit the same level of diligence regarding the insurance thing.

Anyway, it'll flop. The system is at the mercy of third parties keeping a database up to date, which they wont. It is as weak as the laziest data inputter at the most incompetant insurance brokers. First time they set it off to do a run, it'll throw an eppy and use up six months paper supply spitting out largely spurious penalty charge notices. A riot will then ensue, politicians will U-turn and it will be given up as a bad idea.

I don't see why they can't realise that the first people to fill in a SORN declaration are those people who intend to drive without tax and insurance. You tell a computer system your car is off the road, it believes you. Then you are running the risk that a copper spots you are driving while on SORN, which is as much risk as you were taking by driving uninsured anyway.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Tango675
Crazy Courier



Joined: 24 Jul 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:14 - 21 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

One word: SORN?

Will I need to insure a bike thats in bits in the shed?

Not sure that this system will work
____________________
Somebody give that windup merchant a torque wrench..
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:17 - 21 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Link to the consultation:
https://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/open/motor/

If you don't complete it, you don't get to complain.

For the record, I responded to the SORN consultation too stating how stupid an idea I thought it was. I therefore reserve the right to complain about it.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Newbiker0507
Crazy Courier



Joined: 29 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:47 - 21 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

What about bikes in sheds/storage?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:22 - 22 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Newbiker0507 wrote:
What about bikes in sheds/storage?


Will need to be on SORN or insured otherwise they will fine you and then probably crush them.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

cicatrez
Crazy Courier



Joined: 02 Nov 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:34 - 22 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

so for example. If you live somewhere where you can't get off road parking.. you will get fined even tho your car has road tax?
It seems somewhat unfair.Paying insurance for a car that you are not driving. Your not an uninsured driver if you aint driving the damn car.
____________________
-----------------------
'02 Honda City Fly
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Bendy
Mrs Sensible



Joined: 10 Jun 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:34 - 22 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

cicatrez wrote:
so for example. If you live somewhere where you can't get off road parking.. you will get fined even tho your car has road tax?
It seems somewhat unfair.Paying insurance for a car that you are not driving. Your not an uninsured driver if you aint driving the damn car.


Technically, that's already illegal, I believe. Any vehicle on a public road, whether it's moving or not, has to be insured. That's the guts of the reasoning behind why 'you may drive other cars' insurance always needs the other car to be insured by someone - if it isn't then it's not insured the moment you step out of it. Which gets complex in petrol station forecourts and silly things like that. Or your trailer's insured until the moment you unhitch it from the car. Not sure it's something folk get 'done for' much though, as it is a bit ridiculous, but I believe the logic is that your public-parked car could suddenly roll into someone else's public-parked car or your public-parked motorbike could fall over onto someone else's and there's the claim. On private property you argue amongst yourselves.

The biggest problem with this new rule is that tax and insurance are generally annual things so there's an infinite number of scenarios where you could have one and not the other. Especially with bikes, the tax is cheap enough that it's not usually worth the hassle to stop it, the insurance can be expensive enough that it is.

Still think you should be able to insure *yourself* more easily - I can't ride all the bikes and drive all the cars at once so cover me for 'using the road' based on whichever's the highest risk.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

.Chris.
World Chat Champion



Joined: 09 Jun 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:37 - 22 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

There's an almost hilarious lack of logic with this one - people who willingly drive around uninsured probably aren't going to be all that bothered if said vehicle is also (illegitimately) on SORN. The only people who will be fined under this are those who unwittingly don't comply with all the DVLA's pointless bureaucracy.

Also this relies on the MID (which is where I presume the insurance data will come from) being accurate and up to date, which it isn't. Using askmid.com I know my bike isn't on the database, but is most definitely insured.

On the subject of SORN, it seems that the DVLA are too incompetent to even send me a fine! My Land Rover has had no tax or SORN since October and I haven't heard anything.
____________________
Chris
1985 Kawasaki Z550F
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:35 - 22 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

My reply to the consultation:
Quote:

Dear Mr. Curson,

Thank you for your consultation letter dated 20/01/2009.

I am a private citizen of the UK and am responding as such. I own
several vehicles including five motorcycles a car and a van. These
vehicles are currently in various stages of repair, road worthiness
and may or may not be insured.

Let me assure you that should I take one of them on the public
highway, I ensure it fully complies with the appropriate regulations.

I would like to make three points on this proposal:

1) The proposal would put an onerous burden on motoring enthusiasts
like myself in addition to keeping up to date with tax and insurance
documentation requirements. For reasons of cost and convenience, I do
not continuously tax or insure all of my vehicles, indeed, it is often
imposable to do so because they are not always in a roadworthy
condition.

I feel it is incorrect to imply that because a vehicle is not
currently insured, it is being used illegally. Two of my vehicles are
currently uninsured, being in a state of some disrepair. One of those
vehicles is taxed and I hope to have it repaired before the tax
expires, at which point I will insure it.

This also casts doubt on the assumption that a taxed vehicle which is
uninsured is being used illegally, there is a case in point sitting in
my garage.

2) There is an old adage regarding computer systems which goes thus:
"Rubbish in. Rubbish out." That is to say, a computer system believes
what you tell it. If you feed spurious information to a computer, you
will receive spurious results.

So, the proposal states that fines would NOT be sent out to vehicle
keepers who have their vehicle on SORN.

