|
|
| Author |
Message |
| Nixon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Nixon Brolly Dolly

Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 14:28 - 25 Jun 2009 Post subject: 2 piece may be safer than a 1 piece? ... hmmm ... |
 |
|
Here is an interesting point to ponder! While doing some research about motorcycle rider injuries and the way they are managed in a pre hospital setting, i came across a lot of interesting information regarding the risks and the potentials for injurys for us all.
It is a well known fact that riders can suffer an open book fracture to the pelvis from direct impact on the tank. This has the potential to cause massive internal bleeding which could lead to death - very quickly!
Modern, well fitted leathers do a very effective job at immobilising the hip and stop it from further displacing - reducing the risk of blood loss so it is not advised to remove the lower section of leathers in a case of a pelvic injury.
However chest injuries are also common and bleeding into the lung can kill you just as quick, a paramedics/doctor needs to expose your chest in order to assess and ensure you have no serious injuries.
Now imagine if you are wearing a 1 piece and a para cuts off your top half, but leaves the bottom in place. This leaves no structural support arround the waist as in a 1 piece there is no need for it as the support is coming from the shape of the entire article, you cut that you will lose rigidity.
Now in the same situation if you are wearing a 2 piece and the para removes the top they don't even have to touch the bottom half, it is still offering the best possible support it can, which as it has a waist belt and is designed to support itself will offer greater protection to the hip than a dissected 1 piece.
And to be honest i can't find any real reason to chose a 1 piece over a 2 piece apart from the distrust of the zip middle (and the tart factor ). and if i distrusted the zip i would certianly distrust the rest of the seams in the suit, so that kind of flaws that argument.
What do you guys think about this? ..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| UnknownStuntm... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 UnknownStuntm... World Chat Champion

Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 14:42 - 25 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
you think too much.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Wafer_Thin_Ham |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Wafer_Thin_Ham Super Spammer

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 14:58 - 25 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
If what you say is true then why can you only race in a one piece suit?
Although racing injuries tend to be different from road ones. ____________________ My Flickr
Last edited by Wafer_Thin_Ham on 15:04 - 25 Jun 2009; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Luke_Retrofly |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Luke_Retrofly Silly Lesbian

Joined: 05 Jul 2003 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| multijoy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 multijoy World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Oct 2008 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Nixon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Nixon Brolly Dolly

Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 16:30 - 25 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Quote: | If what you say is true then why can you only race in a one piece suit? |
Exactly the point i am trying to raise, Why is this the case? What evidence or theory was the original decision made upon? And is this the safest and most efficient method? look at advances in leather design even from the 80s to todays, huge differences.
Is it time for a review?
| Quote: | Although racing injuries tend to be different from road ones. |
Granted they can be but anatomy and physiology doesn't.
A broken pelvis on track is exactly the same as on the road, your just more likely to have multiple injuries and more at risk of sustaining them on the road. There is no evidence i have found that says track sustained injuries are any different to road sustained injuries.
| Quote: | I believe if they are cutting off your jacket they will more than likely cut off the the bottom half to check for injuries too. |
What makes you think that? I need to expose your chest because most thoracic injuries cannot be assessed or diagnosed through clothing, whereas serious lower limb injuries are going to be pelvis, neck of femur, midshaft of femur, or other bony injuries, all of which can be diagnosed without exposure, removing leathers to assess for injury on scene will cause undue risk, they need immobilisation and support. removal of leather just to have a look is not acceptable practice.
| Quote: | It's worth considering that if you're at the point of cutting the leathers open, you've probably got sufficient trauma managment in place to deal with the consequences of easing the pressure, including immobilisation. |
This is the point, pre hospital we shouldn't be exposing the lower limbs or pelvis. I don't have a theater in the back of my ambulance to deal with a ruptured femoral artery. Fluid replacement only goes so far. and unfortunately its not far enough.
as for immobilisation the patient should already be boarded but if anyone can show me a way of exposing lower limbs while still maintaining sufficient pelvic immobilisation i'm willing to learn....#
| Quote: | Also, there's no point protecting the pelvis if the casualty is going to suffocate instead |
Would never happen as ACBC are the priorities, but in the overall picture, securing a compromised airway if the patient is hypovalaemic isn't going to provide that much benefit them because the o2 or (lack of) in the blood stream will not perfuse the tissues as its bleeding out of the rupture.
But i agree Airway is always the first thing to be secured. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| D O G |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 D O G World Chat Champion

