|
|
| Author |
Message |
| multijoy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 multijoy World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Oct 2008 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 07:06 - 26 May 2009 Post subject: Fears that motorbike swerve test 'could kill' |
 |
|
https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8067672.stm
I've no idea of what the video says as it's blocked from work, but thought it might be of interest.
Enjoy! ____________________ '11 CBF1000A, '99 C90, '98 CB500
silky666: He rode amazingly well considering his bike is the weight of a small van and had slicks on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chadwick |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chadwick Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 10 Nov 2005 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Grayzo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Grayzo Borekit Bruiser
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 08:25 - 26 May 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
i cannot watch the video either as im in college (blocked)
however as a person who has passed his test a month ago! :>:>:>
yipee before the new test came into play............
i do think that they should keep the test as it was, plain and simple.
and it cost a bomb!!!! i paid £300 to do my 1 and a half days training and then my test afterwards.
i didnt think anything of it to be honest. wouldent like to do the new test though  ____________________ BULLDOG BASH 2009 - 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th OF AUGUST
had - NS125R current - FZR400RR EXUP (89) |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Poseidon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Poseidon World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Aug 2008 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 09:28 - 26 May 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
I for one am glad that Justine Moore fell off and broke her shoulder whilst doing the "swerve test"... Too many poor defenceless traffic cones are being wiped out by people who cannot safely swerve around them! It's about time the DSA did more to protect what I believe is an unsung hero on our highways!!! And by keeping people like her off the roads, our humble traffic cones can sleep safe in the knowledge that they are that little bit safer!
https://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/911567/2/istockphoto_911567-traffic-cone.jpg ____________________ 1977 Honda CG125
2002 Ducati Monster S4 (currently restoring)
Last edited by Poseidon on 10:02 - 26 May 2009; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ariel Badger |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ariel Badger Super Spammer

Joined: 02 Dec 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Poseidon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Poseidon World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Aug 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chadwick |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chadwick Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 10 Nov 2005 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Poseidon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Poseidon World Chat Champion

Joined: 15 Aug 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Newbiker0507 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Newbiker0507 Crazy Courier
Joined: 29 Oct 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| psbresner |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 psbresner Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 17 Jun 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 10:20 - 26 May 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Lets hope they do something about it, 300 trials isn't alot of testing in my book.  ____________________ CBT Expired / Theory Expired / Mod1 : TBD / Mod 2 :TBD |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| arry |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 arry Super Spammer
Joined: 03 Jan 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 13:49 - 26 May 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Questions:
Should someone who is unable to satisfactorily avoid hitting at traffic cone that they know is there be given a full motorcycle licence?
Should someone who is not capable of knowing when they are exceeding the handling envelope of their machine to the extent they crash be given a full motorcycle licence?
Should the motorcycle test REALLY be tailored so it can be passed by novices or should it be set so only people who can demonstrate a good degree of control of their riding skills and machine can pass?
Are you more or less likely to have to dodge round a previously unseen obstacle in the wet? Taking the answer to this into account, is the suggestion that the speed of the manouver be reduced in wet conditions a valid one?
OPPINION:
I think the test ought to be difficult.
It should not be possible to pass the bike test after only three days of tuition, especially for direct access riders. There is no way you can get sufficient road experience and machine control in that time. New riders ought to have completed a minimum amount of road experience before they are eligable for a test.
The DSA have attempted to make the test cover more for safety but have only managed to increase expense and complexity.
Consider yourselves lucky you don't have to do your test in Japan where to get a 400cc+ licence you have to do slow riding exercises over both a narrow metal bridge 5m long and over a series of randomly tilted concrete slabs. ____________________ “Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.”
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Crazy Manx Man |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Crazy Manx Man The Fly Swatter
Joined: 26 Oct 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 14:26 - 26 May 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Only value added to the test by the swerve test is the entertainment value! Well done DSA! ____________________ Too Fast For Even The Plod To Keep Up With |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| iooi |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 iooi Super Spammer

Joined: 14 Jan 2007 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| supZ |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 supZ World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Feb 2009 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| UnknownStuntm... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 UnknownStuntm... World Chat Champion

Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Pickledswede |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Pickledswede Traffic Copper
Joined: 15 Jul 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 15:01 - 26 May 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Kickstart wrote: |
Is it a valid test to force someone to ride beyond what they regard as the safe handling envelope? |
In a way, yes.
If they do not feel comfortable pushing the handling that far, they are perfectly at liberty to either slow down or pass outside the cones. The test area is pretty damned big, there is more than enough room to bail-out at any point. They'd fail, but it wouldn't be much of a test if everyone passed.
If they push it beyond their limit or are not aware of that limit then they double fail. Once for not completing the exercise, once for not knowing their limits.
To give a fairly unrelated but possibly relevant analogy. My Dads company used to, among other things, proof-test lifting equipment. One day they were testing a large telescopic crane. It lifted the proof load of around 150 tonnes of steel weights and as it pivoted, one of the outriggers collapsed. The load bounced, the jib broke, the hydraulic ram buckled and the crane collapsed in a heap of twisted metal and hydraulic fluid. Whole thing was utter scrap.
My Dad wrote out a fail certificate and issued an invoice for the test fee. The owner of the crane was less than happy BUT should they have not performed the test because there was a risk of this happening? If they were never proof loaded, would it be reasonable to lift things over peoples heads with it?
In the same way. If they aren't tested to check they are in control and aware of their limits, is it reasonable to allow someone to ride a 150bhp motorcycle on public roads.
I don't think risk of failure is a good reason to not do a test.
Whether that particular test is a good one or not remains to be seen but it certainly seems to be weeding out a large number of people who simply don't know their limits. ____________________ “Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.”
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 15:12 - 26 May 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
| stinkwheel wrote: | If they do not feel comfortable pushing the handling that far, they are perfectly at liberty to either slow down or pass outside the cones. The test area is pretty damned big, there is more than enough room to bail-out at any point. They'd fail, but it wouldn't be much of a test if everyone passed. |
Not much of a test if you have a choice of crashing or failing if it happens to be wet. Hardly like these freshly built tarmac car parks (now covered in spilt oil, fuel and coolant) are going to have a half decent surface.
It is akin to turning up for your bike test and failing for undue hesitency because the examiner instructed you to to sit behind a slow moving queue.
| stinkwheel wrote: | In the same way. If they aren't tested to check they are in control and aware of their limits, is it reasonable to allow someone to ride a 150bhp motorcycle on public roads. |
Different point, but not sure any petty little test is suitable to check if someone can ride a 150hp bike.
| stinkwheel wrote: | Whether that particular test is a good one or not remains to be seen but it certainly seems to be weeding out a large number of people who simply don't know their limits. |
Quite possibly they do know the limits, but having had to take a day off work, pay out a load of money and travel a long way they are pushed into exceeding those limits to pass a test.
As the highway code says to increase the gap in the wet it would seem logical to increase the space allowed in the wet. Otherwise it is hardly a test, just a check to see if the rider is lucky enough to have a test in the dry.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| arry |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 arry Super Spammer
Joined: 03 Jan 2009 Karma :    
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| stinkwheel |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 stinkwheel Bovine Proctologist

Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 15:41 - 26 May 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
| arry wrote: |
From what I'd read on the situation, it seems that the new surface that's been laid in these test centres take at least 18 months worth of abuse UNDER NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS in order to become an effective grippy surface - bearing in mind how little use it'll have in a test centre by comparison, this will take years. The issue being that the test was devised and tested away from these centres, on surfaces that had already bedded in.
If that's the case, then their testing means norra lot, really |
If you mean stone mastic asphalt. It's all over the place on the roads in the UK, no gritting, no skid warning signs. As you say, takes 18 months to bed in.
So, it's a road surface the testee is highly likely to encounter in their day to day riding. ____________________ “Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.”
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| UnknownStuntm... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 UnknownStuntm... World Chat Champion

Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:52 - 26 May 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
I recall them saying that the test will take place off road, and it will be a special high specification surface. So, not an actual surface you're gonna encounter day-to-day then.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 16:09 - 26 May 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
| stinkwheel wrote: | My point being. I strongly suspect the exercise is perfectly possible to do, and do safely at the required speed even in the wet. |
It is perfectly possible to lock the rear wheel, recover and still stop rapidly but that is a fail.
| stinkwheel wrote: | I may be proven wrong about this but you are among the first to point out that wet roads do not affect handling as much as people think. |
Not really.
| stinkwheel wrote: | I've often thought there ought to be a randomised number of driving tests (car and bike) taken in the dark too. |
Possibly, but to have any meaning it would need to be all those doing the test. Otherwise you may as well issue licences by lottery.
| stinkwheel wrote: | If you mean stone mastic asphalt. It's all over the place on the roads in the UK, no gritting, no skid warning signs. As you say, takes 18 months to bed in.
So, it's a road surface the testee is highly likely to encounter in their day to day riding. |
Very true, and on the road they would be expected to cope with it by adjusting their speed, not going at it the same speed and preying they can live with the consequences.
Layout of the new test is here:-
https://www.dsa.gov.uk/Documents/MPTC/2009/dsa_motorcycle_manoeuvre_diagram_mptc.pdf
https://www.dsa.gov.uk/Documents/MPTC/2009/dsa_mc_diagram_manoeuvring_layout.pdf
(note the 2 maps are mirror images).
They have 41m to swerve, swerve back and stop from 31mph or more. As there is 10m to swerve, say 10m to swerve back that leaves 21m. Should be easy enough (HC braking distance is 14m from 30mph). Add the wet on a dodgy surface and it becomes rather more dubious.
All the best
Keith ____________________ Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 16 years, 225 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|