Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Section 59? Advice urgently required - Thanks in advance

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Speedy3
Traffic Copper



Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:35 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Section 59? Advice urgently required - Thanks in advance Reply with quote

Hi Guys,

Just had a CSO at my door, saying that at 5.27pm yesterday he witnessed me travelling along, and that i was travelling 'well above the speed limit and causing alarm'. He also asked me do i own a vehicle bla bla bla, and he said that the vehicle was White, mine is green and purple.

The thing is, at 5.27pm i was at work and had been since 5pm, and can prove this. I have told him this, and he said he'll have to look into this further. (Despite in his notes, it says the time quite clearly.) I am the only person with access to my vehicle, and it was at work with me all the time throughout the evening til 1130pm when i finished.

What can he do? He's had to go away now and seek further advice. If he still comes back and tries to issue one, do i have any rights of appeal and who would i contact?

Thanks,

Perry J
____________________
Current bike: 2005 Triumph Speed Triple 1050 :: Previous Bikes: 2001 Kawasaki ZZR-600 E9 (Sold) 1996 Yamaha Diversion 600s (Sold),1997 Honda CB250 Nighthawk (Sold), 1988 Honda VFR 400 NC24 (Written Off), 1987 Honda CB350 S-G (Sold), Yamaha DT125 (Sold), Honda X8R-S 50cc (Stolen)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mystery
World Chat Champion



Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:39 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

have you got anyone that can ride it a son, wife etc thats got keys to it? they might have taken it out?, you might get off with it if you can prove you where at work as well hope nothing bad comes off it
____________________
Carbon knuckles assure you maximum protect against debris and unfortunate accidents or if someone cuts you off, their side mirror.Mopeds are like chubby chicks.. they are really fun to ride until you're friends catch you on one
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Speedy3
Traffic Copper



Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:41 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, i have 1 key for the bike, and the keys were with me at work, along with the bike. I work at a hotel and we had a wedding on last night, and i can prove that i was there from 445pm -> 1130pm when i left to go home.

I cant wait to see what he comes up with...
____________________
Current bike: 2005 Triumph Speed Triple 1050 :: Previous Bikes: 2001 Kawasaki ZZR-600 E9 (Sold) 1996 Yamaha Diversion 600s (Sold),1997 Honda CB250 Nighthawk (Sold), 1988 Honda VFR 400 NC24 (Written Off), 1987 Honda CB350 S-G (Sold), Yamaha DT125 (Sold), Honda X8R-S 50cc (Stolen)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Artist
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:47 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think it looks like a case of cloned plates
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Wafer_Thin_Ham
Super Spammer



Joined: 18 Nov 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:48 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Re: Section 59? Advice urgently required - Thanks in advance Reply with quote

Perry wrote:
he said that the vehicle was White, mine is green and purple.



You have nothing to fear for this very fact.

All you should have said is that your vehicle was green and purple, and therefore it can't have been you.

Don't worry about it. If he tries to issue one, just fight it due to the fact the colour is different and you were at work.
____________________
My Flickr
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ms51ves3
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Jun 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:52 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

allymoss wrote:
I think it looks like a case of cloned plates


Or the reg of the offender was noted down wrong.

Innocent until proven guilty springs to mind. You shouldn't have to prove it wasn't you.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

yuri2085
World Chat Champion



Joined: 05 Jul 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:00 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Problem is section 59's are written in a scary draconian way with no right to appeal.
Hopefully you will be ok Thumbs Up
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Speedy3
Traffic Copper



Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:05 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

A letter to the chief constable wouldnt go a miss, plus my father and him get on quite well... so i'll see what this CSO comes back with
____________________
Current bike: 2005 Triumph Speed Triple 1050 :: Previous Bikes: 2001 Kawasaki ZZR-600 E9 (Sold) 1996 Yamaha Diversion 600s (Sold),1997 Honda CB250 Nighthawk (Sold), 1988 Honda VFR 400 NC24 (Written Off), 1987 Honda CB350 S-G (Sold), Yamaha DT125 (Sold), Honda X8R-S 50cc (Stolen)
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

ClaireBear
Traffic Copper



Joined: 27 Jun 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:13 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you have proof that you were at work and the fact the vehicle was the wrong colour means that havent got any proof it was you.

Bit over the top, but is there any cctv to prove that you had the vehicle parked up whilst at work?

It probably has to be either human error or cloned plates Confused
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Skudd
Super Spammer



Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:20 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Send a letter off NOW to the Chief Constable before the CPO comes back. Stating time of visit, what was said and what you saw noted down. State also your vehicle is a diiferent colour and that you were in work at the time of the incident. The CPO should have his arse whipped and no further action taken. Put it as a formal complaint against the CPO too.
____________________
Famous last words of Humpty Dumpty. " Stop pushing me "
Petty Anarchists look at "1984".............. The Visionary looks at "Animal Farm".
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:38 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Find the details of the CSOs vehicle and see if you can get your dad to sneak into the computer systems and issues a section 59 against the CSO Razz.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:42 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not quite sure what you'd actually complain about - the PCSO is just investigating something. He probably feels a bit of a tit seeing as the OP appears to be entirely blameless.

If the PCSO does return and attempts to take any form of action, it would appear that the OP has a cast iron alibi AND doesn't even own the vehicle in question.

That said, if he did describe a different vehicle why has the PCSO tracked it back to the OP? Been misbehaving on other occasions? Wink

You can't get a section 59 (or anything else) for something you didn't do with a vehicle you don't own.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

G
The Voice of Reason



Joined: 02 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:57 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mister James wrote:

You can't get a section 59 (or anything else) for something you didn't do with a vehicle you don't own.

I got an ASBO that did not at all meet anything listed on the sheet I was given detailing why I had been given it.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mister James
I want to believe!



Joined: 10 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:59 - 27 Sep 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

The difference being that you have done something that they (being the courts, in the case of an ASBO) don't like, and have decided to punish you for - in this instance with conditions that seem to be unrelated. That seems to be weird and inappropriate, rather than wrong and illegal!

The OP is suggesting that he is in danger of being issued a sect. 59 for actions that he (or his vehicle) did not undertake. That would obviously be unlawful - as he has not provided the 'cause' for the 'effect' he is getting!

Edit: As you no doubt know perfectly well, but were just seeking to highlight how messed up the system can be......? No arguments from me!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 111 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> General Bike Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.06 Sec - Server Load: 0.79 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 82.72 Kb