Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Helmets - how are they rated on safety?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Graprilia
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 02 May 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:06 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Helmets - how are they rated on safety? Reply with quote

hi,
Just wondering if anyone knows where to find a list of helmet safety ratings?

If such a thing exists.

i think my helmet is "e" something
____________________
Piaggo liberty 125 SOLD - CBR 125 - SOLD Aprilia RS 125 - SOLD CBR 400 NC29 - SOLD ZX6R currently own https://bikepics.com/members/Graprilia/


Last edited by Graprilia on 19:09 - 03 Feb 2009; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

.....
Quote Me Happy



Joined: 15 Jan 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:08 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

https://sharp.direct.gov.uk/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:10 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

The government hav started a rating system called SHARP.

They haven't tested all lids yet, but its the closest thing to what you ask.

https://sharp.direct.gov.uk/search/
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Graprilia
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 02 May 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:11 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

ive seen that website but my helmet isnt listed on it.
____________________
Piaggo liberty 125 SOLD - CBR 125 - SOLD Aprilia RS 125 - SOLD CBR 400 NC29 - SOLD ZX6R currently own https://bikepics.com/members/Graprilia/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Graprilia
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 02 May 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:22 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

mine just says:-

ACU Gold Approved
EC ER 05 Approved

i didnt know if there was ER 01 ER 02 etc ,rating scale somwhere.
____________________
Piaggo liberty 125 SOLD - CBR 125 - SOLD Aprilia RS 125 - SOLD CBR 400 NC29 - SOLD ZX6R currently own https://bikepics.com/members/Graprilia/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:24 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Graprilia wrote:
mine just says:-

ACU Gold Approved
EC ER 05 Approved

i didnt know if there was ER 01 ER 02 etc ,rating scale somwhere.


ACU is worthless it is just a tax to fund the ACU
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Graprilia
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 02 May 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:25 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

what about the ER ?? bit then?
____________________
Piaggo liberty 125 SOLD - CBR 125 - SOLD Aprilia RS 125 - SOLD CBR 400 NC29 - SOLD ZX6R currently own https://bikepics.com/members/Graprilia/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

LeeR
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:41 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

All helmets sold in the UK must meet the UN ECE 22.05 standard, which in turn means they meet the BS6658:1985 standard.

In the USA they have a couple of standards which come to mind such as DOT and Snell, there are some informative articles out there on how the different tests differ: Motorcycle Helmet Review.

However, if your helmet was sold in the UK then it's "safe" enough, and as long as it fits properly it will do it's job.

Any reason you ask?
____________________
My claim to fame: Austin Vince nicked my pen...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Graprilia
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 02 May 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:43 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Any reason you ask?


because i vaguely remember from my CBT they mentioned something it must be at least E ?? to be legal.
____________________
Piaggo liberty 125 SOLD - CBR 125 - SOLD Aprilia RS 125 - SOLD CBR 400 NC29 - SOLD ZX6R currently own https://bikepics.com/members/Graprilia/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

LeeR
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:56 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

In which case I think they mean this:

Quote:
You must wear a helmet which has been approved to one of the British Standards listed in the table below (it will have a British Standard 'kitemark' and the number of the standard), or to UN ECE Regulation 22.05 (it will have a UN 'E' mark and the first two digits of the approval number will be '05').


And yes your helmet is therefore safe and legal, subjective though that is.
____________________
My claim to fame: Austin Vince nicked my pen...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:04 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

They are not rated on safety as such. They simply have to pass certain standard tests.....

The biggest safety measure, is one you and only you can take, and that is to eensure that the helmet you buy is a good fit for your head.
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:13 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

None of the tests are that good since they are measured on a test rig to a series of arbitary impacts and penetration tests.

Last time I looked, there seemed to be little or no research into why these particular impacts were selected, how they decided the level of protection necessary or what sort of impacts caused serious injuries or fatalities.

Seems to me they set them at an arbitrary "This seems like a good idea." level which doesn't always mean it IS a good idea. Helmets passing some of the American tests in particular would leave you lying dead in the road wearing a relatively undamaged helmet full of mince.

There again, when has any sort of basis in fact or research stood in the way of legislation? When they brought in the helmet laws back in the 1970's there was NO research proving a helmet increases survivability in a real crash, it just seemed like a good idea. There is still remarkably little research based on real crashes, all the research is done on hypothetical impacts in a laboratory. This tells you how a helmet responds to an impact but not to how it performs in an accident (or even contributes to one?)

