Resend my activation email : Register : Log in 
BCF: Bike Chat Forums


No charges over G20 man's death

Reply to topic
Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs Goto page 1, 2  Next
View previous topic : View next topic  
Author Message

Kris
World Chat Champion



Joined: 03 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 10:28 - 22 Jul 2010    Post subject: No charges over G20 man's death Reply with quote

"An officer who was filmed apparently pushing a man to the ground during the G20 protests will not face charges over his death."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-10723274

Neutral
____________________
NSR125RR - ZXR750H1 - ZX9R E1 - GSF600S - GSF600SK3 - VFR400-NC30 - SV1000N - ST1100-R - CBR900RR-R - GSF1200SK5 - GSF600SK1 - VFR1200FA - GSXR1000K2 - ZZR1400 D8F
www.prisonplanet.com
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

GhostRider
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:04 - 22 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am Jacks complete lack of surprise.

GhostRider
____________________
I have all the characteristics of a human being: blood, flesh, skin, hair; but not a single, clear, identifiable emotion, except for greed and disgust. Something horrible is happening inside of me and I don't know why. My nightly bloodlust has overflown into my days. I feel lethal, on the verge of frenzy. I think my mask of sanity is about to slip.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Mark65
World Chat Champion



Joined: 16 May 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:41 - 22 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did any one even expect him to be charged with anything?
____________________
07 Yamaha YBR125, 07 Honda CG125 , 15 CBR300R (Chocolate Crank, Deaded), 16 CB500FA, 19 Honda Forza 300, 70 Suzuki SV650
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

GhostRider
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 20:34 - 22 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Apparently he couldn't even be charged with assault because it's been more than 6 months since the crime was committed. Which is rather fucking convienient isn't it. Someone should have told old Moaty that if he hacked it to 6 months he'd have got off scot free. Honestly, is it any fucking wonder he unloaded a shotgun into a cops face??

GhostRider
____________________
I have all the characteristics of a human being: blood, flesh, skin, hair; but not a single, clear, identifiable emotion, except for greed and disgust. Something horrible is happening inside of me and I don't know why. My nightly bloodlust has overflown into my days. I feel lethal, on the verge of frenzy. I think my mask of sanity is about to slip.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

D O G
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:10 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's crazy, and what I found even more interesting was that every member of the Question Time panel last night, and Portillo and Ed Milliband thought the same.

The whole thing stinks - like getting a very dodgy pathologist to do the PM, who then discarded litres of body fluid, including blood, found in the body cavity of the victim, so it couldn't be tested later. I can understand discrading 95 of it, but at least keep a sample?

Confidence in the police and justice system is destined to sink lower.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

pinkyfloyd
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:22 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

i agree with the replies.... .seems to me that the most crooked crooks in the country are the cops and justice system

kill a cop and they lock you up and there was once talk of bringing back capital punishment for cop killers

cop kills a civilian and its not even a case of slappin their wrists and tellin them not to do it again. its a case of well done son u got away with that one

even when the video evidence clearly shows assault.
____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:26 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Afraid I agree with some of the points above.

What he should have been charged with I am not sure (probably assault, but possibly manslaughter) but to allow this slip (where they have investigated for so long that they have missed the window for charges) up is ridiculous

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

pinkyfloyd
Super Spammer



Joined: 20 Jul 2010
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:30 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
Hi

Afraid I agree with some of the points above.

What he should have been charged with I am not sure (probably assault, but possibly manslaughter) but to allow this slip (where they have investigated for so long that they have missed the window for charges) up is ridiculous

All the best

Keith


should have been charged with manslaughter as min, max as murder.

end of the day the dude had a dodgy liver but chances are he wouldnt have died if the pig hadnt pushed him over. it was confirmed that the actions of the police led to the death of the guy.

nowdays if your actions cause death your charged with manslaughter. so why the difference?.... oh yes... hes a police man and above the law
____________________
illuminateTHEmind wrote: I am just more evolved than most of you guys... this allows me to pick of things quickly which would have normally taken the common man years to master
Hockeystorm65:.well there are childish arguments...there are very childish arguments.....there are really stupid childish arguments and now there are......Pinkfloyd arguments!
Teflon-Mike:I think I agree with just about all Pinky has said.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

GhostRider
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:47 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

What makes it far more worse is the guy wasn't even involved in the protests whatsoever, he was walking home, and a policeman thought he'd have a bit of him for shits and gigs, so a policeman murdered this man for his own entertainment - not because he was keeping the peace, not because he saw the man as a danger to those around him, but simply because he thought he'd deal out a bit of punishment. For fucks sake, the guy didn't even show any kind of retaliation, he just carrys on walking, but oh no, thats not good enough for PC Cuntface, you WILL respect my AUTHRORATAAH!!

