Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


Drug adviser sacked for criticising government policies

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

SoND
World Chat Champion



Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 16:37 - 30 Oct 2009    Post subject: Drug adviser sacked for criticising government policies Reply with quote

https://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8334774.stm

Quote:
The UK's chief drugs adviser has been sacked by home secretary Alan Johnson after criticising government policies.

Professor David Nutt had been critical of the decision to reclassify cannabis to Class B from Class C.

He accused ministers of devaluing and distorting evidence and said the drugs classification system was being used in a "political way".

The Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, which he headed, is the UK's official drugs advisory body.


Backward morons....

<facepalm>
____________________
Go back to bed - You have no rights - "Streetfighters ~ Mainstream motorcycling's crackwhore sister."
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Albion
Nitrous Nuisance



Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:16 - 30 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Absolute joke.
____________________
A2 Passed on 07/05/08, CG125 bought on 21/07/08.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:38 - 30 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Non-expert fvcktards sacking an expert for offering his expert opinion on said fvcktards' fvcktardery.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Ste
Not Work Safe



Joined: 01 Sep 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:08 - 30 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well it does kind of make sense for him to longer be a government drugs adviser.

I mean, there's little point in paying an expect to do research if you're just going to ignore what they say.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Clanger
Stirrer



Joined: 27 May 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:12 - 30 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Definition of an expert: an ex is a has-been, and a spert is a drip under pressure.
____________________
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter won't mind - Dr. Seuss
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Raffles
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:34 - 30 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whilst I dislike most of the things that this government does and has done, I fully support their decision on this matter. If a paid employee shows such public disloyalty then there can be only one outcome. My only surprise is that it took them so long. He should have been given the push months ago.
Good riddance!
____________________
A good loser will always be a loser.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Vin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:52 - 30 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

raffles wrote:
Whilst I dislike most of the things that this government does and has done, I fully support their decision on this matter. If a paid employee shows such public disloyalty then there can be only one outcome. My only surprise is that it took them so long. He should have been given the push months ago.
Good riddance!

So you want all government advisors to toe the government line. Sounds a bit dangerous to me.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

stinkwheel
Bovine Proctologist



Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:05 - 30 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

He should have refused to step down. Let them sack him, then taken them to a tribunal.
____________________
“Rule one: Always stick around for one more drink. That's when things happen. That's when you find out everything you want to know.
I did the 2010 Round Britain Rally on my 350 Bullet. 89 landmarks, 3 months, 9,500 miles.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Raffles
World Chat Champion



Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 22:41 - 30 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vin wrote:

So you want all government advisors to toe the government line. Sounds a bit dangerous to me.


I reckon that he got off lightly. Do you not remember what happened to Dr. David Kelly?
____________________
A good loser will always be a loser.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

colin1
Captain Safety



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 23:18 - 30 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I dont think he criticised government policies.

He merely stated his interpretation of scientific evidence on the use of recreational drugs. Maybe going public with his views was a bit disloyal. I think he got confused with what his responsibilities were.

As a scientist, your job is to formulate a picture of the world, and talk about it. As an advisor, your job is to communicate advise to specific people, not necessarily make that advice public.

As an advisor, he had stepped beyond the remit of his job.

Technically what he did was wrong, but I think with matters of importance, advisors should be able to go public with their advice if the government is ignoring it.
____________________
colin1 is officially faster than god
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Skudd
Super Spammer



Joined: 01 Oct 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 06:42 - 31 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

I watched a few of his interviews full expecting this sort of thing on BCF

What the guy was saying, and he did stress this, was that we had Lions and Tigers classed as more dangerous than hippos, More people are killed by hippos than lions and tigers. That is because more people are around Hippos and don't see them as dangerous, but some one will die from a hippo attack every day but no one on a given day will die from a lion/tiger attack. That does not mean that Lions and Tigers are ok, but that hippos lions and tigers should be put in the same threat rate.

What happens is, the druggies jump on it and say tigers/lions are safe lets give them to everyone, every house should have it's own roaming free in their back garden.
The anti everything will jump on it and say ban the hippo along with the lions and tigers.

The scientist says put it in context and make a policy to show the facts as he has interpreted them.
____________________
Famous last words of Humpty Dumpty. " Stop pushing me "
Petty Anarchists look at "1984".............. The Visionary looks at "Animal Farm".
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Vin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:39 - 31 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

raffles wrote:
I reckon that he got off lightly. Do you not remember what happened to Dr. David Kelly?

