|
|
| Author |
Message |
| spears |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 spears Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Paxovasa |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Paxovasa World Chat Champion

Joined: 25 Apr 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 20:38 - 23 Aug 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
Yes, but legally no
You should be riding a restricted bike while on L plates. ____________________ Suzuki GSF600 K3 (in the fastest colour, black). |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| spears |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 spears Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Blau Zedong |
This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
 Blau Zedong Banned

Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Paxovasa |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Paxovasa World Chat Champion

Joined: 25 Apr 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| spears |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 spears Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ian789 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ian789 Crazy Courier
Joined: 09 Apr 2010 Karma : 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| spears |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 spears Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 Karma :   
|
 Posted: 21:21 - 23 Aug 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| ian789 |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 ian789 Crazy Courier
Joined: 09 Apr 2010 Karma : 
|
 Posted: 21:33 - 23 Aug 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
14.6 horses  |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| spears |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 spears Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| N cee thirty |
This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
 N cee thirty Banned

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| spears |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 spears Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| N cee thirty |
This post is not being displayed because the poster is banned. Unhide this post / all posts.
|
 N cee thirty Banned

Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| binge |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 binge Emo Kiddy

Joined: 03 Jul 2004 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Digitalize |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Digitalize Nearly there...

Joined: 09 Aug 2009 Karma :     
|
 Posted: 01:20 - 24 Aug 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
I'd ride it regardless, you still get insured, don't get pulled over etc etc, just don't crash
RS125's produced A SUPPOSED 33bhp according to claims, i reckon the newer ones are around 30, and the older ones about 27, when new that is.
Its gotta be close to 30Bhp as they'll pull a tonne.... eventually. ____________________ 1998 CB600F Hornet |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Ingah |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Ingah World Chat Champion
Joined: 10 Apr 2009 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| binge |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 binge Emo Kiddy

Joined: 03 Jul 2004 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| spears |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 spears Two Stroke Sniffer
Joined: 12 Aug 2010 Karma :   
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Teflon-Mike |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Teflon-Mike tl;dr

Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Karma :    
|
 Posted: 15:46 - 31 Aug 2010 Post subject: |
 |
|
| Kickstart wrote: | Hi
Under the old 9kW / 12hp limit there was an exemption allowing you to ride a 125 if any power if registered before the 125cc learner limit came in. However I am not sure that this exemption still applies since the law changed to 11kW / ~15hp.
Not sure that any of the pre restriction 125s are really over 11kW anyway.
All the best
Keith |
Pretty much of the same opinion, understanding as Kick.
I have (As well as half a dozed CB125's!) a pre-83, air-cooled DT125, supposed to make 'about' 16bhp, though specs vary from anything between 14 & 17. Doesn't really effect me as I have a full licence, but would if the G/F or one of my kids was to want to ride it.
By the 'precedents' of whats known as 'grandad rights', certain laws aren't retrospective. So, if you have a 1976 Laverda Jota with open conti megaphone exhausts, which is how it came from the importers, and was 'legal' under teh C&U regs when first sold, you couldn't fail it on MOT for being 'unreasonably loud' by the modern regulations!
But Mopeds are the easiest one to explain.
Mopeds are a 'class' of vehilce on the Log-book, like 'car', and over the years the regulations have been changed frequently to say what is or isn't a 'moped'.
Before, I think it was 1972, the 'moped' was simply a taxation class for motorcycles less than 50cc normally with pedals, and not very fast.
1972 they lifted the age of entitlement for a provisional motorcycle holder to 17 for motorcycles, and restricted 16 year olds to mopeds.
So the Japs started building 'super-mopeds', 50cc motorbikes with race tuned engines, and they introduced a law to say they had to have pedals...... so they fitted pedals to them.......
So they intorduced a law removing the requirement to have pedals, and insisting they were restricted to 3.5bhp and 35mph, and in the latest round of changes now 32mph.
BUT, what is a moped, NOW is not what a moped WAS, so if it says moped on the log-book, and it HASN'T been modified away from what the regs were when it was built, it is STILL a moped, and you can ride it at 16 and on a moped licence.
125 Learner legals are a tad different, in that the 1983 learner law specified that to BE learner Legal it had to be less than 12bhp.
Nothing on the log-book SAYS its Learner-Legal, so its a LICENCE restriction, ENTIRELY the riders responsibility to ensure that the bike IS 12bhp.
Manufacturers from 1982 obligingly provided by making 12bhp complient 125's available, though not ALL 125 bikes sold new were Learner Legal.
Again, riders responsibility.
The 'exemption' enjoyed by pre 1983 125's, was a caveot provided to allow people to buy 125's ahead of the Learner-Laws and to provide 2nd hand learner legal bikes in the first few years of the laws existance, presuming most 'old' 125's would be worn out, crashed or lost to posterity within perhaps ten years, and few if any were significantly more powerful than the 12bhp bikes anyway.
AND in them days if you didn't pass a test within two years, you lost provisional entitlement for a year, anyway, & remember teh grandad rights were provided by the licence NOT the bikes registration.
so I SUSPECT that as Kicks suggestion, the revisions to the learner laws and the increase to 14.6 bhp, and rewording of the actual rules PROBABLY supercede the caveot, and the 'grandad-rights' the old bikes enjoyed, has been lost.
Basically if you COULD ride an unrestricted pre 83 bike on a provisional licence, by legacy, if you haven't passed a test on the darn thing, you should have lost the entitlememnt to ride it ANYWAY, as the 'rights' would be on the riders licence NOT the motorcycles log-book, if you see what I mean.
PRACTICALLY, Honda CB125T, 17bhp, barely 3 over the modern learner limit, IF the specs are NOT inflated, as many were, AND the ruddy thing is in the sort of fettle that it actually MAKES the power it MIGHT have had when it left the factory........ AND if any-one actually gives a shit... I dont think it would make much odds!
I mean we are talking about a VERY old bike here, very close to what IS learner Legal, we are NOT talking about a hot-snot Hi-Po NSR or Cagiva, making double the power limit tearing around at 90+, but a humble commuter bike, NOT likely to gain any attension from any-one, that despite its notional power advantage, STILL struggles to do 70...... and If ANY-ONE even KNOWS what they are looking at, OR that it might on PAPER make more power than your allowed, Then that person will be an 'enthusiast', more likely to bore you with tales of thier youth, and touring round Wales on one one wet summer when they were 17 than giving you a ticket for it........
your call, but I'd play dumb! ____________________ My Webby'Tef's-tQ, loads of stuff about my bikes, my Land-Rovers, and the stuff I do with them!
Current Bikes:'Honda VF1000F' ;'CB750F2N' ;'CB125TD ( 6 3 of em!)'; 'Montesa Cota 248'. Learner FAQ's:= 'U want to Ride a Motorbike! Where Do U start?' |
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Truzo |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Truzo Nova Slayer
Joined: 03 Sep 2010 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
| Kickstart |
This post is not being displayed .
|
 Kickstart The Oracle

Joined: 04 Feb 2002 Karma :     
|
|
| Back to top |
|
You must be logged in to rate posts |
|
 |
Old Thread Alert!
The last post was made 15 years, 224 days ago. Instead of replying here, would creating a new thread be more useful? |
 |
|
|