Words don't exist to express my utter disgust and hatred towards the murderer and the whole farce that was the enquiry, I'm not surprised it happened, but the fucking audacity of the way it's been concluded, how can they keep a straight face whilst spouting this bullshit and expect anyone to believe it for one fucking second. I hope his whole family dies of cancer.

GhostRider
____________________
I have all the characteristics of a human being: blood, flesh, skin, hair; but not a single, clear, identifiable emotion, except for greed and disgust. Something horrible is happening inside of me and I don't know why. My nightly bloodlust has overflown into my days. I feel lethal, on the verge of frenzy. I think my mask of sanity is about to slip.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 11:53 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Murder is premeditated. Very high chance that he would easily have got out of that. Involuntary manslaughter is probably appropriate.

However assault looks to be pretty much automatic in this case. He did assault the dead guy, and the only real defence for that would be the need for self defence (ie, the defence used by the copper who beat the woman on the same day) which can't really be claim when the victim was walking away.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

GhostRider
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:16 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Maybe so, but if I start swinging a baton around, I don't expect it to tickle...

GhostRider
____________________
I have all the characteristics of a human being: blood, flesh, skin, hair; but not a single, clear, identifiable emotion, except for greed and disgust. Something horrible is happening inside of me and I don't know why. My nightly bloodlust has overflown into my days. I feel lethal, on the verge of frenzy. I think my mask of sanity is about to slip.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

D O G
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 12:55 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

However appalling this decision is, there is still the disciplinary procedeures of the Met to happen, and I really don't think they'll fuck about.





Wait, what am I saying? I think he's in line for promotion!
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

GhostRider
World Chat Champion



Joined: 31 Jan 2008
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:39 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

D O G wrote:
However appalling this decision is, there is still the disciplinary procedeures of the Met to happen, and I really don't think they'll fuck about.





Wait, what am I saying? I think he's in line for promotion!


A bit like this tosser?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cressida_Dick

GhostRider
____________________
I have all the characteristics of a human being: blood, flesh, skin, hair; but not a single, clear, identifiable emotion, except for greed and disgust. Something horrible is happening inside of me and I don't know why. My nightly bloodlust has overflown into my days. I feel lethal, on the verge of frenzy. I think my mask of sanity is about to slip.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

smegballs
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Karma :

PostPosted: 13:52 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's quite scary precedent to set, especially when
Quote:
it was confirmed that the actions of the police led to the death of the guy.


I'm sure if the actions of me and you joe public lead to someones death there would be a bit more of a reaction than a lengthy investigation folllowed by a elapsed window of opportunity to press charges...

I'm sure even an accidental death would attract attention, let alone having a bit of baton time with someone.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:11 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi

Trouble is that the first (quite probably bodged) autopsy doesn't say his death was caused by the assault but by natural causes. That makes a conviction difficult to secure for both manslaughter and for assault (which requires proof of harm) and any defence just needs to bring up the first autopsy and point out that the 2nd and 3rd didn't have the fresh corpse or all the parts.

That leaves a common assault charge which has timed out (and would only be a slap on the wrist anyway). Possibly they should have charged him with that withing the time limit even if they had put off the court case.

For the police to salvage anything from this (given even the Metropolitan Police Authority appear to think something should have been done) then the officer needs to dealt with (probably by expulsion from the police including loss of pension).

However it would seem that something also needs to be done to bring those to account who have bodged the investigation.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

pa_broon74
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 14:56 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agreed.

I understand that under those circumstances the police cannot stop and ask every single person what their intentions are but in this instance I think it's clear cut.

They had an ex-firearms officer on the JV show today and in between the usual middle class nimby squeeling you normally get this guy was trying to pisot the idea that they couldn't effectively bring charges because there wasn't enough information outside the CCTV and camera footage available.