Were one in the business of driving uninsured vehicles and armed with
the above fact, the first thing one would do is make sure a SORN
declaration was completed. This is a guaranteed way to ensure a fixed
penalty notice is not issued. It would then be incumbent on the police
to catch the SORNed vehicle on the road. A situation in no way
different to the current one regarding uninsured vehicles being used
on the road.

It is my belief therefore that the proposed enforcement scheme would
have no effect whatsoever on the hardcore of drivers who deliberately
drive without insurance. Instead it would penalise those people whose
vehicles are or appear to be uninsured by omission or error on the
part of either the keeper or the persons responsible for keeping the
database updated.

3) My third point is that of dismay that yet another piece of proposed
legislation places a non-elected government entity in the position of
being able to impose a substantial financial penalty on private
citizens. This being without any burden of proof or possibility of
recourse to the judiciary. It further blurs the traditional, and in my
opinion wholly correct divide between the executive and the judicial.

It puts the DVLA computer in the seemingly Orwellian position of being
solely responsible for determining guilt and extracting penalty. No
computer system is infallible, and I refer you once again to the
"Rubbish in. Rubbish out." axiom. In this case, there being an
exponentially higher risk of "rubbish in" than with the SORN system
due to the huge number of third parties who would be providing the
insurance information.

In summary. I am opposed to the proposal. I feel it would add to the
burden of bureaucracy for the everyday, law abiding motorist with a
Damoclesian fine awaiting any errors in paperwork. At the same time it
would fail to penalise those who deliberately set out to flout the law
regarding insurance.

In the case of a mistake being made, there is no apparent mechanism
for an impartial, non-executive appeal other than by referral back to
the body who imposed the fine in the first place. Even convicted
murderers have more rights than this.


Yours faithfully,


Mr stinkwheel, BVM&S, MRCVS.

____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

RS2MATRIX
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 03 Apr 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:25 - 24 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

wow for a minute i really thought your surname was stinkwheel Laughing
____________________
Reiju RS2 Matrix
Kawasaki ZXR400
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Skudd
Super Spammer



Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:33 - 25 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not sure whether to pay the £82 fully comp insurance or be a rebel and ride around uninsured. Thinking
____________________
Famous last words of Humpty Dumpty. " Stop pushing me "
Petty Anarchists look at "1984".............. The Visionary looks at "Animal Farm".
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Duckyboos
Traffic Copper



Joined: 06 Jul 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:18 - 25 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I wonder how much money from taxed but off-the-road vehicles is currently sitting in Government coffers...

...and if people started submitting SORN declarations left right 'n' centre, how much of this money would have to be refunded?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:27 - 25 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Duckyboos wrote:
I wonder how much money from taxed but off-the-road vehicles is currently sitting in Government coffers...

...and if people started submitting SORN declarations left right 'n' centre, how much of this money would have to be refunded?


You have to glue the old tax disc to a form and post it back, then you get refunded a pro-rata amount for every complete month left by cheque.

I can't remember if there is an admin fee.

Just SORNing a bike doesn't get you a refund. You have to fill in two forms. 1) The refund form and 2) The SORN form.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Howling TerrorOutOfOffice
Super Spammer



Joined: 05 Dec 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:00 - 25 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Uninsured driving adds around £30 a year to every motorist's insurance premium - amounting to more than £400m a year in additional premiums

I await my reduction ...NOT.
Next we'll be expected to have own public liabilty insurance before leaving our houses for a walk... Exclamation Well you get the point


Pat
____________________
Diabolical homemade music Bandcamp and Soundcloud
Singer songwriter, Artist and allround good bloke Listen to Andrew Susan Johnston here
The Harry Turner Project
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

inchi55
Two Stroke Sniffer



Joined: 09 May 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:29 - 25 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are we all forgetting something here. The government keep telling us they know every untaxed and uninsured car or bike on the road (unsorn) around 3 million so if there that sure where they are why have they not been round and crushed them and got them off the road, why leave it to the cops to catch one here and there. They waste more money on advertising to tell us these facts instead of fixing the crap roads like they should be doing with the road tax money.
The point being they rely on us telling them because they carn`t keep up with the system
____________________
past bikes-gt185, gsx250, gsx600f, gsx750f and now rf900/
yea suzuki man all the way.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 00:39 - 26 Jan 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

inchi55 wrote:
Are we all forgetting something here. The government keep telling us they know every untaxed and uninsured car or bike on the road (unsorn) around 3 million so if there that sure where they are why have they not been round and crushed them and got them off the road, why leave it to the cops to catch one here and there. They waste more money on advertising to tell us these facts instead of fixing the crap roads like they should be doing with the road tax money.
The point being they rely on us telling them because they carn`t keep up with the system


Because most of the vehicles that aren't declared SORN aren't on the road. I have five bikes and only two of them are taxed just now. The other three are off the road. Despite what they might say and imply, they can't crush a vehicle for being untaxed unless it is on the road illegally. Failure to declare SORN merely gives them the power to whinge at you and demand money.

They are relying on the fact that a significant proportion of the people sent a penalty charge notice when they inadvertantly allow their tax to lapse without declaring SORN send them a cheque by return of post.

This is the point I suppose. SORN has nothing whatsoever to do with the claimed purpose of getting untaxed vehicles off the road and everything to do with collecting lots and lots of £80 (reduced to £45 if you pay right away) cheques.

I don't believe for a second that the number of vehicles they claim to be evading roax tax are actually on the road. It's all smoke and mirrors to justify another stealth tax.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 17 years, 14 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Biking News & Rumours All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 0.61 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 141.14 Kb