Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Ok to use A2 stainless for brake disc bolts?

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Reppyboyo
Nearly there...



Joined: 15 Sep 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:01 - 22 Mar 2009    Post subject: Ok to use A2 stainless for brake disc bolts? Reply with quote

Hi,

Im thinking of getting new disc brake bolts (and possibly caliper bolts) as my current ones are getting rusty/furry.
I`ve heard however that A2 SS doesn't have the tensile strength for these areas?
Is that true?
Also heard the same for Titanium but found much less on that.

Any one know for certain?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

uniuk2000
Borekit Bruiser



Joined: 11 Jun 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:24 - 22 Mar 2009    Post subject: Re: Ok to use A2 stainless for brake disc bolts? Reply with quote

Reppyboyo wrote:
Hi,

Im thinking of getting new disc brake bolts (and possibly caliper bolts) as my current ones are getting rusty/furry.
I`ve heard however that A2 SS doesn't have the tensile strength for these areas?
Is that true?
Also heard the same for Titanium but found much less on that.

Any one know for certain?


This is a quote from Inox fasteners here https://www.inoxgrp.co.uk/faqs.htm

If Stainless isn’t as strong as high tensile steel is it going to be strong enough?
This is our MOST faq. Firstly it should be made clear that if for whatever reason you require high tensile (HT) bolts you should use original equipment. Secondly if we believed a bolt was not strong enough for a particular application we would not sell it to you. HT steel is used by factories because it is cheap, convenient and saves assembly time. We ran a motorcycle fitted with standard A2 bolts on discs and fork castings etc which were tested on a daily basis for many months and found no problems whatsoever. Not really a surprise when you consider both the hub and the yokes are low tensile cast alloy - the threads on the fastener are actually stronger than the threads in the material. If you need further reassurance - in the seven years we have been selling stainless we have not had a report of a single failure because the bolt wasn’t strong enough.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ichy
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:10 - 22 Mar 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

On paper A2-70 stainless has less tensile strength than plain old carbon steel. The highest rating I've seen is 80 which is comparable with 8.8 in steel. There is an 100 grade but never seen any for sale. No idea what the current rating of your bolts are?

Ignore the A2-A4 bit, that just relates to corrosion resistance.

I have problems with stainless bolts. A lot of cheaper bolts are sourced from Bulgaria or similar so quality control is a bit random. The other problem is that while steel stretches and bends stainless just snaps. Which brings the last bit in to context. For all the talk about tensile strength caliper and disc bolts work in shear stress. Might be a bit out in my figures but the shear strength of stainless is 14% of its tensile strength while steel is about 84%.

Titanium is great if you are sure of the quality and have the money to pay for it!
____________________
https://www.metacafe.com/watch/1972097/how_to_behave_on_a_forum/
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

s44678
Guest





PostPosted: 22:27 - 22 Mar 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whip the tatty ones out, put them in a electric drill (not too tight) then spin 'em up and wet/dry the crap off them first, polishing them up with autosol after. Unless they're properly corroded they should come up pretty nicely.

Saves the cost of replacements and the worry of getting the wrong grade of bolt.
 Back to top
You must be logged in to rate posts

motobiker
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 12 Dec 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:19 - 23 Mar 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Owners have been fitting stainless bolts to the front discs on the GS for years.. A4 though - mainly because its completely impervious to road salt. (or indeed a dip in the sea)

In fact for the GS most stainless kits will be A4 - cause we don't do things by halves. Laughing
____________________
1999 R1100GS + 2006 F800S
(Nottingham)
Sooner or later opinions fade and the name on the tank matters not. I think that happens somewhere between 3rd and 4th gear. Enjoy the ride... everything else takes care of itself.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

sickpup
Old Timer



Joined: 21 Apr 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:42 - 23 Mar 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

The problem I have with Stainless disc bolts it that the originals are shouldered with a shoulder wider than the threaded area. Most replacement ones aren't, they are just standard bolts which don't supply the proper support to the disc.

Note the price of a single disc bolt on the Inox site is around £4 with a wide shoulder. Compare that to the price and pictures of the ones on Ebay, quite shocking.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:57 - 23 Mar 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I for one wouldn't risk it.

The torque settings for a bolt working in tension are all worked out to stretch the bolt by a certain amount. When stretched by this amount and holding two pieces of metal in compression, they won't undo.

The grade and number of bolts is selected to make the degree of compression such that the two pieces of metal behave like one piece. The bolts are NOT acting in shear, they are acting in tension.

With a grade 8,8 bolt, they should be tightened to 80% of the plastic phase on a material with a tensile strength of 800N/mm^2.

With a 12,9 bolt they are tightened to 90% of the plastic phase on a material with a tensile strength of 1,200N/mm^2.

In other words, when properly torqued, a 12,9 bolt is 90% of the way to being broken.

So, how tight do you do up your stainless bolt so it a) Won't come undone and b) Compresses the metal enough so it isn't acting in the shear plane?

I sure as hell don't know and two things I am absolutely certain about are a) I don't want my disc or calliper bolts coming undone and b) I don't want stainless bolts acting in shear.

The strength of the material it is going into is largely irrelevant to the choice of bolt. The thread pitch selection and hole depth on the wheel hub ensures there is sufficient metal "inside" the threads to take the required forces.

Calliper bolts screw into the calliper bracket, not the fork leg. The fork leg just gets compressed between the bolt and the calliper bracket.

Make your own decision.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 109 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 0.85 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 54.62 Kb