I think he was trying to say that off-camera Tomlinson could have been part of the demostration and an agitator to boot. The PC's present may have been aware of information that wasn't in evidence in the video footage hence the potentially justified attack.

So by that logic. If I killed someone and they caught it on CCTV, I could just say 'well, basically round that corner back there where you people couldn't see, he looked at my bird in a funny way then knocked my pint over'. They'd say 'ahhhh, we never knew that, even although we have you on tape murdering a guy we can't prosecute because we have no way of proving if your actions where commensurate with the situation at that time'.

It really doesn't scan at all, plus all the carry on with the crap pathologist? Heads need to roll and not just the PC but those in charge of the investigation too.

Really bad show and makes not just the police but the people who are supposed to police them look bad too.

I wonder what the IPCC will do.

Thumbs Up
____________________
Didn't catch anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:11 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

pa_broon74 wrote:
I think he was trying to say that off-camera Tomlinson could have been part of the demostration and an agitator to boot. The PC's present may have been aware of information that wasn't in evidence in the video footage hence the potentially justified attack.


Even if true that wouldn't make the attack legally justified as it wouldn't be self defence.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

pa_broon74
World Chat Champion



Joined: 28 Mar 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:25 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

Kickstart wrote:
pa_broon74 wrote:
I think he was trying to say that off-camera Tomlinson could have been part of the demostration and an agitator to boot. The PC's present may have been aware of information that wasn't in evidence in the video footage hence the potentially justified attack.


Even if true that wouldn't make the attack legally justified as it wouldn't be self defence.

All the best

Keith


Firstly, I don't believe for a minute that Tomlinson was anything other than an innocent bystander who was assaulted by a police officer.

But, and I absolutely don't agree with this point but this was what the ex-met man was trying to use as a defence or mitigation. In that situation, the police would be foolish to let someone who might be an agitator get behind their lines. Now I'd agree with that if and only if there was self-evident proof; a balaclava, gloves or intent etc.

But Tomlinson was clearly not an agitator. I only mention it because the guy on the radio was having a pretty hard time putting up a defence, basically he was saying even although evidence existed to prove the assault, there was no evidence to explain why the assault took place and under the circumstances that would be germaine to any criminal proceeding.

Which I think is a bit shit to be honest.

It reminds me of the argument I had with a friend who's now a full on probationary Police Officer who tried to justify the Menenez shooting with the statement: "You can only go on information received..." Even if what you see before your very eyes screams the opposite.

Thumbs Up
____________________
Didn't catch anything.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

D O G
World Chat Champion



Joined: 18 Dec 2006
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:32 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

When prominent members of the establishment and government say that the decision is disgraceful, you know something is up.

It's as plain as day that the copper committed an illegal act, to end up in a situation where no prosecutions can be brought is utterly incompetant at best, and perversion of justice at worst.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Kickstart
The Oracle



Joined: 04 Feb 2002
Karma :

PostPosted: 15:37 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

pa_broon74 wrote:
It reminds me of the argument I had with a friend who's now a full on probationary Police Officer who tried to justify the Menenez shooting with the statement: "You can only go on information received..." Even if what you see before your very eyes screams the opposite.


I have some sympathy with that point of view. However if the info is garbage then someone needs to take responsibility. Possibly not the bods on the ground who pulled the trigger, but if not certainly those further up the chain who allowed the situation to escalate.

All the best

Keith
____________________
Traxpics, track day and racing photographs - Bimota Forum - Bike performance / thrust graphs for choosing gearing
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

colin1
Captain Safety



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:34 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

The command structure diffuses responsibility.

The grunt was just obeying orders, and the commanding officers who made the decisions, werent the ones who did the deed.

Two philosophical questions are, if you could go back in time and kill hitler, would it be the right thing to do to save millions of lives, and the ticking time bomb scenario, where you have a terrorist who has planted a bomb and torture is justified to reveal the location of the bomb.

Both situations justify killing and torturing so all you need to do it point at someone and say he is the next hitler to kill him, or point at someone and say they are a terrorist and you can kill them too.

In future, I think there should be stricter rules about death squads roaming our streets. If nothing else, a few should have been transferred to other duties to give the suggestion that killing unarmed civilians is a bad thing to do. Even if they didnt technically break any procedures. Manslaughter at least.