I do as it happens. Sadly he didn't get a chance to go public.
I am liking Skudds explanation. Thumbs Up I was going to bang on about hazard and risk perception.
I also agree to an extent that he shouldn't have gone public but I suspect he only did so because he was advising on the science while the government was electioneering. Basically he got pissed off with being ignored.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:19 - 31 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

He was sacked for having the temerity to bring the govt's disreputable drug policies into disrepute.

The govt have successfully made an issue of something that has no business being an issue at all, eg telling adult human beings what they can and cannot do with their bodies.

Here's the simple response, and one that all adults should state:

"Message to the govt...YOU don't get to tell ME what I can and cannot do with MY body, including what I CAN and CANNOT put into it. Take your illegal 'laws' on drugs and shove them up your fvcking arse, you breathtakingly arrogant FILTH." Middle Finger
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Vin
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Aug 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:36 - 31 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
"Message to the govt...YOU don't get to tell ME what I can and cannot do with MY body, including what I CAN and CANNOT put into it. Take your illegal 'laws' on drugs and shove them up your fvcking arse, you breathtakingly arrogant FILTH." Middle Finger

The irony is that drug prohibition actually makes drug taking more dangerous. So a double fail really. Civil liberties and public safety.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:22 - 31 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vin wrote:
Hetzer wrote:
"Message to the govt...YOU don't get to tell ME what I can and cannot do with MY body, including what I CAN and CANNOT put into it. Take your illegal 'laws' on drugs and shove them up your fvcking arse, you breathtakingly arrogant FILTH." Middle Finger

The irony is that drug prohibition actually makes drug taking more dangerous. So a double fail really. Civil liberties and public safety.


This is the trap the public have been led into by successive criminal governments, being made to believe there's an issue, and one that needs to be dabated at all. There is no issue, and it's not subject to debate between them and us. Your body belongs to you, and what you do with it, so long as it causes no direct harm to another, is exclusively your business. That includes procuring, selling, buying and taking drugs. Your business and absolutely fvckall to do with the govt or any of it's lackies.

When they arrest you for it an act of criminality is being perpetrated against you. Period.
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Villers
World Chat Champion



Joined: 13 Sep 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:14 - 31 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

So by that same idea we could all be government advisors as long as when they say 'This is bad isnt it?' we reply 'Oh yes, very very bad'.

Just like when the Mrs asks 'Does my arse look fat in this?' you have to say 'Of course not petal' even if it looks like a couple of planets colliding in a pair of oversided Levi's.

Im not a drug taker, I am a drinker though. If someone was making decisions on my drinking habits I'd like them to be informed and experienced and backed up by facts from indiviuals who are in a position to do so. Not some monkey who just says 'That's bad mmmmmkay?' because he fears for his job!
____________________
RS125 > CBR6 > SV650S > ZX636R > GSX1300RZ Hayabusa > 06 RSVR Mille > SV1000S > Street Triple 765 RS
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

The Artist
Super Spammer



Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:05 - 31 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Villers wrote:
'That's bad mmmmmkay?' because he fears for his job!


I read that in Mr Garrisons voice Laughing

I don't think you can say that stuff you do to your body won't affect others. There would be some groups of people that would say that we would cost the NHS more for example as if something is legal, it more likely to be done and therefore more health problems. Not talking about anything specific here.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

oldpink
World Chat Champion



Joined: 02 Aug 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:08 - 31 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

couldn't agree more

every report on Drugs says Alcohol & ciggy's are worse than any illegal drug's
no one has ever died from using cannabis, I've smoked it for over 30 years
and I hold down a job, have a family, and no criminal record for anything
but as cannabis is illegal I am a criminal in the eyes of the government

in my eyes they are the criminal's and the recent expenses scam's exposure proved that

Hetzer wrote:
"Message to the govt...YOU don't get to tell ME what I can and cannot do with MY body, including what I CAN and CANNOT put into it. Take your illegal 'laws' on drugs and shove them up your fvcking arse, you breathtakingly arrogant FILTH." Middle Finger

Quote:
The irony is that drug prohibition actually makes drug taking more dangerous. So a double fail really. Civil liberties and public safety.

This is the trap the public have been led into by successive criminal governments, being made to believe there's an issue, and one that needs to be dabated at all. There is no issue, and it's not subject to debate between them and us. Your body belongs to you, and what you do with it, so long as it causes no direct harm to another, is exclusively your business. That includes procuring, selling, buying and taking drugs. Your business and absolutely fvckall to do with the govt or any of it's lackies.

