Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Engineering maths boffins

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

MattHirst
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:21 - 23 Oct 2009    Post subject: Engineering maths boffins Reply with quote

Right, got an assignment due in about 3 weeks, part of it is on Simply Distributed Loads and Uniformly Distributed Loads.

I know we have a few engineers on here, and a few maths boffins so i'm hoping someone will be able to do what i can't Laughing

Apologies if it's in the wrong section.

Firstly, SDL's. I know these are fairly easy to do and i don't have a problem with doing these generally but just to re-cap. I've added an attatchment of an example of how they are set out in our assignments. The idea of them is to illustrate a supported beam (imagine a bridge with a support at either end).

So to work out Ra -

We know Ra - 8.5m

So from there 8.5Ra = (2x5) + (5x4) + (6.5x5)

Therefore 8.5Ra = 62.5 - 62.5/8.5 = 7.353KN exerted on Ra in an upwards motion.

Can't be bothered typing out the shizzle for Rb but we know there is a 15KN downward force.

So 15 - 7.353 = 7.647KN, so Rb has an upward force of 7.647KN.

Right, onto UDL's. These are the ones i can't grasp. I've drawn another shoddy using the same figures as the other one just to make things easier.

I know my UDL is 2.7 x L x (L x 0.5)

I know Ra is calculated the same as the SDL, but you place the result of the UDL in the centre of Ra and Rb (or is it the centre of the beam?) and use this as a downward force when working out Ra. But the problem i have is calculating Rb while taking into account the overhang.

Hope someone can help me as i'm totally baffled haha.

You will be karma'd accordingly.

Thanks
Matt
____________________
It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt, then it's bloody hilarious!!!


Last edited by MattHirst on 22:12 - 23 Oct 2009; edited 1 time in total
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Suitor_Stu
Could Be A Chat Bot



Joined: 19 Jun 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:34 - 23 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Answer is 42.

Laughing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MattHirst
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:41 - 23 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

You can GTFO with your 42 aswell Laughing
____________________
It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt, then it's bloody hilarious!!!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

instigator
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:02 - 23 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not sure if I'm reading this correctly but a UDL is usually illustrated as semi-circles along the length on which it is distributed. I don't see this on your diagram, otherwise I am slightly puzzled.

A UDL should be expressed as a point load in the centre of the UDL if memorysrves me correctly, so 2.7kN/m over a 3m section would be 3 x 2.7 = 8.1kN 1.5m from your reference point.

I may be wrong as I haven't done it on yonks but I presume you're trying to work out your bending moments.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

MattHirst
World Chat Champion



Joined: 25 Jun 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:06 - 23 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah the UDL should be shown as 'semi-circles' accross the whole length of the beam, to show that it is evenly distributed. I just couldn't be arsed to draw them Laughing

I, for some reason, was led to believe that the UDL was 2.7 * L * (L*0.5) where L = Length.

Not sure why, sure my lecturer taught us that way..meh i dunno Laughing
____________________
It's all fun and games until someone gets hurt, then it's bloody hilarious!!!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

instigator
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Oct 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:15 - 23 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't have my books on this any more which is a shame as Structural mechanics was one of my favourite classes and this is one of the first calculations you learn. I did this back at Higher (a-level) Embarassed

This may help - https://www.mechguru.com/?p=299 I'm fookin nackered otherwise I'd quite like to re-learn it.

Or this - www.mathfiles.com/view.php/2420.doc

What are you studying anyway? Mechanical or structural?
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 322 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Random Banter All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.07 Sec - Server Load: 0.45 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 48.74 Kb