Joined: 18 Dec 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| The999Kid |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 The999Kid World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Pete. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Pete. Super Spammer

Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| The999Kid |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 The999Kid World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Nixon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Nixon Brolly Dolly

Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 18:25 - 25 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Damofo D.O.G. wrote: |
Oh I don't know, I've never seen a racer run into the side of a car on the track, or be crushed against a fencepost by a car either.
Come to that I've never seen anyone on the road highside at 120mph then skid into a massive gravel trap, tumbling end over end over end.
I would have thought that the types of injuries racers incur are significantly different to those sustained on the road. |
Every incident is unique, with different factors and variables, every injury is also different and every patient should be treated as an individual patient, however in most pre hospital situations the treatment stays the same. If i feel it is an unstable pelvis i am going to treat it with the best care pathway for the presenting injury, regardless of how it is caused.
An unstable pelvis is an unstable pelvis, that is all i will know on scene, i don't have xray, i dont have an orthopedic consultant, all i know is that its unstable and an unstable pelvis has the potential to cause serious blood loss potentially leading to death = bad!
| Quote: | I mean I haven't actually looked at any hard facts, but then again, have you, and if so, what? |
I have looked at quite a lot, and i have written quite a lot on the subject too, and have spoken with a lot of people who have lots of experience in the field of both biking incidents and major trauma management. and then found any research or articles that do or don't support what they are saying.
And this is also a filed i am considering doing a full blown publishable research piece on, so just testing the water with ideas at the min.
Do you have access to athens? If you do i can forward you quite a few really good articles as a place to start and you can do your own research |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| carlperkins00... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 carlperkins00... Crazy Courier

Joined: 16 Jun 2009 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| carlperkins00... |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 carlperkins00... Crazy Courier

Joined: 16 Jun 2009 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Nixon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Nixon Brolly Dolly

Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Karma :  
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Dr. DaveJPS |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Dr. DaveJPS World Chat Champion

Joined: 24 May 2008 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 18:52 - 25 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
well surely you are still getting support from the lower half of the leathers, unless they are massivly baggy. and also something i'm surprised hasn't been mentioned is the support your waist gets from teh kidney belt of a (good) backprotecter.
just a few ideas ____________________ "intelligent inattention is preferable to unintelligent tinkering"
www.davejps.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| fra-zzr |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 fra-zzr Spanner Monkey

Joined: 24 Aug 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| multijoy |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 multijoy World Chat Champion

Joined: 03 Oct 2008 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 19:24 - 25 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
If belted trousers are effective, why not carry the-yet-to-be-invented-but-I'm-claiming-the-royalties-if-it-is TrouserSecurer?
A wide webbing-type belt with non-slip/adhesive/friction thing on the inside. Secure around your patient to maintain the outfit, start chopping away merrily above it...
Granted, it seems like it's a solution waiting for a problem, but that's what the internet is for
In all seriousness, though, how much pressure is needed to keep things in place? Is the effect of leathers an actual design feature, or just one of those happy coincidences?
Is there not some sort of inflatable hip splint/box thing that could be used, or am I just imaging things again? ____________________ '11 CBF1000A, '99 C90, '98 CB500
silky666: He rode amazingly well considering his bike is the weight of a small van and had slicks on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Nixon |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Nixon Brolly Dolly

Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Karma :  
|
 Posted: 19:43 - 25 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
| multijoy wrote: | If belted trousers are effective, why not carry the-yet-to-be-invented-but-I'm-claiming-the-royalties-if-it-is TrouserSecurer?
A wide webbing-type belt with non-slip/adhesive/friction thing on the inside. Secure around your patient to maintain the outfit, start chopping away merrily above it...
Granted, it seems like it's a solution waiting for a problem, but that's what the internet is for
In all seriousness, though, how much pressure is needed to keep things in place? Is the effect of leathers an actual design feature, or just one of those happy coincidences?
Is there not some sort of inflatable hip splint/box thing that could be used, or am I just imaging things again? |
There is a device salled a SAM Splint designed to be used to support pelvic fractures, as well as act as a manual handling aid
https://www.spservices.co.uk/images/sp101-description.jpg However not many UK trusts have these as standard on all road vehicles. Another issue with this product is once its attached it is essentially only doing the same job as the leathers anyway. We also carry a set of various sized webbing straps that are used to imobilise.
but the method of imobilisation is not what i am trying to examine, that has been done and decided. Its the dangers of a unstable pelvic fractires specifically to bikers and it seems that cutting of leathers for examination could potentially cause an issue, My article im currently writing is to highlight this to other pre hospital health professionals.
I am just fishing for ideas and arguments that could counter what i am trying to say. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Pete. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Pete. Super Spammer

Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| chris-red |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 chris-red Have you considered a TDM?