When they arrest you for it an act of criminality is being perpetrated against you. Period.

____________________
I have become comfortably numb

Theory & hazard 24-may 2016, CBT 8th June 2016, MOD 1 2nd Aug 2016 Mod 2 2nd-Nov 2016 - Current bike CBR 600 RR
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 17:16 - 31 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

allymoss wrote:
There would be some groups of people that would say that we would cost the NHS more for example as if something is legal, it more likely to be done and therefore more health problems.


It is a point, but one that also applies to many other things, whether that is drugs, riding bikes, doing DIY or pregnancy.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Oz.
Spanner Monkey



Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 21:13 - 31 Oct 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

allymoss wrote:

I don't think you can say that stuff you do to your body won't affect others. There would be some groups of people that would say that we would cost the NHS more for example as if something is legal, it more likely to be done and therefore more health problems. Not talking about anything specific here.


I don't think thats entirely true, with how easy it is to get hold of drugs these days, those who want to partake in it will do so, illegal or legal.

I honestly dont think there will be much of an increase in use. Its the same as all the uproad about 24hr drinking laws and binge drinking, but nothing ever happened, there was a small spike initially but then all went back to normal.

Portugal have legalised drugs, and as far as I can make out crime stats have got better including drug related violenece et al.

edit: https://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1893946,00.html
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

lostboy
Crazy Courier



Joined: 03 Sep 2009
Karma :

PostPosted: 09:44 - 01 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the issue of use of cannabis I think for once the government may have got something right the different strains of cannabis are more potent now than they were say 20 years ago and the effects are more intense, another reason that the government may have also chosen to reclassify the class of cannabis could also be due to the number of people who seem to graduate from one drug to the next eg. cannabis to E's to heroin.
To be honest though as someone has stated if someone wishes to obtain illegal drugs they will, it seems the government could be pissing into the sun in an attempt to put it out on this one.
____________________
Never invite a vampire into your house you silly boy!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Robby
Dirty Old Man



Joined: 16 May 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:20 - 01 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you stroll into a coffee shop in Amsterdam you can select from several difference versions and strengths of hash and weed. It's legal, so people don't feel the need to get as stoned as possible quickly.
I think if it was legalised you'd be able to get hold of mild hash here too. The problem is that strong green is seen as a more valuable product, so it is what we see imported and dealt.

You can see similar thing with the prohibition of alohol in the 20s in America. All alohol was outlawed, so the only stuff worth smuggling in was strong spirit. You could go to a speakeasy and get wrecked on whisky, but you couldn't buy a beer.

Don't talk about gateway drugs if you have no idea what you're talking about. Don't lump straightforward recreational class A's (ecstacy) in with stuff almost exclusively reserved for junkies (heroin, crack, meth).
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Hetzer
Super Spammer



Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:45 - 01 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Forget anything the govt says about drugs, every fvcking word from it's mouth is a bare-faced lie. The govt's bottom line is very simple:

"Mashed people don't work."
____________________
"There's the horizon! Ride hard, ride fast and cut down all who stand in your way!"
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

mistergixer
World Chat Champion



Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:59 - 01 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hetzer wrote:
The govt's bottom line is very simple:

"Mashed people don't work."


See, that's just rubbish. When i was 16 i had a part-time job at Sainsbury's stacking shelves etc. I went in one Saturday morning, having been out all night shovelling amphetamines down my gullet.
I did more work that morning than i probably ever have done in my life!
____________________
Space Monkey #7
Don Eladio is dead. His capos are dead. You have no one left to fight for. Fill your pockets and leave in peace. Or fight me and die!
Mistergixer's videos on YouTube
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:14 - 01 Nov 2009    Post subject: Reply with quote

lostboy wrote:
another reason that the government may have also chosen to reclassify the class of cannabis could also be due to the number of people who seem to graduate from one drug to the next eg. cannabis to E's to heroin.


Exactly the same applies to "graduating" from legal things such as tobacco and alcohol, the only difference being that those pair are not likely to put you in contact with those pedaling heroin, etc. Sourcing cannabis might, but that is an effect of the prohibition rather than the actual substance.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 16 years, 104 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Page 1 of 5

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.09 Sec - Server Load: 0.93 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 136.58 Kb