|
Author |
Message |
Hammerlie |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Hammerlie Guest
|
 Posted: 10:44 - 03 Aug 2002 Post subject: RVF 400 |
 |
|
Is RVF 400 good bike? It looks a bit extreme in comparesent to mye nsr but I could live with that
Is the bike better than CBR 400 rr? |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
TiN |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TiN Pocket Tin

Joined: 14 Feb 2002 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 11:50 - 03 Aug 2002 Post subject: |
 |
|
The RVF is an extremely good bike
It's probably (technically) the slowest of the Honda sports 400s though, but has extra goodies (like USD forks, and smoother power delivery).
Viper and Ann can tell you about the CBR4. I personally think that the RVF looks the best out of the bunch, though. ____________________ TiN
dotgems.net |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Phoenix |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Phoenix Twisted Firestarter

Joined: 01 Aug 2002 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
WildGoose |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 WildGoose White Van Man

Joined: 20 Mar 2002 Karma :  
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
TiN |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TiN Pocket Tin

Joined: 14 Feb 2002 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 15:46 - 03 Aug 2002 Post subject: |
 |
|
Yeah, it's true that the RVF is the most expensive of the 400s, but that also means that it should hold it's value better. At the end of the day, you will be paying for a solid piece of machinery. Additionally, I reckon that the styling is more timeless than most other bikes...you only need to look at the FZR, VFR, GSX-R etc. to guess that they're from the early-mid nineties, but the RVF still looks very modern for that era. Although, having said that, I do appreciate that a lot of ppl still like the more classic looks, but not me  ____________________ TiN
dotgems.net |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
retrofly |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 retrofly World Chat Champion

Joined: 11 Feb 2002 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 17:31 - 03 Aug 2002 Post subject: |
 |
|
hi
id go with the VFR if your going with Honda, it's about a grand! cheeper than the RVF for similar quality bikes, buying the RVF seems like a waste of money, but thats just my view, getting a decent VFR is better than getting a crap RVF enjoy
Luke ____________________ "The food was not undelicious"
-Homer Simpson (Exceptional beast : Underachiving Human)
www.geocities.com/retrofly |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Korn |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Korn Admin

Joined: 01 Feb 2002 Karma : 
|
 Posted: 20:04 - 03 Aug 2002 Post subject: |
 |
|
NC35's rule!
If I ever get enough money I want another one, cos it's so much damn fun  |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
biker newbie |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 biker newbie Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
WildGoose |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 WildGoose White Van Man

Joined: 20 Mar 2002 Karma :  
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Korn |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Korn Admin

Joined: 01 Feb 2002 Karma : 
|
 Posted: 20:59 - 03 Aug 2002 Post subject: |
 |
|
You could throw it into the corner just as quick, don't rate your chances of coming out the other side though
Seriously though if you're new to bikes a cb500 would be more than capable of keeping you happy for a year or two. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Robby |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Robby Dirty Old Man

Joined: 16 May 2002 Karma :   
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Ryan |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ryan Nitrous Nuisance

Joined: 09 Mar 2002 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 09:32 - 05 Aug 2002 Post subject: me has one |
 |
|
if u just keep ur eye out and check adverts all the time u could get an RVF for £3300 like me, it's not that much more than a vfr, actually cheaper than what mole paid for his vfr
Go on U know it makes sense.  |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
zaknafien |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 zaknafien

Joined: 25 Mar 2002 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Phoenix |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Phoenix Twisted Firestarter

Joined: 01 Aug 2002 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Demonic69 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Demonic69 The Pink Rhino

Joined: 31 May 2002 Karma :  
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Zimma |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Zimma Wheelie Junkie

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 14:29 - 05 Aug 2002 Post subject: |
 |
|
FIRESTORM U NO IT MAKES SENSE  ____________________ -Zimma |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
TiN |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TiN Pocket Tin

Joined: 14 Feb 2002 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 17:16 - 05 Aug 2002 Post subject: |
 |
|
Quote: | £3300 for your first big bike AND a 400 is a LOT of money, you can get a top condition CBR600 for that. |
Yes, but you've got to consider WHY the value of an older 400 is similar to that of a "top condition CBR600". It is surely a tribute to how well RVF/VFRs hold their value, and their attractiveness as "first bikes". 600s change spec and styling every couple of years, and even if this won't change how enjoyable the bike is to ride, it will affect it's resell value.
A 400 isn't slow! and to the average rider, it should be sufficient (performance-wise) for a while. One thing about 400s, however, is their size: anyone over about 5'9" may find it a *little* impractical for everyday use, although they are very accessible for a quick blast.
If you're a speed nut (an who isn't ), then you will get bored of a 600 as quick as you will a 400 (ask G ).
At then end of the day, if I wanted a first big bike for commuting and a bit o fun, then I would probably consider the CB500 and SV650(s) as well. They are both around the group 9/10 insurance mark, and equally as bullet-proof as the Honda 4s. ____________________ TiN
dotgems.net |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Phoenix |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Phoenix Twisted Firestarter

Joined: 01 Aug 2002 Karma :    
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Ryan |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ryan Nitrous Nuisance

Joined: 09 Mar 2002 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 19:03 - 05 Aug 2002 Post subject: Reply |
 |
|
I didn't get a 600 cos of the insurence and the fact that a 400 can do the speeds i want, like 100mph cruising on dual carrigeways (if i have to). I also think as above they hold their value better than 600's as their 'evolution' has stopped, i feel a 400 was a logical step up as well from a rs125. As for comfort i have no problems with my bike and im 5"9 altho saying that it's not like i do any motorway cruising as im almost always on a/b roads with a bit of town cruising to the shops
p.s. I also lurve mole's rossi job, and will probly get the same or castrol honda when/if i crash my bike |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
TiN |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 TiN Pocket Tin

Joined: 14 Feb 2002 Karma :   
|
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
uglykidjoe |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 uglykidjoe Nova Slayer

Joined: 15 May 2002 Karma : 
|
 Posted: 22:11 - 05 Aug 2002 Post subject: |
 |
|
(totally irrelevant to this topic...)
tin, dat little spierman dancy thing is cool! i want one  ____________________ get in ma belly. |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Hammerlie |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Hammerlie Guest
|
 Posted: 14:33 - 06 Aug 2002 Post subject: |
 |
|
The one I have i mind costs about 5500 £(almost half the price are norwegian taxes)
There`s so few RVFs in norway, so I`m thinking of importing one from uk, sweden or USA |
|
Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 22 years, 286 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|