Joined: 21 Sep 2005 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 20:50 - 25 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Do you actually ride a bike or are you a just a student nurse?
Of course track accidents are way different from road incidents.
https://www.focusedevents.com/images/pics/BCE_r6portimao.web.jpg
Notice the large grass/gravel run offs? and how you could easily be doing 160 as you approach a corner.
https://www.goodguyswearblue.com/_photos/big/London-Road-Where-I-Crashed-into-the-Drunk-Driver.jpg
Now notice the railings parked cars and side roads.
You will probably not be doing more than 60 around town on a bike, a track you could be doing 160.
There are ar more things you can hit and that can hit you on the road, there is usually very little run off and the hings you hit will be solid. On a track you have loads of run off and anything you will likely hit (apart from the ground) will probably have some kind of cushioning. ____________________ Well, you know what they say. If you want to save the world, you have to push a few old ladies down the stairs.
Skudd:- Perhaps she just thinks you are a window licker and is being nice just in case she becomes another Jill Dando.
WANTED:- Fujinon (Fuji) M42 (Screw on) lenses, let me know if you have anything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Wafer_Thin_Ham |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Wafer_Thin_Ham Super Spammer

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 20:53 - 25 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
As Geri says 1 pieces are specified on track because from an abrasion and burst point of view they are stronger. At all points during the actual crash they are safer.
I'm not even sure the pelvis example is true on the track. It's certainly not hugely common.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the broken pelvis occurs when you fly over the front of the bike, but your legs are restrained by the tank. The most common way for this to happen would be in a head on with a car, as there are no cars on track it's rather a moot point.
Perhaps one piece leathers need an internal belt that could be fastened before riding and thus providing the support you need. ____________________ My Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| T.C |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 T.C World Chat Champion

Joined: 05 Nov 2003 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 20:58 - 25 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
I covered this subject some considerable time ago (the original is in the history files somewhere) where, based on 25 years and 20,000+ motorcycle accident investigations, and working with SATRA and other bodies, I wrote about why two piece is safer on the road over a 1 piece which is a requirement for racing.
I still stand by this observation, and since I wrote the original paper, I have looked atr a further 7,500 bike accidents, and riders in two piece suits in ROAD accidents usually come out of it better than those in 1 piece.
But regardless of whether it is 1 piece or 2 piece, the biggest problem or causation of injury after the impact is the poor fit, poor quality of the garment (despite some big brand name claims) and a lack of understanding of what leather (or any other type of protective clothing) is meant to behave like in an accident.
In some areas because of some of the gimmicks, the level of protection has actually decreased, but riders are too easily brainwashed by the brand name or the salesman
So to answer the original question, for the road, 2 piece is safer than a 1 piece for all the reasons you mention, although it looks like someone has copied my original article which appeared in a number of magazines about 6 years ago. ____________________ It is better to arrive 30 seconds late in this world, than 30 years early in the next |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Pete. |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Pete. Super Spammer

Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 20:58 - 25 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Busted pelvis isn't a terrifically common biking injury - and just as well because it's probably ythe most life-threatening bone to break. I don't really see the argument for 2-piece giving pelvic support anyway, as the typical 2-piece leather trousers belt-line is higher than normal trousers/jeans and around your waist not your pelvis anyway.
Unless you're going for 'anti-fit' like you see in the adverts that is  ____________________ a.k.a 'Geri'
132.9mph off and walked away. Gear is good, gear is good, gear is very very good  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Wafer_Thin_Ham |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Wafer_Thin_Ham Super Spammer

Joined: 18 Nov 2005 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 21:00 - 25 Jun 2009 Post subject: |
 |
|
Do these anti-fit leathers come with a flap so you can show off your boxers too?  ____________________ My Flickr |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| sickpup |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 sickpup Old Timer

Joined: 21 Apr 2004 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 17 years, 80 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|