|
Author |
Message |
TimNorwich |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TimNorwich Traffic Copper

Joined: 07 Apr 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 16:42 - 26 Feb 2009 Post subject: Exhaust info. |
 |
|
On my new hornet, I have an ART exhaust, to me it is quite loud (that could be due to the gpz sounding so quiet), not only is it loud but it has no baffles, or BSAU marks or whatnot. So I thought i'd find out the actual law behind exhausts and if i'd get a fine or points. I don't care about a fine, but I do points!
So I thought instead of searching the internet high and low for some answers I would send an E-mail to Norfolk Police and ask my questions on exhausts. The E-mail is as follows:
I am writing to you to ask a question about motorcycle exhausts, and the law around them.
Do they need to be "E" marked and have baffles in them?
If they do need the above, and a motorcycle doesn't comply with those rules what are the possible penalties?
Thankyou for your time.
Tim
****Reply****
Tim,
Re your enquiry above, my understanding is that it does require a British Standard Stamp on it indeed.
This may well be in the form of an E or Kite mark of some description.
The National Police National Legal Database is a excellent site to look up and will give many details of such regulations relating to Construction and Use of Motor Vehicles.
Prescribed requirements are contained in the Motor Cycle Silencer & Exhaust Systems Regulations 1995 SI 1995/2370, and may refer to any British Standard Specifications, regulations under section 41 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 or any EC or international instrument.
You do need baffles as this could fall foul of the reasonable noise permitted on vehicles and render you liable for prosecution.
The Motor Cycle Noise Act 1987 was introduced to prohibit the supply of motor cycle exhaust systems and silencers which do not comply with prescribed requirements and which are likely to cause the emission of excessive noise.
The fine could be a fixed penalty or you could be reported and possibly required to attend Court.
Regards
PC PHILLIPS
So yer, now I have to look on the 'The National Police National Legal Database' and find further information! I'll keep you posted. ____________________ Speedshite 50cc > Honda XR125L > Kawasaki GPZ 500 S > 02 Honda Hornet > 05 Honda CG125 winter hack > 04 Kawasaki ER-5 > 99 Honda Hornet 600 > Kawasaki GPZ 500 S > 99 Honda Hornet 600 > 05 Honda CBR600F > 01 Honda Hornet
Last edited by TimNorwich on 16:51 - 26 Feb 2009; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Mr.Everready |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Mr.Everready World Chat Champion

Joined: 28 Mar 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 16:44 - 26 Feb 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
If you asked on here you would have got the same answer in 5 minutes.  ____________________ the undemocratically unelected mod of the Scottish section |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
TimNorwich |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TimNorwich Traffic Copper

Joined: 07 Apr 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 16:49 - 26 Feb 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Took a look on that Database website and couldn't find anything, however I found this link
https://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1995/Uksi_19952370_en_1.htm
Mentions what must be stamped on the exhaust, however there is no mention of baffles  ____________________ Speedshite 50cc > Honda XR125L > Kawasaki GPZ 500 S > 02 Honda Hornet > 05 Honda CG125 winter hack > 04 Kawasaki ER-5 > 99 Honda Hornet 600 > Kawasaki GPZ 500 S > 99 Honda Hornet 600 > 05 Honda CBR600F > 01 Honda Hornet |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
s44678 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 s44678 Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Wil |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Wil Trackday Trickster

Joined: 05 Jul 2008 Karma :  
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
barmac007 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 barmac007 L Plate Warrior
Joined: 19 Mar 2009 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 04:05 - 19 Mar 2009 Post subject: Re: Exhaust info. |
 |
|
timmyboynorwich wrote: | On my new hornet, I have an ART exhaust, to me it is quite loud (that could be due to the gpz sounding so quiet), not only is it loud but it has no baffles, or BSAU marks or whatnot. So I thought i'd find out the actual law behind exhausts and if i'd get a fine or points. I don't care about a fine, but I do points!
So I thought instead of searching the internet high and low for some answers I would send an E-mail to Norfolk Police and ask my questions on exhausts. The E-mail is as follows:
I am writing to you to ask a question about motorcycle exhausts, and the law around them.
Do they need to be "E" marked and have baffles in them?
If they do need the above, and a motorcycle doesn't comply with those rules what are the possible penalties?
Thankyou for your time.
Tim
****Reply****
Tim,
Re your enquiry above, my understanding is that it does require a British Standard Stamp on it indeed.
This may well be in the form of an E or Kite mark of some description.
The National Police National Legal Database is a excellent site to look up and will give many details of such regulations relating to Construction and Use of Motor Vehicles.
Prescribed requirements are contained in the Motor Cycle Silencer & Exhaust Systems Regulations 1995 SI 1995/2370, and may refer to any British Standard Specifications, regulations under section 41 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 or any EC or international instrument.
You do need baffles as this could fall foul of the reasonable noise permitted on vehicles and render you liable for prosecution.
The Motor Cycle Noise Act 1987 was introduced to prohibit the supply of motor cycle exhaust systems and silencers which do not comply with prescribed requirements and which are likely to cause the emission of excessive noise.
The fine could be a fixed penalty or you could be reported and possibly required to attend Court.
Regards
PC PHILLIPS
So yer, now I have to look on the 'The National Police National Legal Database' and find further information! I'll keep you posted. |
In the UK we still allow manufacturers to self certify. So those UK manufacturers that you see in all the small ads with road legal cans aren't telling porkies but do not have to submit their stuff to any outside agency for approval. The standard is bsau 159 something or other. There is nothing in that standard that specifies whether or not baffles are removable or not. To genuinely acquire an e mark is a much tougher prospect, but again there is nothing stopping a fully e marked can having an easy to remove baffle. So generally UK made cans carrying the BSAU standard will be louder than e marked. However there are loads of exhausts out there from most of the big manufacturers that carry the e mark that have never been tested and wouldn't pass in a million years. Also depending upon how much a design relys upon the use of the fibreglass type wadding that is used will determine how much louder it will get with age and use. ____________________ Live your life as if you'll live forever but enjoy yourself as if you'll die tomorrow |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
barmac007 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 barmac007 L Plate Warrior
Joined: 19 Mar 2009 Karma :  
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
mickm |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 mickm L Plate Warrior
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Karma : 
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 15 years, 289 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|