What am I saying, why am I ranting on about this again?

Wear a helmet because it is the law and wear a well fitting helmet bacause a badly fitting one will most certainly make matters worse in case of a crash. Just don't assume it is going to make any difference to your chances of surviving a crash, in fact, assume it wont.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Louise
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:23 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I personally wont even look at the SHARP test.
Had a few reps talk about the SHARP test and they didnt agree with it also.
I see some Nitros are higher rated then Arai's?
IMHO Arai will be the helmet for me.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:26 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Louise wrote:

I see some Nitros are higher rated then Arai's?
IMHO Arai will be the helmet for me.


Arai have changed the design slightly on the RX7 GP so that the SHARP test doesn't impact on the visor mechanism anymore IIRC.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:27 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

The SHARP ratings are supposed to be based upon real accident statistics.

However Arai in particular disagree with the Sharp reccomendation that impact should be tested around the ear area. The government say that lots of riders die in crashes where the side of their head impacts on something. Arai say that because 99.99% of riders have shoulders that the impact is more likely to happen further up the head nearer the crown.

But, the SHARP tests are based upon some scientific data and it is all reccomendation based rather than trying to enforce something. Its better than the government legislating on how good or bad helmets should be. If they did, then we'd all be wearing lids that are four feet across and filled with cotton wool.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F; Cheap project: CBR900RR FireBlade
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Grav
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:35 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have personally tested a Lazer Helmet when I headbutted a wall at 35mph when I got knocked off my bike a few years ago.

It passed. Thumbs Up

Sharp gave it a 5 star rating and I gave it 10/10 cos I'm still here. Laughing
____________________
Dark Lord Of Custard

snigger..... Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:59 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Louise wrote:

Had a few reps talk about the SHARP test and they didnt agree with it also.
I see some Nitros are higher rated then Arai's?
IMHO Arai will be the helmet for me.


Guess you have a Arai shaped head then Wink

Bet the reps that don't like the test, sell helmets that have not faired too well.

Arai won't be happy as their products are much more expensive and they have led people/mugs to believe that higher cost releates to more safety.
Higher cost may buy you more extra's, but does nothing for the overall safety of the helmet.
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:03 - 03 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

iooi wrote:

Higher cost may buy you more extra's, but does nothing for the overall safety of the helmet.


There would be lots of people that would disagree with that statement.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Louise
World Chat Champion



Joined: 22 May 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:23 - 04 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I do have an Arai head Wink
I like some shoei's but it feels like im being given a face lift taking it off and im only 25 Laughing
I just know the way Arai is tested & made makes me beleive more in that helmet - But then again, I did alot of reading into Arai then any other make.
Before I knew about Arai, the size of the shell appealed to me more - Small & dont look mahoosive like some.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Graprilia
Brolly Dolly



Joined: 02 May 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:41 - 04 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Before I knew about Arai, the size of the shell appealed to me more


i agree obviously the worlds safeist helmet is useless if it doesnt fit right. Pointing out the obvious though.

But if you have an Arai head shape and found they fit you nicely , that is the safeist option.

And everyone has different head shapes. Ive owned ROOF , NITRO , WULF and AGV - which is probably my fav one.

But does anyone else have the same problem as me , when ever someone sees a helmet they go crazy everyone wants to wear it , and people knock them on the floor , or on one occassion two work colleagues were kicking it around the floor like a football.

I gave them the bill for a new one , and did some kicking of my own. Thumbs Up
____________________
Piaggo liberty 125 SOLD - CBR 125 - SOLD Aprilia RS 125 - SOLD CBR 400 NC29 - SOLD ZX6R currently own https://bikepics.com/members/Graprilia/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Newbiker0507
Crazy Courier



Joined: 29 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:51 - 04 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
Just don't assume it is going to make any difference to your chances of surviving a crash, in fact, assume it wont.


I was hit going at about 15-20mph. I was told that my body and head bounced off the floor after I flew over the bonnet. Had I not been wearing a helmet I shudder to think what mess would have been made.

I think your statement might be nearer accurate for high-speed crashes, but for low-speed crashes it's not true at all in my experience.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:27 - 04 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Newbiker0507 wrote:

I was hit going at about 15-20mph. I was told that my body and head bounced off the floor after I flew over the bonnet. Had I not been wearing a helmet I shudder to think what mess would have been made.

