Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


SV650S or Divi 600 s

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

thumper246
Derestricted Danger



Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:02 - 17 Feb 2009    Post subject: SV650S or Divi 600 s Reply with quote

Can any one give me a comparison between these two please
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Pie-Roe
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 01:33 - 17 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Divvy is bland, basic A-B engine (enough poke to lose your license, but slow to get there), brakes, suspension and build quality are budget. One of those bikes that will go for ages. A lot of people use them as a winter hack, fuel economy is supposed to be reasonable.

Sv is also budget, but more sporty, will do about 120-130, more torque, slightly better build quality, although finish will corrode, suzuki's are bad for this. Better brakes, suspension is alright if you set it up correctly.

If it's your first big bike, either will do, but if you can find a nicely priced sv, take it.

Pyro
____________________
Previous: GSF600, FZR600 x2, ZXR750, XT600 Tenere, CB125, CZ125, ETZ 250, ER5, CCM R30, DRZ400, RF600x4, RF900x2, GS500, VTR1000F, 640 SMC, CB250 NIGHTHAWK, GT550x3, GPX750 TE610, CB500, X11x2, SV650, ZING 125, TL1000R,CB250 Superdream, CBR1100XX
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ram_doom
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:23 - 17 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Out of those two, SV.
____________________
TL1000s, KDX200
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Polarbear
Super Spammer



Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:13 - 17 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you can get the divvy with the twin front brakes in good condition, Thumbs Up

My missus had one as her 2nd bike, abused it no end and it came through with no problems. Parts are as cheap as chips and I wouldn't say it was as poor build quality as the SV either.

Then again it is a divvy and they are not sporty. The seat position is 'sit up and beg'. There aren't the aftermarket sports accessories for it that there are for the SV.

I think you'll get a good one at a fraction of the price of a good SV though.
____________________
Triumph Trophy Launch Edition
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

iooi
Super Spammer



Joined: 14 Jan 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 08:37 - 17 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Go for a SV.

Divvy prices are getting silly now. I have been watching on ebay to see if i can pick up another one.
But when you see the like's of a 92 one go for £1000+ you know prices are getting silly.

Reliable hacks, no real vices to catch you out, mine has single disk which has more than enough stopping power (braided lines help). Fuel economy is in the 65mpg range all the time for me.
Couple of weak points collector boxes on exhaust rot, replacing is not cheap for a new system. Very prone to gunking up due to condensation in the air box, which then leads to rough running.

Also have a look at Hysoung's 650 which are pretty much the same as the SV, engine is designed by the same guy.
____________________
Just because my bike was A DIVVY, does not mean i am......
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MarJay
But it's British!



Joined: 15 Sep 2003
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:12 - 17 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thats like comparing a transit van to a focus.

The Divvy is practical but dull and the SV is focussed and fun. (no pun intended) but still practical.
____________________
British beauty: Triumph Street Triple R; Loony stroker: KR1S; Track fun: GSXR750 L1; Commuter Missile: GSX-S1000F
Remember kids, bikes aren't like lego. You can't easily take a part from one bike and then fit it to another.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:19 - 17 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Out of those two it has to be the SV.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Nicky-Jano
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 20 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:37 - 17 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

SVS curvy Wink .
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Blau Zedong This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.

Blue_SV650S
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Nov 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:58 - 17 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

It depends what do you intend to use the bike for!?

The divvy is an IL4, so will give a more comfortable/smooth ride. The SV is a V-twin so will give you power pulses (and noise) to suit.

Both have crap/basic suspension, both have 'adequate' brakes.

If the bike is to be purely used as a workhorse commuter, I think the turbine smooth Divvy makes more sense, especially if there is a fair bit of motorway, if you want to have a bit of weekend fun, the SV. Thumbs Up
____________________
The purpose of life is to fight maturity.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

T0MMY
World Chat Champion



Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:30 - 17 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

MarJay wrote:
Thats like comparing a transit van to a focus.

The Divvy is practical but dull and the SV is focussed and fun. (no pun intended) but still practical.


Can I just stick my oar into to point out that the Focus is not a fun car unless you mean the RS Laughing Agree other than that though. SVs don't appeal to me hugely but they are "sports" bikes to some extent whereas the divvy is very much a commuter so it depends what you want.
____________________
ZX6R + CBR600RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

instigator
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:57 - 17 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

MPG is pretty much the same between the two in my opinion.

Divvy is far more comfortable but has bad vibrations through it's footpegs. Divvy is easier to service and you could argue their parts are cheaper too. Always examine the exhaust on an xj600s, especially the mid section or Y piece. These tend to rot badly and start blowing. Try and buy an XJ that has got an aftermarket system fitted.

I like both bikes to be honest. If I wanted to tour, I would take the XJ. Although the SV is great fun in the twisties, it's not as comfortable at long distances.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

_Will_
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 Jan 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:08 - 17 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are you talking old divvy or new divvy?
https://static.blogo.it/motoblog/la-yamaha-xj6-diversion/big_yamaha_xj6_diversion_01.jpg
____________________
Past -Honda qr50 | 2004 Peugeot Tkr s 50|
| 1996 Yamaha XJ600s Diversion|
| 2005|Kawasaki Z750s | | 2006 Yamaha FZ6 Fazer |
|| 1999 Cbr1100xx Blackbird ||
||| 2000 Kawasaki Zx12R ||| (|2009 Street Triple R |) // 2004 Honda Hornet Streetfighter \\|=| 2000 BMW R1100S |=| ------ My Bikepics page ------
Suffering Bike Withdrawal.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Steve-D
World Chat Champion



Joined: 07 Jul 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:44 - 17 Feb 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
(and noise)


Prefer my divvy to a twin, louder than my R6 with a straight through race can.
https://s72.photobucket.com/albums/i192/stevie__d/?action=view¤t=DSCN1128.flv

Brakes are rubbish and get gummed up a lot.
Suspension is soggy.
Slow after 90, most I've got from mine is 125.
Build quality is good IMO, mines a 96 no rust corrosion rounded off bolts anywhere paints still v good.
Front of the engine is imposible to clean.
Incredibly reliable, I've ragged mine for a year (16k and I mean ragged) with no servicing at all and its never not started with a tiny bit of choke.
Ground clearance is poor.
Good on fuel well over 150 miles to 15 litres.
Very comfortable over long journeys, have rode mine for 9 hours pretty much straight and was still fine.
Boring but good to learn on very forgiving, won't spin the wheels up or wheelie off the throttle, unless you do something really stupid.
____________________
www.southwestbikers.com
Tristan The said 'Dunno what my pace will be like, fastish slow puncture on the rear and if I go too fast I risk my 'keys' falling out'
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 132 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.10 Sec - Server Load: 1.36 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 85 Kb