If every armed response unit considered the possibility of being charged with manslaughter before they killed someone, they might be a bit less trigger happy. Although in this case, I think they were told to shoot to kill, so it was senior commands fault and its them that should have been charged.
____________________
colin1 is officially faster than god
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

map
Mr Calendar



Joined: 14 Jun 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:44 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

colin1 wrote:
...The grunt was just obeying orders....

Only skip read the thread but there appears to be some sensible comments (plus the normal forum dross).

However, just to point out that the Nuremberg defence (only following orders) was deemed invalid at, err Nuremberg Wink, during the war trials there in 1945/46.

It goes to free will and accountability. The fact that if you are ordered to do something that is wrong (illegal, morally, ethically,etc.) then you are responsible for that action if performed.

I'm sure just a minor pedantic point in the scheme of things but one worth remembering!

Thumbs Up
____________________
...and the whirlwind is in the thorn trees, it's hard for thee to kick against the pricks...
Gibbs, what did Duckie look like when he was younger? Very Happy
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website You must be logged in to rate posts

colin1
Captain Safety



Joined: 17 Feb 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 18:50 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

The nuremberg trials were show trials of the victors punishing the defeated.

Tony Blair will never be prosecuted for being stupid enough to believe bullshit about Iraq or devious enough to cook it up. Yet million or so Iraqis are still dead.

Those in power are never prosecuted, only the defeated, or ones who never had it.

Command structure succeeds in diffusing responsibility as the legal killing of a Brazilian has shown.

It was no one's fault, yet he is still dead. We cant punish anyone if it wasnt their fault.
____________________
colin1 is officially faster than god
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts

Itchy
Super Spammer



Joined: 07 Apr 2005
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:14 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

From the Torygraph

Quote:
Ian Tomlinson, 47, a newspaper seller who was not part of the protests, died shortly after he was pushed to the ground by the officer as he attempted to walk home from work.

The officer left the force several years ago under a cloud, only to be re-employed once again because of failures in the vetting process.


He had faced a misconduct hearing in connection with an alleged off-duty road rage incident during his earlier term of employment, but instead retired on medical grounds, according to the reports.

However he rejoined the Met as a civilian computer worker despatching officers to calls and later applied to work as a constable with Surrey Police, where he worked for some time. He then successfully reapplied to transfer to the Met.

The force's vetting process appears to have failed to pick up on the unresolved disciplinary matter, which should have prevented him from becoming a uniformed officer.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission is investigating the officer's actions and also allegations that they may have contributed to Mr Tomlinson's death.


Sooooo all you people are complaining yeah? So what exactly are you going to do about it? Setup a facebook group? Laughing if you want change the price is BLOOD and lots of it.

And until you are willing to pay this price knee deep then nothing will change. There are 136,386 of them there are 62 million of you. You out number them 450-1.

But since nobody does anything about it, quite simply you are giving your consent for this to happen.
____________________
Spain 2008France 2007Big one 2009 We all die. The goal isn't to live forever, the goal is to create something that will. In the end, your life will flash before your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail You must be logged in to rate posts

bazza
World Chat Champion



Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Karma :

PostPosted: 19:21 - 23 Jul 2010    Post subject: Reply with quote

D O G wrote:
When prominent members of the establishment and government say that the decision is disgraceful, you know something is up.


Not at all. It just confirms they're chasing the headlines and playing the populist card.
____________________
"That's it. You people have stood in my way long enough. I'm going to clown college."
'98 Ducati 750SS, '08 Suzuki GSX650F ©2004-2014, Bazza's Harmless Banter
 Back to top
View user's profile Send private message You must be logged in to rate posts
Old Thread Alert!

The last post was made 15 years, 223 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful?
  Display posts from previous:   
This page may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if a visitor clicks through and makes a purchase. By clicking on an affiliate link, you accept that third-party cookies will be set.

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Bike Chat Forums Index -> Politics & Current Affairs All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum

Read the Terms of Use! - Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group
 

Debug Mode: ON - Server: birks (www) - Page Generation Time: 0.10 Sec - Server Load: 0.41 - MySQL Queries: 13 - Page Size: 142.07 Kb