I think your statement might be nearer accurate for high-speed crashes, but for low-speed crashes it's not true at all in my experience.


Pure anecdote, which seems to tbe the basis for most of the helmet legislation.

Could it have been: I wasn't wearing a helmet and because my head wasn't made 2" larger all the way round, my head protecting reflexes, honed by millions of years of evolution meant it never touched the road in the first place. (think, if you fall the first thing you do is bring your arms up and tuck your chin down to protect your head. I have been that ragdoll, at speed and my head never touched the ground in spite of the helmet).

Or: I was just clearing the crap off my visor, when I looked up there was a car right across the road. A few seconds longer and I'd have been able to sverve out of the way.

Or could it have been: I caught sight of a slight movement in the corner of my eye, a car pulling out on me, hit the anchors and swerved out of the way. If anything had been obstructing my peripheral vision, I'd have hit it.

Or even: I flew over the bonnet and hit the ground sliding pretty fast. It was all going ok until the chinbar of my full face helmet snagged on a drain cover. That's why I'm typing this using a stick in my mouth.

In other words, there are a HELL of a lot more variables in an accident than simply the impact you could sustain, not least of which is the degree to which a full face helmet obstructs your peripheral vision (don't believe me? Try riding in town with an open face lid.)

I maintain that in a large number of cases, the wearing of a helmet gave the rider a false sense of security leading them to ride less carefully. I reckon that the number of accidents would go DOWN if people were banned from wearing helmets.

It's in human nature to think "I just spent £250 on soemthing to protect my head, therefore I'll be ok if I come off."

That is also an anecdotal argument, It can't be proved, equally it can't be disproved.

Less anecdotally, the number of motorcycle accidents went UP the year following introduction of the helmet laws. This does not mean necessarily mean it was due to the helmets though.

So, in the absence of good scientific proof, the only safe course of action is to work on the assumption that wearing a helmet is going to make your chances of having then surviving an accident worse.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

LeeR
World Chat Champion



Joined: 12 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:40 - 04 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I understand your points Stinkwheel and recognise that there are occasions when a helmet offers no benefit at all in an accident.

However, I do think that helmets offer other benefits such as: reducing noise, keeping flies out of your teeth, keeping your head warm and dry, and protecting you from air borne debris.

Now if the alternative is to ride in goggles, with a face scarf, and a sou'wester then I'm still going to wear the helmet on my 40 mile motorway commute as the alternative also offers no benefit imho.
____________________
My claim to fame: Austin Vince nicked my pen...
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:05 - 04 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

LeeR wrote:
I understand your points Stinkwheel and recognise that there are occasions when a helmet offers no benefit at all in an accident.

However, I do think that helmets offer other benefits such as: reducing noise, keeping flies out of your teeth, keeping your head warm and dry, and protecting you from air borne debris.

Now if the alternative is to ride in goggles, with a face scarf, and a sou'wester then I'm still going to wear the helmet on my 40 mile motorway commute as the alternative also offers no benefit imho.


Very true. Same reason as I wear one.

My criteria for a helmet is to be light with a small frontal area to save neck fatigue on long trips and to have a good enough fit that the visor doesn't touch my nose no matter how hard you push on it. I really couldn't care if it comforms to this, that or the other regulation as long as those are there and it keeps the wind and rain off.

As it happens, Arai make the only helmet I've tried on that does all of the above.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Newbiker0507
Crazy Courier



Joined: 29 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:27 - 10 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

stinkwheel wrote:
Newbiker0507 wrote:

I was hit going at about 15-20mph. I was told that my body and head bounced off the floor after I flew over the bonnet. Had I not been wearing a helmet I shudder to think what mess would have been made.

I think your statement might be nearer accurate for high-speed crashes, but for low-speed crashes it's not true at all in my experience.


Pure anecdote, which seems to tbe the basis for most of the helmet legislation.

Could it have been: I wasn't wearing a helmet and because my head wasn't made 2" larger all the way round, my head protecting reflexes, honed by millions of years of evolution meant it never touched the road in the first place. (think, if you fall the first thing you do is bring your arms up and tuck your chin down to protect your head. I have been that ragdoll, at speed and my head never touched the ground in spite of the helmet).


I actually don't think my head DID hit the ground. Despite what I was told.

Either way, I'd rather wear a full helmet than not.

I'd be interested to hear how many other serious bikers (on here) share your view.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 17 years, 22 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.11 Sec - Server Load: 1.43 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 139.42 Kb